共查询到19条相似文献，搜索用时 140 毫秒
1.
张琳琳 《大连教育学院学报》2012,28(1):75-77
通过对费希特《论学者的使命》中关于"学者"和"学者使命"思想的认识和分析,探讨教育学者在促进教育学学科发展、推进教育发展和社会进步、促进人类道德水平的提高三个层面上的具体使命。 相似文献
2.
论当代中国教育学者的使命 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
"使命"意味着职责、任务和责任,它是人或组织存在的目的、方向与责任,代表着人或组织事业的价值取向与定位,规定着人或者组织存在的目的、方向和奋斗目标.教育学者的使命是教育学者职业生活信念的体现和表达,教育学者对其使命的透彻意识直接关涉着其学术思考的品质及其价值的发挥.在当前,中国教育学者应肩负起推进中国本土原创教育理论的建构、促进教育决策科学化以及传播教育理论从而提升社会的教育智识等三重使命.要完成这些使命,中国教育学者必须保持和恪守"学者"的品格、良知与天职,扎根中国鲜活的教育实践,在守护自身立场的基础上与国外学术话语和其他学科展开平等"对话",尽力将自己转变为公共知识分子,为我国教育事业的发展、经济社会的进步乃至整个人类社会的进步贡献自己的智慧. 相似文献
3.
费希特关于学者和学者使命的思想精辟、深刻,对当代教育学者的启示,一是教育学者应提高科研的专业化和科学化水平,促进教育学学科发展;二是教育学者应处理好理论与实践的关系,推进教育发展和社会进步;三是教育学者应保持独立人格和批判意识,提高社会道德风尚水平. 相似文献
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
为演绎"阅读教学‘课眼'模式",笔者在本地一所重点中学执教了苏联作家肖洛霍夫的<一个人的遭遇(节选)>.课堂里,我试图引领学生解决以下三个基本问题:(1)索科洛夫做了哪些梦?(2)索科洛夫为什么会做这些梦?(3)索科洛夫的"梦"像梦吗?"梦"在文中有什么作用?"梦",是建构本节课教学内容的"课眼". 相似文献
9.
10.
对我国高等教育问题的思考与争论,在近年来比较激烈。本文认为,讨论高等教育和大学的相关问题,首先要思考的是大学的基本使命是什么?只有认清了这个问题,才能够对今天中国大学的发展、高等教育的改革进行批评。通过对大学发展的历史以及教育理论演变情况的分析比较,本文认为,大学的使命有四个方面:教育使命、发展使命、道德使命、信仰使命。 相似文献
11.
12.
当前正处在由应试教育向素质教育转轨的艰难阶段,素质教育的实施中也出现了不少问题.针对"现在应不应该从应试教育模式向素质教育模式转变?"以及"具体应该如何有效地促使这一转变?"等一系列问题,提出了"教育模式要改,教育效益更要提." 相似文献
13.
"教育"定义逻辑的再审视 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
关于教育的定义,可以通过"教育是什么?""教育应该是什么?""教育可能是什么?"这样三个相互联系但考虑行文的原由不得不分开阐述的问题来进行分析阐释."教育可能是什么?"的命题为认识"教育是什么?"和"教育应该是什么?"提供了一个新的视野. 相似文献
14.
教育发展和改革的实践提出了研究教育现代化的主要目标、评价指标和实施策略等问题。本文拟以现代化的概念为起点,主要探讨：到底什么是教育现代化？它有哪些本质规定？达到什么水平就可以说初步实现教育现代化？ 相似文献
15.
This article seeks to answer the question, “What factors characterize highly productive educational psychologists?” Using qualitative research methods, we identified three top scholars in educational psychology—Richard Anderson, Richard Mayer, and Michael Pressley—and examined factors that influence their work. Although each scholar had a distinctive trademark characteristic, they had much in common. Each had an impressive lineage, gravitated to centers of excellence, was guided by routine, contributed significantly to educational service, pursued outside interests, strived for clarity in writing, collaborated heavily and effectively with students, and shared the same guiding philosophy regarding scholarly productivity. The article concludes with advice to budding educational psychologists and with unanswered questions that perhaps merit further research. 相似文献
16.
Over the years the debate on the aims, approaches, and impacts of formative assessment has never stopped to grow. Parallel to this growth is the awareness that it is crucial to understand what conceptions teachers have of assessment in order to guarantee more effective teacher education. This paper tries to connect these two fields of research: formative assessment and teacher education through an analysis of teachers’ conceptions: What do teachers think about assessment? What aims do they pursue through it? Do teachers really distinguish between formative and summative assessment? On the backdrop of the formative assessment literature, the article reports on an exploratory research study. Limitations and issues are analysed in order to shed light on teacher education implication and on future educational research paths in the educational assessment field. 相似文献
17.
Joanna Swann 《Interchange》1999,30(3):257-282
When asked "What happens when learning takes place?" most people, including those involved in education, find it difficult to provide a satisfactory answer. Nevertheless, assumptions about what happens have a bearing on what we (as learners, educators, researchers, and policy-makers) do, and on our answers to other questions about learning, teaching, and education. The paper addresses the title question on the basis of an analysis of the logic of learning. The approach is philosophical rather than physiological or sociological, and draws on the work of Karl Popper. The outcome is a radical, universally applicable theory which identifies a set of features common to all processes in which learning can be said to take place. The theory has significant implications for educational policy and practice: it draws attention to factors which inhibit learning and is suggestive of ways in which learning can be promoted. 相似文献
18.
《Educational Philosophy and Theory》2013,45(1):93-101
What an honor to have political and educational theorists of such caliber take up ideas from my work! What a daunting task to try to respond! My remarks will touch on the following questions: What are some key issues of distributive justice in education today? Why does defining justice in terms of oppression and domination imply that issues of justice cannot be reduced to distribution? How does normalization constitute a major process enacting oppression, and what does this imply for education? What does it mean to include marginalized groups in economic opportunity and democratic process, and how can educational institutions foster such inclusion? Why do issues of religion and other forms of cultural expression belong to a distinct category of justice? Are values of freedom of expression and tolerance in tension with the project of democratic inclusion? How shall we consider transnational issues of educational justice? 相似文献
19.
What an honor to have political and educational theorists of such caliber take up ideas from my work! What a daunting task to try to respond! My remarks will touch on the following questions: What are some key issues of distributive justice in education today? Why does defining justice in terms of oppression and domination imply that issues of justice cannot be reduced to distribution? How does normalization constitute a major process enacting oppression, and what does this imply for education? What does it mean to include marginalized groups in economic opportunity and democratic process, and how can educational institutions foster such inclusion? Why do issues of religion and other forms of cultural expression belong to a distinct category of justice? Are values of freedom of expression and tolerance in tension with the project of democratic inclusion? How shall we consider transnational issues of educational justice? 相似文献