首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
相似文献
 共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 203 毫秒
1.
杨震宁  吴晨 《科研管理》2021,42(5):21-30
技术战略联盟是合作伙伴资源共享、提高技术创新效率和共同创造价值的组织,但其创新活动往往伴随着各类风险,在实践中很多联盟的运行没有达到预期效果。如何降低联盟的运行风险,优化合作路径既是理论的前沿问题,也是实践亟待解决的难题。本文研究了技术战略联盟运行风险、协同合作与联盟稳定的关系,通过实证研究,结果表明:第一,技术战略联盟运行过程中利益冲突风险和分歧冲突风险会降低联盟的稳定性,而联盟依赖风险初期会提高联盟绩效,但随着依赖程度的逐渐加深,参与各方的自主开拓创新能力有可能受损,从而降低联盟绩效;第二,联盟内部的自主合作可以正向调节技术战略联盟运行中利益冲突风险、分歧冲突风险与联盟绩效的关系,并且削弱联盟依赖风险对联盟绩效的倒U型效应,从而起到协同优化的作用。政府扶持对技术战略联盟运行风险与联盟稳定关系的调节作用并不明显。  相似文献   

2.
Strategic alliances are important channels for interfirm learning, especially for small firms that are resource constrained. Of the several alliance attributes, technological distance between partners (measured as the distance between partners’ innovative outcomes) is shown to have a significant influence on the learning benefits from strategic alliances. Drawing upon the theory of recombination, our study argues that the influence of technological distance on learning is best understood by not only measuring the distance between innovative outcomes, but by also taking into consideration the knowledge elements underlying the innovative outcomes. We develop a concept of knowledge base homogeneity that captures the extent to which the innovative outcomes of partnering firms draw upon similar sets of knowledge elements. Using patent and alliance data from 201 small biotechnology firms during the period 1996–2010, we confirm that the technological distance has an inverted u-shaped relationship on interfirm learning. We further demonstrate that this u-shaped relationship is moderated by the knowledge base homogeneity between partners, such that benefits of technological distance are enhanced and the costs of technological distance are mitigated when the knowledge base homogeneity between alliance partners is high. The results have important implications for interfirm learning, especially in the context of small firms that are limited in their knowledge stocks.  相似文献   

3.
The evolution of trust in information technology alliances   总被引:2,自引:0,他引:2  
As strategic alliances become an increasingly important weapon for companies in achieving a competitive advantage, an important subject of investigation has become those factors that contribute to the success of the alliance. Trust between the alliance partners has been proposed to be one of those critical success factors. The high levels of uncertainty and interdependence that characterizes high technology alliances make trust particularly important in these contexts. Very little is known, however, about the process of trust creation or erosion in strategic alliances. This study addresses this shortcoming in cross-sectional trust research by utilizing a longitudinal survey design to examine the antecedents and outcomes of trust formation between strategic alliance partners. We contrast a transaction cost economics view of trust with a social exchange perspective to more fully explore what may influence changes in the level of trust between partners. Results suggest that the development of trust was not a function of the formal incentive systems that transaction cost economists deem necessary to prevent opportunistic behavior. Conversely, factors from social exchange theory – communication, shared values, and relationship equity – provide a more thorough explanation of what contributes to the development of higher levels of organizational trust. Finally, this study provides evidence that as trust increases between partners, the alliance benefits by displaying higher levels of dependence, higher levels of partner learning, and higher levels of performance.  相似文献   

4.
张运生  赖流滨 《科研管理》2022,43(9):149-158
    专利联盟能否帮助联盟成员防范联盟伙伴专利诉讼?基于联盟学习、合作竞争和社会网络理论,着眼于专利联盟网络,以2006—2018年MPEGLA管理的12个专利联盟成员为样本,通过14 454组配对,采用负二项回归模型实证研究专利联盟对遭受联盟伙伴专利诉讼的影响机制,并分析探索式合作、竞争性学习、网络中心位置和技术相似性的调节作用。研究发现:专利联盟与遭受联盟伙伴专利诉讼强度呈正向关系,探索式合作、竞争性学习和网络中心位置显著削弱专利联盟与专利诉讼的关系,而技术相似性显著强化专利联盟与专利诉讼的关系。本文拓展了专利联盟对联盟伙伴互动的影响路径,对于高技术企业有效利用专利联盟并防范联盟伙伴专利诉讼具有现实指导意义。  相似文献   

5.
Accelerating innovation in clean energy technologies is a policy priority for governments around the world aiming to mitigate climate change and to provide affordable energy. Most research has focused on the role of governments financing R&D and steering market demand, but there is a more limited understanding of the role of direct government interactions with startups across all sectors. We propose and evaluate the value-creation mechanisms of network resources from different types of partners for startups, highlighting the unique resources of government partners for cleantech startups. We develop and analyze a novel dataset of 657 U.S. cleantech startups and 2,015 alliances with governments, firms, research organizations, and not-for-profit organizations from 2008 to 2012 and analyze short-term firm outcomes from the different alliances. Our findings highlight the importance of governmental partners in technology development alliances to catalyze cleantech startup innovation (the patenting activity of cleantech startups increases by 73.7 percent with every additional governmental technology alliance when compared to those startups that did not engage in such alliances) and as quality signals to private sector investors for licensing alliances (private financing deals increase by 155 percent for every additional license from a government organization). Overall, these findings extend the alliance perspectives on innovation, contribute to the emerging research on entrepreneurial ecosystems, and underline the need to develop empirical evidence in different sectors.  相似文献   

6.
Fewer than 50% of strategic alliances are successful [Das, T. K., & Teng, B. (2000). Instabilities of strategic alliances: An internal tensions perspective. Organization Science, 11, 77–101]. This study examines the role of task complexity, nationality, prior alliance experience, and disparity in alliance experience in strategic alliance termination and performance. Based on survey responses from 85 parties in biopharmaceutical alliances, it is found that strategic alliances are more likely to be terminated and have poor performance when they have (1) both R&D and marketing elements, (2) domestic partners, (3) limited prior strategic alliance experience, and (4) large strategic alliance experience disparity between partners. Some of the findings are new and deserve additional investigations.  相似文献   

7.
Asymmetric alliances, those between small technology ventures and large industry players, defy established wisdom regarding the positive relationship between alliance partner similarities and alliance performance. What can we learn from these increasingly prevalent alliance forms to inform and extend alliance theory and practice? To help answer this question, this paper reports on the qualitative study of three asymmetric alliances, one failure and two successes, identifies key conceptual differences between symmetric and asymmetric alliances not addressed in the literature to date, suggests research opportunities and makes recommendations on how technology entrepreneurs can manage their relationship with large partners.  相似文献   

8.
Business groups in emerging economies frequently use international joint ventures (IJV) as a channel for knowledge acquisition and technology advancement. While IJVs provide a business group with access to new technology, how successful a group is in exploiting that new knowledge for innovative purposes depends on the groups’ ability to recombine new knowledge with its existing pool of knowledge and resources. The more resources a group spends in forming IJVs with foreign partners, the less resources the group has in developing and sustaining organizational mechanisms that facilitate integration of existing ideas and resources. Following this theoretical duality, we view the IJV–innovation relationship not as an “either–or” question, but as a question of whether and how. Specifically, viewing business groups as networks of loosely coupled firms, we examine how intra-group network structure and evolving institutional environment moderates the IJV–patenting relationship in Taiwan between 1981 and 1998.  相似文献   

9.
Why do new technology-based firms (NTBFs) cooperate? Starting from Teece's [Teece, D.J., 1986. Profiting from technological innovation: implications for integration, collaboration, licensing, and public policy. Research Policy 15, 285-305] conceptual framework and taking advantage of subsequent literature on alliance formation in the resource and competence-based tradition and in the social structure perspective, we derive an empirical model that aims at highlighting the inducements and obstacles that these firms face in alliance formation according to firm-specific characteristics and the nature of the alliance. In particular, a distinction is made between exploitative commercial alliances and explorative technological alliances. The econometric estimates, based on a large sample of Italian young high-tech firms that are observed from 1994 to 2003, provide strong evidence supporting two key intuitions of Teece's work. First, the “combination of specialized complementary assets” appears to be a key driver of the formation of exploitative commercial alliances by NTBFs. More specifically, patent holding affects positively the likelihood to establish commercial alliances, but this propensity is found to rapidly decrease with firm size, suggesting that as long as NTBFs become larger and possess specialized commercial assets their urge for commercial alliances diminishes. Second, following the parallelism set forth by Teece between search for alliance partners and access to external financing, the analysis indicates that potentially beneficial alliances may not take place because of the high transaction costs faced by smaller NTBFs. In this respect, our results clearly support the view that sponsor institutions as public research organizations, venture and corporate venture capitalists may sensibly reduce these costs and that their role crucially depends on both the identity of the sponsor and the type of alliance.  相似文献   

10.
Managing technology alliances: The case for knowledge management   总被引:4,自引:0,他引:4  
Organizations need to form alliances with external entities in order to acquire or access resources outside ones bounds. In recent times, we have seen an increased number of alliances geared towards acquiring technology capabilities. Alliances for technology capabilities include software application licensing agreements, access to technological infrastructure, and accessing technological know-how. While a lot of attention has been paid to the financial, economic, legal, and architectural issues of such arrangements, one dimension has been under debated and discussed—the knowledge component. Knowledge is the critical resource that is exchanged, managed, and integrated, in technology alliances. Managing knowledge in and around technology alliances is of utmost importance if we want to reap the strategic and operational benefits of such engagements. In this case study analysis, we share crucial knowledge management concerns to bear in mind while constructing, governing, and terminating technology alliances.  相似文献   

11.
总结学术界关于产业技术创新战略联盟的研究重点,运用内容分析法,对国家试点联盟2011—2013年的工作总结文本进行验证性和探索性研究。语义网络结构图与多维尺度图显示项目是合作创新的载体,企业是技术创新的主体,成员活动是联盟发展的基本元素,战略合作是技术创新的发展趋势,在此基础上提出促进联盟发展的对策建议。  相似文献   

12.
知识基础互补性对技术联盟的形成和伙伴选择的影响   总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1  
在回顾相关领域文献的基础上对知识基础互补性的内涵进行了分析和界定,将互补性划分为关联性和差异性两个维度。在此基础上进一步结合企业技术知识基础的层次和两种不同性质的技术联盟(开创型技术联盟、改进型技术联盟)对企业间知识基础的互补性对于技术联盟的形成和伙伴选择的问题进行了讨论,并提出了相关推论。  相似文献   

13.
合作联盟知识产权专有性与知识共享性的冲突研究   总被引:7,自引:0,他引:7  
利用冲突分析模型对知识产权的专有性和知识共享性所引发的冲突产生的必然性从理论上进行论证.模型1结果表明,在两个盟员的合作联盟中,如果没有任何外部约束,理性的盟员是不会共享自己的专有知识产权,从而导致联盟的失败,博弈分析也支持该结论.模型2的分析结果表明,只要在联盟中引入中立的协调入,并赋予该协调人一定的权利(如协调、惩罚等),就会出现稳定解,从而实现专有知识产权的共享.  相似文献   

14.
自20世纪80年代以来,国际战略联盟不断增长并成为企业成长的新模式。在这种联盟背景下,中国企业与跨国公司缔结战略联盟仍然是我国企业成长的重要战略之一。然而,由于伙伴动机的冲突导致战略联盟的失败率极高,因此,选择合适的伙伴是联盟成功的关键。通过构建联盟动机:资源——学习——企业成长框架,从中国企业的角度分析战略联盟伙伴选择的标准。  相似文献   

15.
知识联盟是企业获取外部知识尤其是隐形知识,提高自身竞争力的重要手段。针对知识联盟失败较多的现象,对影响知识联盟动态发展的联盟维持费用、知识资源特征、社会相客性等结构性因素作了分析。建立博弈模型,分两阶段研究了影响知识联盟形成和发展的结构性因素对企业行为决策的影响,并研究了这些因素之间的关系。  相似文献   

16.
吴言波  邵云飞 《科研管理》2021,42(9):103-111
   基于网络理论与动态能力理论视角,以336家高新技术企业为研究对象,本研究探讨了联盟组合重构对合作创新绩效的影响,并采用有调节的中介效应模型考察了联盟合法性与环境动态性的作用机制。研究结果表明:联盟组合结构性重构与联盟组合功能性重构对合作创新绩效均有显著的正向影响,联盟合法性在其中起着部分中介的作用;联盟合法性对合作创新绩效有显著的正向影响;环境动态性调节了联盟合法性对联盟组合结构性重构与合作创新绩效的中介作用,环境动态性调节了联盟合法性对联盟组合功能性重构与合作创新绩效的中介作用。  相似文献   

17.
文金艳  曾德明  王媛 《科研管理》2021,42(11):164-170
利用1999至2013年拥有标准联盟参与经历的170家车辆生产企业的数据,研究标准联盟组合多样性对企业两类技术标准化能力(主导能力、跟随能力)的影响,及关系强度在上述影响中的调节作用。基于负二项随机效应回归模型的实证分析发现:标准联盟组合多样性与企业技术标准化主导能力呈正U型关系,与技术标准化跟随能力呈倒U型关系。在标准联盟组合资源向技术标准化能力转化的过程中,联盟关系强度发挥了显著调节作用:随着关系强度提升,联盟组合多样性与技术标准化主导能力的正U型关系曲线、与技术标准化跟随能力的倒U型关系曲线将变得更为陡峭。  相似文献   

18.
胡少华 《科技管理研究》2012,32(12):114-117
分析产业技术创新联盟的组织运行特点,提出联盟中知识资源、知识服务、知识再生产以及多业务整合的需求特征。针对联盟知识资源特点和服务需求,提出包括成员知识节点和中心服务门户的分布式知识框架,设计统一知识服务门户的技术架构。面向联盟知识服务的长期性、有效性需求,研究分析知识服务的组织运行机制并提出相应的知识审计评价范围和流程。为进一步提升知识要素的创新效能提供理论基础。  相似文献   

19.
《Research Policy》2023,52(4):104705
This study examines exit dynamics in open multiparty alliances, an important form of interfirm collaboration that includes committee-based standard-setting organizations, research and technology consortia, and other types of open meta-organizations. Open multiparty alliances differ markedly from more commonly studied dyadic alliances and closed multiparty alliances due to the open nature of membership and the broad diversity of firms that collaborate towards shaping the trajectory of emerging technologies in a sector. Drawing from literature on interfirm imitation, we posit that under conditions of elevated uncertainty about the technologies under development and the ability of diverse alliance members to work together effectively, firms are subject to social influence from their industry peers and thus tend to imitate them in exiting open multiparty alliances. However, we also argue that firms that are central in the wider network of alliances have access to superior information on sector developments as well as key resources that immunize them from such social influence effects. Analyses of the exit dynamics of the nine most influential open multiparty alliances that shaped the global mobile phone sector between 2000 and 2012 support our predictions. Our findings contribute to research on interfirm collaboration in technology-intensive contexts, in particular on open collaboration between multiple partners.  相似文献   

20.
归纳总结近年来国内外学者就技术标准联盟绩效的研究成果,主要从技术标准联盟的内涵与绩效、网络结构与技术标准联盟绩效、生命周期理论与技术标准联盟等关注度较高的领域对目前的研究进行梳理,并就未来研究方向进行展望.  相似文献   

设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号