文章摘要
占莉娟,武晓耕,李娜.学术期刊专家接收意见反馈的意愿、影响及现状调研.编辑学报,2021,(2):165-169
学术期刊专家接收意见反馈的意愿、影响及现状调研
Survey on the desire and current status of reviewers receiving feedbacks of other reviewers’ referee reports or editors’ final comments of the same manuscript
  
DOI:10.16811/j.cnki.1001-4314.2021.02.011
中文关键词: 同行评议  审稿意见  终审  审稿专家  意见公开
英文关键词: peer review  reviewers’ comments  final review  reviewers  openness of reviewers’ comments
基金项目:*教育部人文社会科学研究项目(19YJA860019);武汉理工大学自主创新研究项目(213113001) 
作者单位
占莉娟 武汉理工大学法学与人文社会学院新闻传播系,430070,武汉 
武晓耕 西北工业大学期刊编辑部,710072,西安 
李娜 武汉理工大学法学与人文社会学院新闻传播系,430070,武汉 
摘要点击次数: 592
全文下载次数: 511
中文摘要:
      向专家反馈评审意见对学术期刊同行评议质量管理具有积极意义。然而,本文通过问卷调查及访谈发现,无论是稿件的最终评审意见,还是其他专家的评审意见,我国绝大多数期刊编辑并不向专家反馈。而专家问卷调查显示,专家接收意见反馈的意愿十分强烈,且认为意见反馈对其审稿积极性产生较大影响。进一步调研原因发现,编辑部的终审权观念、反馈要求的缺失、冒然反馈引发专家不满的顾虑及专家未主动要求等成为编辑未反馈意见的主要原因。据此提出,期刊出版单位宜改变传统终审权观念,主动关注专家的需求;提前告知反馈的必要,严格保护专家身份隐私;明确提出反馈的规定和具体要求;利用网络平台或工具提高反馈效率,进而确保意见反馈这一同行评议质量管理的利好举措能够得以广泛推行。
英文摘要:
      Providing reviewers’ referee reports or editors’ final comments for other reviewers of the same manuscript is helpful for peer review quality management of academic journals. Based on 925 questionnaires and interviews, we find that most editors don’t provide referee reports or editors’ final comments to other reviewers of the same article. Our survey also shows that reviewers strongly desire to receive the above feedbacks and believe the feedbacks’ positive influence on reviewers’ enthusiasm for peer review. Moreover, our survey finds that the main barriers to achieve comments’ feedback include editors’ wrong cognition on the final decisions of manuscripts, the absence of management system, editors’ worries about reviewers’ discontent on the feedbacks, and no request from reviewers. Based on the survey and the analysis, we propose the following suggestions:1) editors should care for reviewers’ needs actively and change the traditional views on the final decisions of manuscripts; 2) it is necessary and important to keep reviewers’ identity anonymous and let reviewers understand the significance of the feedbacks in advance; 3) editor offices formulate regulations specifying the feedbacks; 4) it is important to improve efficiency by digital platform or tools.
查看全文   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭