文章摘要
胡晓梅.科技期刊审稿专家拒审、拖延审稿原因分析及应对办法.编辑学报,2019,31(2):187-190
科技期刊审稿专家拒审、拖延审稿原因分析及应对办法
Reasons and solutions for refusal to review or delay in reviewing of sci-tech journals
  
DOI:10.16811/j.cnki.1001-4314.2019.02.019
中文关键词: 科技期刊  审稿  应对
英文关键词: sci tech journal  manuscript review  solution
基金项目:*华中师范大学基本科研业务费专项资金管理类项目(CCNU18ZY0005)
作者单位
胡晓梅 华中师范大学学报编辑部,430079,武汉〖FL 
摘要点击次数: 1758
全文下载次数: 1177
中文摘要:
      科技期刊审稿专家在审稿期内对论文进行专业、具体、公正的评价是三审制的重要核心环节,直接影响论文的取舍与发表周期。但在实际处理稿件流程中,专家拒审或拖延审稿现象时有发生。文章通过分析专家拒审或拖延审稿具体原因,提出相应应对措施,以期减少此类现象发生,缩短期刊评审时间与出版时滞,提高刊物的时效性以加快科技信息的传播速度。
英文摘要:
      The professional, specific and impartial evaluation of papers by reviewing experts of scientific journals during the period of reviewing papers is an important core link of the three-review system, which directly affects the selection and publication cycle of papers. However, in the actual process of manuscript processing, the phenomenon of experts refusing to review or delaying the review of manuscripts occurs from time to time. By analyzing the specific reasons for refusal to review or delay in reviewing manuscripts, this paper puts forward corresponding solutions in order to reduce the occurrence of such phenomena, shorten the review time and publishing delay of journals, and improve the timeliness of journals so as to speed up the dissemination of scientific information.
查看全文   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭