首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
相似文献
 共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 93 毫秒
1.
对高职英语教学中形成性评价的思考与实践   总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1  
高职学生英语学习形成性评价体系由教师评价、学生相互评价和学生自我评价等部分构成,学生学习档案是形成性评价的有效工具。实践证明,实施形成性评价有助于提高学生的学习成绩。  相似文献   

2.
魏薇 《教育教学论坛》2012,(25):130-131
所谓形成性评价,是"对学生日常学习中的表现、取得的成绩及所反映出的情感、态度和策略等方面的发展"做出的评价。学生是学习的主体,学生的积极参与和自主学习是形成性评价顺利实施的前提。形成性评价关注的是学习的过程、学习目标和学生的主动性。学生利用形成性评价可以反馈自己分析在英语学习中的薄弱点和存在的问题,也可以独立地管理自己的英语学习过程。这样,学习者的自主性在形成性评价的过程中得到了提高,而学生的自主性反过来又可以提高形成性评价的效果。可见,形成性评价提高了学生的自学能力和自我管理能力。  相似文献   

3.
《英语课程标准》要求建伊能激励学生学习兴趣和自丰学习能力发展的评价体系。陔评价体系由形成性评价和终结性评价构成。在英语教学过程中应以形成性评价为主。形成性评价是“对学生的学习过程进行的评价,旨在确认学生的潜力,改进和发展学生的学习”。  相似文献   

4.
梁会然 《考试周刊》2014,(14):110-110
随着传统教学向新课程教学转变,教学评价方式由传统单一的评价向多样性的形成性评价过渡。在初中英语教学中要实施形成性评价,因为形成性评价是一种以学生为主体,关注学生学习过程,旨在挖掘学生学习潜力,发展学生学习能力的可持续性评价。  相似文献   

5.
形成性评价是针对学生整个学习过程进行记录的评价。阐述了形成性考核的目的及专业英语课程形成性评价的构建方法,提出了适合专业英语课程的形成性评价方案,并在教学实践中加以应用。应用结果显示,形成性评价可以提高学生的独立学习能力,促进学生的自主与合作学习,加深学生对本专业的认知和对专业知识的理解程度。  相似文献   

6.
马晓伟 《考试周刊》2011,(39):134-136
对学生进行成绩的评价是教学过程中的一个重要环节。小学英语评价的内容极其广泛,不仅包括语言知识、语言技能和实际交际能力,而且应包括学生在学习过程中所表现出来的学习态度。评价还可分为测试性评价和非测试性评价两种形式。测试性评价即终结性评价,非测试性评价即形成性评价。形成性评价关注学生的学习过程,鼓励所有学生合作学习,提倡在学习中培养性格,反映学习过程中的成功,使具有不同特长的学生都有施展自己才华的机会,让学生的学习兴趣得到更好的延续,学习习惯得到较好的培养,自学能力和交流能力得到发展。小学英语的主要目的之一即通过一系列的教育教学活动激发学生学习英语的兴趣,养成良好的学习习惯。因此,教学评价不仅要注重学生学习的结果,而且需注重学生学习的过程。评价形式应以形成性评价和终结性评价并重,但形成性评价在整个教学过程中应该占主导地位。  相似文献   

7.
龚丽霞 《考试周刊》2013,(42):88-88
作为重要的教育评价理论,形成性评价是基于学生学习全方位不间断地观察、记录和反思作出的发展型评价。在初中英语教学活动中推广形成性评价的目的是"激励学生学习,帮助学生有效调控自己的学习过程,使学生获得成就感,增强自信心,培养合作精神"。形成性评价使学生"从被动接受评价转变成为评价的主体和积极参与者"。本文对形成性评价方法进行了简单介绍,并就如何在初中英语教学活动中善用形成性评价,有效提高中学生英语学习的自觉性进行了阐述。  相似文献   

8.
目前高中英语教学中常规使用的评价方式——测试是一个重结果的评价方式,不利于学生成长,为此笔者认为推广形成性测试很有必要. 一、形成性测试的概念 形成性评价是对学生学习过程中的学业成绩、学习状态、学习态度、学习情感等各方面的发展作出的评价,是一种发展性、过程性、全面性的学生学习生活的评价,它强调学生的主体参与性,学生是评价的重要参与者.而形成性测试实际是形成性评价的教学测试部分,它是在测试过程、测试结果中体现形成性评价特点的测试,其目的是评价学生的学习状况,诊断学生的知识构成,激发学生的学习兴趣,强调师生的共同参与.  相似文献   

9.
评价分为终结性评价和形成性评价。终结性评价体系过于单一,不符合英语写作课程的特点;而形成性评价模式对学生、教师、教学过程都有正面的影响。在写作过程中,形成性评价模式调动了学生的积极性,培养了学生自主学习的意识。在形成性评价模式下学生能够积极参与教学任务,不断地自我调整,逐步摸索出适合自己的学习方法,从而实现自主学习,提高写作能力。  相似文献   

10.
黄金晶 《考试周刊》2009,(37):141-142
在英语教学中,对于学生的评价一般分为终结性评价和形成性评价。与前者相比,形成性评价能更好地激发学生的学习兴趣和反映学生的学习过程。本文从现行英语教学中评价体系存在的问题入手,对形成性评价的作用等方面加以阐述。  相似文献   

11.
The debate between summative and formative assessment is creating a situation that increasingly calls to mind the famous slogan in George Orwell’s (1945) Animal Farm – ‘Four legs good, two legs bad’. Formative assessment is increasingly being portrayed in the literature as ‘good’ assessment, which tutors should strive towards, whereas summative assessment is ‘bad’ assessment on which tutors should minimise their focus, instead moving towards formative assessment (Taras 2005). By revisiting the origins of formative assessment, this article aims to bring back to light that summative and formative assessment are connected at their inception. It highlights how research in the literature has unintentionally created a harmful dichotomy between summative and formative assessment, and it identifies some attempts in the literature to re-connect formative and summative assessment. This paper challenges the dichotomy in the literature and invites those in higher education to consider the fundamental idea that formative and summative assessment need to work in harmony and should not be seen as contrary to each other.  相似文献   

12.
Among contemporary means of enhancing student learning, formative assessment is perhaps one of the most important and effective. While formative assessment ideas and practices have been shown to have a proven record enhancing student learning, these practices are slow to be fully integrated into teachers’ day-to-day classroom practices. This study describes a collaborative effort among university faculty and public school partners to train teachers in the skills and practices of formative assessment. Regarding teachers’ involvement in the formative assessment professional development, findings highlight that 1) teachers’ participation in the professional development efforts did strengthen their understanding of both general knowledge of formative assessment and the use of formative assessment practices, 2) teachers’ plans to use the strategies in the future were related to their understanding of these strategies, and 3) in-depth and comprehensive understanding of formative assessment practices were critical to concrete applications of such practices in their classrooms. With respect to the impact on student learning, an overall effect size of .41 was found for teachers who utilized a formative assessment strategy compared with district averages for similar learning objectives when the practices were not used.  相似文献   

13.
ABSTRACT

This study investigates the relationship between students’ attitudes towards formative assessment and summative assessment and aims to enrich the understanding of formative and summative assessment from the students’ perspective. A total of 3,019 Hong Kong primary school students responded to a newly developed instrument. Overall, students reported positive instrumental yet negative affective attitudes towards formative and summative assessment. Girls had less negative affective attitudes towards formative assessment, but more positive instrumental attitudes towards formative and summative assessment than boys. Grade 4 students consistently scored higher than Grade 5 and Grade 6 students in assessment attitudes. The gender and grade differences were statistically significant, but had small effect size. Moreover, it was found that students’ affective and instrumental attitudes to formative assessment positively predicted students’ affective and instrumental attitudes to summative assessment.  相似文献   

14.
The implementation of formative assessment strategies is challenging for teachers. We evaluated teachers’ implementation fidelity of a curriculum-embedded formative assessment programme for primary school science education, investigating both material-supported, direct application and subsequent transfer. Furthermore, the relationship between implementation fidelity and teacher variables was explored. N = 17 German primary school teachers participated in professional development on formative assessment, N = 11 teachers formed a control group. Teachers’ implementation fidelity was evaluated via classroom observations student ratings and an analysis of students’ workbooks, focusing on the frequency and quality of intended formative assessment elements (assessments, feedback and instructional adaptations). Regarding direct application, treatment group teachers’ implementation fidelity was high, with slight variations in quality. Regarding transfer, implementation fidelity was lower but teachers still implemented more formative assessment elements than the control group. Teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge and their evaluation of the formative assessment intervention were associated with implementation success.  相似文献   

15.
The study investigates one mathematics teacher’s implementation of formative assessment and its effects on students’ self-regulated learning (SRL). A questionnaire administered before and after the eight-month long intervention shows a significant effect, compared to two control classes, on students’ motivational beliefs involved in SRL. Qualitative data shows a notable enhancement of the students’ SRL behavior in the classroom. Analysis of the teacher’s implemented formative assessment shows a practice integrating several aspects of formative assessment, and provides empirical evidence of what formative assessment with large effects on students’ SRL may look like and how it fits with models of SRL development.  相似文献   

16.
This exploratory study of elementary school science examines questions central to policy, practice and research on formative assessment: What is the quality of teachers’ content-pedagogical and assessment knowledge? What is the relationship between teacher knowledge and assessment practice? What is the relationship between teacher knowledge, assessment practice and student learning? Drawing on multiple measures, hierarchical linear modelling and path analysis, results suggest that despite weaknesses in teachers’ content-pedagogical and assessment knowledge, teachers’ formative assessment practices are positively related to student learning. Relationships between teachers’ knowledge and assessment practices are mixed. Findings underscore both the potential and challenge of bringing effective formative practice to fruition as well as the need for continued research.  相似文献   

17.
Recognizing the importance of formative assessment, this mixed-methods study investigates how four teachers and 100 students respond to the new emphasis on formative assessment in English as a foreign language (EFL) writing classes in Norway. While previous studies have examined formative assessment in oral classroom interactions and focused on either studying students or teachers, little research has been conducted on formative assessment of writing where both students and teachers are studied. As such, this study provides new insight. The findings mostly indicate that contradictions are prevalent amongst teachers’ and students’ perceptions of formative assessment of writing. The contradictions revolve around feedback, grades, text revision, self-assessment, and student involvement. The identified contradictions suggest the need for developing a mutual understanding of formative assessment in order to make it useful and meaningful.  相似文献   

18.
形成性评价对大学英语教学的影响   总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1  
本文介绍了形成性评价与终结性评价的区别以及国内外形成性评价研究现状,用实验研究的方法分析了形成性评价对大学英语教学的影响。通过实验研究,结果显示:形成性评价方法有利于增强学生的英语学习动机,促使学生使用学习策略,有效培养学生的英语应用能力。  相似文献   

19.
邓冬至 《海外英语》2012,(2):103-105
The study mainly focuses on the influence of formative assessment upon learning strategies. So as to testify the effectiveness of formative assessment application in the promotion of students’ learning strategy in vocational college, the author has conducted a 20-week study on 76 freshmen in Sichuan College of Architectural Technology. The result shows that the application of formative assessment is mostly effective in the students’ adoption of affective strategy.  相似文献   

20.
Drawing on the programme for international student assessment 2009 US data-set, this study examines the relationship between formative assessment and students’ reading achievement using a structural equation modelling approach. We find that formative assessment is positively related to students’ reading achievement directly and indirectly (through teacher–student relationship and attitude towards reading) for all students. The direct relationship between formative assessment and reading achievement is significantly stronger for Black students than for White students, whether or not student socio-economic status (SES), gender and school mean SES are controlled for. The total relationship (the direct plus the indirect relationship) between formative assessment and reading achievement also appears to be stronger for Black students than for White students; however, the difference is not statistically significant whether or not we control for covariates. No significant difference is found between White and Hispanic students in terms of the direct and the total relationship between formative assessment and reading achievement. Using a nationally representative data-set, this study provides empirical evidence that formative assessment is positively related to students’ reading achievement in general. In addition, this study provides preliminary evidence to show the potential of formative assessment to help reduce achievement gaps between Black and White students. The implications and limitations of the study are also discussed.  相似文献   

设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号