共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 93 毫秒
1.
Initial-link response allocation in concurrent chains becomes less extreme as the absolute duration of the initial links increases
(Fantino, 1969). The present study asked whether initial-link duration affected how quickly response allocation reached asymptote
(i.e., acquisition of preference). Six pigeons were trained on a concurrent-chains procedure in which the terminal links were
fixed-interval (FI) 8 sec FI 16 sec or FI 16 sec FI 8 sec and were reversed every 20 sessions. Across conditions, all possible
combinations of transitions between variable-interval (VI) 8-sec (short) and VI 24-sec (long) initial-link schedules were
studied. Overall, the rate of acquisition was faster when the durations of the initial links preceding the reversal were short
rather than long, and when the durations of the initial links following the reversal were long rather than short. By contrast,
initial-link duration had no effect on acquisition or asymptotic measures of temporal control of terminal-link responding.
These results support the core principle of delay-reduction theory (Fantino, 1969) that the impact of a conditioned reinforcer
varies directly with initial-link duration, but also suggest that temporal learning during the terminal links proceeds independently
of initial-link duration. nt]mis|These data were presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Behavior Analysis,
Boston, May 2004. 相似文献
2.
Pigeons’ preference between fixed-interval and variable-interval schedules was examined using a concurrent-chains procedure. Responses to two concurrently available keys in the initial links of the concurrent chains occasionally produced terminal links where further responses were reinforced under either a fixed- or variable-interval schedule. In previous studies, preferences for the variable schedule with such a procedure have been interpreted as reflecting atemporal scaling process that heavily weights the shorter intervals in the variable schedule. The present experiment examined whetherpredictability, i.e., the presence of external stimuli correlated with the reinforcement interval, might also influence preference in such situations. When the two intervals in a variable schedule were made predictable by being associated with different key colors, preference for that schedule increased. This increase was reliable but small in magnitude and transient when initial-link responses only occasionally produced terminal links; it was large in magnitude when only one response in the initial link was required to produce the appropriate terminal-link schedule. The results suggest that preference between fixed and variable schedules may be influenced both by temporal scaling and to a lesser extent by predictability of the reinforcement intervals. 相似文献
3.
Cassandra D. Gipson Jér?ome J. D. Alessandri Holly C. Miller Thomas R. Zentall 《Learning & behavior》2009,37(4):289-298
When pigeons are given a choice between an initial-link alternative that results in either a terminal-link stimulus correlated
with 100% reinforcement or a stimulus correlated with 0% reinforcement (overall 50% reinforcement) and another initial-link
alternative that always results in a terminal-link stimulus correlated with 100% reinforcement, some pigeons show a preference
for the initial-link alternative correlated with 50% reinforcement. Using this procedure, in Experiment 1, we found a relatively
modest preference for 100% over 50% reinforcement. In Experiment 2, we decreased the reinforcement density for the second
initial-link alternative to 75% and found a significant preference for the 50% reinforcement initial-link alternative. It
may be that this “maladaptive” behavior results from a positive contrast between the expectation of reinforcement correlated
with the 50% reinforcement initial-link alternative and the terminal-link stimulus correlated with 100% reinforcement. But
apparently, the complementary negative contrast does not develop between the expectation of reinforcement correlated with
the 50% reinforcement initial-link alternative and the terminal-link stimulus correlated with 0% reinforcement that often
follow. Such paradoxical choice may account for certain human appetitive risk-taking behavior (e.g., gambling) as well. 相似文献
4.
Five rats responded on several concurrent schedules in which pressing a key produced reinforcers in one component and pressing a lever produced reinforcers in the other component (Experiment 1). Four pigeons responded on several concurrent keypeck treadlepress schedules (Experiment 2). The programmed rates of reinforcement varied from 15 to 240 reinforcers per hour in different conditions. Rates of responding usually changed systematically within experimental sessions, and the changes were similar for the two components of a concurrent schedule. These results imply that within-session changes in responding may not confound the predictions of theories that describe the ratio of the rates of responding during the two components of concurrent schedules. Instead, within-session changes may be controlled by a mechanism that integrates the reinforcers obtained from the two components. 相似文献
5.
Charles I. Brooks 《Learning & behavior》1975,3(1):67-72
In Experiment I, rats which had received six partially reinforced runway acquisition trials, with a reward magnitude of 60 sec access to wet mash on rewarded trials, showed less persistent responding over highly massed extinction trials than subjects which had received the same acquisition schedule but reward magnitudes of either 1 or 10 45-mg pellets. In Experiment II, rats which had received six partially reinforced placements into one compartment of a two-compartment box, with 60 sec access to mash on rewarded placements, jumped a hurdle faster to escape nonreward than subjects which had received the same reward schedule but 10 45-mg pellets on rewarded trials. The data supported a primary frustration analysis for reward-magnitude manipulations within brief partial-reinforcement schedules. 相似文献
6.
In two experiments, pigeons' responding on an extraneous task was explicitly reinforced during delayed matching-to-sample
trials. In Experiment 1, red or green sample stimuli were followed by retention intervals of 0.2, 1, 4, or 12 sec, during
which pecks to a white center key were reinforced with 2.5-sec access to wheat according to extinction, variable-interval
30-sec, and variable-interval 15-sec schedules in different conditions. A proportion of .2, .5, .7, or .9 of subsequent red
or green choice responses that matched the sample were reinforced with 3-sec access to wheat. The result was that increasing
center key reinforcement, or reducing reinforcer probability, lowered overall accuracy. Initial discriminability fell, but
with no change in the rate of forgetting. In Experiment 2, initial discriminability was affected by extraneous reinforcers
that were contingent on center key pecking, but not by noncontingent reinforcers. A plausible conclusion is that initial discriminability
decreases when reinforcers strengthen competing behaviors. 相似文献
7.
In three experiments, we examined the effect on the patterns of responding noted on fixed interval (FI) schedules of prior
exposure to a range of interval and ratio schedules. Rats leverpressed for food reinforcement on random ratio (RR), random
interval (RI), or variable interval (VI) schedules prior to transfer to FI schedules. In Experiment 1, prior exposure to an
RR schedule retarded the development of typical FI patterns of responding. Exposure to a yoked RI schedule produced even greater
retardation of typical FI performance. This effect was replicated in Experiment 2, using a within-subjects design. Rats responded
on a multiple RR-RI schedule prior to a multiple FI-FI schedule. Typical FI performance emerged more slowly in the component
previously associated with the RI than with that associated with the RR. In Experiment 3, exposure to an RR schedule retarded
the development of FI performance to a greater extent than did exposure to a VR schedule. The latter schedule was programmed
to allow the possibility that inhibitory control would develop after reinforcement. These results confirm that ratio schedules
independently result in the disruption of FI responding. This effect was not long lasting and cannot be used plausibly to
explain species differences in responding to FI schedules. However, it does suggest that temporal control—as manifested by
the transfer of inhibitory control from one schedule to another—could facilitate movement between interval schedules. 相似文献
8.
Temporal parameters were varied in two different observing response procedures. In Experiment I, concurrent variable-interval chain schedules were employed. Responding on one key led to either a stimulus correlated with reinforcement or a stimulus correlated with time-out. Responding on the other key led to a stimulus which ended either in reinforcement or time-out. The duration of the delay to reinforcement or time-out was varied, the delays for all three stimuli always remaining equal in a given phase. It was found that the longer the delay, the greater the preference for the observing response. In Experiment II a procedure was employed in which birds pecked during a “trial” to produce stimuli correlated with reinforcement or time-out at the end of the trial. The duration of the trial ending in time out was varied while the positive trial duration remained constant. It was found that the longer the duration of the negative trial, the greater the strength of observing responses. The results were interpreted as supporting the hypothesis that the value of a positive stimulus is a function of time spent in stimuli correlated with nonreinforcement.
相似文献9.
When pigeons are trained on a discrete-trial simultaneous discrimination, some of the value associated with the positive stimulus appears to transfer to the negative stimulus (Zentall & Sherburne, 1994). Pigeons preferred a negative stimulus that had been discriminated from an always-positive stimulus (S+) over a negative stimulus that had been discriminated from a sometimes-positive stimulus (S±). A very different finding (suggestive of transitivity of preference or contrast) was reported by Belke (1992). On concurrent probe tests of stimuli associated with equal variable interval (VI) schedules but originally trained in alternative concurrent pairs (one with a richer schedule, the other with a poorer schedule—VI 20 sec vs. VI 40 sec and VI 40 sec vs. VI 80 sec), the stimulus originally paired with the poorer schedule was preferred. But Belke’s results may have been obtained because the pigeons had been trained to peck the VI 40 sec paired with the poorer schedule and they had been trained not to peck the VI 40 sec paired with the richer schedule. In the present experiment, we avoided this bias by training pigeons on two concurrent schedules in which the tested stimuli both had been associated with the poorer schedule of the pair [A(VI 20 sec) vs. B(VI 80 sec) and C(VI 40 sec) vs. D(VI 80 sec)]. Evidence for value transfer was demonstrated when on probe trials pigeons preferred B over D. 相似文献
10.
Terry W. Belke 《Learning & behavior》1992,20(4):401-406
Four pigeons were exposed to multiple schedules with concurrent variable interval (VI) components and then tested for preference transfer. Half of the pigeons were trained on a multiple concurrent VI 20-sec, VI 40-sec/cuncurrent VI 4G-sec5 VI 80-sec schedule. The remaining pigeons were trained on a multiple concurrent VI 80-sec, VI 40-sec/concurrent VI 40-sec, VI 20-sec schedule-After stability criteria for time and response proportions were simultaneously met, four preference transfer tests were conducted with the stimuli associated with the VI 40-sec schedules. During the transfer tests, each pigeon allocated a greater proportion of responses (M=0,79) and time (M=0.82) to the stimulus associated with the VI 40-sec schedule that was paired with the VI 80-sec schedule than lo the VI 40-sec schedule stimulus paired with the VI 20-sec schedule. Absolute reinforcement rates on the two VI 40 sec schedules were approximately equal and unlikely to account for the observed preference. Nor was the preference consistent with the differences in local reinforcement rates associated with the two stimuli. Instead, the results were interpreted in terms of the differential value that stimuli acquire as a function of previous pairings with alternative schedules of reinforcement. 相似文献
11.
Ken Cheng 《Learning & behavior》1992,20(2):112-120
The peak procedure was used in two experiments. Pigeons in the penalty group in Experiment 1 were rewarded with food in the first phase for the first peck after 12.5 sec had elapsed since the onset of a keylight. In the second phase, reward was withheld if the pigeons pecked within 6.25 sec after keylight onset. Responses in time were tabulated on occasional unrewarded tests in which the keylight was left on for 37.5 sec. Under the penalty contingencies, the response distribution in time remained nearly symmetric about the peak, while the spread of the distribution narrowed, and the time of peak responding came slightly earlier. The yoke group underwent a schedule of rewards similar to that for the penalty group, but without the penalty contingencies. Their response distributions remained similar throughout. The results of Experiment 1 were replicated in Experiment 2, which showed further that the changes due to the penalty contingencies did not generalize to the use of another key on which the penalty contingencies were not in effect. The narrower spread under the penalty contingencies is explained in terms of a change in threshold for when to start responding, and more weight being given to timing versus responding in the presence of the signal per se. No explanation was found for the change in the time of peak responding. 相似文献
12.
Pigeons were given the opportunity to terminate certain segments of fixed intervals by pecking a control key. When 30-sec segments of negative and positive stimuli alternated across the interreinforcement interval (Experiment 1), most birds terminated a large proportion of negative segments. However, few control-key responses were made during the negative segment immediately following food presentation. Under schedules during which only one negative segment was programmed, during the first 30 sec of 1-min intervals (Experiment 2), control-key responses, when they occurred at all, were made after several seconds of the interval had elapsed. Similar findings were obtained when a peck on the control key merely changed the color on the food key (Experiment 3). These findings suggest that the post-reinforcement extinction state (Schneider, 1969) during fixed-interval schedules consists of two phases: an immediate postreinforcement inhibitory phase, followed by a second phase during which a control-key response may occur. These two phases and their associated behavior may be related to Staddon’s (1977) distinction between interim and facultative activities. 相似文献
13.
Pigeons pecked keys on concurrent-chains schedules that provided a variable interval 30-sec schedule in the initial link.
One terminal link provided reinforcers in a fixed manner; the other provided reinforcers in a variable manner with the same
arithmetic mean as the fixed alternative. In Experiment 1, the terminal links provided fixed and variable interval schedules.
In Experiment 2, the terminal links provided reinforcers after a fixed or a variable delay following the response that produced
them. In Experiment 3, the terminal links provided reinforcers that were fixed or variable in size. Rate of reinforcement
was varied by changing the scheduled interreinforcer interval in the terminal link from 5 to 225 sec. The subjects usually
preferred the variable option in Experiments 1 and 2 but differed in preference in Experiment 3. The preference for variability
was usually stronger for lower (longer terminal links) than for higher (shorter terminal links) rates of reinforcement. Preference
did not change systematically with time in the session. Some aspects of these results are inconsistent with explanations for
the preference for variability in terms of scaling factors, scalar expectancy theory, risk-sensitive models of optimal foraging
theory, and habituation to the reinforcer. Initial-link response rates also changed within sessions when the schedules provided
high, but not low, rates of reinforcement. Within-session changes in responding were similar for the two initial links. These
similarities imply that habituation to the reinforcer is represented differently in theories of choice than are other variables
related to reinforcement. 相似文献
14.
Pigeons responded on concurrent-chain schedules with variable-interval initial links and equal delays as terminal links. The terminal-link delays were 1 sec in some conditions and 20 sec in other conditions. The percentages of reinforcers delivered for responses on the left key were 10%, 30%, 70%, or 90%, and this percentage was switched every five to nine sessions. The rate of change in the pigeons’ response percentages after a switch was the same whether the terminal-link delays were 1 sec or 20 sec. Analysis of the effects of individual reinforcers showed that after a response on one key had been reinforced, response percentages on that key were higher for at least the next 100 responses. Small effects of individual reinforcers were evident after eight or nine additional reinforcers had been delivered. The effects of individual reinforcers were about equally large during times of transition and during periods in which overall response percentages were relatively stable. 相似文献
15.
When Pavlovian stimuli activate representations of food, do these representations resemble memories of food consumed in the recent past or expectancies of food that is imminent? In Experiments 1A and 1B, this question was addressed by training pigeons on a symbolic matching-to-sample task involving different grains as memory cues or as expectancy cues for correct choices. Autoshaping trials involving these same grains were interspersed among matching-to-sample trials, as were test trials involving the substitution of autoshaping stimuli for cues in the matching-to-sample task. Control over choices transferred to autoshaping stimuli in both experiments, suggesting that associatively activated representations of food resemble both memories and expectancies. In Experiment 2, pigeons were trained on a symbolic matching-to-sample task in which food and no-food memory cues (i.e., the samples) were juxtaposed with no-food and food expectancy cues. Subsequently, autoshaping stimuli, which activated representations of food and no food, were substituted for the samples. Choices by the pigeons indicated that associatively activated representations of food-related events resemble expectancies more closely than they do memories. 相似文献
16.
Two experiments employed a delayed conditional discrimination procedure in which half the trials began with the presentation of food and half with no food; following a retention interval, subjects were presented with a choice between red and green keys, a response to one of which was reinforced according to whether the trial had started with food or no food. In Experiment 1, after 38 training sessions during which the retention interval was gradually increased, pigeons performed at a moderate level with intervals of 5 to 7.5 sec. A final test produced a steep forgetting function for food trials, but not for no-food trials; performance was unaffected by the duration of the intertriai interval (10 or 40 sec). Experiment 2 used the delayed conditional discrimination procedure to compare short-term memory in jackdaws (Corvus monedulus) with that in pigeons. Although the performance of the jackdaws was below that of the pigeons at the start of training, they showed more rapid learning over long delays, and, in the final test, a shallower forgetting function for food trials than that shown by pigeons. The results suggested superior short-term memory in jackdaws, which may help to explain the better performance of corvids in general when compared with that of pigeons in certain complex learning tasks. 相似文献
17.
Pigeons responded in a two-component peak procedure in which the components differed in terms of reinforcement magnitude (Experiment 1), immediacy (Experiment 2), or probability (Experiment 3). The prediction of behavioral momentum theory that responding in the relatively richer component should be more resistant to change was tested by (1) presenting response-independent food in the intervals between components according to a variable-time (VT) schedule, (2) prefeeding, and (3) extinction. In all the experiments, peak location in baseline occurred earlier, relative to the schedule value in the richer component. Peak response rate was more resistant to change in the richer component during the VT and prefeeding tests, and change in peak rate was more sensitive to differential reinforcement than change in overall response rate. Changes in measures of performance on peak trials during the disruptor tests were partially consistent with predictions of the behavioral theory of timing. The results suggest that peak response rate provides a more sensitive index of resistance to change for fixed-interval schedules than does overall response rate and that reinforcement strengthens both peak responding and temporal control. 相似文献
18.
Pigeons’ responses on an operant key were reinforced according to either multiple variable-interval variable-interval or multiple variable-interval extinction schedules. The multiple-schedule components were signaled by line-tilt stimuli on a second key (signal key). Signal-key responses never produced reinforcement, and operant-key responses were not reinforced if they followed within 1 sec of a signal-key response. Behavioral contrast was not observed on the operant key, although there was a small, but reliable, increase in signal-key responding in the variable-interval component of the multiple variable-interval extinction condition. Generalization tests were interspersed between sessions of multiple variable-interval extinction training. Generalization gradients along the line-tilt dimension exhibited peak shift for both operant-key and signal-key responding following intradimensional (line tilt) discrimination training. Line-tilt generalization gradients following interdimensional discrimination did not exhibit peak shift. Gradients following intradimensional discrimination were sharper than gradients following interdimensional discrimination for both operant-key and signal-key responding. It was concluded that dimensional stimulus control of topographically tagged responding maintained by the stimulusreinforcer relation parallels that maintained by the response-reinforcer relation. 相似文献
19.
20.
Pigeons were trained on an operant procedure to discriminate between morning and afternoon when location did not vary (Experiment
1). The pigeons were placed on a fixed interval (FI) schedule in the morning and on a different FI schedule in the afternoon.
Probe trials that occurred at the beginning of the training sessions were examined. The pigeons responded differently, depending
on the time of day, reflecting the learning of a stable 24-h memory representation of the association between the FI schedules
and the time of day. The pigeons from Experiment 1 were then clock shifted and tested twice, to determine whether they were
relying on an endogenous circadian oscillator, an hourglass mechanism influenced by the photoperiod, or environmental noise
to make the time-of-day discrimination (Experiment 2). The results of the second experiment indicated a circadian mechanism
was most important for the observed time-of-day learning. 相似文献