共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 218 毫秒
1.
20世纪以来,儿童受教育权作为一项基本人权得到了国际社会的广泛认同,诸多国际公约、文件都对儿童受教育权保护作出相关表述。本文回顾了主要的国际教育文件,归纳了这些文件中关于儿童受教育权的基本共识,并讨论在全民终身教育框架下儿童受教育权保护需要解决的几个理论问题。 相似文献
2.
一直以来人们对受教育权的理解更多地是把它作为一项法律规定的权利,而忽略了受教育权与其他权利的内在区别,即作为受教育权核心要素的教育内涵.现代教育具有自由、民主和人权的内在规定要素,即"以人为目的".因此,基于对"人是目的"教育内涵的理解,受教育权应具备自由、平等和人权等基本属性. 相似文献
3.
佘琳 《中国教育技术装备》2009,(9)
受教育权作为公民的一项基本权利已得到各个国家的普遍认同,受教育权在很大程度上是公民生存与发展权的基础,也正因为其基本权利的重要性,以《世界人权宣言》为首的国际性人权文件确认了受教育权的基础性地位,在国际人权保障背景下,世界各国纷纷加强受教育权的保障。我国虽然在宪法中确认受教育权的基本权利地位,但在立法和司法实践中对受教育权的保障亟待完善。 相似文献
4.
5.
受教育权是公民的一项基本人权,宪法和法律赋予了我国少数民族公民受教育的权利。作为公民的基本人权和基本权利,受教育权能否实现和实现状况关系到人的全面、充分和自由的发展。甘肃省为保障少数民族公民受教育权的实现采取了有力的措施,取得了一定的成就,为国家教育和民族教育的发展起到了重要的作用。 相似文献
6.
受教育权被大多数国家确认为公民的一项宪法权利,也是国际人权法确认的基本人权。目前,学术界多从理论的层面对受教育权的性质分析、受教育权的救济途径及其在宪法权利体系中的地位等加以研究、探讨,而从实践层面探讨受教育权问题的文章与著述则比较少。受教育权总具有理论的、历史的、实践的特 相似文献
7.
论我国公民受教育权的法律关系及法律保护 总被引：2，自引：0，他引：2
公民受教育权是指公民接受一定阶段一定形式的教育的权利,是现代社会的一项基本人权。我国宪法将受教育权规定为我国公民的一项基本权利。①但是我国公民究竟应享有哪些受教育权呢？是不是任何公民都有接受任何阶段任何形式教育的权利呢？我国公民的受教育权的性质如何,... 相似文献
8.
探究农村女性受教育权的法律保障 总被引：3，自引：0，他引：3
受教育权是一项基本人权,女性应享有与男性平等的受教育的权利。然而,由于受社会、经济、宗教、性别差异等因素的影响,我国农村女性受教育权遭受侵害的情况还很严重。因此,我们应当从法律的角度对农村女性的受教育权给予特别保护,从而保障农村女性受教育权的真正实现。 相似文献
9.
受教育权是公民的一项基本人权,我国宪法和法律赋予了公民受教育的权利。与传统的权利相比,公民受教育权是指公民享有的由国家保障其实现的接受教育的权利。在我国,少数民族公民受教育权有其自身的特点及其现实的意义,因而,少数民族公民受教育权实现的特殊要求是确保少数民族聚居区经济、政治和文化等社会发展的基础性前提条件。 相似文献
10.
受教育权作为一项基本人权,对人的发展与完善具有奠基作用。20世纪中叶以来,联合国教科文等国际组织发布了有关受教育人权的系列报告,受教育人权理念经历了从“注重学会生存技能”“赋能学习化社会”到“增进全球共同利益”“重新构想教育社会契约”的嬗变,凸显了受教育人权理念内涵不断深化的政治逻辑、经济逻辑与文化逻辑、教育逻辑,充分体现了受教育人权理念对个体乃至人类命运共同体的深切关照。在充满不确定性的未来,我们在制定教育法的过程中,需要充分吸纳不断发展变化的受教育人权理念的丰富内涵,以真正保障公民受教育的权利,从而充分发挥教育的潜能与价值。 相似文献
11.
《Cambridge Journal of Education》2012,42(1):67-81
While respect for human rights has long been endorsed as a goal of education, only recently has significant attention been paid to the need to incorporate rights within educational processes. Current support for human rights within education, however, has a variety of motivations. This paper provides a theoretical exploration of these diverse justifications, leading to a normative proposal. A distinction is made between status-based and instrumental approaches. Human rights within education can be justified from a status-based perspective on the basis of their indivisibility, meaning that the right to education must not entail an infringement of other rights. Yet while rights-respecting environments are important sites of learning, instrumental justifications can be a source of concern, if the goals in question are irrelevant or inimical to the enhancement of rights. An argument, therefore, is put forward for a simultaneous realisation of embodiment of and opportunity for learning about human rights. 相似文献
12.
在我国失地农民是一个庞大的群体,这一群体的基本人权在城市化过程中并没有得到切实的实现。他们的基本人权主要包括生存权、劳动权、平等权,发展权。失地农民个人应该增强自己的维权意识,自觉维护人权;政府应改革征地补偿制度和户籍制度,建立健全社会保障体系,完善有关人权的法律法规与就业制度和推进经济建设,加大对失地农民的政策扶持力度;社会各界都要行动起来,包括企业、城市居民、教育机构和社区等都要发挥各自的作用,为维护失地农民的基本人权而努力。 相似文献
13.
马克思主义人权观教育是大学生思想政治教育工作的必要内容;实践中,要遵循整体性、多样性和客观性原则,要重视大学生的马克思主义人权观教育,要把马克思主义人权理论纳入高校的思想政治教育体系,要借鉴接受理论以把握教育针对性,要善于利用网络以拓展教育途径。 相似文献
14.
人权是人类成员即所有的人都应享有的基本权利，人权的存在形态是由应有权利、法定权利和实有权力构成的互相关联的体系。“受教育权”是一种基本的人权，它具有神圣性、不可缺少性、不可取代性和不可转让性。“受教育权”主要由“受教育机会权”、“受教育条件权”与“获取受教育结果权”构成。从应有、法定与实有三个方面来考察“受教育权”，我国公民之“受教育权”的保障与实现取得了巨大成就，但在新形势下也存在不少问题，分析和研究之，有重要的意义。 相似文献
15.
崔巍 《江西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2012,45(3):38-42
公民教育属于人权的范畴,并与人权概念一样,其内容也与时俱进地发生变化。从自由权、社会权、发展权的演进中,可以看到公民教育在人权中的方向。同样,宪法也给予了公民教育的肯定地位。公民教育在社会发展中的重要地位足以使其在构建公民社会起到关键作用。 相似文献
16.
人权保护有三个基本途径：1．人权的经济保护。经济发展是充分实现人权的基础，是维护生存权、促进发展权的直接动力。实施可持续发展战略，是解决贫困问题、维护生存权和发展权的长远的最佳的方略。2．人权的政治保护。国家作为人权保护的主体在人权保护中有重要作用。3．人权的法律保护。有人权的国内法保护和国际法保护两种。 相似文献
17.
学生的法律地位是教育法学研究的基本理论问题,也是我国教育法治进程中的重大实践问题。学生的权利与义务是学生法律地位的体现。基于现行教育法律关于学生权利义务的规定,可将学生的法律地位归纳概括为民法上的特殊民事主体和行政法上的特殊行政相对人。但当前学生受教育权的可诉性、程序性、公正性不足,有必要将受教育权的救济纳入行政司法审查的范围,对学生权利进行全面救济,并兼顾实体权利与程序权利,依法保障学生受教育权的实现。 相似文献
18.
Michael P. Donnelly 《Journal of School Choice》2016,10(3):283-296
AbstractHomeschooling is legal and growing in many countries but is virtually forbidden by law in Germany and a few others. The European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) has reviewed and upheld this ban. Is home education a human right? How do these courts employ their jurisprudence of proportionality to find banning home education does not violate relevant constitutional or human rights norms? Why does Germany forbid home education? Why does the ECtHR uphold Germany’s position? What does this divergence imply about the right of home education and the jurisprudence of these courts? If the promise of human rights is individual liberty then a system that justifies or endorses state control of education for the purpose of cultural conformity can be said to be far too statist for a free and democratic society. In this article, I argue that both the German Constitutional Court (FCC) and the ECtHR have adopted an approach to education rights that is profoundly mistaken. I conclude that home education is a right of parents and children that must be protected by every state. Nations that respect and protect the right of parents and children to home educate demonstrate a commitment to respecting human rights; nations that do not, such as Germany and Sweden need to take steps to correct their failure to protect this important human right. 相似文献
19.
《Cambridge Journal of Education》2012,42(1):37-51
This paper argues against a trend of human rights education, where human rights are taught in the form of citizenship education. In my view, citizenship education and human rights education cannot be taken as replaceable for each other. Underpinning the idea of citizenship is a distinction between ‘politically qualified’ and ‘politically unqualified’ persons. This distinction implies a violation of human rights in the name of social solidarity and security. This paper will argue that citizenship education could imply discrimination/exclusion although it claims to promote solidarity and human rights. Furthermore, the qualification of having rights is not dependent on citizenship but simply in human life itself. Three educational implications are discussed. Firstly, human rights and citizenship education cannot be seen as equivalents. Secondly, educators should be alert to the dangers of possible exclusion implied in citizenship education. Finally, this paper proposes different suggestions for human rights and citizenship education separately. 相似文献
20.
Kris Gledhill 《Educational Philosophy and Theory》2013,45(12):1252-1261
One question arising in the context of universities as corporate entities is the reason why being an ‘entity’ is important. One relevant consideration is whether it is necessary or sensible that a ‘community of scholars’ has the status of a ‘corporation of scholars’ because that ensures that the community abides by various obligations, including those based on considerations of equity and rights. This article examines universities as legal entities in light of the human rights framework, with a focus on the right to tertiary education to illustrate the more general question of rights. It does so by setting out, first, the use of legal personhood for corporations generally and universities particularly. Secondly, it notes that the modern international regime for the protection of human rights commenced with the idea that its obligations should rest on all elements of society, including corporations. Thirdly, it point out that the developed regime has a focus on the obligations of states to secure rights, including through ensuring remedies against corporate and other private actors. Finally, the main part of the article examines the substance of the right to education and suggests that its realisation is most likely if there are obligations on universities, which they can adopt themselves. 相似文献