共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 218 毫秒
1.
苗素莲 《广东教育学院学报》2007,27(4):34-37
国家政策在一定程度上决定了我国民办高等教育的生存与发展.目前国家政策把民办高校定位于专科层次的高等职业教育.这种不合理的定位限制了民办高等教育的进一步发展.因此要调整民办高等教育的政策定位,允许有条件的民办高校进入本科及研究生教育领域,实现公办高校与民办高校共同发展. 相似文献
2.
我国公办民办高校公平竞争分析 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
毛勇 《山西师大学报(社会科学版)》2009,36(1)
我国民办高等教育发展大体上经历了起步阶段、建立阶段和发展阶段.民办高等教育在不同的发展阶段,国家或地方政府对民办高校的发展因时、因地采取或出台了不同的政策,公办、民办高校之间的竞争亦表现出不同的特征.在政府资助、师资竞争、生源竞争等方面,与公办高校相比,民办高校在发展过程中并非一直处于竞争的不公平状态,其所处的阶段不同,公办、民办高校之间公平竞争问题亦表现得有所不同. 相似文献
3.
民办高等教育资源具有社会性、稀缺性、时效性、连续性和能动性特点。民办高等教育资源的发展环境的特殊性表现有良好的宏观背景;区域环境的不平衡性;生态因子的多样性和多变性。民办高等教育资源的配置机制包括竞争与激励机制、法律与行政机制、自我发展与约束机制。优化民办高等教育资源配置还必须正确认识公办高校与民办高校之异同;正确认识政府职能,扩大民办高校发展空间。民办高校要有竞争意识,提供优质教育服务;建立现代民办大学制度。 相似文献
4.
随着我国民办高等教育在数量、规模、结构和功能上的发展和变化,不论是国家法规还是地方法规,支持与鼓励民办高校的发展仍是其主旋律。公办、民办高校在法规地位上的公平性不是从民办高校发展初期就存在的,而是随着民办高等教育的发展和时间的推移,国家和地方政府才从法规上予以制定的。国家与地方法规对民办高校设置、招生、收费这几个关系到早期民办高校生存与发展的根本问题上,对于公办高校而言,民办高校处于竞争的公平状态。 相似文献
5.
随着我国民办高等教育在数量、规模、结构和功能上的发展和变化,不论是国家法规还是地方法规,支持与鼓励民办高校的发展仍是其主旋律。公办、民办高校在法规地位上的公平性不是从民办高校发展初期就存在的,而是随着民办高等教育的发展和时间的推移,国家和地方政府才从法规上予以制定的。国家与地方法规对民办高校设置、招生、收费这几个关系到早期民办高校生存与发展的根本问题上,对于公办高校而言,民办高校处于竞争的公平状态。 相似文献
6.
我国民办高等教育脱胎于公办高等教育体系,其发展呈现出内部各组成部分之间以及和公办高等教育之间多样性与趋同性共存的特点.本文从市场环境与制度环境、地域性分化与阶层分化等维度分析了影响我国民办高等教育自身多样性和趋同性的因素及相关机制,并比较我国公、民办高校在发展方式与组织行为上的差异与趋同,进而探讨我国民办高等教育的发展以及高等教育系统的分化与整合问题. 相似文献
7.
陕西省民办高等教育考察报告 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
国家教育部老干部调研组 《教育研究》2003,(11)
陕西省民办高等教育发展很快 ,办学规模不断扩大 ,民办高等教育与公办高等教育共同发展的格局已初步形成。大胆进行教育创新 ,不断研究和解决面临的新情况、新问题 ,是陕西民办高等教育得以迅速发展的主要原因。为了促进民办高等教育进一步发展 ,应提高认识 ,提高质量意识 ,加强民办高校管理机构的建设 相似文献
8.
中国民办高校与公办高校趋同化研究 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
李维民 《陕西理工学院学报(社会科学版)》2006,24(1):65-70,78
本文以民办高校与公办高校在法律界定、教育教学、社会环境三个层面具有的趋同化现象进行分析、对比研究,旨在证明民办高等教育与公办高等教育存在本质的同源化和趋势的同质化。以唤起社会各界对民办高校的重新认识和定位,并以对待公办高校的积极态度和工作准则,力促民办高校的快速发展。同时也对民办高校应保持的办学特色给予肯定,避免个性的衰返,走向事物的反面。 相似文献
9.
《民办高等教育发展问题》课题组 《教育与职业》2005,(8):4-7
民办高等教育是指国家机构以外的社会组织或个人,利用非国家财政性经费,面向社会举办的高等教育事业。改革开放以来,特别是20世纪90年代以来,我国的民办高等教育(以下简称民办高教)获得了长足发展,在整个教育体系中的比重逐渐增大,质量不断提高,已经发展成为我国教育体系中重要的组成部分。但是,随着近年来公办高校的持续大规模扩招、公办高校民营机制独立学院的大量出现,民办高校与公办高校、民办高校之间的竞争日趋激烈。 相似文献
10.
民办高等教育的崛起是我国教育改革和发展中最重要的事件之一,随着民办高等教育的迅速发展,民办高校的党建工作越来越被提高到更加突出的地位。由于在领导体制、产权性质、管理方式等一系列问题上的特殊性,民办高校党建工作在发展过程中必然不能机械地照搬公办高校的做法,而应该结合民办高校的实际,不断创新与实践适合民办高校党建工作发展特点的新思路和新方法。 相似文献
11.
文章认为目前公立高校在资源获取、社会认可等方面都处于垄断和优势地位,民办高校无法与公立高校在同一平台上竞争。进一步的政策选择应在促进公平竞争的导向下,推进政策变革,为民办高校的发展提供平等的政策环境。 相似文献
12.
《Higher Education Policy》1998,11(4):257-279
The Malaysian Government is currently implementing policies aimed at major restructuring of tertiary education throughout the country. The stimulus for change derives from the needs of rapid economic development, and in particular a demand for a skilled and well-educated professional labour force, a long-established shortfall in the number of domestic places available in higher education, and a desire to raise participation rates. Measures include corporatisation of the universities in the public sector and active encouragement of state-owned enterprises and private corporations to establish universities in the private sector. While such changes represent a radical departure from the structure of the earlier system, retention of principles favouring such measures as affirmative action for student places and entry requirements for the majority bumiputera and promotion of Bahasa Malaysia as the predominant medium of instruction is likely to limit the effectiveness of the anticipated revolution in higher education which the Government proclaims this to be. 相似文献
13.
本文在概述香港高等教育发展历程的基础上，分析了世纪之初香港高等教育所面临的主要问题、重要改革举措和政策变革。香港高等教育在21世纪初的主要发展和改革表现在：素质评鉴机制的制度化，大学管治体制和教职员薪酬制度的改革，大学角色的再定位，社区学院和私立大学的发展，以及大学教育的国际化等方面。这些改革对香港高校与政府的关系、高校的角色定位等都带来重要影响。香港高等教育的国际化发展，将使香港高校在中国内地高等教育体系中扮演越来越重要的角色，推动香港与中国内地高等教育的互动和发展。为此，香港与内地之间需要加强在高等教育政策上的协调与合作。 相似文献
14.
Internationalising higher education: comparing the challenges of different higher education institutions in Malaysia 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
Internationalisation of higher education in Malaysia is seen as a means for improving and empowering higher education so that the higher education institutions in the country can become comparable to the best in the world. While the government has spelt out the directions as well as some of the targets for internationalisation, higher education institutions in the country have been internationalising for different reasons and with different levels of priority and intensity. Public universities, especially the older ones, have been engaged in internationalisation as part of their academic growth and development. Concurrently, a variety of private institutions of higher learning has evolved since the opening up of private higher education from the 1980s. These include private universities that have been established by large corporations, smaller private colleges that have been elevated to the status of degree-conferring institutions as well as branch campuses of foreign universities. The objective of this paper is to examine the different concepts and challenges of internationalisation faced by the different types of higher education institutions in the country, using the case study approach. It was found that in each of these cases, the concept of internationalisation and the challenges faced are different, although funding is raised as a problem in three of the four cases. These different challenges imply that current policies may have to be fine-tuned in order to address the different needs of these institutions in their respective efforts to internationalise. 相似文献
15.
私立高等教育的公共性 总被引：6，自引：0，他引：6
本文重点分析了私立大学的公共控制问题和私立机构利用公共资源的问题。私立学院和大学将政府提供的资助转换为学费,取得空前的繁荣。不同私立大学在市场化机制下的行为方式是不同的,优秀私立大学带动了学费水平的不断提高。营利性大学是美国高等教育领域中发展最快的一部分。成功商业模式的复制和学生资助政策,是营利性大学快速发展的两个关键因素。私立大学的出现也带来了教育质量等一系列问题。新的政策走向似乎更有利于营利性大学,使之有可能获得更多的公共资源。 相似文献
16.
我国民办高校发展状态整体平稳向好,但各类风险挑战一直伴随着我国民办高等教育发展进程。现存风险主要表现于资金财务、内部治理、教育质量等领域。建立民办高校办学风险防范机制有利于民办高校实现高质量发展。借鉴组织免疫理论来构建的民办高校风险防范分析框架包括非特异性免疫、特异性免疫、组织与环境间关系三大要素。非特异性免疫是民办高校事先进行的风险防范机制,包括组织结构、制度规则和组织文化。特异性免疫是民办高校后天形成的风险防范机制,包括组织监视、组织防御和组织记忆。在组织与环境间关系层面,要构建民办高校风险治理协同体系,净化社会文化环境,完善政策制度环境,构建常态化评估监测。 相似文献
17.
Public higher education in the Philippines 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
V. R. Cardozier 《International Review of Education/Internationale Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft/Revue internationale l'éducation》1984,30(2):193-198
Summary Clearly, the national government of the Philippines has decided to increase the number and comprehensiveness of its public colleges and universities. While private colleges and universities are likely to dominate higher education in the Philippines for the remainer of this century, it appears that public, tax-supported higher education will become increasingly available there. The Philippines is not a wealthy country but it is devoting a substantial portion of its national resources to public higher education. In 1983, higher education received 2.85 percent of the national budget, a figure that has been rising for years. Compared with some highly developed countries, this is not a large percentage, but for a country that has traditionally relied on private higher education, it is a major and growing investment in the public sector.While many of the better universities in the Philippines are private, many other private educational institutions are small and struggling. As their financial resources become more limited, and as less expensive, tax-supported higher education becomes increasingly available, a lot of the struggling private colleges will probably close. This process is also being hastened by actions of the government to upgrade quality, for example in the case of the many private colleges that developed after World War II. In an attempt to improve the academic quality of these marginal institutions, the Ministry of Education, Culture and Sports has been given extensive authority, and while its intrusion into private institutions has been modest by some measures, its requirements are affecting them all and will speed the demise of some. This is bound to lead to a stronger role for public higher education in the Philippines, a country that is striving diligently to improve the education and hence the quality of life of its people.The author is grateful to several officials of public and private colleges and universities whom he interviewed in the Philippines in March, 1983, and particularly to Mr. S.B. Bangug, Philippine Association of State Universities and Colleges, and Dr. Amado C. Dizon, Executive Vice President, Philippine Association of Colleges and Universities, who provided major assistance. 相似文献
18.
营利性民办高校的两个突出特点是具有营利性和民办的。营利性民办高校在我国有其存在的合理性和必要性,一方面有助于实行民办高校分类管理和扩大高等教育资源总量,另一方面有助于提升我国教育服务贸易国际竞争力。然而,当前我国营利性民办高校存在观念变革滞后带来的阻力、营利性民办高校试点无人喝彩、营利性民办高校缺乏政策保障等困境。为了更好的发展我国营利性民办高校,应做到转变观念,客观认识营利性民办高校;大力鼓励和支持营利性民办高校试点;给予营利性民办高校必要的优惠政策。 相似文献
19.
《Peabody Journal of Education》2013,88(2):18-40
The first step toward the introduction and development of university education in Kenya was taken in 1961, when the then Royal College, Nairobi, was elevated to university college status under a special arrangement with the University of London. However, it was not until 1970 that the University College of Nairobi attained university status. Although comparatively young, state universities in Kenya have accomplished a lot. They accomplished their initial mission of producing adequate human resources for the civil service, national corporations, and the private sector; graduated thousands of students; and helped foster an intellectual community in the country. In just 30 years, public higher education has expanded from a single university (the University of Nairobi) to the current 6 public universities: Nairobi, Moi, Kenyatta, Egerton, Jomo Kenyatta, and Maseno. In spite of this growth, public universities in Kenya have faced enrollments beyond their capacity to plan and finance, fiscal challenges beyond their control, a decline in quality beyond their anticipation, and weak management practices beyond their level of training. To help solve some of these problems, private universities have increasingly emerged and gained ground in the country as an alternative route to higher education provision. This article seeks to examine some of the trends, prospects, and challenges to the emergence and development of private university education in Kenya. 相似文献
20.
Daniel C. Levy 《Higher Education》2018,76(4):701-715
Societies’ relative use of private and public services is an abiding and significant issue of scholarly and policy interest. For higher education, however, there has hitherto been no comprehensive dataset and, accordingly, no extensive, reliable analysis of the private-public distribution. As this article provides both the dataset and the analysis, it allows us to discover both the size and geographical shape of global private higher education. Having grown greatly for decades, the private sector now holds a third (32.9%) of the world’s total higher education enrollment. We find striking patterns of concentration and dispersion. The several largest country systems account for much of the private enrollment but, simultaneously, private sectors now exist in all but a few systems; a stunning 97.6% of the world’s present enrollment is in systems with dual-sector provision. Societies no longer rely exclusively on public provision. We discover too that private enrollment concentrates mostly in developing regions, though it is noteworthy in developed regions as well. Asia and Latin America are the twin giants but in all regions, at least 10% of students are in the private sector. 相似文献