共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 15 毫秒
1.
This study examined epistemic metacognition as a reflective activity about knowledge and knowing in the context of online
information searching on the Web, and whether it was related to prior knowledge on the topic, study approach, and domain-specific
beliefs about science. In addition, we investigated whether Internet-based learning was influenced by epistemic metacognition
and the individual differences examined. Seventy 8th grade students were interviewed retrospectively after searching for online
information about the scientifically controversial topic of dinosaur extinction. Both qualitative and quantitative analyses
were performed. Findings showed that participants expressed reflections about the simplicity/complexity, certainty/uncertainty,
source, and justification of knowledge at different levels of sophistication, according to three patterns of epistemic metacognition.
Prior knowledge was not related to epistemic metacognition in the search context, while study approach and epistemic beliefs
about science were associated significantly, although modestly, with aspects of online knowledge evaluation. Moreover, findings
revealed that Internet-based learning was influenced by overall science-related epistemic beliefs. Learning from Internet
sources was also affected by study approach and epistemic reflections about the justification of online knowledge, as well
as by the interaction between beliefs about the justification of scientific knowledge and beliefs about the justification
of the knowledge accessed concerning the topic. 相似文献
2.
The predictability of Internet-specific epistemic beliefs for self-regulated learning within Internet technologies was examined
in a sample of 84 physics undergraduates. Dimensions of Internet-specific epistemic beliefs were found to explain unique variance
in Internet-based search, help-seeking, and self-regulatory strategies, respectively. Specifically, students who emphasized
that course-related knowledge located on the Internet consisted of specific facts and details perceived Internet-search and
evaluation of search results to be less problematic and reported on more help-seeking and use of self-regulatory strategies
during Internet-based learning. Moreover, students believing that Internet-based knowledge claims need to be checked against
other sources, reason, and prior knowledge were reportedly more likely to use self-regulatory strategies when using the Internet
during coursework. The results are discussed in light of what characterizes the Internet as a knowledge source. 相似文献
3.
In the present study it was investigated whether high school students are spontaneously able to reflect epistemologically during online searching for information about a controversial topic. In addition, we examined whether activating epistemic beliefs is related to individual characteristics, such as prior knowledge of the topic and argumentative reasoning skill; also whether learning from the Web is influenced by epistemic beliefs in action and the ability to detect fallacies in arguments. The participants (N = 64) were students of Grade 13, who were asked to think aloud during navigation. Qualitative and quantitative analyses were performed. Findings reveal that most participants spontaneously activated beliefs about all four dimensions identified in the literature, that is, about the simplicity/complexity, certainty/uncertainty, justification, and source of knowledge, at different levels of sophistication. Most epistemic reflections were about the source of knowledge. Two patterns of contextualized epistemic beliefs emerged and significantly influenced learning from the Web, which was also affected by participants' ability to identify argumentative fallacies. 相似文献
4.
Searching the Web to learn about a controversial topic: are students epistemically active? 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
Students are making an increased use of the Web as a source for solving information problems for academic assignments. To
extend current research about search behavior during navigation on the Web, this study examined whether students are able
to spontaneously reflect, from an epistemic perspective, on the information accessed, and whether their epistemic metacognition
is related to individual characteristics, such as prior knowledge of the topic and the need for cognition. In addition, we
investigated whether Internet-based learning is influenced by the activation of spontaneous epistemic metacognition in the
search context. Forty-six psychology and engineering university students were asked to research information about a controversial
subject in order to write an essay. They were also asked to think aloud during their research. Both qualitative and quantitative
analyses were performed. As revealed by their spontaneous reflections, all participants were epistemically active, although
to different extents and levels. As expected, there was evidence that students activated beliefs about the four epistemic
dimensions identified in the literature, especially about the credibility of an electronic source and the criteria for justification
of knowledge. Prior knowledge was not related to activation of epistemic beliefs in the search context, while the need for
cognition significantly associated with aspects of source and its content evaluation. Two patterns of epistemic metacognition
were identified and they significantly influenced Internet-based learning. Students who spontaneously generated more sophisticated
reflections about the sources as well as the information provided, outperformed students who were active only at the first
epistemic level. Educational implications are drawn. 相似文献
5.
How do epistemological attitudes and beliefs influence learning from text? We conceptualize epistemological attitudes and
beliefs as components of metacognitive knowledge. As such, they serve an important function in regulating the use of epistemic
strategies such as knowledge-based validation of information and checking arguments for internal consistency. We report results
from two studies that investigated the effects epistemological attitudes and beliefs on the use of epistemic strategies in
academic learning and the motivational states that mediate these effects. Study 1 (N = 289) tested a mediation model with epistemological attitudes (separate vs. connected knowing) and textual characteristics
as distal predictors, and learning goals (learning factual knowledge vs. developing an own standpoint) as mediator variables.
Separate knowing had large indirect effects on the use of epistemic strategies via the goal to develop an own point of view.
In addition, learners adapted their learning goals and epistemic strategies depending on objective characteristics and the
perceived familiarity of the texts they read. In Study 2 (N = 124), epistemological beliefs concerning the uncertainty of knowledge increased the use of epistemic strategies only when
extrinsic study motivation was low. A mediated moderation model established this effect to be mediated by specific epistemic
curiosity. These results illuminate the mechanisms of how epistemological attitudes and beliefs affect self-regulated learning.
In contrast to other types of learning strategies, the use of epistemic strategies seems to be strongly and consistently linked
to epistemological attitudes and beliefs. 相似文献
6.
To obtain a more complete understanding of personal epistemology this study examines two epistemic paradigms – ways of knowing (specifically connected knowing and separate knowing) and epistemological beliefs (specifically beliefs about knowledge structure, knowledge stability, learning speed, and learning ability). Participants were 107 college students who completed questionnaires that assessed ways of knowing and epistemological beliefs. Multivariate analysis of variance revealed that men score significantly higher on separate knowing. Path analyses revealed that the effects of ways of knowing on academic performance are mediated by belief in the speed of learning. 相似文献
7.
We propose a theoretical model linking students' epistemic beliefs, epistemic emotions, learning strategies, and learning outcomes. The model was tested across two studies with 439 post-secondary students from Canada, the United States, and Germany for Study 1, and 56 students from Canada for Study 2. For Study 1, students self-reported their epistemic beliefs about climate change, read four conflicting documents about the causes and consequences of climate change, self-reported their epistemic emotions and learning strategies used to learn the content, and were given an inference verification test to measure learning. Study 2 used the same procedure but added a think aloud protocol to capture self-regulatory processes and emotions as they occurred. Path analyses revealed that epistemic beliefs served as important antecedents to the epistemic emotions students experienced during learning. Students who believed that the justification of knowledge about climate change requires critical evaluation of multiple sources experienced higher levels of enjoyment and curiosity, and lower levels of boredom when confronted with conflicting information. A belief in the complexity of this knowledge was related to lower levels of confusion, anxiety, and boredom. A belief in the uncertainty of this knowledge predicted lower levels of anxiety and frustration, and a belief in the active construction of knowledge predicted lower levels of confusion. Epistemic emotions predicted the types of learning strategies students used to learn the content and mediated relations between epistemic beliefs and learning strategies. Learning strategies predicted learning outcomes and mediated relations between epistemic emotions and learning outcomes. Implications for research on epistemic beliefs, epistemic emotions, and students' self-regulated learning are discussed. 相似文献
8.
Using a sample of 282 Norwegian upper secondary students, we examined whether two dimensions of topic‐specific epistemic beliefs, concerning the certainty of knowledge and the justification for knowing, predicted students' understanding of seven texts representing partly conflicting views on climate change. Text comprehension was measured at three different levels. Topic knowledge and topic interest were included in the analyses as control variables. Hierarchical regression analyses showed that students' beliefs about justification for knowledge positively predicted text comprehension at all three levels. That is, students believing that knowledge claims about climate change should be based on rules of inquiry and the evaluation and integration of multiple information sources did better on the three comprehension measures. 相似文献
9.
Refutation texts have been previously shown to be effective at promoting knowledge revision. The current study builds on recent trends to gain deeper insights into how this learning advantage can be enhanced and extended to more learners. In particular, we examined whether distinct epistemic profiles can be discerned on the basis of individuals’ beliefs about justification for knowing (i.e., justification by authority, personal opinion, or multiple sources) in the natural sciences. Further, we designed refutation texts according to this trichotomous framework of epistemic justification. We tested whether profiles stronger in certain dimensions would attain higher learning scores over others and whether consistency between profiles and texts would confer a learning advantage compared to when these factors were inconsistent. Results showed that distinct epistemic profiles are discernable and a profile with stronger preference for justification by multiple sources, authority, and lower preference for justification by personal opinion in natural science attained higher learning scores. Further, higher learning scores were observed when refutation texts justified by authoritative explanations were consistent with one cluster dominant in preference for justification by authority. Theoretical and instructional design implications are discussed. 相似文献
10.
Tzung-Jin Lin 《International Journal of Science Education》2013,35(17):2321-2341
ABSTRACTThis study employed the interview method to clarify the underlying dimensions of and relationships between students’ scientific ontological and epistemic beliefs. Forty Taiwanese high school students were invited to participate in this study. Through content analysis of the participants’ interview responses two ontological dimensions including ‘status of nature’ and ‘structure of nature’ were identified and found to be associated with each other. The two epistemic dimensions ‘knowledge’ and ‘knowing’ aligned with past literature were also categorised. Besides five pattern variations in terms of the aforementioned four dimensions were recognised based on the students’ philosophical stances on their scientific ontological and epistemic beliefs. According to the Chi-square test results both dimensions of scientific ontological beliefs were significantly related to the two dimensions of scientific epistemic beliefs respectively. In general the students who endorsed a more sophisticated ontological stance regarding the status and structure of nature tended to express a more mature epistemic stance toward scientific knowledge and ways of knowing. The results suggest that the maturation of students’ scientific epistemic beliefs may serve as a precursor and the fundamental step in promoting the sophistication of students’ scientific ontological beliefs. 相似文献
11.
认识论观念是指个体关于知识和认知的本质的信念,它在学习者自我调节的学习过程中发挥着重要作用,是确定自我调节的学习任务的认知与情感条件之一,同时也制约着自我调节的学习标准与学习策略,还是元认知的来源之一。反过来,自我调节的学习也能有效地促进个体认识论观念的发展。 相似文献
12.
In this study, law students (n = 49) read multiple authentic documents presenting conflicting information on the topic of climate change and responded to
verification tasks assessing their superficial as well as their deeper-level within- and across-documents comprehension. Hierarchical
multiple regression analyses showed that even after variance associated with readers’ prior knowledge about the topic was
accounted for, their epistemic beliefs related to the simplicity of knowledge and the justification for knowing about climate
change uniquely predicted their comprehension performance. The findings are interpreted with reference to the strong emphasis
on multiple-documents literacy in the law degree program. 相似文献
13.
The purposes of the study were to assess preservice teachers’ domain-specific epistemological beliefs and to investigate whether preservice teachers distinguish disciplinary differences (physics, chemistry, and biology) in domain-specific epistemological beliefs. Mixed-method research design guided the present research. The researcher explored three epistemological dimensions: certainty and simplicity of knowledge, justification for knowing, and source of knowledge. Both quantitative and qualitative results suggested that a domain-specific epistemological beliefs system is a valid model to describe preservice teachers’ epistemological beliefs. In terms of epistemological beliefs, disciplinary differences in physics, chemistry, and biology were discussed in the last parts of the study. 相似文献
14.
Muhammet Mustafa Alpaslan Bugrahan Yalvac Cathleen C. Loving Victor Willson 《International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education》2016,14(2):297-317
This article reports on an empirical exploration of the relations and strengths among Turkish grades 9–11 students’ (n = 209) personal epistemologies (justification of knowledge, certainty of knowledge, source of knowledge, development of knowledge), self-regulated learning (extrinsic motivation, intrinsic motivation, rehearsal, elaboration, organization, critical thinking, metacognitive self-regulation), and achievement in physics (course grades). Established instruments were used to collect data on these students’ beliefs about knowledge and components of self-regulated learning (SRL) such as goal orientations (extrinsic and intrinsic motivation) and learning strategies, critical thinking, and metacognitive regulation. Results from structural equation modeling revealed that students’ personal epistemologies directly influenced their motivation (extrinsic and intrinsic goal orientations), rehearsal and organization strategies, and metacognitive self-regulation to learn physics. Furthermore, students’ personal epistemologies indirectly (mediated through motivation beliefs) influenced rehearsal, elaboration and organization strategies, critical thinking, and metacognitive self-regulation to learn physics. Students’ ideas about knowledge and knowing about the source and development of knowledge significantly contributed to students’ self-regulatory skills and physics course grade. Implications and future directions are discussed. 相似文献
15.
KRISTA R. MUIS 《教育心理学家》2013,48(3):173-190
The purpose of this article is to present an integrated theoretical model between epistemic beliefs and self-regulated learning. Based on a review of various theoretical frameworks, models, and empirical studies that have examined relations between the two constructs, this article discusses the role of epistemic beliefs in self-regulated learning. Four propositions are presented: (a) epistemic beliefs are one component of the cognitive and affective conditions of a task, (b) epistemic beliefs influence the standards students set when goals are produced, (c) epistemic beliefs translate into epistemological standards that serve as inputs to metacognition, and (d) self-regulated learning may play a role in the development of epistemic beliefs. The goal of this article is to provide a foundation from which to improve understanding of the nature of epistemic beliefs and why they can facilitate or constrain facets of self-regulated learning. 相似文献
16.
Anindito Aditomo 《Journal of Further & Higher Education》2018,42(4):482-496
Mature epistemic beliefs underlie higher-order thinking and learning outcomes. Previous studies have established that epistemic beliefs predict task-specific performance. However, there is mixed evidence regarding the relationships between such beliefs and course-level academic performance. This study investigated whether disciplinary type (‘soft’ versus ‘hard’) could account for the mixed findings. A survey was conducted among 1366 Indonesian university students enrolled in ‘soft’ (design, psychology and law) and ‘hard’ (engineering, biotechnology and pharmacy) disciplines. Beliefs about the uncertainty of knowledge, the subjectivity of knowledge and authority justification were measured before the start of semester. Findings indicated that, while subjectivity belief was not associated with grade point average in the soft disciplines, it negatively predicted it in the hard disciplines. Meanwhile, uncertainty belief, but not authority belief, was positively associated with grade point average in both disciplines. Hence, the relations between some epistemic beliefs and academic performance may depend on the nature of the discipline. 相似文献
17.
《Contemporary educational psychology》2004,29(2):129-163
The study of personal epistemology has typically addressed the theories and beliefs that individuals hold about knowledge and knowing, and the way in which such epistemological perspectives are related to academic learning. This qualitative, exploratory case study focuses on the epistemology of instructional practices as interpreted by students in two versions of introductory-level college chemistry, each with different underlying epistemological assumptions. Classroom observations and interviews of 25 first-year students provide a contextualized perspective on the dimensionality of beliefs as identified in the literature: certainty of knowledge, simplicity of knowledge, source of knowledge, and justification for knowing. This research suggests that students’ perceptions of instructional practices are interpreted through the lens of their epistemological assumptions, but that such perspectives are evolving and instructors may influence them in multiple ways. 相似文献
18.
This study used think-aloud methodology to investigate 51 Norwegian undergraduates’ topic-specific epistemic cognition while working with six documents presenting conflicting views on the issue of cell phones and potential health risks. Results showed that students’ epistemic cognition was represented by one dimension concerning the certainty and simplicity of knowledge and three dimensions concerning the justification for knowing by different sources. Moreover, components of a mechanism of change, in particular epistemic doubt and resolution strategies, were identified in the think-aloud protocols. Finally, these mechanism of change components seemed to operate within distinct dimensions of epistemic cognition. Three case studies were used to elaborate on and illustrate how epistemic cognition may be differently involved in the reading of multiple conflicting documents over the course of reading. 相似文献
19.
We examined the role of justification for knowing beliefs in learning and comprehension when ethnic majority and ethnic minority students from the same school classes read five conflicting documents on the scientific issue of sun exposure and health. Results showed that the more ethnic minority students trusted scientific authorities and the less they relied on personal opinion when validating knowledge claims in the domain of science, the more they learned from and the better they comprehended the documents. In contrast, justification for knowing beliefs did not seem to play a role in learning and comprehension among ethnic majority students. These results may reflect that the documents represented more of a challenge to the ethnic minority students, with justification beliefs affecting learning and comprehension processes to a greater extent when the task is perceived as an ill-structured problem. This study is probably the first to indicate different relationships between various justification beliefs and performance in different language and cultural groups, having theoretical as well as educational implications. 相似文献
20.
This study investigated the relationships among college students’ epistemic beliefs in biology (EBB), conceptions of learning biology (COLB), and strategies of learning biology (SLB). EBB includes four dimensions, namely ‘multiple-source,’ ‘uncertainty,’ ‘development,’ and ‘justification.’ COLB is further divided into ‘constructivist’ and ‘reproductive’ conceptions, while SLB represents deep strategies and surface learning strategies. Questionnaire responses were gathered from 303 college students. The results of the confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation modelling showed acceptable model fits. Mediation testing further revealed two paths with complete mediation. In sum, students’ epistemic beliefs of ‘uncertainty’ and ‘justification’ in biology were statistically significant in explaining the constructivist and reproductive COLB, respectively; and ‘uncertainty’ was statistically significant in explaining the deep SLB as well. The results of mediation testing further revealed that ‘uncertainty’ predicted surface strategies through the mediation of ‘reproductive’ conceptions; and the relationship between ‘justification’ and deep strategies was mediated by ‘constructivist’ COLB. This study provides evidence for the essential roles some epistemic beliefs play in predicting students’ learning. 相似文献