共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 328 毫秒
1.
考试与舞弊是一对孪生兄弟，自古以来有考试就会有舞弊现象产生。自学考试中的舞弊．就是发生在自学考试中的一切与用欺骗方式骗取国家学历文凭和社会考试证书相联系的违纪、违法行为。自学考试的质量和社会信誉是自学考试发展的生命线．它关系着自学考试事业能否健康发展。我们必须正视自学考试中的舞弊现象，认真分析其产生根源、表现形式和特点．才能做好反舞弊工作，确保自考事业健康发展。 相似文献
2.
考试舞弊行为分析及对策 总被引：2，自引：0，他引：2
考试舞弊现象，无论是在“应试教育”条件下还是在“素质教育”条件下都是值得重视并努力加以克服的不正常现象。对此从考试，考试舞弊行为的界定，考试舞弊行为的种类、成因等进行分析，探索预防和减少考试舞弊行为发生的方法，并提出建设性意见。 相似文献
3.
张连银 《佳木斯教育学院学报》2003,(3):50-52
科场舞弊是科举考试中的违规现象，为了维护科举考试的公正与公平，对舞弊必须予以惩处。明代针对冒籍、关节等舞弊行为，作出了相应的处罚。明代处罚科场舞弊给我们的启示是：必须加强考试立法，加强对特权干预考试的法律约束，对考试舞弊处罚要规范、适度。 相似文献
4.
大学生考试舞弊现象时有发生且愈演愈烈。这不仅是违纪问题,更是道德修养欠缺的问题。大学德育教育工作的加强,能够有利于纠正考试舞弊等道德缺失行为。本文就大学生考试舞弊问题的现状入手,分析其现象归因,进而从德育教育方面提出解决途径与对策。 相似文献
5.
王兴亚 《黄河科技大学学报》2002,4(3):43-50
明代的各级各类考试中的舞弊现象，是吏治腐败在人才选拔任用上的反映。为此明王朝采取了一系列措施，打击和制止各种舞弊行为，留下了值得重视的经验。 相似文献
6.
结合职业院校的工作实践。归纳出舞弊现象的特性和心理因素,全面分析了造成舞弊现象的主客观原因,初步探讨舞弊现象的预防机制。 相似文献
7.
考试舞弊的潜意识在学生中较普遍地存在，考生在考场对现场监管等微观环境进行判断，会产生观望、从众、平衡、博弈、侥幸等心理，可能引发舞弊行为。在加强价值观引导的同时，认识和重视考试舞弊的微观环境动因，针对考生心理加强现场微观环境管理，是有效抑制考试舞弊现象发生的现实途径。 相似文献
8.
高考生考试舞弊的原因探析 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
在考试产生的同时，由于对利益的不正当追求，舞弊现象也就随之出现。舞弊与反舞弊的较量成了保证考试科学、公正的关键。探析高考生舞弊心理，对于改革高考制度，进一步修订和完善考试管理政策法规，有着积极的参考作用。我们认为，影响高考生考试舞弊的心理因素主要有以下五个方面。 相似文献
9.
文山东 《邵阳学院学报(社会科学版)》2003,2(6):50-51
文章分析了我国上市公司会计信息的披露舞弊现象严重的原因，然后根据分析得出减少上市公司舞弊的有效办法是加大对违法上市公司的惩罚力度，监管部门提高抽查上市公司的比率，监管部门降低检查成本。 相似文献
10.
宋鑫 《通化师范学院学报》2008,29(12):110-111
我国目前正处在经济高速发展的关键时期，在未来的市场经济体制下，准确核算企业的经济业务是会计人员的重要职责．该文通过对财务人员舞弊现象和舞弊手段的分析，提出了一些防范措施，旨在建立一支诚信的财务队伍。促进企业健康发展． 相似文献
11.
Honor J. Passow Matthew J. Mayhew Cynthia J. Finelli Trevor S. Harding Donald D. Carpenter 《Research in higher education》2006,47(6):643-684
Academic dishonesty (cheating) has been prevalent on college campuses for decades, and the percentage of students reporting cheating varies by college major. This study, based on a survey of 643 undergraduate engineering majors at 11 institutions, used two parallel hierarchical multiple regression analyses to predict the frequency of cheating on exams and the frequency of cheating on homework based on eight blocks of independent variables: demographics, pre-college cheating behavior, co-curricular participation, plus five blocks organized around Ajzen’s Theory of Planned Behavior (moral obligation not to cheat, attitudes about cheating, evaluation of the costs and benefits of cheating, perceived social pressures to cheat or not to cheat, and perceived effectiveness of academic dishonesty policies). The final models significantly predict 36% of the variance in “frequency of cheating on exams” and 14% of the variance in “frequency of cheating on homework”. Students don’t see cheating as a single construct and their decisions to cheat or not to cheat are influenced differently depending on the type of assessment. Secondary findings are that a student’s conviction that cheating is wrong no matter what the circumstances is a strong deterrent to cheating across types of assessment and that a student who agrees that he/she would cheat in order to alleviate stressful situations is more likely to cheat on both exams and homework. 相似文献
12.
13.
在历时1300年的科举考试当中,始终存在舞弊与防弊的尖锐斗争。科举考试中的舞弊行为可以分为考前舞弊、考试当中的现场舞弊和考后阅卷录取舞弊三大类。少数违规者的舞弊行径,不仅累及绝大多数清白士子,甚至在一定程度上挟持了整个科举考试的管理理念、管理制度和管理措施。今天,考试中的舞弊行为有愈演愈烈之势,舞弊行为也表现出一些新的动向和特点,如高科技化、团伙化、职业化、内外勾结等。治理考试舞弊,需要多管齐下,使考生不想舞弊、不敢舞弊、不能舞弊、不需舞弊。在防范和打击舞弊的同时,还需科学处理严格管理与以人为本的关系、防范舞弊与代价适度的关系、考试内容与管理手段的关系。 相似文献
14.
Dr. Ronald L. Abrell 《Clearing house (Menasha, Wis.)》2013,86(4):171-173
Regrettably, cheating is widespread on all levels of our educational system. Effective monitoring and judicial review processes that ensure that students who cheat are subjected to appropriate disciplinary action are essential. However, policing is not enough. We must go beyond policing to change the culture of the classroom in ways that discourage cheating. This includes doing a better job of explaining why cheating is unacceptable, structuring exams and writing assignments in ways that make it difficult for students to cheat, and fostering an environment of mutual respect in the classroom that encourages students to buy into the educational process, rather than attempt to subvert it. 相似文献
15.
Yulia Poltorak 《Higher Education》1995,30(2):225-246
This paper reports the results of the first survey conducted in Moscow on student cheating behavior in December of 1991. I propose that cheating, like many other forms of deviant behavior, can be explained as rooted in the social structure. I propose a way of combining Merton's structural approach with the learning theory of deviant behavior. Merton's typology of individual adaptation is extended to a case where there is a difference between official and unofficial goals and means. I use the theory of neutralization to understand how students justified cheating in such social conditions. The survey revealed that an overwhelming majority of students cheat, and that students justify cheating by saying that it is the fault of the education system. In addition my results suggest that there was a linkage between the macro structure of Soviet society (including its educational system) and cheating behavior among students. The structure of the Soviet system provided opportunities and motivation to cheat together with the rationale to justify cheating. The changes which were introduced with Perestroika only worsened the situation by blurring the notions of appropriate and deviant behavior in many spheres of life. The implications for the present changes going on in Russia are discussed.An earlier version of this paper was presented at the Eastern Sociological Society Meeting (Boston, March 1993). I am grateful for the helpful comments of Jerry A. Jacobs, Ewa Morawska, Harold Bershady and Paul Wolpe. 相似文献
16.
基于大学生考试作弊的现实演变,本文运用问卷调查和访谈的方法对西部某高校大学生作弊的现状、成因及行为发生机制进行了相关研究。结果表明:(1)大学生考试作弊具有普遍性,作弊行为已经进入到一些学生的基本价值体系,形成一种"作弊文化";(2)来自城乡的学生,在"对作弊的认识倾向"、"作弊动机"变量上有显著差异;(3)不同性别的学生,在"对作弊的认识倾向"、"作弊动机层面"、"管理制度层面"、"作弊原因"等方面有显著差异;(4)不同年级的学生,在"对作弊的认识和态度"上有显著差异;(5)不同专业的学生,在"作弊动机"变量上有显著差异;(6)作弊方式多样,并带有明显的时代技术特征;(7)学生对作弊的认识和态度有不同的倾向、攀比心理的影响、考试试题的结构与性质、教学管理过程的松懈、考试与评价方面的不合理性、教师监考的松懈等是促成学生作弊的重要因素。作者在指出作弊现状、分析作弊成因及其发生机制的基础上,提出了防止作弊或尽量减少作弊的干预性建议。 相似文献
17.
Arden Miller Carol Shoptaugh Jessica Wooldridge 《Journal of Experimental Education》2013,81(2):169-184
The authors investigated the relations among reasons students gave for why they would not cheat in response to a cheating vignette, self-reported cheating, and the extent to which students take responsibility for promoting academic integrity. The authors surveyed 1,086 graduate and undergraduate students. Students who said they would not cheat because of punitive consequences were more likely to report that they cheated in classes and took less responsibility for promoting academic integrity. Students whose reasons related to the value of learning, personal character, and/or it being simply not right reported less cheating and took more responsibility for academic integrity. Academic-integrity responsibility correlated with less cheating. Results are discussed in terms of the effectiveness of punishment and the significance of internalizing integrity standards. 相似文献
18.
The theory of planned behaviour was used to examine academic dishonesty among secondary school students in Hong Kong. Participants were 386 students in Forms 1–3 (Grades 7–9). Attitudes toward cheating, perceived behavioural control, and moral obligation were positively related to the intention to cheat, but only the subjective norm against cheating was significantly related to self-reported cheating behaviour. The subjective norm was both a predictor of self-reported cheating and a moderator of the relationship between the intention to cheat and self-reported cheating: the intention predicted the behaviour only when the subjective norm against cheating was perceived to be weak. 相似文献
19.
Robert Glaser 《教育心理学家》2013,48(3):129-132
This article uses theoretical concepts from self-efficacy theory, goal theory, expectancy value, and intrinsic motivation theory as a way to organize the vast and largely atheoretical literature on academic cheating. Specifically, it draws on 3 particular questions that students encounter when deciding whether to cheat: (a) What is my purpose?, (b) Can I do this task?, and (c) What are the costs associated with cheating? This article reviews both experimental and nonexperimental evidence related to each of these questions and offers suggestions for future research and instructional practices that will lessen the likelihood of cheating. 相似文献
20.