科研管理

科研管理 ›› 2007, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (2): 1-8.

• 论文 •    下一篇

基于SSM分折的科研评价系统探讨

孟溦1, John Mingers2, 刘文斌2   

  1. 1. 中国科学院物理研究所,北京100080;
    2. 中英管理联合研究中心,英国肯特大学商学院,英国
  • 收稿日期:2005-08-01 出版日期:2007-03-24 发布日期:2011-05-16
  • 作者简介:孟蟩(1970-),女,新疆人,北京物质科学基地办公室,中国科学院物理研究所。主要研究方向:公共管理部门业绩评估,数据包络分析(DEA),软系统方法论(SSM).
  • 基金资助:

    受中科院基础科学局软课题资助

Studies on framework for science-technology evaluation using soft system nethodology

Meng Wei1, John Mingers2, Liu Wenbin2   

  1. 1. Institute of Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100080, China;
    2. Anglo-Chinese Business and Management Centre, University of Kent, UK
  • Received:2005-08-01 Online:2007-03-24 Published:2011-05-16

PDF

2548

摘要： 科技评价体系是一个复杂的,多目标评价体系。当今科技评价已逐渐从强调科研产出,转向同时关注资源的使用效率,注重科技创新能力的提升和对国民经济发展的贡献。如何建立一个客观、公正、健全、规范的,且具备可操作性的科学评价体系引起了政府和科技界的广泛关注。本文以SSM系统分析为基础,从3E出发探讨了评价指标体系的构建和评价系统的设计。基于系统分析基础上形成的指标体系,既考虑了直接的产出,又分析了内部运行机制,形成的指标体系相对更全面、完整,在此基础上针对具体评价内容选择适宜的评价方法,可定量或定性,软硬结合,具有透明性和延展性,同时易与决策管理部门交流。

关键词: 科技评价, 系统分析, SSM, 指标体系, 评价方法

Abstract: Science-technology evaluation is a complex and multi-objective task.Nowadays,emphasis on evaluation has been placed not only on increasing research outcomes,but also on improving research productivity and contributions to socio-economic development.It is important but complex to develop an open,fair,and effective evaluation framework for science-technology evaluation.Based on Soft System Methodology(SSM),a possible framework for science and technology evaluation is discussed.SSM focuses not only on research outcomes,but also on internal operational management.In particular,how to form 3E indicator systems in science and technology evaluation through SSM system analysis,and how to select evaluation methodologies for different 3E indicator classes are investigated.A case study is also briefly discussed.

Key words: science-technology evaluation, system analysis, SSM, indicator system, evaluation methodology

中图分类号: