共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 203 毫秒
1.
随着新课程改革的不断深入，树立发展性教师评价理念，改革学校教育评价管理的措施，建立发展性教师评价体系，探索发展性教师评价方法，日渐成为教育工作者共同关注的重要研究课题。近年来，浙江省定海区学校教育督导从单向评估、基层学校被动参与转变到学校发展性教育督导评估，为学校的自主发展提供了难得的机遇。学校发展性督导评估的主要对象是管理者、教师和学生， 相似文献
2.
3.
新课程改革明确提出,要建立促进学生、教师和课程不断发展的评价体系,即建立发展性课程评价体系。发展性课堂评价标准的构建:教师的教学设计是否和谐自然;教师是否重视学生主动参与课堂学习;教师是否注重学生创新能力的培养;教师对课堂的控制能力。 相似文献
4.
课堂评价是依据一定的教育教学目标进行的.作为一个客观而行之有效的评价,发展性课堂教学评价需要规定体现教育目标有关的被评价因素.发展性课堂教学评价指标的设计还应结合新课程的"三维"目标,从教师和学生两个方面准确判断课堂教学目标的达成度. 相似文献
5.
顾寿林 《化工职业技术教育》2006,(2)
《中等职业教育教学质量发展性评价的研究》课题,对专业、教师和学生发展性评价进行了实验和研究,着手建立有利于专业教师和学生发展的评价机制。提出了科学发展观指导下的中职教育教学质量评价系统,形成了3个发展性评价方案和指示体系,提出了发展性教育评价的鉴定改进型、目标影响型、质量跟踪型和自主选择型4个模式,形成了发展性评价特色的操作方式、方法,提出了推进中职教育教学质量发展性评价的积极建议。 相似文献
6.
发展性教师评价是提高教育质量的教育有效工具之一。本文以发展性小学教师评价实验为立论依据 ,重点阐述了发展性小学教师评价的指标体系、评价方法和工具 ,以及发展性小学评价对提高教师队伍专业化水平的重要意义。 相似文献
7.
教师评价是教育教学活动的重要组成部分,也是长期困扰教育管理的一个难题。现阶段教师评价已由奖惩性评价转向发展性评价,但对发展性教师评价模型研究仍较少。以发展性教师评价理念为指导思想,构建适合中小学发展性教师评价的指标体系,并运用模糊数学及综合评价方法建立的中小学发展性教师模糊综合评价模型,对中小学教师评价工作的开展具有操作性参考意义。 相似文献
8.
初中数学课堂学生评价首先要关注发展要素。在数学课堂发展性评价中,教师不仅要把握学生的学习水平,更要关注学生数学学习的行为、态度、价值观等发展性要素。在数学课堂教学中,教师要将终结性评价和发展性评价结合应用,既要提高学生的数学思维能力和核心素养,又要为学生的可持续发展奠定坚实的基础。 相似文献
9.
10.
在初中生物课堂应用发展性教学,要求教师能够对教学行为实行改革,对学生的教学主体参与的过程进行研究,在评价方面应用发展性评价,以提高学生的综合素质,促进学生整体发展。文章分析了发展性教学的目标、思想及如何实现发展性教学和学生主体的构建,同时也针对实例,分析了发展性教学评价在初中生物课堂中的具体应用。 相似文献
11.
Robin D. Tierney 《Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice》2006,13(3):239-264
The pedagogical potential of classroom assessment to support student learning has increasingly been evidenced in research over the past decade. Constructive classroom assessment has been championed by assessment specialists, and endorsed by professional organizations. In practice, however, the process of changing classroom assessment from its traditionally summative orientation is not straightforward. This methodical review looks at how six sources, which are educational research, evaluative inquiry, large‐scale assessment, educational policy, professional development, and teachers’ beliefs, influence and mediate assessment practices. A group of purposively selected research articles are analysed as evidence of the dynamics in this complex process. Cross‐currents relating to research perspective, collaboration, and time are discussed. For the movement seen in this study to continue, the tension between teacher autonomy and school community, and the relationship between collective commitment and assessment literacy should be considered. 相似文献
12.
Anders Jonsson Christian Lundahl Anders Holmgren 《Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice》2015,22(1):104-121
This study reports on a large-scale implementation of Assessment for Learning (AfL) in a Swedish municipality. The implementation was founded on two principles: (1) teaching should be informed by educational research; (2) to be successful teachers’ professional development needs to be based in everyday classroom practice. From these principles, AfL was chosen as a strand of educational research to inform teaching and ‘Teacher Learning Communities’ were chosen as a vehicle for professional development and for implementing AfL practices. Findings indicate that the project has been successful in bringing about a change in how teachers talk about teaching and learning and in changing teachers’ pedagogical practice towards AfL. Findings also suggest that AfL practices are mostly teacher-centred, which means that the teachers still take most of the responsibility for the assessment. This leads to high workload for the teachers and may also hinder students from taking responsibility for their learning. 相似文献
13.
Christopher DeLuca Adelina Valiquette Andrew Coombs Danielle LaPointe-McEwan Ulemu Luhanga 《Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice》2018,25(4):355-375
Classroom assessment has become a cornerstone of today’s standards-based system of education. However, recent policy developments, professional standards, and variable assessment education have led to significant variability in teachers’ approaches to assessment. The primary purpose of this research was to use a new instrument predicated on recently published classroom assessment standards – the Approaches to Classroom Assessment Inventory – to measure teachers’ (a) approaches to assessment, (b) perceived skill in current assessment tasks and responsibilities, and (c) professional learning preferences and priorities. Based on 404 teachers from across North America, this study contributes initial evidence of how teachers approach classroom assessment with respect to four dimensions: Assessment Purposes, Assessment Processes, Assessment Fairness and Measurement Theory. Results from this study point to significant differences based on career stage and previous assessment education. The study concludes with four key implications for assessment research and practice. 相似文献
14.
Christopher DeLuca Don Klinger Jamie Pyper Judy Woods 《Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice》2015,22(1):122-139
The purpose of this research was to examine the implementation of a professional learning project aimed at building educators’ knowledge and skills in assessment for learning (AfL) within two school districts in Ontario, Canada. Specifically, the research examined the value of a two-tier Instructional Rounds (IR) professional learning model. This professional learning model was unique because it engaged both teachers and principals in collaboratively learning and implementing AfL strategies in order to develop systemic capacity in assessment. In total, 12 principals, 48 teachers, two superintendents and two school district assessment consultants participated in the study. Data were collected through observations of IR sessions, classroom observations, interviews, IR session reflections and a post-project survey. Findings from this study report on positive changes in teachers’ and principals’ conceptions and implementation of AfL as well as on the value and challenges of IR as a professional learning model. The paper concludes with a discussion on developing systemic capacity in AfL through an IR model of professional learning. 相似文献
15.
16.
This case study looked at how an assessment strategy designed for an online learning environment can support teachers’ professional development. More specifically, we intended to evaluate how a particular online assessment design can help the participating in-service teachers to recognize the added value of formative assessment, and promote their own use of formative assessment in their professional classroom practices. The presented assessment design consists of a combination of different, non-standard assessment methods in an online environment. We analysed data from 494 questionnaires, the participants’ critical reflections about their learning and the participants’ produced artefacts. The findings illustrate the participants’ recognition of the formative character of the proposed assessment design, reflected not only by the high scores reported in seven of the eight themes explored, but also from the qualitative analysis of the participants’ reflections and artefacts. Suggestions are offered for the improvement of the proposed assessment design, so as to better promote the formative character of assessment. In particular, implications for the development of formative assessment in online professional development are discussed taking into account its potential to promote the participants’ self-regulatory learning processes. 相似文献
17.
Kim H. Koh 《Teaching Education》2013,24(3):255-276
This study examined the effects of professional development on teachers’ assessment literacy between two groups of teachers: (1) teachers who were involved in ongoing and sustained professional development in designing authentic classroom assessment and rubrics; and (2) teachers who were given only short-term, one-shot professional development workshops in authentic assessment. The participating teachers taught Year 4 and 5 English, science, and mathematics. The findings showed that the assessment literacy of teachers who were involved in ongoing, sustained professional development had increased significantly during the second year of study. These teachers had also gained a better understanding of authentic assessment. 相似文献
18.
促进学生学习和发展的课堂评价——2011课堂评价国际研讨会会议综述 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
课堂评价作为一种典型的形成性评价,与学校的教学和学生的学习有着紧密的关系,当前在我国教育领域内却备受冷落。本次国际研讨会从课堂评价、课程标准与外部考试一致性;课堂评价设计和实施的理论和技术;学习进展、学生发展与课堂评价系统的设计;课堂评价与教师专业发展;促进学习的课堂评价:学校经验报告等五个方面进行了深入研讨,以期引起教育领域内对课堂评价的关注,提升课堂评价的研究质量,促进学生学习和发展。 相似文献
19.
Christine Harrison 《Teachers and Teaching》2013,19(2):202-213
This paper sets out to explore science teachers’ classroom assessment practices and outlines some of the tensions and synergies in changing assessment practices. It describes episodes from a collaborative action research project with science teachers designed to support the strengthening of classroom assessment practices – the King’s Researching Expertise in Science Teaching project. This paper focuses on how the collaborative action research project functioned as a tool for generating formative feedback for the teachers and how this feedback supported the teachers in making sense of and further developing their classroom assessment practices. 相似文献
20.
Christine J. Lyon Leslie Nabors Oláh E. Caroline Wylie 《The Journal of educational research》2019,112(3):301-314
The purpose of this study was to directly observe and investigate the factors that support or hinder the implementation of an integrated approach to formative assessment and to understand how the implementation of formative assessment strategies interact. The authors present findings from a collective case study that included the observation of six teachers (three mathematics and three English language arts) who were purposefully sampled from a large, public, suburban high school in the northeast United States. The analysis of the case studies resulted in the identification of different patterns in teachers’ formative assessment practice. These patterns illustrate how the complex interaction between formative assessment practices can either support or hinder the implementation of an integrated approach to formative assessment and suggests classroom observations as a potential mechanism for identifying challenges and informing just-in-time professional development. 相似文献