[1]刘荣平.论文献记载的唐宋词真迹之价值[J].福建工程学院学报,2021,19(02):174-181.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-4348.2021.02.013]
 LIU Rongping.Value of authentic works of Ci in Tang and Song Dynasties in documentary records[J].Journal of FuJian University of Technology,2021,19(02):174-181.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-4348.2021.02.013]
点击复制

论文献记载的唐宋词真迹之价值()
分享到:

《福建工程学院学报》[ISSN:2097-3853/CN:35-1351/Z]

卷:
第19卷
期数:
2021年02期
页码:
174-181
栏目:
出版日期:
2021-04-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Value of authentic works of Ci in Tang and Song Dynasties in documentary records
作者:
刘荣平
厦门大学
Author(s):
LIU Rongping
Department of Chinese Language and Literature, Xiamen University
关键词:
唐宋词真迹价值校勘还原
Keywords:
authentic works of Ci in Tang and Song Dynasties value collation restoration
分类号:
I207
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1672-4348.2021.02.013
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
唐宋词真迹今天已很少见,古籍文献特别是唐宋文献对唐宋词真迹的记载,可视为是唐宋词真迹保存的一种方式。文献记载的唐宋词真迹,在校勘、还原、鉴赏方面有一定的价值,如李煜?临江仙?词的创作场景,黄庭坚?念奴娇?词“爱听临风笛”之“笛”、?西江月?词“杯行到手莫留残”之“莫留残”,秦观?踏莎行?词“杜鹃声里斜阳暮”之“斜阳暮”等。词人词作真迹记载,不仅可以据之考察词作初创之面貌,还可以考察词人笔迹,了解其书法水平,并进一步考察词人人品、情趣。
Abstract:
Authentic works of Ci in Tang and Song Dynasties are rare today. The recording of the authentic works of Ci in Tang and Song Dynasties in ancient books, especially in the Tang and Song literature, can be regarded as a way to preserve the authentic works of Ci in the Tang and Song Dynasties. The authentic works of Ci in Tang and Song Dynasties recorded in the literature are of certain value in collation, restoration and appreciation,for example, the creation background of Li Yu’s Lin Jiang Xian, ‘di’ in ‘ai ting lin feng di’ of Nian Nu Jiao, ‘mo liu can’ in ‘bei xing dao shou mo liu can’ of Xi Jiang Yue written by Huang Tingjian, ‘xie yang mu’ in ‘du juan sheng li xie yang mu’ of Ta Suo Xing,written by Qin Guan. The authentic records of Ci can not only be used to study the original appearance of Ci, but also be used to study the handwriting of the poet, to understand his calligraphy level, and to further study the character and taste of the poet.

参考文献/References:

[1] 永瑢, 纪昀. 景印文渊阁四库全书[M]. 台湾:商务印书馆, 1986. [2] 陆游. 老学庵笔记[M]. 北京:中华书局, 1985:11. [3] 张端义. 贵耳集[M]. 北京:中华书局, 1985:52-53. [4] 王若虚. 滹南遗老集[M]. 北京:中华书局, 1985:253. [5] 周必大. 益公题跋[M]. 北京:中华书局, 1985:52. [6] 费衮. 梁溪漫志[M]. 北京:中华书局, 1991:73-74. [7] 楼钥. 攻媿集[M]. 北京:中华书局, 1985:1022-1023. [8] 周密. 齐东野语[M]. 北京:中华书局, 1985:254-255. [9] 胡仔. 苕溪渔隐丛话前集[M]. 北京:中华书局, 1985. [10] 张邦基. 墨庄漫录[M]. 北京:中华书局, 1985:77. [11] 陈鹄. 西塘集耆旧续闻[M]. 北京:中华书局, 1985:17. [12] 王楙. 野客丛书[M]. 北京:中华书局, 1985:195. [13] 黄溍. 日损斋笔记[M]. 北京:中华书局, 1985:195. [14] 岳珂等. 宝真斋法书赞[M]. 台北:世界书局股份有限公司, 2009. [15] 吴师道. 吴礼部诗话[M]. 北京:中华书局, 1985:32-33. [16] 周密. 浩然斋雅谈[M]. 北京:中华书局, 1985:25-26. [17] 吴曾. 能改斋漫录[M]. 北京:中华书局, 1985: 424.

相似文献/References:

[1]赵雅丽.《金台残泪记》的戏曲史料价值[J].福建工程学院学报,2021,19(02):182.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-4348.2021.02.014]
 ZHAO Yali.Historical values of Remembrance of the Golden Platform[J].Journal of FuJian University of Technology,2021,19(02):182.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-4348.2021.02.014]
[2]吕宛庭.论文献记载的唐宋诗真迹之价值[J].福建工程学院学报,2022,20(02):191.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-4348.2022.02.015]
 LYU Wanting.Value of authentic works of Tang and Song poems in documentary records[J].Journal of FuJian University of Technology,2022,20(02):191.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-4348.2022.02.015]

更新日期/Last Update: 2021-04-25