共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 31 毫秒
1.
An Australian Research Council project, Electronic Health Records: Achieving an Effective and Ethical Legal and Recordkeeping Framework, brought together experts in recordkeeping, privacy, confidentiality, intellectual property, torts, medical law and ethics
to address concerns with a major networked Australian health record initiative. The research required developing innovative
research tools and understandings, which provides an exemplar for methodologies to address multiple-disciplinary concerns
and priorities that set a precedent for future inter-disciplinary collaborative projects concerned with the analysis and design
of such systems. This article provides an analysis of the research design, methods, tools and findings of the project which
operated within a records continuum framework.
Dr. Livia Iacovino is an Honorary Senior Research Fellow with the Centre for Organisational and Social Informatics in the Faculty of Information Technology, Monash University, Australia, where she has taught the legal and ethical curricula in the recordkeeping courses. Her research and publications are focused on interdisciplinary perspectives of archival science, law and ethics, in particular ownership, access and privacy of electronic records. She has been a Chief Investigator for Electronic Health Records: Achieving an Effective and Ethical Legal and Recordkeeping Framework, an Australian Research Council Discovery Grant and has collaborated internationally with the InterPARES Project and the International Records Management Trust. Barbara Reed has been involved with industry, teaching, research and standards setting, in the course of her 25 years in the recordkeeping and information management communities. She has been the Director of The Recordkeeping Institute since 2000 and has over 20 years consulting experience to all levels of government, private and public companies and not-for profit organisations. She has developed and negotiated Standards for recordkeeping at state, national and international levels. She has published widely on metadata definition and deployment, recordkeeping, interoperability, management of resources over time and digital preservation. She was a Research Associate in the Electronic Health Records: Achieving an Effective and Ethical Legal and Recordkeeping Framework, 2002–2005, and Clever Recordkeeping Metadata, 2005–2006, both ARC Projects. 相似文献
| Barbara ReedEmail: |
Dr. Livia Iacovino is an Honorary Senior Research Fellow with the Centre for Organisational and Social Informatics in the Faculty of Information Technology, Monash University, Australia, where she has taught the legal and ethical curricula in the recordkeeping courses. Her research and publications are focused on interdisciplinary perspectives of archival science, law and ethics, in particular ownership, access and privacy of electronic records. She has been a Chief Investigator for Electronic Health Records: Achieving an Effective and Ethical Legal and Recordkeeping Framework, an Australian Research Council Discovery Grant and has collaborated internationally with the InterPARES Project and the International Records Management Trust. Barbara Reed has been involved with industry, teaching, research and standards setting, in the course of her 25 years in the recordkeeping and information management communities. She has been the Director of The Recordkeeping Institute since 2000 and has over 20 years consulting experience to all levels of government, private and public companies and not-for profit organisations. She has developed and negotiated Standards for recordkeeping at state, national and international levels. She has published widely on metadata definition and deployment, recordkeeping, interoperability, management of resources over time and digital preservation. She was a Research Associate in the Electronic Health Records: Achieving an Effective and Ethical Legal and Recordkeeping Framework, 2002–2005, and Clever Recordkeeping Metadata, 2005–2006, both ARC Projects. 相似文献
2.
3.
Brian Edward Hubner 《Archival Science》2007,7(3):195-206
Census information of some form has been collected in Canada since the 1611 census of New France. Aboriginal people, identified
or not, have been included in these enumerations. The collection of this information has had a profound impact on Aboriginal
people and has been an element that has shaped their relationship with the dominant society. In response, Canadian Aboriginal
people have often resisted and refused to co-operate with census takers and their masters. This article is an examination
of this phenomenon focused on the censuses conducted in the post-Confederation period to the present. A census is made to
collect information on populations and individuals that can then be used to configure and shape social and political relations
between those being enumerated and the creators of the census. However, the human objects of the census are not just passive
integers and they have resisted its creation in a number of ways, including being “missing” when the census is taken, refusing
to answer the questions posed by enumerators or even driving them off Aboriginal territory. A census identifies elements of
the social order and attempts to set them in their “proper” place and those who do not wish to be part of that order may refuse
to take part. Archivists and historians must understand that the knowledge gained in a census is bound with the conditions
of own creation. This has been noted by contemporary Aboriginal researchers who often state that the archival record of their
people often distorts history and reflects the ideas and superficial observations of their Euro-Canadian creators. Changes
to the Census of Canada since 1981, have increased the participation rate and therefore changed the nature of the record.
Brian Edward Hubner is currently Acquisition and Access Archivist at the University of Manitoba Archives & Special Collections. He was previously employed at the Archives of Manitoba, in Government Records; Queen’s University Archives, Kingston; and at the National Archives of Canada, Ottawa. He has a Master of Arts (History, in Archival Studies) from the University of Manitoba, and a Master of Arts (History), from the University of Saskatchewan. The 2nd edition of Brian’s co-authored book on the history of the Cypress Hills of Saskatchewan and Alberta is being published in 2007. He has published articles and delivered conference papers on Canadian Aboriginal peoples including “Horse Stealing and the Borderline: The N.W.M.P. and the Control of Indian Movement, 1874-1900.” His current research interest focuses on relationship between Canada’s Aboriginal Peoples and Canadian archives. Brian is married and has two children. 相似文献
| Brian Edward HubnerEmail: |
Brian Edward Hubner is currently Acquisition and Access Archivist at the University of Manitoba Archives & Special Collections. He was previously employed at the Archives of Manitoba, in Government Records; Queen’s University Archives, Kingston; and at the National Archives of Canada, Ottawa. He has a Master of Arts (History, in Archival Studies) from the University of Manitoba, and a Master of Arts (History), from the University of Saskatchewan. The 2nd edition of Brian’s co-authored book on the history of the Cypress Hills of Saskatchewan and Alberta is being published in 2007. He has published articles and delivered conference papers on Canadian Aboriginal peoples including “Horse Stealing and the Borderline: The N.W.M.P. and the Control of Indian Movement, 1874-1900.” His current research interest focuses on relationship between Canada’s Aboriginal Peoples and Canadian archives. Brian is married and has two children. 相似文献
4.
Joanna Sassoon 《Archival Science》2007,7(2):133-145
The emergence of the new format of electronic/digital records provides the opportunity for archivists to reconsider the presumed
format-neutrality of professional practice. As research in electronic records has served to re-emphasise, without an understanding
of the needs and forms of material, then the work of archivists can have a profound impact on the evidential value and long-term
research potential of the material. This paper attempts to broaden the debate about the requirements of all archival formats,
and to build a new regime of 21st-century format specialists.
Dr. Joanna Sassoon is currently seconded to Edith Cowan University as Senior Lecturer in the School of Computer and Information Science. Her permanent position is in the State Records Office of Western Australia. She has long experience in managing archival collections, and has written extensively on a range of topics including digitisation, the effect of institutional practice on archival materials, environmental and indigenous history, and photographs as archives, and her work has been recognised with two Mander-Jones awards from the Australian Society of Archivists. She holds a Ph.D. in history with distinction from the University of Western Australia. 相似文献
| Joanna SassoonEmail: |
Dr. Joanna Sassoon is currently seconded to Edith Cowan University as Senior Lecturer in the School of Computer and Information Science. Her permanent position is in the State Records Office of Western Australia. She has long experience in managing archival collections, and has written extensively on a range of topics including digitisation, the effect of institutional practice on archival materials, environmental and indigenous history, and photographs as archives, and her work has been recognised with two Mander-Jones awards from the Australian Society of Archivists. She holds a Ph.D. in history with distinction from the University of Western Australia. 相似文献
5.
6.
This article critically analyses the views of a group of international experts on ISO 15489, the international records management
standard, during the final phase of a project assessing its impact in the UK. It provides an overview of the entire research
project and then focusses on the use of a modified Delphi study in gathering the views of experts. The Delphi technique is
a research method not commonly used in records management and archival science research; relevant background to the technique
is provided though the purpose of the article is not to provide a comprehensive review of it as a research method. A modified
electronic version of the technique was used which was qualitative rather than quantitative and not focussed on the more usual
consensus building. The article concludes that a Delphi study is a practical technique for conducting research which seeks
to gather views from geographically dispersed participants in a timely, time-effective and convenient manner for all those
involved. The use of a modified Delphi study proved to be extremely valuable in facilitating discussions of complex emergent
issues about the role, value and nature of standards for records management, in particular ISO 15489, and about the future
of ISO 15489, at a higher level of abstraction. The article makes a contribution in two areas: first in terms of the views
of a group of leading international records management experts on the first international standard in records management;
and second, in terms of the use of a research method which has previously been little used in the records management discipline.
Julie McLeod is a Professor in Records Management in the School of Engineering, Computing and Information Sciences at Northumbria University, joining after a career in industry. She has worked on innovative work-based and distance learning training and education initiatives with the BBC, Deutsche Bank, The National Archives and the European Central Bank. A member of the BSI and ISO committees on records management standards work, she has conducted JISC and AHRC funded research in records management, has published widely and holds positions on the boards of several esteemed journals. In 2006 she became a member of the AHRC Peer Review Panel for Libraries, Museums and Archives and in 2007 was awarded a Personal Chair by Northumbria University. Sue Childs is a Research Fellow within the Information Society Research and Consultancy Group at the School of Computing, Engineering and Information Sciences, Northumbria University. Her research interests include: records management; information society; health information; evidence-based practice particularly systematic reviews; user needs; ICT, information and critical/evaluative skills. She has worked on many research projects funded by a wide range of organisations. She has worked with Julie McLeod on records management projects funded by the AHRC and JISC; she also teaches on research methods courses. She edits the ‘Health Information on the Internet Journal’, published by the Royal Society of Medicine Press. 相似文献
| Sue ChildsEmail: |
Julie McLeod is a Professor in Records Management in the School of Engineering, Computing and Information Sciences at Northumbria University, joining after a career in industry. She has worked on innovative work-based and distance learning training and education initiatives with the BBC, Deutsche Bank, The National Archives and the European Central Bank. A member of the BSI and ISO committees on records management standards work, she has conducted JISC and AHRC funded research in records management, has published widely and holds positions on the boards of several esteemed journals. In 2006 she became a member of the AHRC Peer Review Panel for Libraries, Museums and Archives and in 2007 was awarded a Personal Chair by Northumbria University. Sue Childs is a Research Fellow within the Information Society Research and Consultancy Group at the School of Computing, Engineering and Information Sciences, Northumbria University. Her research interests include: records management; information society; health information; evidence-based practice particularly systematic reviews; user needs; ICT, information and critical/evaluative skills. She has worked on many research projects funded by a wide range of organisations. She has worked with Julie McLeod on records management projects funded by the AHRC and JISC; she also teaches on research methods courses. She edits the ‘Health Information on the Internet Journal’, published by the Royal Society of Medicine Press. 相似文献
7.
Eric Ketelaar 《Archival Science》2007,7(4):343-357
Around 1800 the “paradigm of patrimony” recognized archives as cultural and national patrimony. That paradigm was, however,
not a new revolutionary invention. It had been fostered by a “patrimony consciousness” which had developed in the seventeenth
and eighteenth centuries. The value of archives as a patrimony to future generations was acknowledged first in the private
sphere by families and then by cities—communities of memory becoming communities of archives.
Eric Ketelaar is Professor of Archivistics in the Department of Mediastudies of the Faculty of Humanities of the University of Amsterdam. He is Honorary Professor at Monash University, Melbourne (Faculty of Information Technology). He engages with the social history of archives by researching the history of recordkeeping and the use of records and archives, resulting in articles on thirteenth century Dordrecht, sixteenth century Leiden, the eighteenth century Court of Holland, Dutch public administration 1795–1950, and record creation in the context of systematic management in Dutch enterprise, 1870–1940. He is particularly interested in the relationship between recordkeeping and organizational, professional, and national cultures, past and present. This led him further to study the role of records and archives in times of oppression, war, liberation, and reconciliation. 相似文献
| Eric KetelaarEmail: |
Eric Ketelaar is Professor of Archivistics in the Department of Mediastudies of the Faculty of Humanities of the University of Amsterdam. He is Honorary Professor at Monash University, Melbourne (Faculty of Information Technology). He engages with the social history of archives by researching the history of recordkeeping and the use of records and archives, resulting in articles on thirteenth century Dordrecht, sixteenth century Leiden, the eighteenth century Court of Holland, Dutch public administration 1795–1950, and record creation in the context of systematic management in Dutch enterprise, 1870–1940. He is particularly interested in the relationship between recordkeeping and organizational, professional, and national cultures, past and present. This led him further to study the role of records and archives in times of oppression, war, liberation, and reconciliation. 相似文献
8.
This article is a general introduction into the special issue of Archival Science on “archiving research data”. It summarizes
the different contributions and gives an overview of the main issues in this special field of archiving. One of the leading
questions is how and why research data archives differ from public record offices. In the past, the developments in these
two worlds have been rather separate. There are however signs that they are converging in the digital world. In particular,
this can be seen in the areas of metadata and Internet dissemination as these are strongly influenced by the rapid changes
in information technology. These changes have also led to important new developments in the infrastructure of research data
to which special attention is paid. New concepts such as collaboratories, data curation, Open Access and the Open Archives
Initiative are discussed.
相似文献
| Heiko TjalsmaEmail: |
9.
Jennifer S. Milligan 《Archival Science》2007,7(4):359-367
Curious Archives examines the creation of the museum of archives, the Musée de l’Histoire de France, at the Imperial Archives
of France under the direction of Leon de Laborde, 1858–1867. This museum was intended as a crucial tool for publicizing the
Archives and educating the public, but also represented a break from the Archives’ role as administrative storehouse both
in practice and in the popular imagination. The museum’s conception and reception reveal conflicts around the Archives’ mission
and contents, particularly regarding public interest, the potential dangers of public curiosity, and nature of documentary
and historical knowledge in nineteenth-century France.
相似文献
| Jennifer S. MilliganEmail: |
10.
Beatrice S. Bartlett 《Archival Science》2007,7(4):369-390
This article describes the first half century of the Communist government’s supervision and management of the central-government
archives of the last two dynasties. Immediately with the Communist ascent to power in 1949, the new government took great
interest in assembling and protecting the country’s archival documents, readying the Ming-Qing archives for access to scholars,
and preparing for publication of selected materials. By the 1980s Beijing’s Number One Historical Archives, in charge of the
largest holding of Ming-Qing documents, had become the first Chinese authority to complete a full sorting and preliminary
catalogues for such a collection. Moreover, to facilitate searches, an attempt has recently begun to create a subject-heading
system for these and other holdings in the country. In the first half century’s final decades, foreign researchers were admitted
for the first time and tours and international exchanges began to take place.
相似文献
| Beatrice S. BartlettEmail: |
11.
Deciphering the diplomatic archives of fifteenth-century Italy 总被引：1，自引：1，他引：0
Paul Marcus Dover 《Archival Science》2007,7(4):297-316
This article examines the repercussions of the explosion of paper documents generated by new developments in diplomatic practice
in Italian city-states between 1450 and 1500. With the proliferation of resident ambassadors whose daily duties centered around
writing and receiving letters and other documents, a flood of written material was produced. The management and archiving
of all this material triggered the formation of new institutions, of new methods of working, and of new personnel. Though
the results of the efforts at archiving were often fitful and incomplete, the governments of the Italian peninsula henceforth
sought to collect, control and preserve diplomatic documents so that they could be referenced in the future.
Paul M. Dover is Assistant Professor of History at Kennesaw State University in Kennesaw, Georgia. He has published several articles on the political and intellectual history of Renaissance Italy. He is currently writing a book on ambassadors and the culture of diplomacy in fifteenth-century Italy. He holds a PhD from Yale University. 相似文献
| Paul Marcus DoverEmail: |
Paul M. Dover is Assistant Professor of History at Kennesaw State University in Kennesaw, Georgia. He has published several articles on the political and intellectual history of Renaissance Italy. He is currently writing a book on ambassadors and the culture of diplomacy in fifteenth-century Italy. He holds a PhD from Yale University. 相似文献
12.
1 This essay demonstrates that initiatives in the imperial periphery, not least in Western Australia, played a significant role in the development of recordkeeping systems in the British Empire and Commonwealth. Local circumstances, including the adequacy of local revenues and the availability of skilled staff, played their part in shaping the systems. Nonetheless, there are overarching patterns. The need to maintain security provided a potent driver for the creation of confidential registries. The need to carry out basic functions influenced the design of recordkeeping systems far more than any shared ‘imperial imaginary’. The diverging work patterns of colonial capitals and of district administrations tended to produce distinct recordkeeping systems. The development of integrated registry systems may have played a part in the development of the Secretariat as an institution of colonial government. 相似文献
13.
Jacob Soll 《Archival Science》2007,7(4):331-342
This article examines the archival methods developed by Colbert to train his son in state administration. Based on Colbert’s
correspondence with his son, it reveals the practices Colbert thought necessary to collect and manage information in his state
encyclopedic archive during the last half of the 17th century.
相似文献
| Jacob SollEmail: |
14.
Andy Weissberg 《Publishing Research Quarterly》2008,24(4):255-260
This article analyzes current industry practices toward the identification of digital book content. It highlights key technology
trends, workflow considerations and supply chain behaviors, and examines the implications of these trends and behaviors on
the production, discoverability, purchasing and consumption of digital book products.
相似文献
| Andy WeissbergEmail: |
15.
16.
17.
18.
On rank-based effectiveness measures and optimization 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
Many current retrieval models and scoring functions contain free parameters which need to be set—ideally, optimized. The process
of optimization normally involves some training corpus of the usual document-query-relevance judgement type, and some choice
of measure that is to be optimized. The paper proposes a way to think about the process of exploring the space of parameter
values, and how moving around in this space might be expected to affect different measures. One result, concerning local optima,
is demonstrated for a range of rank-based evaluation measures.
相似文献
| Hugo ZaragozaEmail: |
19.
Astrid M. Eckert 《Archival Science》2007,7(3):223-244
The article examines the transition of (West) German archivists from the Nazi period to the time of Allied occupation and
on into the early years of the Federal Republic of Germany. After considering the extent of the profession’s nazification,
the article focuses on Allied denazification efforts after the war and discusses the strategies archivists devised in order
to maneuver through these dangerous times. In the end, the archival profession mastered the transition with only minor “denazification
damage.” The article closes with an examination of the consequences of the continuity of personnel especially among the leading
archivists of the former Prussian Archival Administration (Preussische Archivverwaltung) for the reconstruction of the archival
profession in West Germany.
Astrid M. Eckert is an Assistant Professor of Modern European History at Emory University in Atlanta. (M.A., University of Michigan, 1995; M.A. Free University Berlin, 1998; Dr. Phil. Free University Berlin, 2003). Before moving to Emory, she was a Research Fellow at the German Historical Institute (GHI) in Washington, D. C. (2002–2005). Her 2003 Dissertation on the history of captured German records after the Second World War was awarded the Friedrich Meinecke Dissertation Prize of Free University’s history department, and the biennial Hedwig Hintze Dissertation Award of the German Historical Association. The work was published in German in 2004 and will appear in English with Cambridge University Press as Fight for the Files: The Western Allies and the Captured German Archives after World War II. Her research interests include the history of postwar Germany, transnational historiographical questions, and, most recently, the political and cultural history of the inter-German border. 相似文献
| Astrid M. EckertEmail: |
Astrid M. Eckert is an Assistant Professor of Modern European History at Emory University in Atlanta. (M.A., University of Michigan, 1995; M.A. Free University Berlin, 1998; Dr. Phil. Free University Berlin, 2003). Before moving to Emory, she was a Research Fellow at the German Historical Institute (GHI) in Washington, D. C. (2002–2005). Her 2003 Dissertation on the history of captured German records after the Second World War was awarded the Friedrich Meinecke Dissertation Prize of Free University’s history department, and the biennial Hedwig Hintze Dissertation Award of the German Historical Association. The work was published in German in 2004 and will appear in English with Cambridge University Press as Fight for the Files: The Western Allies and the Captured German Archives after World War II. Her research interests include the history of postwar Germany, transnational historiographical questions, and, most recently, the political and cultural history of the inter-German border. 相似文献
20.
Fotis Lazarinis Jesús Vilares John Tait Efthimis N. Efthimiadis 《Information Retrieval》2009,12(3):230-250
With increasingly higher numbers of non-English language web searchers the problems of efficient handling of non-English Web
documents and user queries are becoming major issues for search engines. The main aim of this review paper is to make researchers
aware of the existing problems in monolingual non-English Web retrieval by providing an overview of open issues. A significant
number of papers are reviewed and the research issues investigated in these studies are categorized in order to identify the
research questions and solutions proposed in these papers. Further research is proposed at the end of each section.
相似文献
| Efthimis N. EfthimiadisEmail: |