共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 203 毫秒
1.
司晓蓉 《开封教育学院学报》2013,(3):65-66
同伴互评是英语写作教学的重要方法,同伴互评充分调动学生间的交流和互动,改变了学生在学习文章写作中的被动地位。通过实验研究发现,同伴互评较好地提高了学生英语写作的水平和评阅文章的能力。教师在此后的英语写作教学中应充分运用这种方法,力图使不同层次的学生都能受益。 相似文献
2.
运用独立样本T检验的研究方法,在对同伴互评在英语专业一年级学生写作课的功效进行实证研究基础上,通过同伴互评对学生写作能力影响的评价,发现大部分同学对写作课上同伴互评的教学模式持肯定态度,表明同伴互评是英语写作教学的一种有效方式。 相似文献
3.
《佳木斯教育学院学报》2017,(3)
应用文写作是高职英语写作教学的难点,过程中加入同伴互评能够让学生更有主动性。本研究以"投诉信"为例,编制应用文写作中同伴互评模式的测量评价表,并对其信度和效度进行测试。结果表明,信度和效度均达到较理想的要求。高职英语应用文教学进行同伴互评的过程中,"同伴互评模式"测量评价表,可作为测量评价工具使用。 相似文献
4.
同伴互评对非英语专业学生写作水平的影响 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
同伴互评是过程教学法的重要组成部分,本次调查研究表明,在英语写作教学过程中有效实施同伴互评能够改变学生对写作的态度以及提高写作水平。 相似文献
5.
本文基于当前八年级英语写作教学中存在的问题,论述同伴互评理论在八年级英语写作教学中的应用,建议教师运用同伴互评挖掘学生潜能,培养学生英语写作兴趣,锻炼学生合作探究能力和互评能力,进而提高学生的英语写作能力。 相似文献
6.
正评价是中学英语写作教学的重要组成部分。"英语课程标准"指出,学生应在评价中发挥主体作用。然而,传统的以教师为主体的评价方式剥夺了学生的主体性,在封闭的写作评价中学生没有参与。因此,他们缺乏对于自己作文的思考和认知,没有写作的积极性。基于此,笔者认为,在中学英语写作教学中,应积极开展同伴互评的评价反馈方式。同伴互评又称为同伴反馈、同伴反应、同伴评论、同伴评估等。[1]在同伴互评中,学生结对或是结成小组,阅读同伴的作文,提出问题并给出相应的评语或建议。同伴互评能帮助学生增强读者意识,降低写作焦虑,弥补自己作文中的不足,促进文本 相似文献
7.
同侪互评是二语写作教学中的重要手段。本研究调查同侪互评在非英语专业英语写作教学中的应用情况和效果。调查结果显示,大部分学生对同侪互评持积极态度,认为互评可帮助提高自己的写作水平,并会利用同伴的反馈意见对作文进行修改。同时,教师评阅和反馈仍然会得到学生更多的倚重。研究还发现,对同侪互评的态度及对同伴反馈的利用与学生的英语水平相关。总的来说,互评活动得到了学生的认可,对写作教学有积极作用,但互评较为费时,且受较多因素影响,需在实施过程中进行合理的组织和控制。 相似文献
8.
同伴互评在大学英语写作教学中的应用研究 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
朱艳华 《河南职业技术师范学院学报(职业教育版)》2008,(5):112-114
本文主要研究了将同伴互评运用于学生英语写作表达能力的评估问题。研究证明：同伴互评在大学英语写作教学中的运用是有效的;是培养和提高学习者自主性的有效途径。 相似文献
9.
在注重实践技能的今天,英语写作教学逐渐突破传统的以教师为中心的教学模式,转向以学生为中心的过程法英语写作教学,而同伴互评模式便是过程法教学的重要组成部分。本文正是通过对在中外合作项目中高职英语写作同伴互评过程的调查,综合高职学生英语写作能力的实际水平,探究同伴互评模式实施中的优缺点,进而加强对学生互评过程的规范和引导,趋利避害,以期提高互评的效率,增强学生的写作能力。 相似文献
10.
施宝林 《江西电力职业技术学院学报》2020,33(4):57-58
随着过程教学法在英语写作教学中的普及和推广,同伴互评在英语写作教学中有着教师反馈无法替代的作用。主要分析了影响同伴互评有效实施的因素,并重点从互评教学实施策略方面,探讨基于微信平台的同伴互评在英语写作教学中的有效运用,以期为大学英语写作教学提供借鉴和参考。 相似文献
11.
我国二语写作教学中"教师一次性评定"的传统评改模式制约着学生二语写作能力的发展。同伴互助交流并共同探讨写作任务,是将输出假设理论应用于二语写作的积极尝试。在二语写作过程中,通过学习者的互助互评,并反思同伴的意见反馈,对中国学生二语写作能力的构建和发展有积极的意义。 相似文献
12.
Despite the benefits of peer assessment, many teachers are not willing to implement it, particularly for low-achieving students. This study used the theory of planned behaviour to predict pre-service teachers’ intention to use peer assessment for low-achieving students. A total of 229 pre-service teachers in Singapore participated in the survey which consists of eight factors about peer assessment in writing: belief of knowledge source, belief of ability, belief of constructivist assessment, attitude, subjective norm, perceived behaviour control, behavioural intention, and intention for low-achieving students. Structural equation modelling was used to test hypothesized relationships of the eight factors. This study found that pre-service teachers’ beliefs about knowledge source and constructivist assessment significantly influenced their attitude towards peer assessment of writing. In addition, the attitude and perceived behaviour control were significant factors in shaping the intention of peer assessment. Lastly, pre-service teachers’ intention of implementing peer assessment for low-achieving students was influenced by both the intention of peer assessment and the belief of ability. 相似文献
13.
Ineke van den Berg Wilfried Admiraal Albert Pilot 《Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education》2006,31(1):19-36
Peer assessment is understood to be an arrangement with students assessing the quality of their fellow students’ writings and giving feedback to each other. This multiple‐case study of seven designs of peer assessment focuses on the contribution of peer assessment to the acquisition of undergraduates’ writing skills. Its aim is to arrive at an optimal design of peer assessment. Factors included in this study are: the quality of peer assessment activities, the interaction between students in oral peer feedback, students’ learning outcomes, and their evaluation of peer assessment. Most students took assessing the work of their fellow students seriously, and included the peer feedback in the revision of their work. In most conversations, students provided feedback in an evaluative manner. In others, the interaction was more exploratory. For peer assessment, we recommend a combination of written and oral peer feedback. 相似文献
14.
同伴互评在大学英语写作教学中发挥着重要的作用,这种教学方式不仅符合大学英语教学改革的趋势,而且对大学生的合作学习能力、社交能力及写作能力等都有帮助。以同伴互评详细清单为基础的自我评价报告和小组评价报告相结合的同伴互评模式,既能降低学生进行英语写作的惰性,减少主观评价和人际焦虑,又能形成合作互助的学习氛围,有利于建立大学英语写作的自主学习机制。 相似文献
15.
Shulin Yu Yiran Zhang Yao Zheng Kaihao Yuan 《Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education》2019,44(1):50-65
While research on peer feedback in second language (L2) writing at university/college level has proliferated, scholars have conducted less research on peer feedback in L2 academic and scholarly writing. Drawing upon multiple sources of data including semi-structured interviews, stimulated recalls, online interviews via WeChat, first and revised drafts of master’s theses, peer written feedback, audio-recordings of oral peer feedback conferences and the finalised master’s theses, this case study examines how three master’s students affectively, behaviourally and cognitively engaged with peer feedback on drafts of their thesis in a Master of Education programme at a Macau university. The findings show that the relationship between sub-constructs within each dimension and the relationships between the three dimensions of student engagement were interconnected in a dynamic and complex way. While there were individual differences among the three students’ engagement, their affective engagement could promote or negatively influence their behavioural and cognitive engagement. This study builds our understanding of the multifaceted nature of master’s students’ engagement with peer feedback. It provides pedagogical implications about how peer feedback can enhance the quality of master’s students’ academic writing and sheds light on how to guide students to establish scholarly learning communities in higher education. 相似文献
16.
Lanqin Zheng Panpan Cui Xin Li Ronghuai Huang 《Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education》2018,43(3):500-514
Research on peer assessment in higher education has been conducted for decades. However, ways to improve the quality of peer feedback and optimise student’ benefits through peer assessment remain a puzzle. The present study aimed to examine the impacts of synchronous discussion between assessors and assessees on writing performance, qualitative feedback quality, meta-cognitive awareness and self-efficacy in web-based peer assessment. A total of 64 undergraduate students participated in the study and were randomly assigned into either the experimental or control group. Participants in the experimental group conducted synchronous discussion after the first round of peer assessment, while students in the control group did not conduct any synchronous discussion. The results revealed that synchronous discussion between the assessors and assessees significantly improved the students’ writing performance, especially content writing skills, affective and meta-cognitive feedback quality, meta-cognitive awareness and self-efficacy. Practical implications, limitations and future directions are discussed based on these findings. 相似文献
17.
Huahui Zhao 《Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education》2018,43(7):1133-1145
Despite the increasing volume of research in peer assessment for writing, few studies have been conducted to explore teachers’ perceptions of its appropriateness for writing instruction. It is essential to understand teachers’ perceptions of peer assessment as teachers play an important role in whether and how peer assessment is implemented in their instruction. The current study investigated tertiary English writing tutors’ perceptions of the appropriateness of peer assessment for English as a Foreign Language writing in China, where peer assessment has been increasingly discussed and researched but only occasionally used in teaching. The current study scrutinised the reasons behind its limited use via in-depth exploratory interviews with 25 writing tutors with different teaching backgrounds. The interview data showed tutors’ limited knowledge of peer assessment and unanimous hesitation in using it. The former was explained by insufficient instruction and training in peer assessment. The latter relates to the incompatibility of peer assessment with the examinations-oriented education system, learners’ low English language proficiency and learning motivation, and the conflict of peer assessment with the entrenched teacher-driven learning culture. Suggestions are made about training and engaging teachers to effectively use peer assessment in instruction. 相似文献
18.
基于元认知理论框架的英文写作元认知知识由个体知识、 任务知识、 策略知识三个变量构成,当这三个变量共同作用于个体认知活动中的某项具体写作行为时, 促使写作行为发生的学习模式会对学习者的英文写作过程产生影响。本文基于一项同伴互评学习模式下的英文书面评语写作活动的实证个案研究,探讨了同伴互评学习模式与英文写作元认知因素的关联及学生的英文书面评语的话语倾向对写作元认知知识构建的影响因素。 相似文献
19.
《The Internet and Higher Education》2010,13(4):242-247
This study used an online peer assessment activity to help 47 college students to learn biology through writing. Each student submitted a biology writing report to an online system and then experienced three rounds of peer assessment. During the online peer assessment process, self, peer and expert evaluation scores for the writing were gathered across three rounds. It was found that self-assessment scores were not quite consistent with the expert's scores, but the peer assessment scores demonstrated adequate validity with the expert's evaluation. In particular, when the students had more rounds of peer assessment for reviewing the writing, the validity of the peer scores was enhanced. An examination of the students' writing scores, allocated by peers and expert, indicated that the students significantly improved the writing as the peer assessment activity proceeded. Content analyses of the students' writing also revealed that their writing gradually developed with significantly better coverage, richness and organization resulting from the online peer assessment activity. 相似文献
20.
Teresa McConlogue 《Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education》2012,37(1):113-123
Peer assessment of long written tasks poses particular problems as these tasks typically involve complex learning and solving ill‐structured problems which require divergent responses. Marking reliability of this kind of writing task is difficult to achieve. The author illustrates this through an evaluation of two implementations of peer assessment, involving 81 students, in a UK university. In these implementations, all peer assessor grades were returned to students (not just mean grades). In this way students were exposed to subjectivity in marking. The implementations were evaluated through questionnaires, focus groups, observations of lectures and tutor interview. While students reported a better understanding of quality in student writing as a result of their experience, many complained that peer assessors’ marks were not ‘fair’. The article draws on recent research on the reliability of tutor marking to argue that marking judgements are subjective and that peer assessment offers the opportunity to explore subjectivity in marking, creating an opportunity for dialogue between tutors and students. 相似文献