共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 159 毫秒
1.
高校图书馆外文纸本期刊馆藏建设面临着使用率下降、出版社向电子期刊战略转移和价格较高且年年调涨等问题。删订纸本期刊、保留电子期刊是目前多数高校图书馆的做法。中山大学图书馆采取删订与电子期刊重复的外文纸本期刊、高价外文纸本期刊和各校区馆藏复本刊的做法,调减外文纸本期刊品种,取得了较好的成效。未来高校图书馆外文纸本期刊馆藏应注重调整学科馆藏结构;实施战略,协调馆藏发展;重新确立增减原则。 相似文献
2.
电子期刊时代如何应对馆藏重复问题 总被引：9，自引：0，他引：9
分析电子期刊的现状,认为在现阶段电子期刊并不能够完全取代传统纸本期刊。从合同、服务提供者、图书馆特性、出版特性、技术因素、图书馆状况六个方面对图书馆在取消重复纸本刊时必须考虑的问题进行剖析总结,以期为图书馆馆藏决策提供参考依据。 相似文献
3.
中文期刊数字化主要采用数据库厂商集群网络化出版方式,但是此种模式存在一些弊端,如重复收录程度高、雷同性强、同质化严重、完整性差、时效性差等。针对上述问题,图书馆中文期刊馆藏发展应积极构建纸质期刊与电子期刊互补并存的期刊馆藏模式,适时进行纸质期刊与电子期刊的整合,加强电子期刊商业模式研究,制订科学的期刊馆藏发展战略。 相似文献
4.
研究型图书馆外文期刊采访探析 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
5.
外文电子期刊数据库捆绑纸本订购模式分析 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
随着期刊市场纸本与电子共同出版模式的形成,以及期刊出版业的垄断集团化,为了获取高额利润,一些出版商采取纸本与电子版捆绑销售模式来销售电子期刊数据库,其捆绑模式有保留现有纸本订购、规定一个最低订购额以及提供E-only和纸本+电子捆绑三种形式。随着图书馆馆藏数字化,出版商的纸本捆绑销售出现了一些转变,有的出版商允许用户将纸本刊转成电子刊,有的允许用户取消纸本载体转而支付电子内容费,有的取消纸本捆绑启用E-only模式,但这些转变并没有给用户节省多少费用,并没有在真正意义上取消纸本捆绑,只是出版商换了一种销售方式而已。 相似文献
6.
7.
数字环境下大学图书馆外刊资源建设的思考 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
从分析外刊资源建设的现状及环境影响因素入手,探讨了外刊资源建设中存在的经费紧缺、重复建设、使用不平衡和电子期刊的局限等问题,进一步提出了明确发展目标、建立馆藏评价机制、加强用户研究、加强协调与合作以及创建外刊资源门户等方面的思考和建议。 相似文献
8.
探讨了在当今网络环境下公共图书馆的期刊管理工作;分析了期刊资源分散管理和系统管理的优劣,以及网络环境对一个地区公共图书馆期刊工作的要求,包括馆藏资源建设、管理模式、期刊服务工作、纸质和电子期刊的协调采购、纸质期刊的深度开发等方面。 相似文献
9.
10.
网络电子期刊替代印刷文本的决策研究 总被引：5，自引：0，他引：5
当代图书馆处于多种文献载体复合集藏的时期，协调纸本期刊及电子期刊的馆藏结构，是资源建设研究的焦点之一。本文探讨了网络电子期刊替代纸本期刊的决策问题。 相似文献
11.
Librarians in the Health Sciences Library System at the University of Pittsburgh explored the possibility of developing an electronic reference collection that would replace the print reference collection, thus providing access to these valuable materials to a widely dispersed user population. The librarians evaluated the print reference collection and standard collection development lists as potential benchmarks for the electronic collection, and they determined which books were available in electronic format. They decided that the low availability of electronic versions of titles in each benchmark group rendered the creation of an electronic reference collection using either benchmark impractical. 相似文献
12.
Librarians in the Health Sciences Library System at the University of Pittsburgh explored the possibility of developing an electronic reference collection that would replace the print reference collection, thus providing access to these valuable materials to a widely dispersed user population. The librarians evaluated the print reference collection and standard collection development lists as potential benchmarks for the electronic collection, and they determined which books were available in electronic format. They decided that the low availability of electronic versions of titles in each benchmark group rendered the creation of an electronic reference collection using either benchmark impractical. 相似文献
13.
Amalia Monroe 《资料收集管理》2013,38(2):83-100
During the spring and summer of 2008 the University of Kansas (KU) Libraries conducted a collection evaluation study on the serial sales publications issued by United Nations (UN) specialized agencies. After a checklist was compiled, KU holdings were compared to the list to develop a record of UN specialized agency serial publication holdings at KU. The goal was to identify both electronic and print holdings within this specific collection. The project also sought publications that were freely available electronically for the purpose of expanding the KU international government information collection while increasing neither the serials budget nor the physical size of the collection. 相似文献
14.
中美大学图书馆资源构成与配置比较研究 总被引：20，自引：1，他引：19
以调查统计数据为基础,阐述我国大学图书馆的经费投入和资源构成特点,论述美国大学图书馆的资源配置状况和发展趋势,并在与我国大学图书馆的资源配置进行比较后,提出我国大学图书馆资源建设的合理发展方向,尤其是电子资源的发展方向。 相似文献
15.
16.
17.
OBJECTIVES: Patterns of use of electronic versions of journals supplied by an academic health sciences library were examined to determine whether they differed from patterns of use among corresponding print titles and to relate the applicability of print collection development practices to an electronic environment. METHODS: Use data supplied by three major vendors of electronic journals were compared to reshelving data for corresponding print titles, impact factors, and presence on Brandon/Hill Lists. RESULTS: In collections where one-click access from a database record to the full text of articles was possible, electronic use correlated with print use across journal pairs. In both versions, Brandon/Hill titles were used more frequently than non-Brandon/Hill titles, use had modest correlations with journals' impact factors, and clinical use appeared to be higher than research use. Titles that had not been selected for the library's print collections, but which were bundled into publishers' packages, received little use compared to electronic titles also selected in print. CONCLUSIONS: Collection development practices based on quality and user needs can be applied with confidence to the electronic environment. Facilitating direct connections between citation databases and the corresponding journal articles regardless of platform or publisher will support scholarship and quality health care. 相似文献
18.
19.
我国图书情报单位电子出版物收集的现状、问题与对策 总被引：12，自引：0，他引：12
图书情报单位收集电子出版物时 ,应加强宏观调控 ,避免重复引进 ;调整纸介质文献和电子文献采购经费比例 ,合理配制 ;加强网络建设 ,建立虚拟馆藏 ;尊重网上作品作者的著作权。参考文献 12。 相似文献
20.
Academic health sciences libraries in the United States and Canada were surveyed regarding collection development trends, including their effect on approval plan and blanket order use, and use of outsourcing over the past four years. Results of the survey indicate that serials market forces, budgetary constraints, and growth in electronic resources purchasing have resulted in a decline in the acquisition of print items. As a result, approval plan use is being curtailed in many academic health sciences libraries. Although use of blanket orders is more stable, fewer than one-third of academic health sciences libraries report using them currently. The decline of print collections suggests that libraries should explore cooperative collection development of print materials to ensure access and preservation. The decline of approval plan use and the need for cooperative collection development may require additional effort for sound collection development. Libraries were also surveyed about their use of outsourcing. Some libraries reported outsourcing cataloging and shelf preparation of books, but none reported using outsourcing for resource selection. The reason given most often for outsourcing was that it resulted in cost savings. As expected, economic factors are driving both collection development and outsourcing practices. 相似文献