Extracts From the report prepared by the Group of Experts are presented below. 相似文献
-
Professor György Adam (Hungary), Rector of Budapest University;
-
Professor Gunnar Adler‐Karlsson (Sweden), Roskilde University;
-
Professor Hélène Ahrweiler (France), President of the University of Paris I;
-
Professor Johan Galtung (Norway), Director General of the Inter‐University Centre of Post‐Graduate Studies in Dubrovnik;
-
Dr. Stefan Kwiatkowski (Poland), Deputy Director of the Institute of Science Policy and Higher Education in Warsaw;
-
Professor Mircea Malita (Romania), Bucharest University,’ Counsellor to the President of the Socialist Republic of Romania;
-
Professor Manfred Nast (GDR), Secretary to the Council of Higher Education Institutions of the German Democratic Republic;
-
Professor James A. Perkins (USA), Chairman of the International Council for Educational Development (ICED);
-
Professor Branko Pribicevic (Yugoslavia), Belgrade University;
-
Professor Ludwig Raiser (FRG), President of the Standing Conference of Rectors and Vice‐chancellors of the European Universities (CRE);
Professor Yuri Zhdanov (USSR), Rector of Rostov University.
Also at the meeting were observers and representatives from the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), Council of Europe, International Association of Universities (IAU), the European Cultural Foundation and Association des Universités Partiellement ou Entièrement de Langue Frangaise (AUPELF).
The meeting was opened by the Representative of the Director General of UNESCO, Mr. René Ochs, Director of the Division of Higher Education and of Training of Education Personnel.
H.E. Mrs. Suzana Gddea, Minister of Education and Learning of the Socialist Republic of Romania, addressed the meeting during the inaugural session on behalf of the Romanian Government.
We give below a summary of the discussions. This is not an official report of the meeting. (For further information on this meeting and its follow‐up see page 32 in this issue.) 相似文献
We give below information on this study and the main task of CICHE. 相似文献
The main points raised in discussions were as follows:
-
the current situation and trends in tertiary education;
-
the recognition of degrees and diplomas;
-
the future existence of the Committee for Higher Education and Research;
-
the current situation and trends in university research;
-
the teaching of human rights;
-
mobility of higher education staff and students;
-
the future programme of the Committee.
The information presented below concentrates on some of the above points. 相似文献
The main points raised in discussions were as follows:
-
the current situation and trends in tertiary education;
-
the recognition of degrees and diplomas;
-
the future existence of the Committee for Higher Education and Research;
-
the current situation and trends in university research;
-
the teaching of human rights;
-
mobility of higher education staff and students;
-
the future programme of the Committee.
The information presented below concentrates on some of the above points. 相似文献
As partial response to these requests, we present below a survey on the Swiss system of higher education, written for “Higher Education in Europe” by Dr. Esther C. Garke from the Swiss Federal Office for Education and Science, and CEPES Liaison Officer in Switzerland.
We also take this opportunity to invite our readers to provide us with papers or documents for similar presentations. 相似文献
We give below information based on those parts of the draft final report of the meeting concerned with relations between secondary and higher education. 相似文献
In 1978 a new organization was created by the Council of Europe's Standing Conference on University Problems (CC‐PU) whose terms of reference are: “as a committee of experts under the authority of the new Council for Cultural Co‐operation (CDCC):
-
to organize or encourage cooperation among European nations in the field of higher education and research;
-
to propose activities to the CDCC for inclusion in the annual programme of activities;
-
to promote relations among European universities and institutions
of higher education and research”.
The first meeting of CC‐PU was held from 20 to 21 December 1978 in Strasbourg. Professor Dominique Rivier, Rector of the University of Lausanne was elected as its Chairman and as its Vice‐chairman, Professor Paul Sabourin from the Cabinet du Ministre aux Universites (France).
The following information concerns issues discussed during the first meeting of the Conference; these were the Council's Cultural Co‐operation (CDCC) activities in promoting student mobility in the countries of the European Community3 and interrelations between employment and training. 相似文献
It was written for “Higher Education in Europe” by Victor Kolybine from the Environmental Education Section of Unesco. 相似文献
A monograph containing all the documents of this meeting is currently being prepared and will be published later in 1978.
(For information on this meeting see N°6 November‐December 1977 issue of this Bulletin). 相似文献
The article is based on a paper Professor Millett presented at the International Seminar on Efficiency of Higher Education (Nieborow, 25‐28 September 1979), (Editor's Note: In No.1, January‐March 1980 of “Higher Education in Europe” other papers delivered at this meeting were presented, as well as the summary of the seminar's discussions.) 相似文献
The Central Committee of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union (CC CPSU) adopted the Principal Directions for the Reorganization of Higher Education and Specialized Secondary Education. As a follow‐up to that framework document, the CC CPSU and the Council of Ministers of the USSR adopted a number of decisions, dated 13 March 1987, aimed at giving substance to and at amplifying the basic principles enumerated. As change in Soviet higher education has been in the air for some time, we were able to preview some of its directions in previous issues of Higher Education in Europe, specifically in No. 4, Vol. XI (1986), pp. 80‐81 and in No. 2, Vol. XII (1987), pp. 83‐84.
As promised in the latter issue, we are now presenting the main provisions of these “Measures”, and “Decisions” via excerpts taken from five documents which were published partly in Byulleten’ Ministerstva Vysshego i Srednego Spetsialnogo Obrazovaniya, No. 6, 1987, and partly in Pravda, 27 March 1987.
The editors are solely responsible for the choice of excerpts as well as for the editorial and stylistic modifications that they believed necessary in order to fit them into the content of Higher Education in Europe. 相似文献
The information presented below reflects these developments. 相似文献
Ecological repercussions of the project or construction where there has been a lack of appreciation of environmental harmony might have negative consequences affecting many people. Recognition of this situation is reflected in the numerous efforts of national and international organizations to reorganize engineering studies and to in‐corporate environmental education in the training of engineers.
The following article was written, for “Higher Education in Europe” and deals with Unesco's activities in the area of development of environmental education of engineers. It was written by Albert Sasson from the Division of Ecological Science of Unesco. 相似文献
The purpose of the meeting was to analyse the main findings of nine national case studies which had been prepared in the framework of the project (Denmark, France, Federal Republic of Germany, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Poland, Romania, United Kingdom) and to make suggestions regarding a synthesis study to be elaborated on that basis.
A preliminary draft of this study was presented as a working document to the Symposium. The main objectives of the meeting were, therefore, to facilitate an exchange of views and experience on the proposed topic and to identify the most significant data contained in the case studies which might be reflected in the synthesis study.
For information on the discussions of this meeting see page 36 in this issue.
The three following articles are based on the case studies on Hungary, Romania and Poland. 相似文献
University governing bodies are experiencxing difficulties in coping with this situation. They must try to keep or to regain the necessary amount of flexibility in their administrative and financial decisions; they have to reconsider their principles of selection of students, and ensure that, in spite of a restricted budget for teaching, research does not suffer.
These problems were discussed during the 16th Semestrial Conference of the Standing Conference of Rectors and Vice‐Chancellors of the European Universities (CRE), held from 27 to 28 April 1978 in Salamanca, Spain.
We present below an edited version of the final report of this meeting, reflecting the conclusions of this conference. 相似文献
We give below information concerning this convention and selected articles from the Convention itself relating to definitions, implementation, documentation, ratification, accession and entry into force. 相似文献
Below are summarised some of the view‐points presented in the meeting. 相似文献