共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 156 毫秒
1.
对学生进行成绩的评价是教学过程中的一个重要环节。小学英语评价的内容极其广泛,不仅包括语言知识、语言技能和实际交际能力,而且应包括学生在学习过程中所表现出来的学习态度。评价还可分为测试性评价和非测试性评价两种形式。测试性评价即终结性评价,非测试性评价即形成性评价。形成性评价关注学生的学习过程,鼓励所有学生合作学习,提倡在学习中培养性格,反映学习过程中的成功,使具有不同特长的学生都有施展自己才华的机会,让学生的学习兴趣得到更好的延续,学习习惯得到较好的培养,自学能力和交流能力得到发展。小学英语的主要目的之一即通过一系列的教育教学活动激发学生学习英语的兴趣,养成良好的学习习惯。因此,教学评价不仅要注重学生学习的结果,而且需注重学生学习的过程。评价形式应以形成性评价和终结性评价并重,但形成性评价在整个教学过程中应该占主导地位。 相似文献
2.
随着传统教学向新课程教学转变,教学评价方式由传统单一的评价向多样性的形成性评价过渡。在初中英语教学中要实施形成性评价,因为形成性评价是一种以学生为主体,关注学生学习过程,旨在挖掘学生学习潜力,发展学生学习能力的可持续性评价。 相似文献
3.
所谓形成性评价,是"对学生日常学习中的表现、取得的成绩及所反映出的情感、态度和策略等方面的发展"做出的评价。学生是学习的主体,学生的积极参与和自主学习是形成性评价顺利实施的前提。形成性评价关注的是学习的过程、学习目标和学生的主动性。学生利用形成性评价可以反馈自己分析在英语学习中的薄弱点和存在的问题,也可以独立地管理自己的英语学习过程。这样,学习者的自主性在形成性评价的过程中得到了提高,而学生的自主性反过来又可以提高形成性评价的效果。可见,形成性评价提高了学生的自学能力和自我管理能力。 相似文献
4.
作为重要的教育评价理论,形成性评价是基于学生学习全方位不间断地观察、记录和反思作出的发展型评价。在初中英语教学活动中推广形成性评价的目的是"激励学生学习,帮助学生有效调控自己的学习过程,使学生获得成就感,增强自信心,培养合作精神"。形成性评价使学生"从被动接受评价转变成为评价的主体和积极参与者"。本文对形成性评价方法进行了简单介绍,并就如何在初中英语教学活动中善用形成性评价,有效提高中学生英语学习的自觉性进行了阐述。 相似文献
5.
6.
《校园英语(教研版)》2016,(28)
教育评价在现代教育科学领域当中占据重要地位,因此,形成性评价广泛受到人们的重视。形成性评价是对学生的学习过程进行有效评估,目的在于挖掘学生的最大潜力,改进学生的学习方法,为教师提供具有价值的学习反馈。本文就形成性评价在初中英语教学当中的实施进行探讨,通过对形成性评价实施结果的研究,寻找出存在问题,并提出相关解决方案。 相似文献
7.
形成性评价是通过多种评价手段和方法对学生学习过程进行的评价。其目的是"激励学生学习,帮助学生有效调控自己的学习过程,使学生获得成就感,增强自信心并取得良好的学习成果"。本文通过介绍形成性教学评价的概念,分析了形成性教学评价的有效性、全面性、多样性、描述性等特征。着重提出在中职英语教学中,形成性教学评价对于学生自评,学生互补,教师评价等方面的运用及给予启示如何有效地运用。 相似文献
8.
大学英语形成性评价研究 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
吴娟 《读与写:教育教学刊》2012,(3):38+56
大学英语形成性评价是相对于终结性评价的一种评价方式。大学英语形成性评价能真实地反映学生的英语学习情况,对于促进学生的英语学习具有重要意义。传统的以终结性评价为主的学习评价体系存在着弊端,以大学英语形成性评价为主的学习评价体系是21世纪大学英语教学改革的必然趋势。 相似文献
9.
钱萍 《学生之友(初中版)》2011,(24):18-18
《英语课程标准》要求建伊能激励学生学习兴趣和自丰学习能力发展的评价体系。陔评价体系由形成性评价和终结性评价构成。在英语教学过程中应以形成性评价为主。形成性评价是“对学生的学习过程进行的评价,旨在确认学生的潜力,改进和发展学生的学习”。 相似文献
10.
英语教学中的终结性评价忽视语言学习的积累过程,不利于学生养成良好的语言学习习惯,形成性评价可以弥补这一不足。本文通过收集学生平时学习中的形成性评价资料和期末及中考成绩,并用SPSS19.0分析数据,研究形成性评价和终结性评价的相关性及终结性评价的多元回归分析。从数据结果来看,形成性评价和终结性评价存在统计学意义的显著相关,而且学生的单词词组掌握情况,即学生平时的听写成绩和作业情况及课文背诵情况等,对终结性评价的成绩有很大的解释力度。 相似文献
11.
ABSTRACTThis study investigates the relationship between students’ attitudes towards formative assessment and summative assessment and aims to enrich the understanding of formative and summative assessment from the students’ perspective. A total of 3,019 Hong Kong primary school students responded to a newly developed instrument. Overall, students reported positive instrumental yet negative affective attitudes towards formative and summative assessment. Girls had less negative affective attitudes towards formative assessment, but more positive instrumental attitudes towards formative and summative assessment than boys. Grade 4 students consistently scored higher than Grade 5 and Grade 6 students in assessment attitudes. The gender and grade differences were statistically significant, but had small effect size. Moreover, it was found that students’ affective and instrumental attitudes to formative assessment positively predicted students’ affective and instrumental attitudes to summative assessment. 相似文献
12.
Tony Burner 《Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research》2016,60(6):626-648
Recognizing the importance of formative assessment, this mixed-methods study investigates how four teachers and 100 students respond to the new emphasis on formative assessment in English as a foreign language (EFL) writing classes in Norway. While previous studies have examined formative assessment in oral classroom interactions and focused on either studying students or teachers, little research has been conducted on formative assessment of writing where both students and teachers are studied. As such, this study provides new insight. The findings mostly indicate that contradictions are prevalent amongst teachers’ and students’ perceptions of formative assessment of writing. The contradictions revolve around feedback, grades, text revision, self-assessment, and student involvement. The identified contradictions suggest the need for developing a mutual understanding of formative assessment in order to make it useful and meaningful. 相似文献
13.
Hongli Li 《Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice》2016,23(4):473-494
Drawing on the programme for international student assessment 2009 US data-set, this study examines the relationship between formative assessment and students’ reading achievement using a structural equation modelling approach. We find that formative assessment is positively related to students’ reading achievement directly and indirectly (through teacher–student relationship and attitude towards reading) for all students. The direct relationship between formative assessment and reading achievement is significantly stronger for Black students than for White students, whether or not student socio-economic status (SES), gender and school mean SES are controlled for. The total relationship (the direct plus the indirect relationship) between formative assessment and reading achievement also appears to be stronger for Black students than for White students; however, the difference is not statistically significant whether or not we control for covariates. No significant difference is found between White and Hispanic students in terms of the direct and the total relationship between formative assessment and reading achievement. Using a nationally representative data-set, this study provides empirical evidence that formative assessment is positively related to students’ reading achievement in general. In addition, this study provides preliminary evidence to show the potential of formative assessment to help reduce achievement gaps between Black and White students. The implications and limitations of the study are also discussed. 相似文献
14.
Maria Weurlander Magnus Söderberg Max Scheja Håkan Hult Annika Wernerson 《Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education》2012,37(6):747-760
This study aims to provide a greater insight into how formative assessments are experienced and understood by students. Two different formative assessment methods, an individual, written assessment and an oral group assessment, were components of a pathology course within a medical curriculum. In a cohort of 70 students, written accounts were collected from 17 students and group interviews were carried out to explore the students’ experiences of these two forms of assessment. All students were engaged in both assessment methods, which were conducted a few weeks apart, and data were collected soon after each assessment. Our findings suggest that formative assessments motivate students to study, make them aware of what they have learned and where they need to study more. Thus, formative assessment can act as a tool for learning, contributing to the process and outcomes of learning. A closer look at students’ experiences of each form of assessment reveals interesting differences. 相似文献
15.
A case study of a formative assessment practice and the effects on students’ self-regulated learning
The study investigates one mathematics teacher’s implementation of formative assessment and its effects on students’ self-regulated learning (SRL). A questionnaire administered before and after the eight-month long intervention shows a significant effect, compared to two control classes, on students’ motivational beliefs involved in SRL. Qualitative data shows a notable enhancement of the students’ SRL behavior in the classroom. Analysis of the teacher’s implemented formative assessment shows a practice integrating several aspects of formative assessment, and provides empirical evidence of what formative assessment with large effects on students’ SRL may look like and how it fits with models of SRL development. 相似文献
16.
Bakhtiar Naghdipour 《Curriculum Journal》2017,28(2):283-299
Undergraduate students' experience of assessment in universities is usually of summative assessment which provides only limited information to help students improve their performance. By contrast, formative assessment is informative and forward-looking, possessing the leverage to inform students of their day-to-day progress and inform teachers of how to better tailor their instruction to students' immediate learning needs. Despite these potentials, studies carried out on the use of formative assessment in English as a foreign language (EFL) contexts are somehow rare. The current study reports on incorporating formative assessment in an L2 writing course in Iran. The analysis of data from pre- and post-study writing tasks, pre- and post-study questionnaires, and semi-structured interviews revealed that first-year undergraduate students were offered opportunities to improve various aspects of their writing and to develop positive attitudes toward writing as well as formative assessment. However, the students reported several challenges that could have implications for the further implementation of formative assessment in similar contexts. 相似文献
17.
基于网络的形成性考核的有效性和时效性分析 总被引：4，自引：0，他引：4
中央广播电视大学的形成性考核,素以单一的作业册的形式向各试点学校发行。由于师生见面时间有限,教师批改作业后很难及时反馈给学生,并且单一的纸笔式练习也有很大的局限性。针对这一情况,中央电大于2005年3月启动了“宏微观经济学”等六门课程的基于网络的课程形成性考核试点项目。基于网络的形成性考核能否提高评价的有效性和时效性,实现信息的及时反馈,改进远程教与学的质量呢?本文应用院校研究的方法,对基于网络的课程形成性考核的评阅率、评阅的及时性、评阅的方式与质量进行了分析。 相似文献
18.
形成性评价是对学生学习过程的评价,是教学环节的重要组成部分。通过研究形成性评价的理论基础和作用以及实践形成性评价的基本方法,将形成性评价的多元模式运用于高职英语的教学中,实现学生自我评价和合作性评价,对英语教学与测试产生一定的借鉴作用。 相似文献
19.
大学英语教学中的形成性评价及策略研究 总被引：9，自引：0，他引：9
形成性评价注重对学生的学习过程进行评价，及时提供反馈，调整教学，满足学生需求。将形成性评价恰当地运用到大学英语课堂，能显著改善教学效果，有效弥补当前大学英语教学与测试的一些不足，并帮助学生成为自主高效的学习者。 相似文献
20.
实验采用问卷调查、周记等为研究工具,对非英语专业大学生进行了为期一个学期的形成性评价教学与终结性评价教学对比研究,探讨形成性评价对学生口语学习策略的促进作用,对比形成性评价教学与终结性评价教学对学习成绩的影响。 相似文献