| 焦阳,宋轶文,程琴娟,李博,李雨桐.SCI期刊影响因子膨胀加剧及其对科研评价的影响.编辑学报,2023,(4):355-361 |
| SCI期刊影响因子膨胀加剧及其对科研评价的影响 |
| SCI journal impact factor surge and its influence on scientific research evaluation |
| |
| DOI：10.16811/j.cnki.1001-4314.2023.04.001 |
| 中文关键词: 期刊影响因子 泡沫式膨胀 驱动因素 科研评价 影响和对策 |
| 英文关键词: journal impact factor bubble inflation driving factors scientific research evaluation influence and countermeasures |
| 基金项目:*中国科技期刊卓越行动计划(卓越-C-088)；三秦卓越期刊培育项目(2022-3-3-3)；中央高校基本科研业务费创新团队项目(1301032371) |
| 作者 | 单位 | | 焦阳 | 陕西师范大学学报编辑部,710119,西安 | | 宋轶文 | 陕西师范大学学报编辑部,710119,西安 | | 程琴娟 | 陕西师范大学学报编辑部,710119,西安 | | 李博 | 陕西师范大学学报编辑部,710119,西安 | | 李雨桐 | 陕西师范大学学报编辑部,710119,西安 |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 54 |
| 全文下载次数: 574 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 使用2015—2022年Clarivate Analytics发布的期刊引证报告(JCR)数据进行统计分析,探究近年来SCI期刊的影响因子(JIF)变化特征及其对科研评价的影响。研究发现,2015—2022年期间高JIF的SCI期刊比例增加,低JIF的SCI期刊比例下降, JIF整体出现连年上涨趋势,且2021、2022年涨幅显著增加。这说明SCI期刊的JIF正在经历泡沫式膨胀且情况日益加剧,而中国SCI期刊的JIF增长率更甚于世界平均水平。JIF膨胀表面是论文数量和参考文献列表长度扩张的产物,但受益期刊精英群体和受益作者群体的推崇才是其增长的内在驱动,其侧面反映了追求高JIF的学术风气依然高涨,将造成JIF指标的进一步强化和滥用,引发更多有关结构性歧视和学术公平性的矛盾。此外,JIF前50位期刊多数保持稳定,其中知名期刊家族占有举足轻重的地位；而中国SCI期刊数量仅占世界总量的1.45%,在2022年JIF前50位期刊中只有1家,国际影响力较小。培育国内高影响力期刊,完善学术期刊评价体系,进行期刊质量、效益、贡献多维评价,并结合同行评议开展科研综合评价,是破“SCI至上”、弱化JIF膨胀对我国学术生态不良影响,建立合理科研评价体系,走出一条中国特色期刊发展道路的有效路径。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| The Journal Citation Report (JCR) data published by Clarivate Analytics from 2015 to 2022 was analyzed to explore the changing characteristics of SCI journal impact factor (JIF) in recent years and its impact on scientific research evaluation. The results showed that, from 2015 to 2022, the proportion of SCI journals with high JIF increased remarkably, while that of SCI journals with low JIF decreased. JIF showed an overall upward trend yearly and the increase was more remarkable in 2021 and 2022, implying a bubble inflation which getting worse. For JIF growth rate of China’s SCI journals, it became even higher than that of the world average. Superficially, JIF bubble could be attributed to the expansion of paper number and the length augment of reference list, while the acceptance from the beneficial groups of elite journals and authors were the internal drive. This phenomenon reflected that the academic atmosphere of pursuing high JIF remained, which might lead to further strengthening on and misuse of JIF resulting more conflicts concerning structural discrimination and academic fairness. In addition, most of the JIF top 50 journals remained unchanged, among which are from some well-known journals families, while the domestic SCI journals showed poor international influence accounting only 1.45% of the world SCI journal and only one journal in the top 50 list in 2022.Cultivating domestic high-impact journals, improving the evaluation system of academic journals, conducting multi-dimensional evaluation for the quality, efficiency and contribution of journals, and carrying out comprehensive evaluation of scientific research combined with peer review are effective ways to break the “SCI supremacy”, weaken the impact of JIF inflation on academic ecology, establish a reasonable scientific research evaluation system and find a way to develop periodicals with Chinese characteristics. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|
