文章摘要
陈锐锋.AMLC检测结果之《著作权法》与科研道德分析.编辑学报,2012,24(3):219-221
AMLC检测结果之《著作权法》与科研道德分析
Analysis of AMLC test results in the light of Copyright Law and scientific research moral
投稿时间:2011-01-25  修订日期:2011-01-25
DOI:
中文关键词: AMLC  学术不端  文字复制比  《著作权法》  侵权  科研道德
英文关键词: AMLC  academic misconduct  text copy ratio  Copyright Law  infringement  scientific research moral
基金项目:
作者单位
陈锐锋 《中国职业医学》编辑部,510300,广州 
摘要点击次数: 921
全文下载次数: 802
中文摘要:
      使用AMLC为检测工具,检测国内某医学期刊2011年第1~4期所发表的139篇论文中存在的学术不端问题,检出可疑对象21篇,发现合法发表6篇(4.3%),存在学术不端15篇(10.8%)。并据此进行著作权分析和科研道德分析。指出AMLC的检测结果存在“假阳性”问题。提出大力推广应用AMLC,从编辑出版各环节防范学术不端的同时,应科学分析AMLC的检测结果,对“假阳性”结果应加以剔除,同时应加强科研道德教化和《著作权法》的普及教育,加强立法,坚决打击侵犯著作权的行为等一系列措施。
英文摘要:
      With the fast development of information technology, it is more convenient to acquire and use the desired information, which results in frequent academic infringements. Using AMLC as the tool, we tested the academic misconduct in the first four issues of a domestic medical journal published in 2011. Of 139 tested papers, 6 papers (4.3%) are free of misconduct, 21 are suspectable, and 15 (10.8%) are detected having academic misconduct. However, we find that the suspectable or detected misconduct is somewhat exaggerated according to the Copyright Law and scientific research moral. This paper point out that, while popularizing AMLC to prevent academic misconduct, we should analyze the test results scientifically, and screen out those "false" results. We should also strengthen universal education to people in terms of Copyright Law and scientific research moral, reinforce legislation, and fight firmly against copyright infringements.
查看全文   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭