共查询到17条相似文献，搜索用时 221 毫秒
1.
本研究以42名大三英语专业学生为受试,探究二语词汇知识对于阅读中的词汇推理成绩及其策略选择上有何影响。运用SPSS19.0进行相关分析和回归分析处理后,得出以下结论:(1)二语词汇广度知识与词汇推理成绩呈现正相关。深度知识对词汇推理成绩的影响不显著。(2)二语词汇广度知识对词汇推理成绩的预测力度大于深度知识对于词汇推理成绩的预测力度。(3)词汇量多的学生倾向从大的语境进行词汇推理,而词汇量低的学生倾向于运用构词法、连接词、搭配等小的方面进行词汇推理。 相似文献
2.
以某高校122名非英语专业二年级学生为研究对象,运用结构方程模型,探究不同维度的词汇知识与阅读理解的关系,并采用自助法(Bootstrapping)与蒙地卡罗(Monte Carlo Method)进一步考察了词汇流畅性的中介作用。结果发现：一是接受性词汇深度对于阅读理解贡献最大、接受性词汇广度次之、产出性词汇广度位居第三、产出性词汇深度贡献最小。分别为：β=.48, p<.001,β=.31, p<.001,β=.28, p<.001,β=.19, p<.001;二是词汇知识四个维度对阅读理解的整体预测力为59%;三是词汇流畅性在产出性词汇广度与阅读理解之间的关系起到部分中介的作用;四是在词汇流畅性的介入下,词汇知识四个维度对阅读理解的影响力不同程度地有所增加。最后讨论了不同维度的词汇知识在L2阅读理解中的不同重要性,研究结论对二语词汇与阅读教学具有重要指导意义。 相似文献
3.
研究在大学英语四级层面上词汇深度和广度与阅读理解的关系。研究结果显示词汇的各个方面对阅读理解能力有着不同的作用。在四级层面上,词汇广度和深度与阅读理解有显著性正相关。相比词汇深度,词汇广度可以更好的预测阅读理解能力。综合本研究的结果以及前人研究,本研究提出了一个有关词汇水平与阅读理解能力关系的假设模型。 相似文献
4.
申亚琳 《合肥师范学院学报》2014,(4):87-92
基于阅读组合模式的理论框架、Nation提出的词汇广度测试构念和结构语言学家对于句法知识的界定,考察词汇广度和句法知识对二语阅读理解测试成绩的预测,以了解此预测是否受二语水平的调节作用。实验结果表明：受试的词汇广度和句法知识都与其阅读理解测试成绩存在线性相关关系;无论对于高水平受试还是低水平受试,句法知识对阅读理解测试成绩的预测能力都大于词汇广度对其的预测。 相似文献
5.
本文以词汇专家Nation建立的词汇知识框架(1990)为理论基础,旨在探讨汉语作为外语学习的环境下,中亚留学生词汇知识深度与阅读理解之间的关系。受试者是新疆大学国际文化交流学院的50名中亚留学生。研究发现:词汇知识深度和阅读理解之间存在显著相关。 相似文献
6.
本文综合部分国内外学者对影响阅读理解水平的因素的研究，通过实验简要分析了阅读广度、语言知识水平和阅读理解监控水平与阅读理解成绩之间的关系。实验结果表明：1、阅读广度、语言知识水平和阅读理解监控水平均与阅读理解成绩相关；2．三者之间无交互作用，但阅读广度、语言知识水平效果显著；3、语言知识水平和阅读理解监控水平对阅读理解成绩有预测作用。 相似文献
7.
本文对近年来刊登在国内主要外语期刊上有关二语词汇知识深度习得的文章进行了检索统计,从研究内容角度将这些文章主要归纳成三类(关于词汇广度和深度关系的研究、关于深度知识各个层面的发展的研究、关于深度知识与阅读能力的关系的研究)加以讨论和分析,期望能通过本文给更多外语工作者提供一些研究思路,并对我们的教学工作起到一定的指导作用. 相似文献
8.
词汇是语言的重要组成部分,词汇知识包括广度和深度。词汇广度指词汇量的大小。词汇深度指词形、词性、词语搭配等。本文以牛津高中英语教材(江苏版)为载体,探讨了词汇知识(包括广度和深度)的重要性。若词汇知识广度和深度能达到要求,学生就能较快、较准确地掌握文章的中心思想、段落大意,找出重要细节,从而提高阅读的速度和准确性。教师在教授词汇知识和学生在学习词汇知识的过程中,都应充分重视这两个方面的知识,忽视任何一个方面都有失偏颇。 相似文献
9.
采用具有高效度与信度的测试工具对长春两所高校74名英语专业的大二学生进行了词汇知识和阅读理解测试,以此探索词汇知识与阅读理解的相关性。结果表明,词汇广度与阅读理解存在显著的正相关关系;词汇深度与阅读理解的相关性较为显著;词汇广度与阅读理解的相关性大于词汇深度与阅读理解的相关性。 相似文献
10.
本研究以南京市62名中班幼儿为研究对象,以《儿童图片指认测试图》和自编《图画故事阅读理解测试题》为研究工具,探讨口语词汇广度水平与阅读能力的相关性.研究发现:(1)幼儿对词义理解准确与否是影响其口语词汇广度水平高低的主要因素.(2)幼儿对故事结构要素的理解优于对故事内容的理解,对故事表层内容的理解明显优于对故事深层内容的理解.(3)幼儿口语词汇广度水平与阅读能力存在显著正相关,口语词汇广度水平能够预测其阅读能力成绩.为提高幼儿阅读能力,早期教育工作者宜采取多种方式,如游戏化形式,帮助幼儿提高词汇广度,要关注幼儿在词汇学习过程中容易出现的错误并给予正确引导. 相似文献
11.
Beyond breadth: the contributions of vocabulary depth to reading comprehension among skilled readers 
下载免费PDF全文
下载免费PDF全文 Katherine S. Binder Nicole Gilbert Cote Cheryl Lee Emily Bessette Huong Vu 《Journal of Research in Reading》2017,40(3):333-343
This study investigated the relationships among vocabulary breadth, vocabulary depth, reading comprehension, and reading rate among college‐aged students. While the relationships of some of these variables have been explored in previous research, the current study's focus on the role of vocabulary depth on the literacy measures within a sample of skilled readers is new and produced several interesting findings. First, consistent with the hypotheses, both vocabulary breadth and depth were significantly correlated with reading comprehension and reading rate. Second, while both types of vocabulary knowledge explained unique variance in reading comprehension, only vocabulary breadth explained unique variance in reading rate. Finally, although vocabulary breadth was significantly correlated with both of the vocabulary depth measures, the two depth measures were not significantly correlated with each other. This work implies that a strong depth of vocabulary affects reading comprehension, in addition to the well‐established relationship between vocabulary breadth and comprehension. 相似文献
12.
Zheng Lin 《Journal of Research in Reading》2002,25(2):172-190
This paper investigates EFL learners’ perception of prior knowledge and its roles in reading comprehension. It is based on a survey conducted among 400 EFL students studying at secondary and tertiary levels in China. Through the analysis of the ranked multiple responses to the questions posed in the questionnaire, the paper shows that EFL students in mainland China believe that their command of English vocabulary plays a crucial role in their reading comprehension. However as their linguistic knowledge increases, they tend to attach less importance to their linguistic knowledge, especially the knowledge of English syntax and formal structures. At the same time, conceptual and sociocultural knowledge seems to gain greater importance. Furthermore, the perceived importance of linguistic knowledge seems to start diminishing around the end of secondary education, when EFL students have acquired a vocabulary of about 3000 words and the basic knowledge of English syntax and formal structures. The final replacement of linguistic knowledge by conceptual or sociocultural knowledge as the top factor that affects their reading comprehension seems to take place one year after the beginning of the tertiary EFL course. This may well be considered as an indication of the EFL threshold level for EFL students in China. 相似文献
13.
This study examined individual differences among beginning readers of English as a foreign language (EFL). The study concentrated
on the effects of underlying first language (L1) knowledge as well as EFL letter and vocabulary knowledge. Phonological and
morphological awareness, spelling, vocabulary knowledge, and word reading in Hebrew L1, in addition to knowledge of EFL letters
and EFL vocabulary, were measured. The study also investigated the effect of socioeconomic background (SES) on beginning EFL
readers. Participants included 145 fourth graders from three schools representing two socioeconomic backgrounds in the north
of Israel. The results indicate that knowledge of English letters played a more prominent role than knowledge of Hebrew L1
components in differentiating between strong and weak EFL readers. The Linguistic Coding Differences Hypothesis was supported
by L1 phonological awareness, word reading, and vocabulary knowledge appearing as part of discriminating functions. The presence
of English vocabulary knowledge as part of the discriminant functions provides support for English word reading being more
than just a decoding task for EFL beginner readers. Socioeconomic status differentiated the groups for EFL word recognition
but not for EFL reading comprehension. 相似文献
14.
Nicole M. Swart Marloes M. L. Muijselaar Esther G. Steenbeek-Planting Mienke Droop Peter F. de Jong L. Verhoeven 《Reading and writing》2017,30(3):489-507
The mental lexicon plays a central role in reading comprehension (Perfetti & Stafura, 2014). It encompasses the number of lexical entries in spoken and written language (vocabulary breadth), the semantic quality of these entries (vocabulary depth), and the connection strength between lexical representations (semantic relatedness); as such, it serves as an output for the decoding process and as an input for comprehension processes. Although different aspects of the lexicon can be distinguished, research on the role of the mental lexicon in reading comprehension often does not take these individual aspects of the lexicon into account. The current study used a multicomponent approach to examine whether measures of spoken and written vocabulary breadth, vocabulary depth, and semantic relatedness were differentially predictive of individual differences in reading comprehension skills in fourth-grade students. The results indicated that, in addition to nonverbal reasoning, short-term memory, and word decoding, the four measures of lexical quality substantially added (30 %) to the proportion of explained variance of reading comprehension (adding up to a total proportion of 65 %). Moreover, each individual measure of lexical quality added significantly to the prediction of reading comprehension after all other measures were taken into account, with written lexical breadth and lexical depth showing the greatest increase in explained variance. It can thus be concluded that multiple components of lexical quality play a role in children’s reading comprehension. 相似文献
15.
Martina Röthlisberger Christoph Zangger Britta Juska-Bacher 《Journal of Research in Reading》2023,46(1):1-21
Background
In countries with German as an official language, children with German as a second language perform overall worse in school than their German native speaking peers. This particularly affects written language skills, which require advanced language knowledge. The reasons are manifold, but one is prominent, namely poor vocabulary knowledge. Vocabulary, however, consists not only of the number of known words but also of a complex and hitherto under-researched lexico-semantic framework, which is referred to as vocabulary depth.Method
In the present study, a sample of 373 children (322 German native speakers and 51 with German as a second language) was examined longitudinally in Grade 2 and 3 for their reading comprehension and vocabulary breadth and depth. Vocabulary depth was defined as relational and semantic word knowledge. Latent change score models on vocabulary breadth and depth development including reading precursor skills, non-verbal intelligence and SES were conducted.Results
The children with German as a second language scored lower than the native German speakers in reading and vocabulary tests, with the difference in vocabulary depth being more pronounced than in vocabulary breadth. Importantly, the differences did not tend to diminish over time, which could have been expected. The differences in reading comprehension can be accounted for mainly by the variations in vocabulary, especially in vocabulary depth.Conclusions
These findings emphasise the importance of including not only vocabulary breadth but also vocabulary depth in the context of reading research on children who do not speak the majority language.16.
杨筱霞 《成都教育学院学报》2008,22(7):73-76
对广东某高职院校81名非英语专业高职学生的英语词汇广度、深度知识和各项语言技能调研发现,被试之间的词汇知识水平和语言各项技能均存在着相当大的差距,二语习得连续系统的词汇知识越高,被试在各种语言技能的表现就越好,词汇深度知识对不同水平学生的预测力和影响模式各不相同,词汇深度知识比词汇广度对高分组和中间组的英语综合能力的影响程度更大,而阅读变量对低分组的语言水平预测力最大。 相似文献
17.
Children learning English as an additional language (EAL) are a growing population of learners in English primary schools. These children begin school with differing levels of English language proficiency and tend to underperform in relation to their non-EAL peers on measures of English oral language and reading. However, little work has examined the developmental trajectories of these skills in EAL learners in England. EAL learners and 33 non-EAL peers in Year 4 (age 8–9 years) were assessed at three time points over 18 months on measures of oral language (vocabulary, grammar and listening comprehension), phonological processing (spoonerisms and rapid automatised naming) and reading skills (single-word decoding and passage reading). At t1, EAL learners scored significantly lower than non-EAL peers in receptive and expressive vocabulary (breadth but not depth), spoonerisms and passage reading accuracy. Contrary to previous research, no significant group differences were found in listening or reading comprehension skills. With the exception of passage reading accuracy, there was no evidence for convergence or divergence between the groups in rate of progress over time. After three years of English-medium classroom instruction, EAL learners continue to underperform relative to their non-EAL peers in breadth of English vocabulary knowledge. This discrepancy in vocabulary knowledge does not appear to narrow as a result of regular classroom instruction in the run up to the final stages of primary school, pinpointing vocabulary as a key target for intervention. 相似文献