共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 31 毫秒
1.
2.
作为档案工作追求的根本目标,档案服务社会化日益受到档案工作者和理论研究者的关注与重视。2005-2010年间,相关档案服务社会化的研究成果层出不穷,为档案服务社会化实践提供了强有力的理论支撑。本文选取档案服务社会化研究成果为考察对象,分析2005-2010年我国档案服务社会化研究的总体状况,以期进一步推动档案服务社会化的实践及理论进程。 相似文献
3.
4.
《Journal Of Archival Organization》2013,11(1-2):117-145
ABSTRACT This article explores the uses, practicality, and problems involved in creating online finding aids by state-funded university archivists across the nation. It examines various aspects of online finding aids such as financial considerations, its importance as a research tool, timelines, demographics, and use. The more technical side is also explored by inquiring how finding aids are created (e.g., EAD/XML, HTML), whether they have been reformatted before appearing on the web, and what archivists believe are the best methods for their creation. Finally, problems that the participants have encountered along the way are reviewed as well as how archivists dealt with them. The study involved 16 university archivists from state-supported institutions and one from a private university. The research for this article is based on the responses to a 20-question survey that was administered by the author by telephone or e-mail. The research was further supported by an examination of the recent literature that has appeared in archival journals as well as contacting archivists who are working on large online projects. The goal of this article is to assist archivists in identifying potential problems in the development of online finding aids while promoting their presence on the Internet as an important research tool. 相似文献
5.
Richard J. Cox 《Archival Science》2002,2(3-4):287-309
In this essay, the author ruminates on the relationship between collecting and archival appraisal. He argues that collecting
does not necessarily equal appraisal, although society and even archivists value it as an important function. The author stresses
that the critical need is for archivists to have a clear perspective, whether highly theoretical or immensely practical, of
what it is they hope to accomplish in appraising and that they need to document this process so that future researchers and
archivists can understand what archival appraisal meant. As it is, archives might become more valued as important cultural
symbols than for the records they actually hold. The notion of an “end” of collecting is in the sense that collecting is appraising,
but appraising elevated to a professional function requiring more care, deliberate thought, and self-evaluation. 相似文献
6.
《The Reference Librarian》2013,54(56):185-202
Abstract The archival profession is dynamic, adaptive, and undergoing continual change. This is particularly true in the areas of reference (or researcher) services and outreach. This article advocates reexamination of these functions, relating them more closely to each other. It maintains that archival records are underutilized and that archivists should address this issue by proactively reaching out to researchers and encouraging research use. Special skills are required to assist researchers to ensure that their use of archival records meets their information needs. The increasing creation and use of electronic records occasions even more attention to archivists' relations with researchers. Finally, there are several areas where archivists and researchers can and should work together to address common needs. 相似文献
7.
8.
Donghee Sinn 《Archival Science》2010,10(2):117-140
Archivists have long tried to understand users from the viewpoint of their archival collections. Such an approach misses important
perspectives about use in, and users of, archives; how they perform research and develop knowledge while using archives. This
study aims to comprehend the use of archival materials in research from the users’ perspective. It attempts to understand
users’ perceptions of the impact of archival collections on their research, how and when archival materials are involved in
the research process and how much weight they grant those materials in support of their thesis, from an actual research topic,
the No Gun Ri massacre. The case of the No Gun Ri incident provides a good example of how archival materials play a role in historical discussions and an opportunity to look
at archival contributions. No Gun Ri researchers acknowledged that archival documents were essential source materials for details about the incident and a major
player in stimulating controversies and, consequently, provided the impetus for further publications. General recordkeeping
situations also provided a circumstantial context of the incident. However, No Gun Ri researchers agreed that oral history was the most valuable and influential evidence for their major ideas and used archival
documents to provide hard facts about the details of oral history. There are some unique research patterns of No Gun Ri researchers identified in this study which are different from the typical assumptions of archivists. 相似文献
9.
在2018年各省政府陆续开启的新的一轮改革的过程中,档案机构一方面置身于全新的政府发展方向潮流中,另一方面其管理体制也从“局馆合一”转向了“局馆分离”。本文以政府机构改革为出发点,选取山东省省级机构的档案工作者为研究对象,采取半结构化访谈法收集数据,围绕档案机构在后机构改革时代应如何确立自身的定位这一研究问题,从宏观时代背景层面、中观政府改革层面和微观档案机构层面梳理了档案工作者在后机构改革时代的担忧和矛盾,并以这三个层面为导航,为档案机构在后机构改革时代的定位重塑提出建议。 相似文献
10.
11.
程长源是我国早期档案学家,他参与了20世纪30年代民国地方政府的档案工作改革,首次提出了档案十进分类法,并在档案编目、档案行政、档案保管、档案人员等方面提出了独到的见解。程长源的档案学思想是近代中国档案学思想体系的一个重要组成部分,对当前的档案学理论研究和实践工作仍具有借鉴价值。 相似文献
12.
编码档案著录标准（EAD）的开发、实施和评价 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
编码档案著录标准 (EAD) 是档案管理员为改善著录和利用馆藏的方式而开发的一种标准，始于20世纪90年代。EAD以SGML作为编码语言，并以SGML DTD（文件类型定义）形式表示EAD内容与结构。EAD的开发和实施是极为迅速和广泛的,它作为一种档案著录标准，具有很大的发展潜力。本文研究了EAD的起源、结构，分析了EAD的开发和实施现况，并从正反两方面对EAD进行了评价。 相似文献
13.
14.
记忆研究是21世纪人文社科领域学者探索的重要议题,同时以其独特的时空属性、文化张力和社会关怀为档案学界所关注。法国历史学家皮埃尔·诺拉（Pierre Nora）主编的多卷本《记忆之场》（les lieux de mémoires）探索了记忆与历史的关系,提出富有象征意味的“记忆之场”理论,其中蕴含着丰富而多元的档案学思想。本文从物质、象征、功能三个维度分析了“记忆之场”理论中的档案学思想,为重新思考现代档案工作在国民意识形成中的价值,充分发挥档案馆的纪念空间及认同功能,深入理解档案工作者的时代责任及其与历史学家的职责关系等方面带来启示。 相似文献
15.
Matthew Gordon-Clark 《Archival Science》2012,12(1):51-67
Over the past 10 years, a clear pattern of increasing sea-level rises has been recorded across the Pacific region. As international
work progresses on climate change, it is becoming clear that the expected rise of sea levels will have significant impacts
upon low-lying islands and nations. Sea-level rises of less than 0.5 m are generally suggested, although some researchers
have made more drastic projections. This paper describes the second stage of research into the impacts of climate change upon
the national archival collections in low-lying Pacific islands and nations. This article follows on the argument that archival
collection relocation will be necessary and sets the boundaries for further research. It will summarize current research into
climate change models and predicted sea-level rises, identify Pacific islands and nations that will be the focus of detailed
further research by setting a range of research boundaries based on the known geography of nations within the Pacific, arguing
for a specific measurement of “low-elevation”, outlining other risk factors likely to affect the survival of threatened national
archival collections and naming those islands and nations that are thus deemed to be at greatest risk of flooding and thus
likely to need to relocate their archives. The goal is to demonstrate how archivists might inform the governmental policy
in threatened islands and nations as well as what other nations might do to offer assistance. 相似文献
16.
17.
18.
21世纪开始之际，档案行业面临着严峻的挑战。本判断和分析了档案工作所面临的十项最为迫在眉睫的挑战，其中包括：电子献的管理；将更多的资源投入到非字资料方面；对于件的全球性的认识：为档案录和利用提出新的方法；档案利用和馆藏发展重点的扩大；对档案馆的信息管理进行更多的研究；美国档案工作协会的发展；档案事业各方资源的丰富；以及使档案行业不负众望地承担社会利益的保障的角色。 相似文献
19.
档案价值鉴定论作为档案鉴定理论是诞生以来认可最普遍的档案学思想,从档案的保存价值、价值判别主体、判别标准、价值内容等多个方面,逐步揭示了档案鉴定的一般规律,在中外档案鉴定的历史实践和现实工作中得到普遍遵循。但是,价值鉴定论把档案的“保存价值”建立在档案“未来用户需求”的基础上,不仅超出了档案工作者的能力极限和实践操作的可行性,而且使档案鉴定陷入“主观臆测”的悖论。对此,档案鉴定应立足于鉴定环节的基本职能,从档案作为“社会记忆”的本质出发,以档案的社会记忆作用为鉴定依据和标准,判别文件的“保存价值”,从主客体和主客观方面建构档案记忆鉴定理论。 相似文献
20.
A review of the archival literature, including records and information management, indicates that archivists’ have shown over
the last two decades an interest in program evaluation. The sparceness of the literature on the subject suggests a gap in
an articulate body of knowledge, based on solid theoretical and methodological foundations, for evaluation of archival programs
and activities. However, if they have not particularly investigated the subject from a theoretical perspective, archivists
have developed in their different organizations and working environment practical knowledge of and experience with program
evaluation. In large corporations as well as in public bureaucracies, they have been part of or subjected to specific or generic
program evaluation initiatives conducted by internal and external evaluators. But archivists might need now to go some steps
further and to look from a critical perspective at what is needed in order to get full benefit from program evaluation. 相似文献