首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
相似文献
 共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 578 毫秒
1.
本研究对高一至高三年级的94名聋高中生和108名普通高中生的自尊进行了调查与比较研究。结果显示:聋高中生的整体自尊和具体自尊都显著低于普通高中生;聋高中生的自尊发展不存在年级差异,普通高中生的自尊发展存在显著的年级差异,表现出随年龄增长而下降的趋势;聋高中生和普通高中生自尊总体上都不存在性别差异;聋高中生的自尊发展存在年级性别交互作用,高一、高二年级女生的自尊水平高于男生,高三年级男生的自尊水平却显著高于女生。  相似文献   

2.
本研究采用自编的《初中生自主性发展自陈问卷》,对257名初中生的自主性从三个维度进行研究,结果表明:(1)初中生自主性发展具有独特的年级特点。在自主性发展水平上,初一与初二、初三学生之间存在显著的年级差异,并且初一水平好于初二、初三;初二与初三学生之间不存在显著的年级差异。初二是自主性发展水平下降最为明显的阶段。到了初三,除自我控制维度继续呈下降趋势外,其余维度及总体发展水平不再下降。(2)初中生在自主性的总体发展水平及自我依靠和自我主张两个维度上均不存在显著的性别差异,但在自我控制维度上存在显著的性别差异,并且女生水平好于男生。初一学生在自我控制维度上、初二学生在总体发展水平上存在显著性别差异,而且均表现为女生水平好于男生。初三学生中不存在显著的性别差异。  相似文献   

3.
青少年自尊发展特点研究   总被引:4,自引:0,他引:4  
采用自编<青少年自尊评定问卷>,探讨2 470名青少年自尊发展的年级和性别特点.结果表明:(1)青少年自尊存在显著的年级差异,初二是青少年自尊发展的关键时期;(2)青少年自尊存在极其显著的性别差异,女生自尊发展水平显著高于男生.从而可以预测,女生的心理健康水平高于男生.  相似文献   

4.
王萌  宋岳礼 《考试周刊》2015,(33):95-96
本文运用定量研究和定性研究相结合的方法,对150名初中生进行问卷调查,并对其中9名初中生进行访谈,重点考察不同性别、年级的初中生英语学习自我效能感的差异及英语学习自我效能感与英语成绩之间的关系。结果表明:初中生英语学习自我效能感总体上处于中等偏上水平;女生的英语学习自我效能感显著高于男生;初三年级学生的英语学习自我效能感显著低于初一与初二年级;英语学习自我效能感与英语成绩呈显著正相关,能解释英语成绩38.2%的差异。  相似文献   

5.
采用阈下启动实验范式,探讨初中生内隐攻击性的发展特点。采用2(启动条件:暴力启动/中性启动)×2(性别:男/女)×3(年级:初一/初二/初三)被试间设计,对331名初中生进行施测。结果表明,暴力启动组和中性启动组、年级间的反应倾向存在显著的差异,初一、初二、初三年级两两之间的消极反应倾向均存在显著的差异,男生和女生之间的反应倾向差异不显著。结论:初中生的内隐攻击性会受到无意识的激活;随着年级递增,内隐攻击性受到阈下启动影响的程度有明显下降趋势;初中男、女生内隐攻击性不存在差异。  相似文献   

6.
汉、藏中学生在数学学习总体元认知、元认知知识和元认知体验上差异显著。汉族中学生的总体元认知和元认知知识水平高于藏族中学生,而在元从知体验水平上则低于藏族中学生;汉、藏男生在总体元认知及其各个堆度上均无显著差异,女生在元认知知识上盖异显著。汉族女生高于藏族女生;初二年级汉、藏学生在元认知体验上有显著差异,藏族初中生的元认知体验高于汉族初中生;高二年级汉、藏学生在总体元从知、元认知知识和元认知监控上有显著差异。汉族高中生高于藏族高中生。  相似文献   

7.
研究发现,初中生人格发展的年级主效应和性别主效应显著,交互作用不显著.从年级上看,亲社会性、智能特征在年级上没有显著差异,在认真自控、外倾性、情绪稳定性三个维度上,均是初一得分显著高于初二和初三.从性别上看,在人格的五个维度中,亲社会性、认真自控、外倾性三个维度的男生得分显著低于女生;而在智能特征和情绪稳定性维度上,男生得分显著高于女生.  相似文献   

8.
文章探究了农村初中生英语阅读元认知水平及发展特点。结果表明:农村初中生英语阅读元认知水平总体呈中等水平,其中阅读元认知体验水平相对较高而阅读元认知监控水平相对较低;农村初中生英语阅读元认知发展存在显著年级差异,初一显著高于初二与初三而初二与初三,无显著差异;农村初中生英语阅读元认知发展存在显著的性别差异,女生在英语阅读元认知体验与监控得分显著高于男生。  相似文献   

9.
采用了问卷调查分析初中生对教师角色期待的现状。得出结论,初中生对教师角色的期待总体较高。不同性别的学生对教师角色期待的差异显著,其中,女生在各个方面对教师角色的期待都高于男生,且男女生在师生互动、教学管理两个维度上存在显著的差异;不同年级的学生对教师角色期待差异不显著,但各个年级的学生在师生互动、生活关注两个维度上存在显著的差异,初一学生的期待显著高于初二学生。  相似文献   

10.
初中生心理适应性与主观幸福感的关系研究   总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1  
采用青少年心理适应性量表(APAS)和总体幸福感量表(GWB)对180名初中生进行调查,探讨初中生心理适应性与主观幸福感的状况以及两者之间的关系.结果表明:(1)性别和年级因素在群体活动适应性因子上的交互作用显著,进一步的简单效应分析表明,初三年级在群体活动适应因子上的得分存在显著的性别差异,男生显著高于女生;(2)性别和年级因素在主观幸福感各维度上的交互作用均不显著,性别在松弛与紧张维度上的主效应显著,女生显著高于男生.年级在精力维度上的主效应显著,初二年级显著高于初二和初三年级;(3)初中生心理适应性与主观幸福感有着密切的关系:身体与体育竞赛适应、考试焦虑情境适应和群体活动适应与初中生主观幸福感呈非常显著正相关,陌生情境与学习情境适应与初中生的幸福感呈显著正相关.  相似文献   

11.
12.
The purpose of this study was to investigate the practicality of extending the Multidimensional Self Concept Scale (MSCS) norms downward for use with third and fourth grade students from a predominantly African-American sample. This research compared domain-specific and general self-concepts by grade, gender, and race among third through sixth grade students. Comparison was also made between fifth and sixth grade students in this sample and fifth and sixth grade students in the national standardization sample. It was concluded that no meaningful differences existed between the present sample of fifth and sixth grade students and the standardization sample of fifth and sixth grade students. However, differences found between the third through sixth grade students in this sample were significant and clinically meaningful for the Total Scale score and for all scales, except the Academic and Physical scales. Although the existing norms for the Academic and Physical scales appear appropriate for the younger children, separate norm tables appear warranted for the remaining subscales and Total Scale. Internal consistency for the MSCS for third and fourth grade students was comparable to the fifth and sixth grade students in this sample. © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.  相似文献   

13.
目的:探讨大学生抑郁、自尊和自我价值保护策略的关系。方法:采用问卷调查、量表和内隐联想测验对200名大学生进行试测。结果:①学生的抑郁与外显自尊显著负相关(t=-0.066,P〈0.01),与自我价值保护策略显著正相关(t=0.419,P〈0.01);②抑郁对自我设限和防御性悲观具有正向预测作用(t=2.988,P〈0.01;t=5.856,P〈0.01),外显自尊对自我设限具有正向预测作用(t=2.875,P〈0.01),对防御性悲观有负向预测作用(t=-4.846,P〈0.01),内隐自尊对自我设限具有负向预测作用(t=-2.466,P〈0.01)。结论:自尊在抑郁和自我价值保护策略中起中介作用。  相似文献   

14.
This study reports an investigation into the sources and levels of stress in relation to locus of control and self esteem in university students. Two stress questionnaires (ASQ and LSQ) were used to assess students’ stress. The first deals with academic sources of stress, and the second assesses the student's life stress levels. The achievement scale of the Multidimensional Multi‐attributional Scale Causality (MMCS) was used to measure locus of control, and the Rosenberg Self Esteem Scale to assess students’ self esteem. The study sample consisted of 675 (202 males and 473 females) second‐year undergraduate students. The results indicated that examination and examination results were the highest causes of stress in students, followed by studying for exams, too much to do and the amount to learn, respectively. Results showed that 77.6% and 10.4% of the students fall into the moderate and serious stress categories, respectively, and that there were significant differences between females and males students in both academic and life stress, with female students more stressed than males. Results also indicated a significant positive correlation between locus of control and academic stress, suggesting that students with external beliefs are more stressed than those with internal. A significant negative correlation between self esteem and both academic and life stress emerged, indicating that students with high self esteem are less stressed than are those with low.  相似文献   

15.
This study analysed the effects a values education programme can have on the feelings of self‐realisation, self‐concept and self‐esteem of Romany adolescents in southern Spain. To do this, an experimental group received a values education intervention but a control group did not. The intervention programme was adapted to the Romany culture. The self‐realisation, self‐concept and self‐esteem of both groups were evaluated using the Self‐Concept and Realisation Questionnaire. Statistical analyses showed the existence of significant differences between the experimental and control groups on the variables studied. Based on the results, we suggest that a values education programme like this, that has been culturally adapted, can make a positive impact on the self‐realisation of young people from a marginalised community.  相似文献   

16.
The purpose of this study was to explore the relationship between divergent thinking abilities, self‐esteem, and personal characteristics of older adults. A total of 39 subjects ranging in age from 61 to 84 years responded to a personal data inventory, a self‐esteem measure, and a taped auditory free‐response exercise in divergent thinking. Scores were obtained for fluency, flexibility, and originality of thought and for self‐esteem. Level of education was the best predictor of divergent thinking abilities. Self‐esteem and age were significantly correlated with fluency and flexibility but not with originality. Level of education accounted for the greatest proportion of variance in divergent thinking scores. In the multiple regressions neither self‐esteem nor age accounted for a significant proportion of the variance in fluency, flexibility, or originality. Self‐reports of subjects supported positiveness in self‐perceptions. Results are discussed in terms of the age‐decrement model of cognitive abilities and positiveness of educational intervention efforts.  相似文献   

17.

The purpose of this study was to examine the self‐concepts, locus of control, and machi‐avellianism of 169 ethnically diverse middle grade students identified as gifted. Subjects consisted of 90 African‐American (31 boys, 18 girls). Self‐concept, locus of control, and machiavellianism were assessed by Me: A Self‐Concept Scale for Gifted Children (Feldhusen &; Kolloff, 1981), the Nowicki‐Strickland Locus of Control Scale (Nowicki &; Strickland, 1973), and Mach IV Scale (Christie &; Geis, 1970) respectively. A three‐way analysis of variance (group × Gender × Grade) on subjects’ scores revealed significant group differences in self‐concept. No significant gender or grade differences were found in self‐concept. No significant group, gender, or grade differences were found in locus of control and machiavellianism. Self‐concept was significantly and positively correlated with internal locus of control and with low machiavellianism. Mean scores indicated that ethnically diverse students who are gifted had positive self‐concepts, internal locus of control, and were low machiavellians.  相似文献   

18.
The Adaptive/Maladaptive Perfectionism Scale (AMPS) for children measures different dimensions of perfectionism. In this study, subscales derived from the AMPS were compared with results of the Piers‐Harris Self‐Concept Scale (PHSCS) in a sample of fourth‐ and fifth‐grade students (9 to 11 years old). The AMPS dimensions accounted for significant variation in PHSCS scores for both boys and girls, though the specific patterns of results differed between the sexes. For boys but not girls, greater sensitivity about making mistakes was only problematic, in terms of predicting negative aspects of self‐concept, under conditions of lower self‐esteem. Results provided additional psychometric support for the AMPS and revealed important considerations for assessment and intervention with perfectionistic children. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Psychol Schs 41: 279–290, 2004.  相似文献   

19.
The aim of this study is to investigate the relationship between being labelled either as having dyslexia or as having general special educational needs (SEN) and a child's self‐esteem. Seventy‐five children aged between 8 and 15 years categorised as having dyslexia (N = 26), as having general SEN (N = 26) or as having no learning difficulties (N = 23), completed an age‐appropriate version of the Culture‐Free Self‐Esteem Inventory and a standard test of reading ability. When the self‐esteem scores of the groups were compared (with the discrepancy between reading and chronological age being partialled out), it was found that the self‐esteem scores of those in the ‘general SEN’ group had significantly lower self‐esteem scores than those in both the ‘dyslexia’ group and the ‘control’ group. There was no significant difference between the self‐esteem scores of the ‘dyslexia’ and the ‘control’ group. On the basis of these findings, it is suggested that being labelled as having a general SEN may negatively affect children's self‐esteem because, unlike the label dyslexia, this label offers very little in the way of an explanation for the child's academic difficulties and because targeted interventions are not as available for those with a less specific label.  相似文献   

20.
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号