共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 546 毫秒
1.
欧盟公民来自不同的种族,多元化语言战略势在必行。为了促进国际合作和交流,欧洲理事会颁布了《欧洲语言共同参考框架：学习、教学、评估》及其辅助性文件《欧洲语言档案》,两者如今已成为欧盟各国语言教学领域最有影响力的文件,为世界外语教育揭开了新篇章。本文详细阐述欧盟外语教学和评估的统一标准,以及欧洲外语教育的理念与实践。欧共参框架不仅建立了语言内容标准,而且有配套的语言能力标准和实施标准,这对我国的外语教学和对外汉语推广带来重大的启发、影响和挑战。 相似文献
2.
《欧洲语言共同参考框架:学习、教学、评估》是欧洲理事会制定的关于语言教学、学习及评估的整体指导方针与纲领.在语言测评方面,《欧框》提出了三级六等的语言分级标准,突出以"语言实际运用能力"为中心的测试理念等对中国大学法语测评体系有很多启示. 相似文献
3.
"任务型"教学评价指的是在英语教学中,利用各种评估工具和方法,系统地收集、分析评估数据,判断教学是否有效的过程。它包括对学生任务完成和学习进展的评价、对学习任务有效性的评价、对评估活动本身的评价以及对教学方案有效性的评价,等等。开展评价主要有三个目的:通过评价使学生在英语课程的学习过程中不断体验进步与成功,认识自我、建立自信,促进学生综合语言运用能力的发展,促进学生综合素质的全面发展; 相似文献
4.
已经举行24年的日语能力考试在2005年又开始了新一轮的改革.改革重点在于着力检测应试者运用外语解决问题的能力和交际能力.欧洲委员会组织语言专家编写的<欧洲语言教学与评估共同纲领>对欧洲多种语言的教学和评价提供了参照标准,共同纲领的核心部分就在于通过对能力指标的规范,从而引导学习者提高语言的交际能力.在提高交际能力上,日语能力考试和欧洲语言教学与评估共同纲领找到了交界点. 相似文献
5.
付桂芳 《北京教育学院学报》2010,24(1):41-44
从欧洲语言教学与评估所共同参考的水平整体分级中,语言学习者可以做到自我评价。根据欧洲语言档案的执行模式,语言学习者能在学习中提高自主性、多元文化意识,促进反馈学习,也能记录学习者的熟练程度和语言经历。在我国的外语教育中可尝试使用这两种标准,促进外语教育的国际化,而对于学习者应树立多元文化的语言教育理念,拓展外语学习环境,更好地发挥外语的作用。 相似文献
6.
《校园英语(教研版)》2014,(14)
社会学和人类学为系统地学习语言学习所必需的语境——社会和文化提供了工具。语言的社会学也为在社会中看待语言及语言教学提供了方法,这也使二语教学成为建立跨语言与跨民族联系的一个社会途径,这就使得从宏观角度来探析非母语语言教学有其一定的必要性。 相似文献
7.
为促进欧洲高等教育一体化进程,欧盟支持多个试点项目来研发旨在提高欧洲高等教育机构间透明性的政策工具,包括:“大学地图”项目开发的高等教育分类工具;“多维度大学排名”项目开发的高等教育排名工具;“欧洲微型数据搜集”项目和“欧洲高等教育注册”项目开发的高校数据信息搜集工具;“欧洲大学科研评估”项目开发的大学科研评估工具;“高等教育学习成果评价”项目开发的学习效果评估工具.这些政策工具相互补充与支持,通过共享一套概念框架和引入多元利益群体参与的方法,形成了欧洲高等教育区域整合的独特机制,使多样化的欧洲高等教育区变得更加透明. 相似文献
8.
9.
《欧洲语言教学与评估共同纲领》已经成为世界公认的语言能力标准之一。研究匹配手册,将我国英语测试与《欧洲语言教学与评估共同纲领》相匹配有助于我国英语测试与国际接轨,促进其他国家与我国英语教学评估相互认证合作。 相似文献
10.
高校法语学生作为成人个体,其语言学习在方法上应该有别于初高中时期.语言交际能力在经济全球化背景下显得尤为重要.本文结合《欧洲统一语言参考框架:学习、教学、评估》探讨如何优化高年级基础法语教学环节,提高教学效果,更有效的完成教学目标. 相似文献
11.
Tineke Brunfaut Luke Harding 《Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice》2020,27(2):215-231
ABSTRACTIn the field of second and foreign language learning, the Common European Framework of Reference for languages (CEFR) is widely-used for setting language proficiency standards within European, and increasingly global, contexts. Few studies, however, have investigated the ways in which systemic, macro-level factors within national educational contexts may influence standard setting practices using the CEFR. In this paper, we explore this issue through an analysis of recorded discussions within standard setting sessions for the Épreuve Commune for English, a national English language examination in Luxembourg. The data reveals four key sources of influence on standard setting decision-making: Luxembourg’s unique language ecology, streamed schooling, the national curriculum, and an ongoing exam reform project. Through this analysis, we argue that Luxembourg functions as a critical case illustrating the tension between international standards of language proficiency and local realities. 相似文献
12.
Liyana Ahmad Afip M. Obaidul Hamid Peter Renshaw 《Globalisation, Societies & Education》2019,17(3):378-393
The Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR) has emerged as a global policy in language education which has been ‘borrowed’ by nations across the world. This paper presents a critical analysis of Malaysia’s borrowing of the CEFR as part of English language curriculum reform with particular reference to policy motivation and implementation processes as outlined in the English Language Education Roadmap for Malaysia (2015–2025). The analysis draws on Phillips and Ochs’s (2003, “Processes of Policy Borrowing in Education: Some Explanatory and Analytical Devices.” Comparative Education 39 (4): 451–461.) framework for examining educational policy borrowing to highlight challenges as well as prospects of the implementation of the global policy in higher education in Malaysia. 相似文献
13.
14.
Máirín Hennebry 《Irish Educational Studies》2013,32(1):83-112
This paper presents some of the findings of a study investigating young people's attitudes towards Europe and the European Union and their self-reported learning about European citizenship in Ireland. The paper considers adolescents’ attitudes and motivations for language learning in light of recent literature arguing for the role of modern foreign language instruction in the teaching of European citizenship. Findings based on the results of a knowledge test regarding the rights and opportunities offered through European citizenship are also included. Data provide evidence that Irish students possess more knowledge than their counterparts in England, Spain and France on the subject, while showing more positive attitudes than other students. The paper considers the contribution of modern foreign language teaching to this knowledge and their positive attitudes, drawing some possible inferences for other European member states. 相似文献
15.
Karen Ashton 《Compare》2016,46(3):414-434
This paper reflects on the methodology used in international comparative education surveys by conducting a systematic review of the European Survey on Language Competences (ESLC). The ESLC was administered from February to March 2011, with final results released in June 2012. The survey tested approximately 55,000 students across 14 European countries with the goals of (1) providing comparative data on foreign language competence and (2) informing policy on language learning and teaching. The paper argues that there is a gap between the purpose of international comparative education surveys such as the ESLC and the methodology used, and thus also the ability of the data to feed into and inform policy. It is suggested that further methodological advances and improvements are needed if surveys are to produce data that give a clearer and more in-depth understanding of what actually goes on in classrooms and positively impact on learning and teaching. 相似文献
16.
Mark D. Shermis 《教育实用测度》2018,31(3):177-190
ABSTRACTThis article employs the Common European Framework Reference for Language Acquisition (CEFR) as a basis for evaluating writing in the context of machine scoring. The CEFR was designed as a framework for evaluating proficiency levels of speaking for the 49 languages comprising the European Union. The intent was to impact language instruction so that “mastery” of one language has the same meaning as it does in another. A second objective is to provide a crosswalk for what one automated writing evaluation (AWE) system does in attending to the dimensions of the framework. The CEFR Framework is divided into five traits and different proficiency levels. The question then becomes: Does the AWE system attempt to measure these dimensions of writing? And, if so, how is this operationalized? Is it measuring aspects of communication that are not specified? The goal here is to create a common vocabulary between the writing community and those interested in AWE systems as to what is actually being measured by their software, and mapping that to a developmental scale of writing performance. 相似文献
17.
欧洲语言能力评价体系以外语学习者的交际语言能力为评价对象,采用“能做”描述,其评价理念和方式对中国传统的外语教学模式和评价方式产生了冲击。以中外联合培养项目的外语教学为例,通过分析欧洲外语评价方式的特点,阐述借鉴欧洲外语能力评价体系改革外语教学可能性。 相似文献
18.
States use standards‐based English language proficiency (ELP) assessments to inform relatively high‐stakes decisions for English learner (EL) students. Results from these assessments are one of the primary criteria used to determine EL students’ level of ELP and readiness for reclassification. The results are also used to evaluate the effectiveness of and funding allocation to district or school programs that serve EL students. In an effort to provide empirical validity evidence for such important uses of ELP assessments, this study focused on examining the constructs of ELP assessments as a fundamental validity issue. Particularly, the study examined the types of language proficiency measured in three sample states’ ELP assessments and the relationship between each type of language proficiency and content assessment performance. The results revealed notable variation in the presence of academic and social language in the three ELP assessments. A series of hierarchical linear modeling (HLM) analyses also revealed varied relationships among social language proficiency, academic language proficiency, and content assessment performance. The findings highlight the importance of examining the constructs of ELP assessments for making appropriate interpretations and decisions based on the assessment scores for EL students. Implications for policy and practice are discussed. 相似文献
19.
Judith Glaesser 《牛津教育评论》2019,45(1):70-85
This paper first provides a brief overview of the history and current usage of the concept of competence in academic research, and then undertakes a critical discussion of how the term is currently used in educational policy. The running example used throughout the paper is competence in foreign language learning. The PISA study is discussed to demonstrate how the concept of competence has come to prominence in the international discourse on education in recent years. Following this, particular attention is given to the situation in Germany where there has been a shift towards competence as an aim of teaching in recent years, coupled with an increased focus on standards and accountability. The relationship between competence and standards is examined critically, since some authors appear to use the two interchangeably whether or not this is justified. Finally, the Common European Framework for Languages (CEFR) and a German curriculum document are examined critically with regard to their use of the concept of competence. 相似文献
20.
欧洲外语教育政策是欧洲一体化的一个直观反映。近年来,欧盟一直致力于语言多元化的推进和完善。北欧国家既希望通过一体化融入欧洲,也尽力避免以英语为代表的欧洲优势语言对本国语言母语人群的侵蚀。瑞典和挪威通过一系列的外语教育政策和实践,努力推进欧洲语言多元主义和语言学习多样化。 相似文献