共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 156 毫秒
1.
《英语课程标准》中明确指出:评价是英语课程的重要组成部分。英语课程的评价应根据标准的目的和要求,实施对教学全过程和结果的有效监控。通过评价,使学生在英语课程的学习过程中不断体验进步与成功,认识自我,建立自信,促进学生综合语言运用能力的全面发展。一、小组合作学习及其分组小组合作学习将合作、竞争和个人行为融为一体,并进行优化组合。小组成员不仅要争取个人目标的实现,更要帮助小组同伴实现目标。通过相互合作,小组成员共同达到学习的预期目标。它能有效地调动学生学习的主动性和自我控制,提高教学效率,促进学生之间良好的人… 相似文献
2.
3.
儿童同伴合作学习的价值、机制与促进策略——基于建构主义学习理论的视角 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
建构主义学习理论认为儿童同伴合作学习的关键价值在于促进儿童的认知改变.而同伴合作学习之所以能促进儿童认知改变是由于两个重要因素,即"同伴间的差异"和"积极的语言交流".因此,为了促进儿童同伴合作学习的有效开展,教师应确定适宜的合作学习任务,合理组建合作学习小组,提高儿童语言交流能力. 相似文献
4.
本文通过对英语小组合作学习的实施策略,小组合作在英语课前、课堂及课后的设计,小组合作形式的评价,小组合作学习的积极意义的描述与分析,说明有效的小组合作学习不仅可以加大学生语言实践量,提高学生运用语言的能力,还可以培养学生自主学习的积极性和与他人合作的能力。 相似文献
5.
本文探讨网络环境中在线评价修改同伴作文的方式对独立学院学生英语写作能力提高所起的作用。研究结果表明:学生基本认可同伴评价的方式,对同伴评价持积极肯定的态度;同伴评价提高了学生的自主学习能力;使学生作文在内容、结构和语言上都有很大的改进。因此只要设计合理、操作严谨,同伴评价可以作为一种有效的评价方式,融入到写作教学中。 相似文献
6.
《校园英语(教研版)》2016,(21):140-141
随着素质教育的不断深入,小组合作学习在小学英语教学中有着举足轻重的作用。它是以小组学习为基本形式,以团体成绩为评价标准,旨在调动每一位学生的学习积极性,使小组成员之间达成一定的学习目标,通过相互合作和探究学习,促进学生共同进步的教学活动。小组合作学习的方式是教师提高教学效率的重要方法,同时有助于培养学生综合运用语言的能力和团队合作精神。 相似文献
7.
《校园英语(教研版)》2014,(20)
本文探讨网络环境中在线评价修改同伴作文的方式对独立学院学生英语写作能力提高所起的作用。研究结果表明:学生基本认可同伴评价的方式,对同伴评价持积极肯定的态度;同伴评价提高了学生的自主学习能力;使学生作文在内容、结构和语言上都有很大的改进。因此只要设计合理、操作严谨,同伴评价可以作为一种有效的评价方式,融入到写作教学中。 相似文献
8.
随着社会的发展与进步,我们的教学质量在稳步提高,然而,传统教育下的课堂评价仍然存在着一些问题。我们应该重视学生课前的自主学习和小组合作情况,在课前对学生组织对小组合作学习情况的自我评价,在课上,教师要跟学生共同评价学习过程,在课后还要组织学生对作业的自评、同伴评、教师评。 相似文献
9.
10.
11.
The impact of two types of peer assessment on students' performance and satisfaction within a Wiki environment 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of two peer assessment methods on university students' academic writing performance and their satisfaction with peer assessment. This study also examined the validity and reliability of student generated assessment scores. Two hundred and thirty-two predominantly undergraduate students were selected by convenience sampling during the fall semester of 2007. The results indicate that students in the experimental group demonstrated greater improvement in their writing than those in the comparison group, and the findings reveal that students in the experimental group exhibited higher levels of satisfaction with the peer assessment method both in peer assessment structure and peer feedback than those in the comparison group. Additionally, the findings indicate that the validity and reliability of student generated rating scores were extremely high. Using Wiki interactive software and providing an online collaborative learning environment to facilitate peer assessment added value to peer assessment. 相似文献
12.
Frans J. Prins Dominique M. A. Sluijsmans Paul A. Kirschner Jan‐Willem Strijbos 《Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education》2005,30(4):417-444
In this case study our aim was to gain more insight in the possibilities of qualitative formative peer assessment in a computer supported collaborative learning (CSCL) environment. An approach was chosen in which peer assessment was operationalized in assessment assignments and assessment tools that were embedded in the course material. The course concerned a higher education case‐based virtual seminar, in which students were asked to conduct research and write a report in small multidisciplinary teams. The assessment assignments contained the discussion of assessment criteria, the assessment of a group report of a fellow group and writing an assessment report. A list of feedback rules was one of the assessment tools. A qualitative oriented study was conducted, focusing on the attitude of students towards peer assessment and practical use of peer assessment assignments and tools. Results showed that students’ attitude towards peer assessment was positive and that assessment assignments had added value. However, not all students fulfilled all assessment assignments. Recommendations for implementation of peer assessment in CSCL environments as well as suggestions for future research are discussed. 相似文献
13.
Lan Li 《Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education》2017,42(4):645-656
This quasi-experimental study aimed to examine the impact of anonymity and training (an alternative strategy when anonymity was unattainable) on students’ performance and perceptions in formative peer assessment. The training in this study focused on educating students to understand and appreciate formative peer assessment. A sample of 77 students participated in a peer assessment activity in three conditions: a group with participants’ identities revealed (Identity Group), a group with anonymity provided (Anonymity Group) and a group with identities revealed but training provided (Training Group). Data analysis indicated that both the Anonymity Group and Training Group outperformed the Identity Group on projects. In terms of perceptions, however, the Training Group appreciated the value of peer assessment more and experienced less pressure in the process than the other two groups. 相似文献
14.
Nanine A.E. van Gennip Mien S.R. Segers Harm H. Tillema 《Learning and Instruction》2010,20(4):280-290
The present study examined the role of interpersonal variables (psychological safety, value diversity, interdependence, and trust) and conceptions of peer assessment in vocational education. An intervention was conducted (N = 45) with a control group (N = 17), which indicated change in psychological safety, value diversity, and trust in the peer as an assessor. Furthermore, when comparing the intervention and control group, peer assessment contributed to psychological safety and lower value diversity. Perceived learning was predicted by value diversity and conceptions. Conceptions were predicted by psychological safety, value diversity, and trust in the self and in the peer as an assessor. 相似文献
15.
The use of peer learning and peer assessment has gained considerable interest in higher education driven by both its educational value and by its ability to provide students with the opportunity to develop important transferrable skills. This paper reports on the use of peer learning and peer assessment with a cohort of four-year undergraduate physiotherapy students and an 18 month taught post-graduate teacher education programme. The study observed the students’ engagement in the process, surveyed their opinions on the activity at the end of the experience and conducted one focus group discussion with a subset of students from each cohort. The study found that the vast majority of respondents felt that the experience was valuable and enjoyable. However, when asked to indicate whether it was a fairer method of assessment there were more varied responses. Similarly when asked whether their peers should have a greater say in their overall grade the majority disagreed. Views on the educational value of the experience appeared to differ between the two cohorts of students. The study highlights the influence of a prevailing assessment cultures on students’ engagement in peer learning which requires consideration when including such pedagogical approaches. 相似文献
16.
Minjeong Kim Jeeheon Ryu 《Educational technology research and development : ETR & D》2013,61(4):549-561
An assessment was conducted of a web-based formative peer assessment system (WFPAS) emphasizing learners’ metacognitive awareness for their performance in ill-structured tasks. Results indicate that the WFPAS group achieved significantly higher scores for metacognitive awareness and performance in ill-structured tasks than the traditional peer assessment group and that a traditional peer assessment group achieved higher scores for metacognitive awareness than a self-assessment group. In addition, the WFPAS group showed significantly higher scores in motivation than the traditional peer assessment group. Results are explained from the perspective of peer interaction and scaffolding. The potential challenges and implications of the WFPAS are discussed. 相似文献
17.
This article complements two previous papers which presented quantitative data about methods of peer assessment within a group project. The previous quantitative papers indicated that holistic peer assessment supports the purposes of summative group assessment better than category-based peer assessment. The qualitative findings presented here support this notion. Student attitudes towards the two methods of peer assessment were more supportive of the holistic approach than the category-based approach. This article raises the question as to whether the method of peer assessment has some influence on the extent to which students work cooperatively in a group setting. 相似文献
18.
Parviz Birjandi 《Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education》2012,37(5):513-533
In the last decade, with the increased attention to learner-centred curricula, the topic of self-assessment and peer assessment has become of particular interest in testing and evaluation. The present study explores the role of self-assessment, and peer assessment in promoting writing performance of language learners. To do this, 157 intermediate TEFL (Teaching English as Foreign Language) students were assigned to five different treatments in five groups: four experimental groups and one control group. The first experimental group did journal writing as a self-assessment technique, the second group self-assessed their own writings, the third group employed peer assessment, and the fourth group had both self- and peer assessment. Moreover, there was teacher assessment in all experimental groups, except the fourth group, i.e., the self- and peer assessment group. In the control group, there was only teacher assessment. Also, at the beginning and end of the semester, all participants took a writing test. The design of the study was quasi-experimental, non-randomised control group, pre-test–post-test design. The results revealed that in the second and third groups, in which the students employed self-assessment and peer assessment, together with teacher assessment, we observed the maximum improvement in writing. 相似文献
19.
Jiangmei Yuan ChanMin Kim 《Educational technology research and development : ETR & D》2018,66(1):25-52
Although peer assessment is widely implemented in higher education, not all students are highly engaged in it. To enhance student engagement in peer assessment, we designed and developed a web-based tool, autonomy-supportive peer assessment (ASPA), to support students’ need for autonomy when they conducted peer assessment. Students’ sense of autonomy, and their behavioral, emotional, and cognitive engagement in peer assessment were examined via interviews and surveys. We also examined students’ academic performances, including their improvement from initial to revised essays and the quality of feedback they provided. Survey results indicated that the ASPA group (1) experienced a slightly higher sense of autonomy than the non-ASPA group, and (2) spent much more time on each evaluation criterion than the non-ASPA group. Interviews suggested that both the ASPA and non-ASPA groups were engaged in peer assessment. However, there were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in behavioral, emotional, cognitive engagement, and academic performances. 相似文献
20.
AbstractPeer assessment has proven to have positive learning outcomes. Importantly, peer assessment is a social process and some claim that the use of anonymity might have advantages. However, the findings have not always been in the same direction. Our aims were: (a) to review the effects of using anonymity in peer assessment on performance, peer feedback content, peer grading accuracy, social effects and students’ perspective on peer assessment; and (b) to investigate the effects of four moderating variables (educational level, peer grading, assessment aids, direction of anonymity) in relation to anonymity. A literature search was conducted including five different terms related to peer assessment (e.g., peer feedback) and anonymity. Fourteen studies that used a control group or a within group design were found. The narrative review revealed that anonymous peer assessment seems to provide advantages for students’ perceptions about the learning value of peer assessment, delivering more critical peer feedback, increased self-perceived social effects, a slight tendency for more performance, especially in higher education and with less peer assessment aids. Some conclusions are that: (a) when implementing anonymity in peer assessment the instructional context and goals need to be considered, (b) existent empirical research is still limited, and (c) future research should employ stronger and more complex research designs. 相似文献