首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
相似文献
 共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 171 毫秒
1.
阅读是学习英语的一个重要组成部分,生词是影响阅读速度和阅读质量的一大障碍。本文总结了六种猜词技巧来克服阅读中的生词障碍,以提高阅读速度和阅读质量。  相似文献   

2.
阅读能力是中职英语教学中的一个重要任务,然而相当一部分学生普遍存在阅读速度慢的问题。教师应该分析影响学生英语阅读速度提高的六种原因,针对原因,探讨提高阅读速度的六种方法及技巧。  相似文献   

3.
英语阅读教学一直是英语教学中的重中之重,而影响学生阅读能力提高的一个主要原因就是阅读速度.读者应灵活调整阅读速度,并利用SQ3R,略读及寻读等技巧来提高阅读效果.  相似文献   

4.
一、报刊阅读在高中英语教学中的意义阅读是人们获取信息的一个重要途径,也是人类社会文化交流的一个重要形式。因此,提高中学生的阅读理解能力是中学英语教学的一个主要目标和要求,阅读能力的强弱决定了其吸收信息的速度和效率。而制约中学生阅读能力提高的一个重要因素是课本阅读材料较少。语言是不断发展的,尤其  相似文献   

5.
如何提高学生的英语阅读能力,使学生快速有效阅读一直是英语阅读教学中的一个难点。在大学英语考试中,尤其是四、六级考试中,阅读理解题型所占的比重和分值都非常大,然而部分学生在英语阅读中存在阅读速度慢、理解正确率低等问题。为了改进英语阅读教学,提高阅读能力,笔者结合多年英语阅读教学的实践,提出了英语阅读的准确性及英语阅读的速度是大学英语阅读能力提高的关键之观点,进而探讨了提高阅读的准确性及阅读的速度的相关策略。  相似文献   

6.
阅读能力是一个综合概念,它主要是指运用语言知识、语言能力和阅读技巧以一定速度进行成功阅读的能力。一直以来,阅读理解是大学英语的一大难题,阅读教学中的“相互作用”可以避免传统教学的不足,帮助提高学生阅读理解能力。  相似文献   

7.
快速阅读是新大学英语四级考试中的重头戏,其测试目标是英语学习者的阅读技能、浏览速度和查读能力。它要求学习者扩大阅读范围,增加词汇数量,提高阅读速度,丰富语言知识,增强英语语感。本文通过分析影响快速阅读的因素,提出相应的策略,以期提高学习者的阅读速度和阅读质量。  相似文献   

8.
培养学生的阅读能力是英语教学中的一项重要内容。提高阅读能力首先要提高阅读速度;根据上下文推测和判断词意是阅读中的关键环节;针对不同体裁的文章,采用不同的分析方法是提高阅读能力的有效手段。  相似文献   

9.
阅读能力是一个综合概念,它主要是指运用语言知识、语言能力和阅读技巧以一定速度进行成功阅读的能力。一直以来,阅读理解是大学英语的一大难题,阅读教学中的“相互作用”可以避免传统教学的不足,帮助提高学生阅读理解能力。  相似文献   

10.
阅读是获取书面知识的一个重要途径。阅读能力主要包括阅读速度、获取信息的能力和语篇的分析能力。阅读能力是在日积月累的过程中慢慢提高的。通过从大量阅读、扩大词汇量、提高猜测词义的能力和提高阅读速度的方法四个方面可以如何提高阅读能力。  相似文献   

11.

Aims

Speed reading is advertised as a way to increase reading speed without any loss in comprehension. However, research on speed reading has indicated that comprehension suffers as reading speed increases. We were specifically interested in how processes of inference generation were affected by speed reading.

Methods

We examined how reading speed influenced inference generation in typical readers, trained speed readers and participants trained to skim read passages. Passages either strongly or weakly promoted a bridging or predictive inference. After reading, participants performed a lexical decision task on either a nonword, neutral or inference‐related word.

Results

Typical readers responded to strong and weak inference words faster than neutral words. There were no statistical differences in reaction time between inference‐related and neutral words for speed and skim readers.

Conclusions

These findings provide no substantive evidence that the appropriate inferences are generated when reading at rapid speeds. Thus, speed reading may be detrimental to normal integrative comprehension processes.  相似文献   

12.
The silent reading fluency is not an observable behaviour and, therefore, its evaluation is perceived as more challenging and less reliable than oral reading fluency. The present research is aimed to measure the silent reading speed in a sample of proficient students, assessed by an original silent reading fluency task, based on behavioural indicators of the silent reading speed. A total of 325 high school and university skilled students (age range 14–23 years) have been assessed using 3 tasks aimed to evaluate the oral reading speed (lists of words, lists of pseudowords and narrative text) and one task aimed to measure the silent reading speed. The average silent reading speed in our sample was around 12.5 syll/sec, almost double than the oral reading speed rate. The silent reading speed had an increase from 9.13 to 12.38 syll/sec from the first year of high school (ninth grade) to the fifth year of University. Conversely, the oral reading speed remained substantially unchanged for the entire academic course. Our results showed that the reading fluency in silent mode tends to increase up to the last years of University and it may be considered the most rapid and efficient reading mode. This study highlights the importance of including both silent and oral reading modes in the assessment of the older students and young adults, since silent reading is the main reading mode for proficient readers.  相似文献   

13.
This study investigated the adequacy of an expanded simple view of reading (SVR) framework for English language learners (ELLs), using mediation modeling approach. The proposed expanded SVR included reading fluency as an outcome and phonological awareness and naming speed as predictors. To test the fit of the proposed mediation model, longitudinal data from 308 ELLs from different linguistic backgrounds were analyzed using structural equation modeling. We examined the mediating role of Grade 2 word-level reading skills in the association between Grade 1 phonological awareness, naming speed, and listening comprehension and Grade 3 reading comprehension and reading fluency. The results indicated that word-level reading skills fully mediated the association between phonological awareness, reading comprehension and reading fluency. Word-level reading skills partially mediated the association between naming speed and reading fluency. Listening comprehension contributed directly to reading comprehension and reading fluency. It appears that reading development in ELLs is better understood when reading fluency is added to the SVR framework as an outcome and naming speed as a building block of SVR. Theoretical aspects of the mediation model in relation to ELL reading development are also addressed.  相似文献   

14.
We hypothesised that college students take reading speed into consideration when evaluating their own reading skill, even if reading speed does not reliably predict actual reading skill. To test this hypothesis, we measured self‐perception of reading skill, self‐perception of reading speed, actual reading skill and actual reading speed to determine the relations that exist. The results supported our predictions. Primarily, self‐perceived reading speed strongly correlated with self‐perceived reading skill, whereas the correlation between actual reading speed and actual reading skill was low. Next, a multiple regression analysis showed that self‐perception of reading speed significantly predicted self‐perception of reading skill after controlling for actual reading skill. Lastly, how highly correlated reading skill was with self‐perceived reading speed was found to affect how accurately one perceived his or her reading skill. Consequently, the study results suggest a negative impact of self‐perceived reading speed on accuracy of self‐perceived reading skill, as hypothesised.  相似文献   

15.
Although phonemic awareness is a well-known factor predicting early reading development, there is also evidence that Rapid Automatized Naming (RAN) is an independent factor that contributes to early reading. The aim of this study is to examine phonemic awareness and RAN as predictors of reading speed, reading comprehension and spelling for children with reading difficulties. It also investigates a possible reciprocal relationship between RAN and reading skills, and the possibility of enhancing RAN by intervention. These issues are addressed by examining longitudinal data from a randomised reading intervention study carried out in Sweden for 9-year-old children with reading difficulties (N?=?112). The intervention comprised three main elements: training of phonics, reading comprehension strategies and reading speed. The analysis of the data was carried out using structural equation modelling. The results demonstrated that after controlling for autoregressive effects and non-verbal IQ, RAN predicts reading speed whereas phonemic awareness predicts reading comprehension and spelling. RAN was significantly enhanced by training and a reciprocal relationship between reading speed and RAN was found. These findings contribute to support the view that both phonemic awareness and RAN independently influence early phases of reading, and that both are possible to enhance by training.  相似文献   

16.
本通过阐释阅读原理,剖析种种影响阅读速度的原因,提出一整套克服发声读,摇头读,指读,倒读及心读等阅读陋习的方法,从而在理解的基础上提高阅读速度,培养阅读能力。  相似文献   

17.
泛读是广泛地阅读,也就是“多读”。掌握了阅读的技巧和方法。就提高了阅读的速度和理解能力,也是“会读”。上升到阅读的最高境界,也就是“读好”。三者中“会读”尤其重要,泛读教学的目的就是提高阅读速度和理解能力。  相似文献   

18.
本研究以小学五年级学生为被试,经过12周的快速阅读训练,使学生初步掌握快速阅读训练的技能,据此探索快速阅读训练和阅读方式(先看文章再回答问题、先看问题再读文章)对小学生阅读效果的影响。结果发现:第一,快速阅读训练可显著减少学生的总阅读时间、提高阅读速度,但不影响阅读理解率;第二,先看问题再读文章的阅读方式在主旨题目的理解率上有其独特优势;第三,阅读方式和快速阅读训练在学生阅读效果上不存在交互作用,即两者不存在相互影响的问题。  相似文献   

19.
The present study tested the hypothesis that underlying orthographic representations vary in completeness within the individual, which is manifested in both spelling accuracy and reading speed. Undergraduate students were trained to improve their spelling of difficult words. Word reading speed was then measured for these same words, allowing for a direct evaluation of whether improvements in spelling would bring about faster reading speeds. Results were clear: Spelling accuracy and reading speed were strongly related across and within participants. Most important, words that improved in spelling accuracy were read more rapidly at posttest than words that did not show improvement in spelling. These results provide direct evidence showing that the quality of orthographic representations, as indexed by spelling accuracy, directly relates to reading speed. This is consistent with the lexical quality hypothesis and highlights the relevance of spelling in literacy acquisition.  相似文献   

20.
The measure words correct per minute (WC/M) incorporates a measure of accurate aloud word reading and a measure of reading speed. The current article describes two studies designed to parse the variance in global reading scores accounted for by reading speed. In Study I, reading speed accounted for more than 40% of the reading composite score variance in 4th‐, 5th‐, and 10th‐grade students. In Study II, reading speed accounted for more than 30% of the reading/language arts composite score variance of fourth‐ and fifth‐grade students. Across both studies, when reading speed was combined with words read correctly and converted to WC/M the additional variance accounted for was less than 10% with one exception, fourth‐grade students' reading/language arts scores. These findings are consistent with various theories regarding reading speed, provide direction for future researchers, and may assuage those concerned that WC/M is primarily a measure of aloud, accurate word reading (i.e., word calling). © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.  相似文献   

设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号