共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 46 毫秒
1.
Joaquin De Juan Rosa M. Pérez-Cañaveras Yolanda Segovia Jose Luis Girela Noemi Martínez-Ruiz Alejandro Romero-Rameta Maria José Gómez-Torres M. Flores Vizcaya-Moreno 《Learning Environments Research》2016,19(1):87-106
Cell biology is an academic discipline that organises and coordinates the learning of the structure, function and molecular composition of cells in some undergraduate biomedical programs. Besides course content and teaching methodologies, the laboratory environment is considered a key element in the teaching of and learning of cell biology. The aim of this study was to determine students’ opinions about the quality of the teaching and learning environment in cell biology laboratory practice. For this study, we used a short form of the Science Laboratory Environment Inventory (SLEI), which we adapted and translated into Spanish. The questionnaire, administered to students enrolled in four undergraduate programs, consisted of 24 questions divided into four scales: integration of content, clarity of laboratory rules, cohesion between students and teachers, and quality of laboratory infrastructures and materials. The results suggested that (1) students positively assessed the learning environment provided for cell biology practice, (2) the short Spanish form of the SLEI was a valid, reliable instrument for evaluating student satisfaction, laboratory activities, the degree of cooperation between students and teachers, and theoretical and practical organisation of content and (3) the questionnaire detected differential perceptions of the learning environment based on gender and the program studied. 相似文献
2.
Conclusion This paper attempts to stimulate and facilitate future research and practical applications involving the psychosocial environment
of science laboratory classrooms by describing the development of a new instrument, the Science Laboratory Environment Inventory
(SLEI), which assesses eight dimensions of the actual and preferred environment of science laboratory classes at the upper
secondary school and higher education levels. Comprehensive validation information reported here in tentatively attests to
the internal consistency reliability and discriminant validity of the actual and preferred forms of the SLEI for use in Australian
or American classrooms. As well, further analyses supported the ability of the actual form of the SLEI to differentiate between
the perceptions of students in different classrooms. It is hoped that science teachers and other researchers will make use
of the SLEI to pursue several research and practical applications analogous to those completed successfully in prior work
in non-laboratory classrooms. 相似文献
3.
Avi Hofstein Ita Cohen Reuven Lazarowitz 《Research in Science & Technological Education》2013,31(1):103-116
In this article a comparison of students’ perceptions of laboratory classes in chemistry and biology is presented. By using the Science Laboratory Environment Inventory (SLEI), pronounced and significant differences between chemistry and biology laboratory environments were found on two of the subscales: ‘Integration’ that describes the extent to which its laboratory activities are integrated with non‐laboratory and classroom learning and ‘Open‐endedness’, a subscale that measures the extent to which the laboratory emphasises an open‐ended, divergent, and an individualised approach to experimentation. It is suggested that the SLEI can be considered as a sensitive tool to measure students’ perceptions of their learning environment in different subject matters during the laboratory work. In this study the SLEI was also used to compare students’ actual and preferred learning environments and to explore gender differences regarding this issue. 相似文献
4.
In order to investigate the learning environment of senior high school science laboratory classrooms in Korea, the Science
Laboratory Environment Inventory (SLEI) was translated into Korean and administered to 439 students (99 science-independent
stream students, 195 science-oriented stream students and 145 humanities stream students). Data analyses attested to the sound
factorial validity and internal consistency reliability of the SLEI, as well as its ability to differentiate between the perceptions
of students in different classrooms. Students in the science-independent stream generally perceived their science laboratory
classroom environment more favourably than did students in either the humanities or science-oriented stream. Associations
were found between various measures of students’ attitudes to science and their perceptions on SLEI scales; in particular,
as in past research in other countries, integration between theory and practical classes was a statistically significant predictor
of all attitude criteria when the other SLEI scales were mutually controlled. 相似文献
5.
Assessment of the psychosocial environment of university science laboratory classrooms: a cross-national study 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
A strong tradition in educational research has involved several widely-used instruments assessing student or teacher perceptions of characteristics of actual or preferred classroom psychosocial environment. Existing instruments, however, are unsuitable for one of the most important settings in science teaching, namely, the science laboratory class. Consequently, the present research aimed to develop and validate a new instrument, the Science Laboratory Environment Inventory (SLEI), which is specifically suited to science laboratory environments at the higher education level. The SLEI assesses students' or teachers' perceptions of five dimensions of actual or preferred classroom environment, namely, Student Cohesiveness, Open-Endedness, Integration, Rule Clarity, and Material Environment. A distinctive feature of the design of the study was that the instrument was field tested and validated cross-nationally in six different countries, namely, the USA, Canada, Australia, England, Israel, and Nigeria. The total sample consisted of 1720 students in 71 university laboratory classes. Various item and factor analyses guided the evolution of a refined version, and attested to each SLEI scale's internal consistency reliability, discriminant validity, factorial validity, predictive validity (i.e., ability to predict student outcomes), and ability to differentiate between the perceptions of students in different classes. An important finding was that the SLEI is equally valid for use in its actual and preferred versions, and for the individual or the class mean as the unit of analysis. As well, separate within-country analyses confirmed the validity and usefulness of the SLEI in each of the six countries involved in the field testing. Overall, the study attested to the general advantages of employing cross-national designs in learning environment research. 相似文献
6.
An inquiry-type laboratory has been implemented into the chemistry curriculum in high schools in Israel. In this study, we
investigated the idea that generally the science laboratory provides a unique learning environment that differs from the learning
environment that exists in classrooms in which other instructional techniques are used. Moreover, the inquiry laboratory provides
students with a learning situation in which they are involved in activities that might influence some of the variables that
are influencing the learning environment of such laboratories. In this study, the Science Laboratory Environment Inventory
(SLEI) was used to assess the students' perceptions of their chemistry laboratory learning environment. Statistical comparison
of two groups (control and inquiry) revealed significant differences between the groups regarding their actual perceptions.
Moreover, it was found that the differences between the actual and preferred laboratory learning environment were significantly
smaller for the inquiry group than for the control group.
This revised version was published online in July 2006 with corrections to the Cover Date. 相似文献
7.
The Science Laboratory Environment Inventory (SLEI) is a recently developed classroom environment instrument for assessing students' or teachers' perceptions of their science laboratory classroom environment. This paper describes its development and reports on the validation and application of its modified form, the Chemistry Laboratory Environment Inventory (CLEI), with a Singapore secondary school sample. The sample consisted of 1 592 final-year secondary school (i.e. tenth grade) chemistry students from 56 intact classes from 28 randomly selected co-educational government secondary schools in Singapore. Various item and factor analyses supported the reliability and validity of the instrument for assessing students' perceptions of their chemistry laboratory environment specifically in Singapore. 相似文献
8.
The research reported in this article makes two distinctive contributions to the field of classroom environment research. First, because existing instruments are unsuitable for science laboratory classes, the Science Laboratory Environment Inventory (SLEI) was developed and validated. Second, a new Personal form of the SLEI (involving a student's perceptions of his or her own role within the class) was developed and validated in conjunction with the conventional Class form (involving a student's perceptions of the class as a whole), and its usefulness was investigated. The instrument was cross-nationally fieldtested with 5,447 students in 269 senior high school and university classes in six countries, and cross-validated with 1,594 senior high school students in 92 classes in Australia. Each SLEI scale exhibited satisfactory internal consistency reliability, discriminant validity, and factorial validity, and differentiated between the perceptions of students in different classes. A variety of applications with the new instrument furnished evidence about its usefulness and revealed that science laboratory classes are dominated by closed-ended activities; mean scores obtained on the Class form were consistently somewhat more favorable than on the corresponding Personal form; females generally held more favorable perceptions than males, but these differences were somewhat larger for the Personal form than the Class form; associations existed between attitudinal outcomes and laboratory environment dimensions; and the Class and Personal forms of the SLEI each accounted for unique variance in student outcomes which was independent of that accounted for by the other form. 相似文献
9.
An investigation of relationships between students’ attitudes towards chemistry and their perceived laboratory environments was carried out using a sample of 1592 final year secondary school students in 56 chemistry classes in 28 randomly selected co‐educational government schools. This study is distinctive in that it marks the beginning of science classroom environment research in Singapore and because it pioneers the use of the Hierarchical Linear Model (HLM) in learning environment research. The Chemistry Laboratory Environment Inventory (CLEI), a modified version of the Science Laboratory Environment Inventory, was used to assess students’ perceptions of the learning environment in chemistry laboratory classes. Students’ chemistry‐related attitudes were assessed using the Questionnaire on Chemistry‐related Attitudes (QOCRA), which is based on the Test of Science‐related Attitudes. Environment‐attitude relationships were examined using conventional multiple regression analysis and the more rigorous HLM. Positive associations emerged between the nature of the chemistry laboratory classroom environment and the students’ attitudinal outcomes 相似文献
10.
Dr Campbell J. McRobbie Dr Geoffrey J. Giddings Dr Barry J. Fraser 《Research in Science Education》1990,20(1):200-209
Existing instruments for assessing student or teacher perceptions of characteristics of actual or preferred classroom psychosocial
environment are unsuitable for one of the most important settings in science teaching, namely, the science laboratory class.
Consequently, the Science Laboratory Environment Inventory (SLEI), was designed to assess student or teacher perceptions of
seven scales:Teacher Supportiveness, Student Cohesiveness, Open-Endedness, Integration, Organization, Rule Clarity andMaterial Environment. An important feature of the design of the study was that the new instrument was field tested simultaneously in six countries:
Australia, USA, Canada, England, Nigeria and Israel. This paper is based on a sample of 4643 students in 225 individual laboratory
classes, together with the teachers of most of these classes. Preliminary analyses were used to shed light on various important
research questions including the differences between Actual and Preferred environments, gender differences in perceptions
of Actual and Preferred environment, the relationship between the science laboratory environment and attitude towards science
laboratory work, differences between school and university laboratory classes, differences between teachers’ and students’
perceptions of the same laboratory classes, and differences between laboratory classes in different science subjects (Physics,
Chemistry, Biology).
Specializations: Science education, educational evaluation.
Specializations: Curriculum, science education, science laboratory teaching.
Specializations: Learning environments, science education, educational evaluation, curriculum. 相似文献
11.
Catherine S. Martin-Dunlop 《Research in Science Education》2013,43(3):873-893
This study investigated prospective elementary teachers’ understandings of the nature of science and explored associations with their guided-inquiry science learning environment. Over 500 female students completed the Nature of Scientific Knowledge Survey (NSKS), although only four scales were analyzed–Creative, Testable, Amoral, and Unified. The learning environment was assessed using previously-validated and reliable scales from What Is Happening In this Class? (WIHIC) and the Science Laboratory Environment Inventory (SLEI). Analyses indicated moderate multiple correlations that were statistically significant (p?<?0.01) between Creative (R?=?0.22), Testable (R?=?0.29), and Unified (R?=?0.27), and a positive learning environment. Regression coefficients revealed that Open-Endedness was a significant independent predictor of students’ understanding of the role of creativity in science (β?=?0.16), while Cooperation, Open-Endedness, and Material Environment were linked with understanding the testable nature of science (β?=?0.10–0.12). Interview questions probed possible relationships between an improved understanding of the nature of science and elements of a positive classroom environment. Responses suggested that an appropriate level of open-endedness during investigations was very important as this helped students grapple with abstract nature of science concepts and shift their conceptions closer to a more realistic view of scientific practice. 相似文献
12.
The purpose of this study was to investigate associations between students' perceptions of their biology teachers' interpersonal behavior and their laboratory learning environments and their attitudinal, achievement, and performance outcomes. A sample of 489 students from 28 senior biology classes in eight schools in Tasmania, Australia completed the Questionnaire on Teacher Interaction (QTI) and the Science Laboratory Environment Inventory (SLEI). Responses to two attitude questionnaires, achievement on an external written examination, and performance in laboratory practical tests were used as student outcome measures. Statistical analyses supported the reliability and validity of the QTI and the SLEI when used with senior secondary biology students. We investigated associations between students' perceptions of teacher behavior and their laboratory learning environment with student outcomes, including the unique and common contributions of the QTI and SLEI to variance in student outcomes. Associations with students' perceptions of the learning environment were stronger for the attitudinal outcomes than for the cognitive or practical skills outcomes. Some commonality between the QTI and SLEI scales was found in their contributions to the variance in attitudinal outcomes, but not in their contributions to variance in cognitive and practical skill outcomes. © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Res Sci Teach 37: 26–43, 2000 相似文献
13.
14.
Science laboratory learning has been lauded for decades for its role in fostering positive student attitudes about science and developing students’ interest in science and ability to use equipment. An expanding body of research has demonstrated the significant influence of laboratory environment on student learning. Further research has demonstrated differences in student perceptions based on giftedness. To explore the relationship between giftedness and students’ perceptions of their learning environment, we examined students’ perceptions of their laboratory learning environment in biology courses, including courses designated for high-achieving versus regular-achieving students. In addition, to explore the relationship between students’ perceptions and the extent of their experience with laboratory learning in a particular discipline, we examined students’ perceptions of their laboratory learning environment in first-year biology courses versus elective biology courses that require first-year biology as a prerequisite. We found that students in high-achieving courses had a more favourable perception of all aspects of their learning environment when compared with students in regular courses. In addition, student perceptions of their laboratory appeared to be influenced by the extent of their experience in learning science. Perceptions were consistent amongst regular- and high-achieving students regardless of grade level. In addition, perceptions of students in first year and beyond were consistent regardless of grade level. These findings have critical applications in curriculum development as well as in the classroom. Teachers can use student perceptions of their learning environment to emphasize critical pedagogical approaches and modify other areas that enable enhancement of the science laboratory learning environment. 相似文献
15.
We report a survey of 100 preschool teachers from 15 preschools in Singapore using a modified instrument called the Pre-School Level Environment Questionnaire. The aims were to explore differences in actual and preferred perceptions of preschool teachers’ school-level environment and to investigate the relationship among preschool teachers’ profile, preschool learning environments and job satisfaction. Quantitative data using paired samples t tests indicated that there were significant differences in teachers’ actual and preferred perceptions of their preschool learning environments except for the scale of Work Pressure. Logistic regression revealed a positive influence of Resource Adequacy on preschool teachers’ job satisfaction. 相似文献
16.
Classroom Environment Instruments: Development,Validity and Applications 总被引：11，自引：0，他引：11
Few fields of educational research have such a rich diversity of valid, economical and widely-applicable assessment instruments as does the field of learning environments. This article describes nine major questionnaires for assessing student perceptions of classroom psychosocial environment (the Learning Environment Inventory, Classroom Environment Scale, Individualised Classroom Environment Questionnaire, My Class Inventory, College and University Classroom Environment Inventory, Questionnaire on Teacher Interaction, Science Laboratory Environment Inventory, Constructivist Learning Environment Survey and What Is Happening In This Class) and reviews the application of these instruments in 12 lines of past research (focusing on associations between outcomes and environment, evaluating educational innovation, differences between student and teacher perceptions, whether students achieve better in their preferred environment, teachers' use of learning environment perceptions in guiding improvements in classrooms, combining quantitative and qualitative methods, links between different educational environments, cross-national studies, the transition from primary to high school, and incorporating educational environment ideas into school psychology, teacher education and teacher assessment). 相似文献
17.
18.
We investigated and compared the learning environment perceptions of students, teachers and guides who participated in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM)-based outreach activities in secondary education. In outreach activities, schools and teachers work together with companies and other external institutions in learning activities in order to motivate students for the STEM domain. In this study, we identified characteristics of outreach activities that explain variance in perceptions of students. Data were gathered from 729 high-school students as well as 35 teachers and guides in 12 activities both in the US and the Netherlands. A questionnaire was used to asses outreach activities based on subscales from validated questionnaires such as the What Is Happening In this Classroom, Constructivist Learning Environments Survey, Classroom Environment Scale and the Learning Climate Questionnaire. Teachers’ perceptions were more positive than students’ perceptions for most scales, while guides perceived the outreach learning environment in almost the same way as students. Student perceptions were very positive for outreach activities. Outreach activity characteristics such as teaching method and emphasis were found to be the most important factors in explaining variance in students’ perceptions between activities. Long-term problem-based activities and the perspective of new views of science and scientists were perceived as providing the most positive learning environments. Additionally, outreach learning environments can create opportunities to increase students’ motivation in STEM. 相似文献
19.
This study compared the Reform of Secondary Education (ROSE) students’ and nonROSE students’ perceptions of five psychosocial
dimensions of their science practical tasks: Student Cohesiveness, Open-Endedness, Integration, Rule Clarity and Material
Environment. The sample comprised 177 ROSE and 223 nonROSE Jamaican students, 230 and 170 of them were 8th and 9th graders
respectively, 209 were boys and 191 were girls. The Actual Form of Fraser, Giddings and McRobbie’s (1995) Science Laboratory
Environment Inventory (SLEI) was adapted and used as an instrument. The results indicated that the students’ perceptions were
relatively favourable; ROSE students had significantly better perceptions of Open-Endedness and Material Environment than
nonROSE students; the girls had significantly better perceptions of all the dimensions (except Open-Endedness) than the boys;
ROSE girls’ and boys’ perceptions of Open-Endedness were significantly better than those of nonROSE students; grades 8 and
9 students’ perceptions were not statistically significantly different. 相似文献
20.
Dr. Campbell J. McRobbie Dr. Barry J. Fraser Dr. Geoffrey J. Giddings 《Research in Science Education》1991,21(1):244-252
Existing instruments in classroom environment research have limitations when subgroups are investigated or case studies of
individual students conducted. This study reports the validation and development of a personal form of the Science Laboratory
Environment Inventory which is better suited to such studies. Further, systematic differences between scores on the class
and personal forms of the instrument are reported along with comparisons of their associations with inquiry skill and attitudinal
outcomes.
Specializations: Science education, Preservice science teacher education.
Specializations: Learning environments, science education, educational evaluation, curriculum.
Specializations: Curriculum, science education, science laboratory teaching. 相似文献