共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 46 毫秒
1.
In two pairs of three-stage conditioned taste aversion experiments, we examined the effects of delay interval (1 or 21 days)
between the second and third stages, and of context in which the animals spent the delay (same as or different from the context
of the other stages) on latent inhibition (LI) and spontaneous recovery following extinction. In the LI experiments (Experiments
1A and 1B), the first stage comprised nonreinforced presentations to saccharin or to water. In the second stage, rats were
conditioned by saccharin paired with LiCl. In the extinction experiments (Experiments 2A and 2B), the order of the stages
was reversed. For all experiments, Stage 3, the test stage, consisted of three presentations of saccharin alone. There was
a super-LI effect in the saccharin-preexposed group that spent the 21- day delay in the different context (Experiment 1A).
When the delay was spent in the same context, there was no difference in the amount of LI between the short- and long-delay
groups (Experiment 1B). Conversely, there was a spontaneous recovery effect in the long-delay/same-context group (Experiment
2B), but not in the long-delay/different-context group (Experiment 2A). The pattern of results, incompatible with current
explanations of delay-induced changes in memory performance, was interpreted in terms of an interaction between the delay
conditions (same or different delay context), which modulate the extinction of previously acquired context-CS-nothing associations
(during CS-alone presentations), and primacy effects. 相似文献
2.
In three conditioned taste aversion experiments, we examined the roles of several variables in producing super-latent inhibition (LI). This effect, greater LI after a long interval than after a short interval between the conditioning and the test stages (De la Casa & Lubow, 2000), was shown to increase with the number of stimulus preexposures (0, 2, or 4; Experiment 1) and with the length of the delay interval (1, 7, 14, or 21 days; Experiment 2). Furthermore, super-LI was obtained when the delay interval was introduced between the conditioning and the test stages (Experiments 1 and 2), but not when it was introduced between the preexposure and the conditioning stages (Experiment 3). The results are discussed in relation to interference explanations of LI. 相似文献
3.
Four experiments are reported in which pigeons first learned one wavelength discrimination (green S+, yellow S?) and then the reversal; finally, after various delays, they were tested for wavelength generalization in extinction. In Experiment 1, the two problems were learned in different contexts; testing in Context 1 produced maximal responding to green in only half of the subjects, even when testing was delayed 30 days. In Experiment 2, testing of the subjects repeatedly in both contexts showed good control by each context after a 30-day delay. In Experiment 3, both problems were learned in the same context, and all gradients showed recency, peaking at yellow, even after 30 days. In Experiment 4, the subjects learned a series of reversals in the same context, terminating in yellow, S+, green, S?, and their gradients peaked at yellow, even after a 30-day delay. In Experiments 3 and 4, the gradients became flatter with increasing delays, and they were flatter in Experiment 4 (after three reversals) than in Experiment 3 (after one reversal). The location of the peak was not affected by delay, but only by testing in a context that had been uniquely associated with Problem 1 (Experiments 1 and 2). It is proposed that the location of gradient peaks indicates what is being remembered, whereas the slope of the obtained gradients indicates how well the target memory has been retrieved. 相似文献
4.
Nicholas J. Grahame Robert C. Barnet Lisa M. Gunther Ralph R. Miller 《Learning & behavior》1994,22(4):395-408
Treatments that attenuate latent inhibition (LI) were examined using conditioned suppression in rats. In Experiment 1, retarded conditioned responding was produced by nonreinforced exposure to the CS prior to the CS-US pairings used to assess retardation (i.e., conventional LI). In Experiment la, retarded conditioned responding was induced by preexposure to pairings of the CS and a weak US prior to retardation-test pairings of the CS with a strong US (i.e., Hall-Pearce [1979] LI). Both types of LI were attenuated by extensive exposure to the training context (i.e., context extinction) following the CS-US pairings of the retardation test. Experiment 2 examined the specificity of the attenuated LI effect observed in Experiment 1. After preexposure to two different CSs in two different contexts, each CS was paired with a US in its respective preexposure context. One of the two contexts was then extinguished. This attenuated LI to a greater degree for the CS that had been trained in the extinguished context. Experiment 3 differentiated the roles in LI of CS-context associations and context-US associations. Following preexposure to the CS in the training context, LI was reduced by further exposure to the CS outside the training context. This observation was interpreted as implicating the CS-context association as a factor in LI. Thus, the results of these experiments suggest that LI is a performance deficit mediated by unusually strong CS-context associations. Implications for Wagner’s (1981) SOP model and Miller and Matzel’s (1988) comparator hypothesis are discussed. 相似文献
5.
Four experiments used a within-subjects design with rats to study the effects of preexposure on the restoration of fear responses
(freezing) to an extinguished conditioned stimulus (CS). In each experiment, rats were preexposed to one CS (A), but not to
another (B), and then were exposed to pairings of each of these CSs with an aversive unconditioned stimulus (US). In each
experiment, there was less freezing to A than to B across extinction, showing a latent inhibitory effect of preexposure. There
was no differential recovery to A and B following either a US reexposure (Experiment 1) or a delay interval (Experiment 2). However, when a delay interval included US reexposure, there was greater recovery to the preexposed CS, A, than to the
nonpreexposed CS, B (Experiments 1, 3, and 4). These results suggest that the effects of US reexposure and delay combine to affect recovery from the depressive effects
of CS-alone exposure. The results are consistent with the view that US reexposure produces better mediated conditioning of
CSs that are strongly associated with the context. The results may additionally reflect an effect of preexposure on the learning
produced by extinction. 相似文献
6.
Three experiments with rat subjects examined the effects of contextual stimuli on performance in appetitive conditioning. A 10-sec tone conditioned stimulus (CS) was paired with a food-pellet unconditioned stimulus (US); conditioning was indexed by the observation of headjerking, a response of the rat to auditory stimuli associated with food. In Experiment 1, a context switch following initial conditioning did not affect conditioned responding to the tone; however, when the response was extinguished in the different context, a return to the original conditioning context “renewed” extinguished responding. These results were replicated in Experiments 2 and 3 after equating exposure to the two contexts (Experiment 2) and massing the conditioning and extinction trials (Experiment 3). The results of Experiment 1 also demonstrated that separate exposure to the US following extinction reinstates extinguished responding to the tone; this effect was further shown to depend at least partly on presenting the US in the context in which testing is to occur (Experiments 2 and 3). Overall, the results are consistent with previous data from aversive conditioning procedures. In either appetitive or aversive conditioning, the context may be especially important in affecting performance after extinction. 相似文献
7.
Retention interval effects are seen in taste-aversion learning when single-element aversions are significantly weaker 24 h after conditioning compared with tests at later intervals. This report contains three experiments which suggest that the source of the increased drinking at the 1-day interval is nonassociative interference produced by the novel conditioning episode. In Experiment 1, a parametric analysis demonstrated that aversion strength increased monotonically over a 30-h period following conditioning, and that by 48 h after conditioning it was stabilized. In Experiment 2, a single US preexposure was used to reduce the novelty of the US prior to conditioning. As a result, animals preexposed to the US had stronger taste aversions than did non-preexposed controls at a 1-day retention interval; however, no differences were seen at a 5-day interval. Experiment 3 investigated whether the counterintuitive outcome of Experiment 2 was due to the summation of environment-illness and taste-illness associations at the 1-day test. The results ruled out the summation argument; the US preexposure did not need to be presented in the conditioning context to strengthen the aversion at the 1-day interval. Collectively, these results suggest that the presentation of a surprising US can interfere with the retrieval of the taste-illness association for a short period after conditioning, and that this contributes to the retention interval effect. 相似文献
8.
Chana K. Akins 《Learning & behavior》1998,26(4):416-426
Three experiments were conducted to investigate direct and modulatory influences of context in the conditioned sexual behavior of male Japanese quail. A preference test procedure was used to assess the acquisition of contextual excitation. In Experiment 1, following direct context-unconditioned stimulus (US) pairings, male quail shifted their contextual preference from an initially preferred context to one in which they received copulatory opportunity with a female quail (US). Unpaired control group subjects did not demonstrate this shift in preference. This place preference procedure was used in Experiments 2 and 3 to assess contextual excitation when context was trained in the presence of a discrete conditioned stimulus (CS). Experiment 2 provided evidence that context can modulate responding to a discrete CS. In Experiment 3, we varied the spatial contiguity between the context and the US. Some subjects received the US directly in the training context, whereas other subjects received the US in an alternate context. Contextual excitation was evident only in subjects that received the former. Thus, there is a dissociation between the modulatory and excitatory properties of context in sexual conditioning that may depend on the context-US spatial contiguity. 相似文献
9.
In two experiments, we examined how preexposure to discriminative stimuli and introduction of a 21-day retention interval
affected the latent inhibition (LI) and perceptual learning (PL) of rats in a choice-maze discrimination task. Experimental
groups were preexposed to three wall patterns, one in each of three arms of a maze. Control groups were preexposed only to
white arms. PL groups were trained to discriminate A versus B, and LI groups, to discriminate A or B versus C. The A and B
patterns shared many elements not shared with the C pattern. In Experiment 1, both at the end of training and after the subsequent
retention interval, the PL groups performed better than controls, whereas the LI groups performed worse. In Experiment 2,
inserting the 21-day retention interval between preexposure and discrimination training disrupted final measures of LI but
not PL performance. Implications for current concepts of PL and LI are discussed. 相似文献
10.
The effects of element or compound preexposure and retention interval were examined in three experiments with the taste-aversion paradigm. In Experiment 1, preexposure to the elements of a compound flavor produced less latent inhibition to the compound than did preexposure to the compound itself when a 1-day preexposure-conditioning interval was used. However, preexposing the elements or the compound resulted in equivalent latent inhibition effects when a 21-day retention interval was used. In Experiment 2, a similar pattern of results was observed when the conditioning-test interval was manipulated. Experiment 3 explored the effect of element or compound preexposure when preexposure and test were carried out in different contexts. Attenuated latent inhibition following preexposure to the elements was found when preexposure and test were carried out in the same context. In contrast, preexposure to the elements resulted in as much latent inhibition as did preexposure to the compound when the context was switched from preexposure to testing. The implications of these findings for a retrieval-oriented view of latent inhibition are discussed. 相似文献
11.
Matías López Patricia Gasalla Mercedes Vega Cheryl L. Limebeer Erin M. Rock Katharine J. Tuerke Holly Bedard Linda A. Parker 《Learning & behavior》2010,38(2):177-186
The present experiments, using the latent inhibition (LI) paradigm, evaluated the effect of nonreinforced exposure to saccharin
on the acquisition of an LiCl-induced saccharin aversion as measured by conditioned disgust reactions in the taste reactivity
test and conditioned taste avoidance in a consumption test. When rats were preexposed to saccharin by bottle exposure (Experiments
1 and 3), LI was evidenced only by conditioned taste avoidance (bottle testing), but not by conditioned disgust reactions
(intraoral [IO] testing). On the other hand, when rats were preexposed to saccharin by IO infusion (Experiments 2 and 3),
LI was evidenced only by conditioned disgust reactions, but not by conditioned taste avoidance. Experiment 4 showed that LI
of conditioned disgust reactions does not appear to be affected by a context shift from preexposure to testing phases. These
results show that the expression of LI of both conditioned taste avoidance and conditioned disgust reactions depends critically
on a common method of flavor exposure during preexposure and testing. 相似文献
12.
Lynn J. Hammond 《Learning & behavior》1995,23(3):349-356
Three experiments were conducted to demonstrate that the place where an organism has been, before the organism is moved to a place with aversive consequences, can also become aversive through classical conditioning. In Experiment 1, two groups of 8 mice were exposed to three different contexts in succession, with a single shock occurring in the third context. The distal context was a putative 3-min conditioned stimulus (CS) for freezing; the second context was a delay manipulation; and the unconditioned stimulus (US) occurred in the proximal context. The group delayed for 15 sec showed significantly more freezing to the distal CS context than did the group delayed for 3 h. In a second experiment, conditioning to the distal context was demonstrated with a discrimination procedure for 8 more mice by using two different distal contexts as CS+ and CS? for the proximal context with shock. On CS+ days, 3 min of exposure to the distal context was followed within 5 sec by placement in the proximal box where shock occurred, whereas on CS? days, exposure to a second distal context was followed immediately by return to the home cage. Very strong differences in freezing between the CS+ and CS? distal contexts were found in all 8 mice after 14 days of conditioning. In a third experiment, the discriminative procedure was repeated for 9 more mice, with two changes. More objective stabilometertype activity measures were substituted for observed freezing, and, in addition to the CS+ and CS? distal context trials, each mouse was also exposed to a third discriminative distal context, which was followed by 15 min in a delay chamber followed by shock in the proximal context. This discrimination procedure with the activity suppression measure again resulted in significant differences between the contexts. The CS+ context and the context followed by a 15-min delay did not differ, but both of them differed from the CS? context. 相似文献
13.
Luís Gonzalo De la Casa Auxiliadora Mena Juán Carlos Ruiz-Salas Esperanza Quintero Mauricio R. Papini 《Learning & behavior》2018,46(1):49-59
Three experiments explored the link between reward shifts and latent inhibition (LI). Using consummatory procedures, rewards were either downshifted from 32% to 4% sucrose (Experiments 1–2), or upshifted from 4% to 32% sucrose (Experiment 3). In both cases, appropriate unshifted controls were also included. LI was implemented in terms of fear conditioning involving a single tone-shock pairing after extensive tone-only preexposure. Nonpreexposed controls were also included. Experiment 1 demonstrated a typical LI effect (i.e., disruption of fear conditioning after preexposure to the tone) in animals previously exposed only to 4% sucrose. However, the LI effect was eliminated by preexposure to a 32%-to-4% sucrose devaluation. Experiment 2 replicated this effect when the LI protocol was administered immediately after the reward devaluation event. However, LI was restored when preexposure was administered after a 60-min retention interval. Finally, Experiment 3 showed that a reward upshift did not affect LI. These results point to a significant role of negative emotion related to reward devaluation in the enhancement of stimulus processing despite extensive nonreinforced preexposure experience. 相似文献
14.
In six experiments, we examined taste and compound taste/taste aversions at different retention intervals. In Experiment 1, saccharin aversions were significantly weaker 1 day after conditioning than 21 days after conditioning. This effect was determined not to be caused by the aftereffects of illness or differential hydration. With the use of a saccharin/denatonium compound, Experiment 2 demonstrated overshadowing of a denatonium aversion at 21- and 1-day retention intervals, Experiment 4 showed a potentiated saccharin aversion only at the 21-day retention interval, and both Experiments 2 and 4 revealed that the aversion of the taste-only controls was stronger at the later retention interval. Experiments 3 and 5 demonstrated that the differences at the two retention intervals were not caused by unconditioned changes in taste preference. Finally, Experiment 6 showed that extinction of the conditioning environment prior to testing results in stronger saccharin aversions than occur in nonextinguished controls. Collectively, these experiments suggest that testing within a 24-h period after conditioning will result in significantly weaker taste aversions. Also, these results support a retrieval-competition explanation that may account for the weakened aversions at the 1-day testing interval of both groups conditioned to single elements and those conditioned to compounds. 相似文献
15.
In four trace-conditioning experiments with rats, the influence on the blocking of differences between the blocking cue-unconditioned
stimulus (US) and the blocked cue-US trace intervals was explored. Experiment 1 demonstrated blocking despite the blocked
cue’s having a shorter trace interval than the blocking cue in both elemental (Phase 1) and compound (Phase 2) training. In
Experiment 2, blocking was attenuated when the blocked cue had a longer trace interval than did the blocking cue in both elemental
and compound training. In Experiments 3 and 4, the trace intervals of the two cues during compound training were matched (i.e.,
unlike in Experiments 1 and 2, neither had temporal priority). Blocking was attenuated when the blocking cue trace interval
in the elemental phase was shorter (Experiment 3) or longer (Experiment 4) than the compound cue trace during compound training.
The findings indicate that subjects encode interstimulus intervals, and they further suggest that cue competition is greatest
when the competing cues have the same temporal information as the US. 相似文献
16.
Two experiments were conducted to examine the effects of US preexposure on differential conditioning of the rabbit’s nictitating membrane response. Both experiments consisted of three phases: a 10-day US preexposure phase, a 7-day differential conditioning phase, and a 3-day retardation of learning test for inhibition. In Experiment 1, US preexposures retarded the development of excitation to CS+ but facilitated the development of inhibition to CS?. In Experiment 2, half of the preexposed subjects received the preexposures in one experimental environment and differential conditioning in a second environment. The remaining preexposed subjects received both phases in a single environment. Retarded excitatory and facilitated inhibitory conditioning were observed only in the preexposed subjects that received both phases in the same environment. Rabbits that received a context shift performed at control levels. The results are discussed in terms of current theories of US preexposure effects, and the best account was provided by a modified associative theory. 相似文献
17.
Tolerance to an environmental cold challenge in rats is eliminated when cold exposure occurs in a context different from the adaptation context, indicating that learning mechanisms play a role in thermoregulation (Riccio, MacArdy, & Kissinger, 1991). This finding, analogous to outcomes obtained with drug tolerance, was investigated in the present study. Experiment 1 demonstrated that a change in both proximal and distal contextual cues disrupts an established cold adaptation, an outcome consistent with the view that associative processes contribute to the tolerance. In Experiment 2, although cold tolerance persisted over a 7-day retention interval, the disruption of tolerance by a shift in context was attenuated with the delay of testing. This finding suggests that the precise stimulus attributes of the context were forgotten over the interval. Experiment 3 demonstrated that cold-tolerance disruption is due to the actual change in context and not to novelty of the test context. Experiment 4 showed that changing the context associated with each cold exposure impaired the development of tolerance. The results of these experiments provide additional evidence that cold tolerance is regulated at least partially by associative learning processes. 相似文献
18.
Gonzalo Miguez Bridget McConnell Cody W. Polack Ralph R. Miller 《Learning & behavior》2018,46(3):265-280
This report is part of a larger project examining associative interference as a function of the nature of the interfering and target associations. Lick suppression experiments with rats assessed the effects of context shifts on proactive outcome interference by latent inhibition (LI) and Pavlovian conditioned inhibition (CI) treatments on subsequently trained Pavlovian conditioned excitation treatment. LI and CI were trained in Context A during Phase 1, and then excitation treatment was administered in Context B during Phase 2, followed by tests for conditioned excitation in Contexts A, B, or C. Experiment 1 preliminarily established our LI and CI treatments and resulted in equally retarded acquisition of behavioral control when the target cue was subsequently trained as a conditioned excitor and tested in Context A. However, only CI treatment caused the target to pass a summation test for inhibition. Centrally, Experiment 2 consisted of LI and CI treatments in Context A followed by excitatory training in Context B. Testing found low excitatory control by both LI and CI cues in Context A relative to strong excitatory control in Context B, but CI treatment transferred to Context C more strongly than LI treatment. Experiment 3 determined that LI treatment failed to transfer to Context C even when the number of LI trials was greatly increased. Thus, first-learned LI appears to be relatively context specific, whereas first-learned CI generalizes to a neutral context. These observations add to existing evidence that LI and CI treatments result in different types of learning that diverge sharply in transfer to a novel test context. 相似文献
19.
David Chiszar Santford Wellborn Mary Ann Wand Kent M. Scudder Hobart M. Smith 《Learning & behavior》1980,8(3):511-511
In Experiment 1, boid and colubrid snakes defecated with shorter latencies after their home cages were cleaned than did control snakes that received equivalent handling without cage cleaning. Experiment 2 replicated this finding and also showed that snakes exposed to clean cages emit more tongue flicks after reintroduction to the clean home cage than do control snakes. Experiment 3 demonstrated that cage cleaning has similar effects in two species of crotalid snakes. The increase in tongue flicking after cage cleaning is interpreted as investigatory behavior and reflects the fact that snakes respond to the absence of familiar odors. Experiment 4 showed that a clean cage containing odors derived from snake feces produces less tone-flick exploration and fewer defecation responses in rattlesnakes than does a clean cage without such odors. 相似文献
20.
David Chiszar Santford Wellborn Mary Ann Wand Kent M. Scudder Hobart M. Smith 《Learning & behavior》1980,8(3):505-510
In Experiment 1, boid and colubrid snakes defecated with shorter latencies after their home cages were cleaned than did control snakes that received equivalent handling without cage cleaning. Experiment 2 replicated this finding and also showed that snakes exposed to clean cages emit more tongue flicks after reintroduction to the clean home cage than do control snakes. Experiment 3 demonstrated that cage cleaning has similar effects in two species of crotalid snakes. The increase in tongue flicking after cage cleaning is interpreted as investigatory behavior and reflects the fact that snakes respond to the absence of familiar odors. Experiment 4 showed that a clean cage containing odors derived from snake feces produces less tone-flick exploration and fewer defecation responses in rattlesnakes than does a clean cage without such odors. 相似文献