| 文敏.关于论文“撤销声明”标注的调查及建议.编辑学报,2020,32(3):278-281 |
| 关于论文“撤销声明”标注的调查及建议 |
| Investigation and suggestion on mark of retraction statement |
| |
| DOI：10.16811/j.cnki.1001-4314.2020.03.010 |
| 中文关键词: 撤销论文 数据库 标注 规范 |
| 英文关键词: retracted articles databases mark specification |
| 基金项目: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 762 |
| 全文下载次数: 782 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 统计发现2017年1月—2019年12月3大中文数据库共撤销54篇论文。撤销声明中撤销主体还算明确,但存在撤销原因不清晰问题；数据库存在撤销发布形式不统一,一个数据库撤销而另一数据库未撤销现象,易导致继续引用从而使错误信息继续传播。建议国家有关部门尽快对论文撤销声明的要求和格式制订规范,期刊和数据库按照规范提交和处理撤销论文。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| A total of 54 retracted articles were searched from three Chinese databases from Jan 2017 to Dec 2019. We found that the declarant is relatively clear, but the reasons of retraction are not clear, and the forms of retraction statement are not uniform in the databases and some articles were retracted in one database but not in another. We think the disunity of the retracted articles in the database may lead to the citation of other authors and the dissemination of error information. We suggest the standard retraction statement shall issue a norm specification, and the journals and databases should treat the retracted articles with the norm. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|
