文章摘要
刘文华,张琴,孙玉花.医学期刊伦理审查的问题调研与对策探讨.编辑学报,2023,(4):412-415
医学期刊伦理审查的问题调研与对策探讨
Problem investigation and countermeasure discussion of ethical review in medical journals
  
DOI:10.16811/j.cnki.1001-4314.2023.04.012
中文关键词: 医学伦理  医学期刊  伦理审查  期刊编辑  审查规范
英文关键词: medical ethics  medical journal  ethical review  journal editor  review specification
基金项目:*安徽省高校学报研究会2023年度编辑科研基金项目 
作者单位
刘文华 《安徽医专学报》编辑部,230601,合肥 
张琴 《安徽医专学报》编辑部,230601,合肥 
孙玉花 《安徽医专学报》编辑部,230601,合肥 
摘要点击次数: 44
全文下载次数: 314
中文摘要:
      探讨医学期刊的医学伦理审查问题。通过随机抽样调查分析32种医学期刊近2年的稿约(投稿须知)对医学伦理审查的要求情况及其所刊220篇论文对医学伦理审查的说明情况,结果表明:32种医学期刊稿约明确要求进行医学伦理审查的占比不高(56.3%),医学伦理审查要求不够统一、明确;所刊220篇论文对医学伦理审查说明的占比也不高(40.0%),医学伦理审查表现不够规范、严谨。因此需要不断提高医学期刊和作者对医学伦理审查的认识和责任意识,积极完善医学伦理审查的制度和措施,同时相关方面需加强协作共同完善医学伦理审查规范和机制,促进医学伦理审查的落实。
英文摘要:
      Medical ethical review of medical journals is discussed. Through random sampling survey, the author analyzes the requirements (Instructions to Authors) of 32 medical journals on medical ethical review and the explanations of 220 papers on medical ethical review in the past two years. Among 32 medical journals, the proportion of journals that explicitly require medical ethical review is not high (56.3%), The requirements of medical ethics review are not uniform and clear enough and the proportion of 220 papers that explain medical ethical review is not high (40.0%). The medical ethics review is not standardized and rigorous enough. As a result, it is necessary to continuously improve the awareness of responsibility of medical journals and contributors’ cognition on medical ethical review. Norms and measures of medical ethical review should be improved actively. Meanwhile, relevant parties should strengthen cooperation to improve the review norms and mechanisms of medical ethical review and promote the implementation of medical ethical review.
查看全文   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭