国际科技合作对跨学科研究影响的评价研究—基于文献计量学分析的视角

科研管理 ›› 2015, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (3): 127-137.

国际科技合作对跨学科研究影响的评价研究—基于文献计量学分析的视角

王文平^1,2, 刘云¹, 何颖², 谭龙¹

1. 北京理工大学管理与经济学院, 北京 100081;
2. 中国电子信息产业发展研究院, 北京 100846

收稿日期:2014-09-09 修回日期:2015-01-09 出版日期:2015-03-25 发布日期:2015-03-20
作者简介:王文平(1982-),女,河北衡水人,中国电子信息产业发展研究院助理研究员,北京理工大学科技评价与创新管理研究中心兼职研究员,研究方向为科技评价与科技政策。
刘云(1963-),男,安徽合肥人,北京理工大学教授、博士生导师,研究方向为科技评价、创新管理、科技政策。
何颖(1980-),女,天津人,中国电子信息产业发展研究院高级工程师,研究方向为工业科技与创新管理。
谭龙(1987-),男,四川罗江人,北京理工大学博士研究生,研究方向:科技评价与知识产权。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金重点项目“国家自主创新体系国际化理论与政策研究”(71033001)、国家国际科技合作计划项目“应对气候变化南南科技合作监测系统构建”(2012DFG11750)。

A research on the evaluation of effect of international S&T collaboration on interdisciplinary research based on the analysis in bibliometrics

Wang Wenping^1,2, Liu Yun¹, He Ying², Tan Long¹

1. School of Management and Economics, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China;
2. China Center for Information Industry Development, Beijing 100846, China

Received:2014-09-09 Revised:2015-01-09 Online:2015-03-25 Published:2015-03-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 基于中国学者在生物技术与应用微生物学、电子电气工程、数学、医学、神经科学、物理学等6个重要研究领域发表的SCI论文,分别将国际合作论文和非国际合作论文作为研究对象,构建论文跨学科研究程度的测度指标,评价国际科技合作对推动跨学科研究的影响程度及中国与世界跨学科研究程度的差异。结果表明:国际合作促进了跨学科的研究;但国际合作推动跨学科研究的程度受研究领域的影响,新兴的、应用性较强的研究领域的跨学科研究程度较高;国际合作论文的跨学科研究程度逐渐提高;中国在多个研究领域的跨学科程度低于国际平均水平。

关键词: 国际科技合作, 跨学科研究, 文献计量, SCI论文, 国际合著论文

Abstract: Based on the SCI papers, each of which areauthored by at least one Chinese scholar and published in the journals of six key areas, e.g.Medicine-Research&Experimental, this study did the research on the international collaboration articles and non-international collaboration articlesrespectively, built the indicators for measuring the extent of inter-disciplines, assessed the extent of the effect of international collaboration on interdisciplinary research, and compared the extent of inter-disciplines of the articles authored by Chinese scholars with the average extent of the global articles. The main findings are: (a)international collaboration has promoted researches of inter-disciplines assuredly; (b) the extent to which international collaboration promotes research of inter-disciplines is influenced by research fields, and the extent of burgeoning and applied research fieldsare higher; (c) the extent of interdisciplinary research on international collaborative papers are getting higher and higher; and (d) the levels of interdisciplinary research in multiple fields of China are lower than international averaged ones.

Key words: international S&T collaboration, interdisciplinary research, bibliometrics, SCI articles, international co-authored articles

中图分类号:

G321.5
G353

王文平, 刘云, 何颖, 谭龙. 国际科技合作对跨学科研究影响的评价研究—基于文献计量学分析的视角[J]. 科研管理, 2015, 36(3): 127-137.

Wang Wenping, Liu Yun, He Ying, Tan Long. A research on the evaluation of effect of international S&T collaboration on interdisciplinary research based on the analysis in bibliometrics[J]. Science Research Management, 2015, 36(3): 127-137.

参考文献

[1] 杨良斌. 跨学科测度指标的构建及实证研究[D]. 中国科学院, 2009. YangLiangbin, Construction of the measure indices ofinterdisciplinarity and empirical research [D]. Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2009. [2] 刘仲林, 张淑林. 中外“跨学科学”研究进展评析[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2003, 24(9): 5-8. Liu Zhonglin, Zhang Shulin.Analysis on the study of "interdisciplinarity" in China and abroad [J]. Science of Science and Management of S. &T., 2003, 24(9): 5-8. [3] Porter A.L., ChubinD.E. An indicator of cross-disciplinary research [J]. Scientometrics, 1985, (8): 161-176. [4] Rinia E.J., van Leeuwen T.N., Bruins E.E.W., van Vuren H.G., van RaanA.F.J.Measuring knowledge transfer between fields of science [J]. Scientometrics, 2002, (54):347-362. [5] vanRaan A.F.J., van LeeuwenT.N. Assessment of the scientific basis of interdisciplinary applied research: application of bibliometric methods in nutrition and food research [J]. Research Policy, 2002, (31): 611-632. [6] Schoolman E., Guest J., Bush K.,et al.How interdisciplinary is sustainability research? Analyzing the structure of an emerging scientific field [J]. Sustainability Science, 2011, (10): 1-14. [7] Song C.H. Interdisciplinarity and knowledge inflow/outflow structureamong science and engineering research in Korea[J]. Scientometrics, 2003, (58): 129-141. [8] Sanz-Menéndez L., Bordons M., Zulueta M.A. Interdisciplinarity as a multidimensional concept: Its measure in three different research areas [J]. Research Evaluation, 2001, (10): 47-58. [9] Morrison P.S., Dobbie G., McDonald F.J. Research collaboration among university scientists[J]. Higher Education Research & Development, 2003, (22): 275-296. [10] Morillo F., Bordons M., Gomez I.An approach to interdisciplinarity through bibliometricindicators [J].Scientometrics, 2001(51): 203-222. [11] StirlingA. A general framework for analysing diversity in science, technology and society [J]. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 2007, 4(15): 707-719. [12] RaoC. R. Diversity and dissimilarity coefficients: A unified approach [J]. Theoretical Population Biology, 1982, (21): 24-43. [13] Porter A. L., Cohen A. S., Roessner J. D., Perreault, M. Measuring researcherinterdisciplinarity [J].Scientometrics, 2007, 72 (1): 117-147. [14] Stirling A. On the economics and analysis of diversity [EB/OL]. SPRU Electronic Working Paper. http://www.sussex.ac.uk/Units/spru/publications/imprint/sewps/ sewp28/sewp28.pdf, 2014-06-01. [15] Porter A. L., Rafols I. Is science becoming more interdisciplinary? Measuring and mapping six research fields over time [J]. Scientometrics, 2009, 81(3): 719-745. [16] Sydney J. Pierce. Boundary crossing in research literatures as a means of interdisciplinary information transfer [J], Journal of the American society for information science, 1999, 50(3): 271-279.