共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 31 毫秒
1.
Developing a course for online instruction requires content knowledge and understanding of the interactivity, technological
requirements, and possibilities in the asynchronous environment. Using a case study method, the researchers investigated the
development of an online humanities course by a team of faculty and instructional designers. Data were collected through observation
of face-to-face planning meetings, document analysis of group postings at the online site, and interviews with the team members.
Using Berge’s typology of online facilitator roles and Stark and Luttuca’s framework on academic plans, this study examined
the roles assumed by team members and the curricular decisions.
Haixia Xu is a Ph.D. candidate in the Institute of Higher Education at the University of Georgia. Her research interests include policy
aspects of distance education, comparative higher education, qualitative research methodology, and assessment and evaluation.
Libby V. Morris is the Director of the Institute of Higher Education at the University of Georgia. She holds the Ph.D. degree from the University
of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. Her research interests include evaluation and assessment, instructional technology, and educational
demographics. 相似文献
2.
张伟远 《现代远程教育研究》2013,(1):7-14,23
教育信息化已经成为世界各国继续教育发展的方向,网络教学日益成为继续教育的重要教学传递模式。国家教育部2012年的《教育信息化十年发展规划》明确提出信息化技术与教育深度融合的要求,为学习者提供方便、灵活、个性化的学习环境。如何实现信息技术和继续教育的深度融合,关键是发展和采用有效的网络教学模式。从理论阐述上,笔者提出这一网络教学模式的基本框架,其组成包括网络学习平台、网络学习课程、网络导学和支持、网络教学管理以及质量保证体系。香港大学教师进修学院对这一网络教学模式的应用实践效果明显。学院于1999年开发了第一个网络教学平台,2012年又推出新的平台,称为SOUL2.0,其优势是功能模块化、整合Web2.0互动功能、整合学习功能、整合评价功能、降低开发成本。新平台为推进信息技术与继续教育的深度融合提供了坚实的基础设施。以全网络课程＂网络课程的设计和开发＂为例,在新平台上对课程介绍、课程教学设计、网络导学和支持、信息技术和互动学习融合及质量保证等方面进行了探索。经案例研究表明,我们通过采用系统的和有质量保证机制的网络教学发展模式,在继续教育领域中可以达到与面授相同而且更加灵活的教学和学习成效。 相似文献
3.
Students take summer and compressed courses for a variety of reasons and research indicates that learning outcomes in these courses are similar to those gained in traditional semester or quarter courses. This quantitative study was an attempt to clarify faculty perceptions about summer compressed courses. One hundred and fifty-one faculty members teaching at a large, multicampus institution completed a survey addressing teaching methodology, approaches to student assessment, and other pedagogical issues relating to such courses. It was determined that many faculty did make adjustments in teaching methods and approaches to student assessment. In addition, perceptions were different between experienced/tenured faculty and inexperienced/nontenured faculty.Mark Kretovics is an Assistant Professor of Higher Education Administration and Student Personnel at Kent State University. He received his Ph.D. from Colorado State University and his research interests include the assessment of student learning, business practices in higher education, distance education, and pedagogical issues in compressed courses. Mark had over 20 years of administrative experience within higher education before transitioning into his current faculty role. Alicia R. Crowe, Ph.D. is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Teaching, Leadership, and Curriculum Studies at Kent State University. Her areas of interest and research include teacher education, social studies education, teacher learning, and technology integration. Eunsook Hyun, Ph.D. is Associate Professor in the Department of Teaching, Leadership, and Curriculum Studies at Kent State University. Her area of research interests include teacher education, critical pedagogy, curriculum theorizing, and higher education curriculum 相似文献
4.
Leo L. Rockwell 《College Teaching》2013,61(1):17-18
Faculty workload is based on the amount of time spent on teaching, research, and service. The workload varies according to institutional focus, teaching field, type of course, course level, and instructional format. Compared with traditional face-to-face courses, online courses require a disproportionate investment of time and effort by faculty, necessitating special consideration when calculating faculty workload. The authors examine the workload for faculty teaching online courses in community colleges, specifically, the number of online classes taught per semester, class sizes for online courses, incentives for online instructors and how the workload for online instructors is calculated. Results indicate inconsistent practices within and between institutions; the workload for online instructors based on class sizes is less than, equal to, or more than that of faculty teaching face-to-face courses. Further investigations into common practices at other institutions and dialogue between administrators and faculty to discuss workload issues are recommended. 相似文献
5.
Melissa M. Patchan Christian D. Schunn Wilfried Sieg Dawn McLaughlin 《Technology, Pedagogy and Education》2016,25(3):269-286
While online instructional technologies are becoming more popular in higher education, educators’ opinions about online learning tend to be generally negative. Furthermore, many studies have failed to systematically examine the features that distinguish one instructional mode from another, which weakens possible explanations for why online instructional technology can be beneficial. The current study isolates three benefits of the authors’ particular online instructional technology: (1) providing flexibility in how students learn, (2) offering immediate and targeted feedback and (3) increasing student participation and engagement with instructional material. Maximum benefits were observed when students used the online instructional technology to prepare for their face-to-face class – that is, students with this blended instruction learned twice as much content in the same amount of time in comparison to students with face-to-face instruction alone, without creating an atypically high workload. 相似文献
6.
This qualitative study makes the case for the implementation of curriculum mapping, a procedure that creates a visual representation
of curriculum based on real time information, as a way to increase collaboration and collegiality in higher education. Through
the use of curriculum mapping, eleven faculty members in a western state university Teacher Licensure program aligned and
revised the teacher education curriculum across a sequence of courses. An increase in collaboration and collegiality among
faculty emerged as an unintended outcome as a result of participation in the project.
Kay Pippin Uchiyama is currently the Assessment Coordinator for the Poudre School District in Fort Collins, Colorado. During this study, she was
an Assistant Professor of Teacher Education at Colorado State University and a co-primary investigator for the Preparing Tomorrow’s
Teachers to Use Data grant. She received her Ph.D. in Instruction and Curriculum in the Content Areas with an emphasis on
Teacher Education and Learning to Teach from the University of Colorado at Boulder. Her interests include data driven instruction,
assessment for learning, teacher education, professional development schools, and mathematics education. Her email is kuchiyam@psdschools.org.
Jean L. Radin is an adjunct professor at Colorado State University and a co-primary investigator for the Preparing Tomorrow’s Teachers to
Use Data grant. She received her Ph.D. from Colorado State University. Her interests are brain-based teaching and learning,
data driven instructional practices, teacher education and professional development schools. Her email is jradin@cahs.colorado.edu. 相似文献
7.
江声皖 《江苏广播电视大学学报》2014,(4):49-53
教学理念与教学程序及方法是教学模式中不可或缺的两大要素。反思电大教学模式设计,结论是:"系统办学"理念、"现代远程教育属性"与"特定的教学活动序列及其方法策略"应是开放大学系统教学模式设计的必备条件;以国家开放大学的"六网融通"模式为依据,从教学安排一体化、网络教学多样化、面授网教互补化、衔接教学差异化、实践教学实训化、毕业作业实用化六个维度去考量教学模式设计应该是地方开放学院暨基层学习中心必须坚持的根本。 相似文献
8.
Susan A. Santo Mary E. Engstrom Linda Reetz William E. Schweinle Kristine Reed 《Innovative Higher Education》2009,34(2):117-129
All programs in a midwestern university recently embarked on a path to help increase the scholarly productivity of faculty.
The effort to develop a research emphasis within the School of Education required determining the needs of tenure-track faculty
regarding meeting the new requirements. The purposes of our study were to investigate these needs and identify the individual,
environmental, and leadership factors that affect faculty productivity. Findings revealed a need to transform the School’s
service and teaching culture to a culture of research and scholarship. Recommendations for helping other schools of education
to become more research-oriented are provided. While the study focuses on data from a particular School of Education, the
implications may generalize to faculty productivity within other institutions, particularly within professional schools.
Susan A. Santo received a Ph.D. in Instructional Technology from the University of Virginia and is currently an Associate Professor of Adult
and Higher Education at the University of South Dakota. Her research interests include faculty productivity in higher education
and improving distance learning.
Mary E. Engstrom received an Ed.D. from the University of South Dakota in Curriculum and Instruction. She is currently the Associate Director
of Extended Learning Services at the University of Montana. Her research interests include instructional design for online
learning and professional development for educators.
Linda Reetz received an Ed.D. from the University of North Dakota in Teacher Education and serves as the Associate Dean of the School
of Education at the University of South Dakota. Her research interests include higher education practices for teacher education
programs and mild disabilities.
William Schweinle received a Ph.D. from the University of Texas at Arlington in Psychology and serves as an Assistant Professor at the University
of South Dakota. His research interest area is in statistics.
Kristine Reed received a Ph.D. from the University of Nebraska at Lincoln in Curriculum and Instruction/Administration and serves as a faculty
member in Curriculum and Instruction, University of South Dakota. Her research emphases include multicultural education and
rural education. 相似文献
9.
Sally J. Baldwin 《The American journal of distance education》2019,33(3):195-211
As online education continues to grow, instructors from traditional classrooms are being asked to design online courses. In this study, data from interviews with thirty-three public four-year college and university instructors, who had experience designing online courses, were used to understand the instructor’s perspective on online course design. Using grounded theory, data were analyzed, sorted, and coded to uncover the strategies instructors use to design online courses. Results revealed instructors adapt to the online environment by using strategies to mimic elements of face-to-face courses: in essence, adaption comes through assimilation. Instructors expressed interest in helping students navigate online to encourage active participation in courses. They described using technology and learning management system (LMS) features (e.g., videos, discussion forums) to “hear” and “see” students, as a way to increase interaction and presence, familiar elements from face-to-face education. They spoke of creating authentic assignments to increase student engagement. The implications of this study include effective design and instructional strategies for online courses, as well as understanding the motivation of instructors who design online courses. The study results are relevant to a broad audience including online instructors, instructional designers, LMS organizations, and administrators. 相似文献
10.
This article presents a synthesis of reports and research on K-12 blended teaching competencies compared with K-12 online teaching competencies. The skills needed to teach in online and blended environments are distinct from traditional teaching, but teacher education programs often do not equip preservice teachers for the new modes of instruction. Additionally, there is a dearth of research on blended teaching competencies. This review synthesizes 8 blended teaching documents and 10 online teaching documents. Seven global themes identified in both competency domains are (1) pedagogy, (2) management, (3) assessment, (4) technology, (5) instructional design, (6) dispositions, and (7) improvement. The top 20 blended teaching skills include flexibility and personalization, mastery-based learning, data usage and interpretation, learning management system usage, online discussion facilitation, and software management. The authors recommend that researchers collect more methodologically transparent data about blended teaching and that teacher education programs include the identified skills in curriculum. 相似文献
11.
Cheryl Allendoerfer Denise Wilson Mee Joo Kim Elizabeth Burpee 《Teaching in Higher Education》2013,18(7):758-771
In this paper, we identify beliefs about teaching and patterns of instruction valued and emphasized by science, technology, engineering, and mathematics faculty in higher education in the USA. Drawing on the notion that effective teaching is student-centered rather than teacher-centered and must include a balance of knowledge-, learner-, community-, and assessment-centered learning environments; we use qualitative interview data to explore how faculty's reported beliefs about teaching are associated with their consideration of these four types of environments. Findings indicated that although a range of beliefs about teaching emerged, most were firmly located in knowledge-centered learning environments, with little or no focus on the remaining three learning environments. Furthermore, even patterns of instruction that were heavily student-centered were situated within a knowledge-centered learning framework. We argue that for student-centered instruction to be truly successful, faculty must consider all four learning environments in crafting and facilitating the classroom environment. 相似文献
12.
Admiraal Wilfried F. Lockhorst Ditte Wubbels Theo Korthagen Fred A.J. Veen Wim 《Learning Environments Research》1998,1(1):59-74
The use of computer conferencing environments with student teachers and their supervisors was implemented during teaching practice and evaluated for four teacher education programs. Computer conferencing can be contrasted with the more common supervision methods, such as face-to-face conferences between the student teacher and the cooperating teacher, or between a group of student teachers and their supervisor at the teacher education institute. In our evaluation, we focused on participants' opinions of computer conferencing and their participation, activities and educational outcomes. During their field experiences, student teachers used computer conferencing primarily to exchange emotional support when they recognised similar experiences among their peers. It was less used for reflecting on their teaching and exchanging pedagogical content knowledge, including instructional methods and designs, classroom management strategies, general and instructional theories, and aspects of the teaching profession. This finding led to the conclusion that more attention should be paid to the structure of student teachers' learning environment, because more coaching and instruction of student teachers in their systematic and reflective use of computer conferencing leads to more varied and extensive communication 相似文献
13.
Di Xu Danny Glick Fernando Rodriguez Bianca Cung Qiujie Li Mark Warschauer 《British journal of educational technology : journal of the Council for Educational Technology》2020,51(1):211-227
Despite steady investment in English language education made by developing countries over the past few decades, results continue to be constrained by lack of high-quality instructors and language learning resources. Thus, using technology in language instruction has increasingly been recognized as a potential approach for addressing these constraints. This study uses administrative data from a large public university in Mexico to examine the impact of a technology-enhanced blended program on students' English course grades and course completion rates. Specifically, we focus on a campus-wide policy change in all compulsory English language courses that replaces half of the traditional face-to-face class time with an interactive online learning environment developed by a leading technology-mediated English language learning and assessment provider. Our results suggest that, compared to traditional face-to-face instruction, blended learning had a significant, positive impact on students' course grades and course completion rates. In addition, the enrollment-teacher ratio increased after replacing half of the face-to-face instructional time with online learning, suggesting that blended learning environments hold promise for providing high-quality and cost-effective language instruction. 相似文献
14.
The three-ring circus of academia is made up of research, teaching, and service. It is also characterized by continuous action
that must be facilitated by the academic ringmaster. Academic life is more difficult than most anticipate because the responsibilities
are time-consuming, diverse, and conflicting. Therefore, this article focuses on strategies faculty members can develop to
meet these pressing demands. Specifically, we begin with a discussion of how to balance research, teaching, and service. We
then highlight strategies faculty members can use in becoming an effective academic ringmaster. We conclude with a discussion
of life outside the “big top.”
Michelle L. Toews received a Ph.D. in Human Development and Family Science from The Ohio State University and is currently an Assistant Professor
of Family and Child Development at Texas State University-San Marcos. Her research interests include separation violence as
well as conflict and coparenting after divorce.
Ani Yazedjian received a Ph.D. in Human and Community Development from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. She is an Assistant
Professor of Family and Child Development at Texas State. Her research interests focus on adolescents and the role of families,
peers, and schools in promoting ethnic identity development. In addition, both authors are currently working on a longitudinal
study examining personal and internal variables as predictors of college adjustment and achievement. 相似文献
15.
As demands for accountability continue and increase, higher education administrators require tools for evaluating campus programs. Learning communities, as a course design strategy, have proven successful in confronting challenges associated with attrition and retention. Because high attrition is associated with online distance education, learning community principles might be applicable to online courses. The authors surveyed attendees at a learning communities conference to determine the applicability of learning community principles to Internet learning and assessment. On the basis of their findings, they developed a rudimentary diagnostic tool for ascertaining whether online course design takes learning community principles into account.David DiRamio is Assistant Professor of Higher Education Leadership at Auburn University. He received both B.S. and M.B.A. degrees from the State University of New York at Buffalo and a Ph.D. in Educational Leadership from the University of Nevada, Las Vegas. David's research interests include studying technology's impact on postsecondary education from administrative, legal, and policy perspectives. Mimi Wolverton is Program Coordinator and Professor of Higher Education Leadership at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas. She received a B.S. from Northern Illinois University, an M.B.A. from Arizona State University, and a Ph.D. in Educational Leadership and Policy Studies from Arizona State University. Her research interests include academic deans, women and minorities in leadership, and elite M.B.A. programs. E-mail: diramio@auburn.edu. 相似文献
16.
William C. Bosch Jessica L. Hester Virginia M. MacEntee James A. MacKenzie T. Mark Morey James T. Nichols Patricia A. Pacitti Barbara A. Shaffer Paul B. Tomascak Suzanne P. Weber Rosalie R. Young 《Innovative Higher Education》2008,33(2):83-98
Faculty, staff, and student perceptions of high-quality learning experiences were explored using focus groups attempting to
define a “learning-centered” college. Common themes emerged suggesting that a successful learning community requires faculty-student
collaboration, effective communication, critical thinking skills, reciprocal respect, faculty passion for learning, high expectations
of both students and faculty, a variety of teaching and assessment strategies, and student engagement in and responsibility
for learning. All groups stressed the need for learning opportunities outside the classroom in both intellectual and social
situations. These themes provide a conceptual framework for future campus initiatives, which has broad relevance for other
institutions.
William C. Bosch is Retired Director of the Center for Learning and Teaching. He received his M.S. in Computer Science from Syracuse University,
and his interests include teaching and learning in higher education and educational technology.
Jessica L. Hester is an Assistant Professor in Theatre and received her Ph.D. from The University of Texas at Austin. Her research interests
are American theatre history and dramaturgy.
Virginia M. MacEntee is Assistant Professor in Curriculum & Instruction. She received her Ed.D. in Early Childhood Education from Nova Southeastern
Florida University; and her interests include special education, authentic learning, and classroom technology.
James A. MacKenzie is Assistant Professor of Biological Sciences. He received his Ph.D. in Molecular Medicine from Wake Forest University School
of Medicine; and his interests include molecular and cellular biology, physiology, and human health and disease.
T. Mark Morey is Professor of Psychology and received his Ph.D. at Depaul University. Research interests include stress, trauma, and coping.
James T. Nichols is Instruction/Reference Librarian and Distance Learning Librarian. He received his M.A. in Library and Information Management
from the University of Denver; his interests include information literacy.
Patricia A. Pacitti is Coordinator of Math and Science Services for the Office of Learning Services. She received M.A.s in Mathematics and Statistics
from Pennsylvania State University; and her interests include developmental education, curriculum design, and classroom technology.
Barbara A. Shaffer is Coordinator of Reference Services and an Instruction Librarian at Penfield Library. She received her M.L.S. from Syracuse
University, and her interests include information literacy and online learning.
Paul B. Tomascak is an Assistant Professor of Geology and Geochemistry. He received his Ph.D. in geology from the University of Maryland;
his research interests include applications of elemental and isotopic systematics to understanding solid Earth and Earth surface
processes.
Suzanne P. Weber is Associate Dean of the School of Education and Professor of Science Education. She received her Ph.D. in Population Ecology
from Syracuse University; her current interests include assessment of student performance and program effectiveness in higher
education.
Rosalie R. Young is Associate Professor in Public Justice. She received her Ph.D.in political science from Syracuse University, and her interests
include family mediation and the ability of the poor to access the legal system.
All authors are currently members of the Committee on Learning and Teaching at State University of New York at Oswego. 相似文献
17.
This research effort reports the findings of an empirical study focusing on the ways in which technological tools are implemented specifically in mathematics education in a Title I school. The purpose was to identify the perspectives and actions of the school’s mathematics specialist and the multi-graded (grades 2–3) classroom teacher as they attempted to deliver instruction with technology for both English Language Learners1 (ELL) and non-ELL students. Findings showed that a critical factor in access to mathematics education and technology for ELL students in a multi-graded 2–3 classroom in a Title I (K-5) school setting was language. Although potentially powerful technologies—analog (concrete objects) and digital (software) were used, many ELL students could not access the content solely because of language difficulties. Teachers used the concrete objects as modeling tools, to reveal students’ thinking, and for communication of foundational mathematics. Conversely, the software used served none of these functions because the available software did not do the kinds of things the manipulatives did, teachers’ knowledge of exemplary software was insufficient, the school used an impoverished model of technology integration, and teachers were constrained by the school district’s policies of English immersion for ELL students.This paper was presented at the American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, 2005, Montreal, Canada, on Tuesday, April 12, 2005, 4:05–5:35 pm, in Le Centre Sheraton Montreal/Salon 7, in a session titled, “Science and Mathematics Teaching for Linguistically and Culturally Diverse Students” sponsored by Division K-Teaching and Teacher Education/Section 1—Research on Teaching Practices, Teacher Knowledge, and Teacher Education in Math and Science.Tirupalavanam G. Ganesh is a December 2003 graduate of the Interdisciplinary Ph.D. program in Educational Media and Computers, Division of Curriculum and Instruction, at the College of Education, Arizona State University. He also holds a Master of Computer Science degree from Arizona State University. His teaching interests include graduate and undergraduate courses for in-service and pre-service teachers in the use of learning technologies for Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) education and technology integration. His research interests include studying the impact of informal learning experiences in settings such as museums and after-school programs, technology integration, and teacher’s practices in elementary/middle schools. Address correspondence to Tirupalavanam G. Ganesh, Assistant Professor, Instructional Technology, College of Education, Curriculum and Instruction, University of Houston, 256 Farish Hall, Houston, TX 77204-5027. Tel.: +1-713-743-0574; e-mail: tganesh@uh.edu.James A. Middleton is Division Director of Curriculum and Instruction at the College of Education, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ. He obtained his Ph.D. in 1992, in Educational Psychology from the University of Wisconsin, Madison. His teaching interests include mathematics methods for secondary teachers and graduate courses in children’s mathematical thinking and technological innovation. His research interests include motivational processes in education, children’s mathematical thinking especially in the area of rational number and geometry, and technological innovation in mathematics instruction and assessment. James A. Middleton, Director, Division of Curriculum and Instruction, College of Education, Arizona State University, Box 871011, Tempe, AZ 85287-1011. Tel.: +1-480-965-9644; e-mail: james.middleton@asu.edu. 相似文献
18.
Diane Gillespie Nives Dolšak Bruce Kochis Ron Krabill Kari Lerum Anne Peterson Elizabeth Thomas 《Innovative Higher Education》2005,30(3):149-162
This article describes and assesses “Research Circles” as a mechanism for enhancing faculty collegiality and research. Recently
established on our campus, these circles, composed of three to four faculty members, have had a particularly powerful effect
on the new faculty members' adjustment to their tenure track positions, especially since they entered a context that might
otherwise have been challenging: a new interdisciplinary upper-division campus with high expectations for teaching excellence.
Based on the end-of-year evaluations, journals, and focus groups, the co-authors described themes that emerged from their
participation in these circles. Circle participation not only facilitated faculty writing throughout their first year, but
it also fostered the development of an interdisciplinary community which nurtured creativity and risk taking in writing.
All authors are currently teaching in Interdisciplinary Arts and Sciences (IAS) at The University of Washington, Bothell (UWB).
Except for Diane Gillespie, Professor and Associate Director of IAS, all other authors are Assistant Professors in IAS. Diane
Gillespie received her Ph.D. in cultural and psychological studies in education from The University of Nebraska, Lincoln.
Her interests include critical pedagogy, narrative psychology, and cultural diversity. Nives Dolšak received a joint Ph.D.
in public policy and political science from Indiana University. Her interests include public policy, environmental policy,
and international relations. Bruce Kochis, received his Ph.D. in Slavic languages & literatures at the University of Michigan.
He focuses on global human rights policy, discourse analysis, and political theory. Ron Krabill received his Ph.D. in sociology
and historical studies from New School for Social Research. His interests include comparative media, politics and social movements
with a special emphasis on South Africa, as well as the study of peace, conflict, social justice, and human rights. Kari Lerum
received her Ph.D. in sociology from The University of Washington. Her interests include culture, organizations, sexuality,
qualitative methods, and visual studies. Anne Peterson received her Ph.D. from Washington University. Her interests include
urban politics and policy and the distribution of natural resources at the local level. Elizabeth Thomas received her Ph.D.
in psychology from The University of Illinois at Urbana—Champaign. Her interests include community-based resources for adolescent
development, cultural psychology, and the social context of learning. 相似文献
19.
基于Web的听力教学语料库的设计与实现 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
随着网络环境下信息技术与英语教学课程整合的不断进展,传统的听力教学资源和教学模式不能适应日益变化的需求,基于Web的听力语料库正是解决该问题的主要途径。该研究在对基于Web的语料库的介绍基础上,设计并开发了一个用于大学英语听力教学的小型Web语料库,该语料库实现了对听力材料的检索、浏览、在线收听观看和更新等功能。 相似文献
20.
Christopher Justice James Rice Wayne Warry Sue Inglis Stefania Miller Sheila Sammon 《Innovative Higher Education》2007,31(4):201-214
Our 5-year experiment with teaching and evaluating an inquiry course has led us to conclude that inquiry is a potent pedagogical tool in higher education, encouraging students to become self-directed and engaged learners. This article offers key ingredients and procedures for designing an inquiry-based course. It provides a pragmatic model of inquiry that describes the structure and function of such a course and the goals and learning objectives for students. This model of inquiry is widely applicable and will help faculty members from a variety of disciplines develop an innovative way of engaging and teaching students.
Christopher Justice, Ph.D., is an anthropologist and health social scientist, and is an associate of the Centre for Leadership in Learning.e-mail: justice@mcmaster.ca
James Rice, Ph.D., is Professor Emeritus in the School of Social Work.e-mail: ricejame@mcmaster.ca
Wayne Warry, Ph.D., is Associate Professor, Department of Anthropology. His interests include aboriginal issues, aboriginal health and health systems evaluation, and educational research.e-mail: warrywa@mcmaster.ca
Sue Inglis, Ph.D., is Professor in the Department of Kinesiology. Her interests include organizational behaviour and student inquiry.e-mail: ingliss@mcmaster.ca
Stefania Miller, Ph.D., is Associate Professor, Department of Political Science. Her interests include international human rights and democratization in post-communist systems.e-mail: millers@mcmaster.ca
Sheila Sammon, M.A., is Associate Professor, School of Social Work. Her interests include social work education and the integration of theory and practice.e-mail: sammon@mcmaster.ca 相似文献