共查询到14条相似文献，搜索用时 250 毫秒
1.
举重抓举和下蹲翻运动学比较与用力特征分析 总被引：4，自引：0，他引：4
运用三维运动学的研究方法对参加2003年全国女子举重锦标赛的10名运动员的抓举和下蹲翻进行运动学分析并对力量的特点进行比较分析;运用逆向动力学方法对两种技术动作的主要关节的净力矩进行比较分析。结果表明,膝关节角度在提铃离地时刻有显著性的差异;对力量参数回归分析表明,运动员抓举杠铃重量的能力很大程度上取决于运动员所能够输出的最大功率,而运动员下蹲翻杠铃重量的能力很大程度上取决于运动员对杠铃的作用力的积累过程;对于抓举和下蹲翻动作髋关节净力矩分析表明,对于抓举,髋关节最大净力矩与对应此时刻的髋关节角度呈负相关,而对于下蹲翻,髋关节最大净力矩则与所试举的杠铃重量呈正相关。 相似文献
2.
通过对十一运会女子举重比赛欧阳晓芳抓举122 kg创全国纪录的技术动作进行影片拍摄和图像解析,得出膝关节角、髋关节角、躯干角和杠铃中心点垂直速度随时间变化曲线及各动作阶段的时间比、作功比和杠铃上升高度比以及杠铃重心的速度曲线.从而找出欧阳晓芳技术动作的优点与不足. 相似文献
3.
方法:运用高速摄相和三维运动解析的方法对运动员的抓举技术进行研究.目的:通过对运动员朱丁梅抓举技术的分析找出运动员技术上存在的不足并进行改进,帮助运动员取得更好的成绩.结果表明:(1)运动员膝关节角、髋关节角比较合理,在发力阶段伸髋不充分.(2)杠铃的运动轨迹偏向后方,没有呈现近似s型,运动员发力时有明显的后跳动作.(3)各阶段时间比和杠铃上升高度比整体较合理,精细化程度不够.结论:(1)发力阶段伸髋不充分影响了运动员的成绩.(2)两心向运动员后上方偏移,抓举技术动作不符合"近"的原则.(3)运动员在抓举90kg时过早发力,当杠铃高度达到最高点时杠铃在支撑点后方不利于支撑,导致后掉失败.(4)抓举的总体节奏较好但是精细化程度还不够.(5)对运动员的后跳动作不予以纠正. 相似文献
4.
运用三维运动学研究方法,对参加2019年亚洲举重锦标赛暨东京奥运会资格赛的我国男子举重67kg公斤级优秀运动员谌利军与冯吕栋抓举技术进行对比分析。研究结果认为:提铃准备阶段,冯吕栋身体姿势更符合抓举中“近”的技术要求;总体上,冯吕栋伸膝提铃和引膝提铃阶段技术动作优于谌利军,谌利军发力和惯性上升及接铃阶段技术动作优于冯吕栋。谌利军抓举过程中主要存在伸膝提铃阶段髋关节打开过早,引膝提铃阶段膝关节回屈角度小以及整个抓举过程中杠铃重心左右偏移量过大的问题;冯吕栋主要存在发力和惯性上升阶段“两心”前后距离过大,杠铃相对于运动员水平运动幅度大,垂直运动幅度小以及接铃过程中杠铃下落距离长,下降速度过快的问题。建议谌利军加强膝关节主要屈伸肌群的力量训练以及进行身体左右侧力量平衡的评估;冯吕栋应掌握在发力和惯性上升阶段正确的用力方向,并改善接铃节奏。 相似文献
5.
全国举重冠军伍超抓举154kg的技术特征分析 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
通过SIMI°Motion三维录像分析系统,对2011年全国举重冠军赛冠军伍超的抓举技术动作进行运动学分析,揭示其抓举154 kg的技术特征。结果显示:伍超的身体重心和杠铃重心距离较近,并在整个提铃过程中杠铃重心的垂直速度呈上升趋势;膝关节角、躯干角、髋关节角、杠铃中心点垂直速度随时间变化曲线符合抓举的技术特点;从整体上看,伍超的技术较为合理,且有较大的提升空间。 相似文献
6.
运用三维运动学的研究方法,对参加2005年全国第十届体育运动会举重比赛的运动员石智勇的抓举技术进行运动学分析。结果表明,提铃过程中人杠重心间距控制合理,杠铃平均加速度超过2 m/s2,体现了优异的爆发力和出色的提铃技术;引膝阶段的技术与常规引膝技术已有了很大的改变,该阶段用时很短,膝关节角度也几乎没产生变化,通过对膝关节的制动充分发挥了腰背部肌肉力量,使抓举时杠铃最高加速度的值出现在引膝阶段而非发力阶段,这是最体现石智勇抓举技术特点的地方;抓举发力阶段,身体用力协调,各关节角度的把握也恰到好处;抓举下蹲支撑阶段技术动作堪称完美,人杠重心间距控制合理,杠铃回落距离仅为13.6 cm,人体重心向下的平均加速度为11.2 m/s2,两项均属于世界顶级选手的技术指标;在起立阶很好地利用了杠铃的弹性势能,与杠铃同步起立,同时人杠重心间距仅为0.002 m,确保了起立的稳定性。 相似文献
7.
《西安体育学院学报》2016,(5):618-622
研究以运动员左侧末端杠铃加速度、速度和高度等为指标对高丹抓举技术进行分析。采用2台Speed Cam Macro Vis Eo Sens高速相机进行拍摄,通过SIMI-motion三维运动录像分析系统对其技术动作进行分析。研究结果:(1)成功时在A点杠铃加速度为0.39 m/s2,失败时为0.12 m/s2,说明成功时在杠铃离地瞬间用力较快,2次抓举A至D杠铃加速度和肩部移动距离的变化,说明在伸膝提铃阶段都有二次发力现象且上体过早后仰;(2)D至E杠铃加速度成功和失败时分别减少了0.07 m/s2和0.03 m/s2,说明在引膝阶段用力不连贯;(3)在F点成功时杠铃加速度最大为0.38 m/s2,失败时为0.41 m/s2,说明成功时用力节奏较差;(4)成功时左侧和右侧支撑点分别向后移动了0.17 m和0.22 m,而失败时左侧和右侧支撑点分别向后移动了0.13 m和0.11 m,后跳之后两个支撑点没有在同一条水平线上,说明后跳之后两个支撑点发生前后偏离;(5)失败时杠铃的最高高度为1.04 m,而成功时1.09 m,失败时杠铃高度较低,在下蹲支撑阶段没有撑住杠铃导致其失败。把杠铃加速度的变化以折线图的形式来分析运动员技术动作,可以直观反映运动员的用力节奏,发现其技术动作的精细化程度不够,用力节奏较差,还需对其技术动作进行改进。 相似文献
8.
9.
研究运用三维运动学方法,获取评价抓举技术动作稳定性的量化指标,并对廖辉、石智勇等5名运动员8次成功试举与7次失败试举中每个特征时刻该指标进行对比分析,旨在从动作稳定性的角度分析抓举失败的原因。研究认为人/杠合重心与人体支撑面中心在前后方向的距离(两心差)是评价运动员抓举技术动作各阶段稳定性的重要指标,两心差越小,技术动作稳定性越强。抓举过程中运动员的两心差数值曲线呈现出双波峰双波谷的特点,较为合理的两心差变化趋势应该是:两心差于发力阶段初达到第一个波谷,惯性上升阶段初达到第一个波峰,于下蹲支撑初达到第二个波谷,杠铃速度最大时刻达到第二个波峰。大多数抓举试举失败都出现在接铃完成阶段,而下蹲支撑阶段两心差过大是导致运动员在接铃完成阶段无法对杠铃形成有效制动的重要原因。研究中成功试举在接铃完成阶段末两心差几乎为零;接铃完成末两心差过大,将导致运动员在上举时失去平衡。 相似文献
10.
11.
运用录像分析系统，分析了我国优秀女子举重运动员的抓举技术，对抓举技术中的预备、提铃、发力、下蹲支撑、上举等5个动作环节进行了阐述，揭示该技术的生物力学特征，为运动员教练员提供可靠的数据参考。 相似文献
12.
We investigated the linear kinematics and the change in energy of the barbell and the angular kinematics of the trunk and leg during the snatch technique of 12 elite male Greek weightlifters under competitive conditions after the new weight classification. Two S-VHS cameras operating at 60 Hz were used to record the lifts. The spatial coordinates of selected points were calculated using the direct linear transformation procedure; after digital filtering of the raw data, the angular displacements and angular velocities were calculated for the hip, knee and ankle joints. The following variables were also calculated for the barbell: vertical and horizontal displacement, vertical linear velocity and acceleration, external mechanical work and power output. The results revealed that all weightlifters flexed their knees during the transition phase, independently of their weight category. This indicates that the athletes use the elastic energy produced during the stretch-shortening cycle to enhance their performance. In nine athletes, we found that the barbell trajectory did not cross a vertical reference line that passed through the initial position of the barbell. The vertical linear velocity of the barbell was increased continuously from the beginning of the movement until the second maximum extension of the knee joint, with no notable dip being observed. Regarding the change in energy of the barbell, we found that the mechanical work for the vertical displacement of the barbell in the first pull was significantly greater than the mechanical work in the second pull. In contrast, the estimated average mechanical power output of the athletes during the vertical displacement of the barbell was significantly greater in the second pull than in the first pull. We conclude that the major elements of the snatch technique of elite Greek weightlifters have not been affected by the new weight classification. 相似文献
13.
Vassilios Gourgoulis Nickos Aggelousis Giorgos Mavromatis Athanasios Garas 《Journal of sports sciences》2013,31(8):643-652
We investigated the linear kinematics and the change in energy of the barbell and the angular kinematics of the trunk and leg during the snatch technique of 12 elite male Greek weightlifters under competitive conditions after the new weight classification. Two S-VHS cameras operating at 60 Hz were used to record the lifts. The spatial coordinates of selected points were calculated using the direct linear transformation procedure; after digital filtering of the raw data, the angular displacements and angular velocities were calculated for the hip, knee and ankle joints. The following variables were also calculated for the barbell: vertical and horizontal displacement, vertical linear velocity and acceleration, external mechanical work and power output. The results revealed that all weightlifters flexed their knees during the transition phase, independently of their weight category. This indicates that the athletes use the elastic energy produced during the stretch–shortening cycle to enhance their performance. In nine athletes, we found that the barbell trajectory did not cross a vertical reference line that passed through the initial position of the barbell. The vertical linear velocity of the barbell was increased continuously from the beginning of the movement until the second maximum extension of the knee joint, with no notable dip being observed. Regarding the change in energy of the barbell, we found that the mechanical work for the vertical displacement of the barbell in the first pull was significantly greater than the mechanical work in the second pull. In contrast, the estimated average mechanical power output of the athletes during the vertical displacement of the barbell was significantly greater in the second pull than in the first pull. We conclude that the major elements of the snatch technique of elite Greek weightlifters have not been aff ected by the new weight classification. 相似文献
14.
The purpose of this study was to determine the association between weightlifting performance and vertical barbell acceleration patterns. Barbell kinematic time-series data were tracked from 18 snatches from six weightlifters during a regional weightlifting competition. These data were used to calculate vertical barbell accelerations. Time-series data were normalised to 100% of lift phase, defined as the time interval between barbell lift-off and maximum height of the barbell during each snatch lift. The time-series data were then entered into a pattern recognition algorithm that extracted principal patterns and calculated principal pattern scores. Body mass-normalised lift weight, which was used to quantify weightlifting performance, was significantly correlated (r = 0.673; P = 0.033) with a pattern that captured a difference in peak vertical barbell acceleration between the transition and the second pull phase. This correlation indicated that barbell acceleration profiles of higher weight snatch lifts were characterised by smaller decreases in acceleration during the second knee bend and smaller peak acceleration during the second pull phase. Weightlifting coaches and sports scientist should monitor and track vertical acceleration of the barbell, with focus on acceleration profiles that limit (1) deceleration during the transition phase between the first and second pull and (2) peak acceleration during the second pull phase of the snatch. 相似文献