共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 109 毫秒
1.
2.
为了改变科学课程学习内容零散且缺乏衔接的现状,学习进阶成为了国际科学教育研究的热点议题。对学习进阶的研究系统追踪学生的认知发展过程,为科学教育中标准设计、课程开发、学业评价和教师培训等多个系统的整合提供了统一框架。基于文献综述并结合自身研究经验,并从学习进阶的定义、进阶研究的基础、进阶研究的模式和研究成果的应用四个方面展开分析讨论后发现：科学教育界对学习进阶内涵理解上的差异逐渐消弭,进阶研究在描述学生认知发展过程上取得了阶段性的成果并在向着精细化发展,在学习进阶中融合知识学习与能力培养、学习进阶与教学实践的交互影响等将是后续研究的核心议题。 相似文献
3.
《中学政治教学参考》2016,(25)
<正>近几年,美国的NRC专家对科学教育进行了研究,普遍认为科学教育应该是一个整体连贯的和不断深入的过程,在此基础上对学生的思维进行了可描述性的假定,提出了学科教育的学习进阶(简称LPS)。主题学习主张教师教学和学生学习也应是一个基于课程标准的、整体连贯的和不断深化拓展的过程。具体来说,教师的教学应当依于主题、螺旋式上升,学生的学习应当主题进阶、能力提升。国外关于学习进阶 相似文献
4.
有效的测评是科学、有序地推进小学阶段计算思维教育的必备条件。基于学习进阶理论,依据结构中心设计法,构建小学生计算思维测评框架。测评框架包含进阶变量、成就水平和学习表现,其中进阶变量分为计算概念、计算实践和计算观念,成就水平从低到高依次为识别、理解、设计和问题解决。测评框架开发与使用促进了学生核心素养的发展。 相似文献
5.
模型与建模是科学思维的核心要素和科学研究的关键工具,世界各国均把它们作为科学教育的重点。科学哲学领域对模型与建模的认识在20世纪经历了从句法观到语义观的发展历程,近年来,中介观和认知的人造物观成为主流观点。承袭科学哲学对模型与建模的认识建构分析框架,梳理科学教育领域对模型认知与实践的研究,提出七维度五水平的科学模型认知与实践的学习进阶框架。利用该框架,分析现行课程标准中的学业质量水平划分并提出优化建议,为建模能力的培养与学习进阶的实证检验提供支持。 相似文献
6.
美国科学教育框架以"实践"作为首要维度,提议让K-12年级的学生通过以围绕科学大概念而组织的实践来提升科学素养。这一实践转向,不是对科学探究的否定,而是对其的拓展:从作为知识的科学转向作为实践的科学,加入社会与文化的维度以回归科学作为人类实践的本质属性。对此,我们要变革科学观,吸收美国科学教育实践内涵,学习其整合和学习进阶的实施理念和途径,培养我国学生优质科学素养。 相似文献
7.
学习进阶是对学生在特定学科领域认知发展的描述.学习进阶研究有潜力为课程、教学和评价带来革命性变革.在此变革中,教师专业发展是提升学校和区域教育质量的关键,决定了课程改革和教学改进的愿景能否实现.本文以科学教育中教师学科教学知识(PCK)的五个维度为线索,梳理国际上基于学习进阶的教师专业发展的理论研究与实践成果.学习进阶有潜力促进科学教师PCK的各维度发展.但相比其他学科,物理教育领域对教师专业发展的研究还比较少,尤其在优化教学决策等方面的系统研究还有待开展,师范生培养和一线教研仍需进一步探索学习进阶在物理教师专业发展中的实践应用. 相似文献
8.
黄璐璐 《福建基础教育研究》2023,(8):127-130
根据学习进阶理论与高中生物学课程目标,构建学习进阶概念框架与学习进阶障碍突破路径,设计与实施“遗传的分子基础”专题复习。以猜想激发学生学习兴趣,开启学习进阶。以科学史实验分析培养科学探究能力,进阶关联层级。以模型建构发展科学思维,巧破进阶障碍。以拓展实验提升问题解决能力,进阶系统层级。以综合性阐述提升应用能力,进阶整合层级。以多元评价进行诊断和反思,完善进阶框架。以此探讨学习进阶理论在生物学专题复习中的应用以及对学生理解大概念的重要意义。 相似文献
9.
学习进阶的研究在近十年来逐渐成为国际科学教育界的热点研究领域,它与学习理论、课程、评价领域的研究具有密切的继承关系。目前,科学教育界对学习进阶的概念界定虽然呈现多样化,但均试图刻画学生认知和思维模式的变化。学习进阶典型的开发模式有伯克利系统和结构中心设计法。已有的学习进阶研究均是围绕核心概念建构,力图刻画学生知识和能力的不同层级,并将学生的学习表现作为进阶发展的证据,从而对课程和教学产生影响。国际上关于学习进阶的研究成果对我国科学教育研究具有重要启示。 相似文献
10.
学习进阶作为近年来教育领域的研究热点,引发了国内外众多教育专家与一线教师的讨论与研究。随着学习进阶理论的完善,其模型开发流程也趋于一致。学习进阶是基于核心概念的进阶,着重促进学生的学科能力和核心素养的发展。对于当前一线教师而言,合理地应用学习进阶,不仅有助于提高课堂效率,还能有效地培养学生的综合能力。 相似文献
11.
Despite the apparent lack of universally accepted goals or objectives for elementary science methods courses, teacher educators nationally are autonomously designing these classes to prepare prospective teachers to teach science. It is unclear, however, whether science methods courses are preparing teachers to teach science effectively or to implement the National Science Education Standards (National Research Council, 1996). Using the Science Teaching Standards as a framework for analysis, this research proceeded in two phases. During the first phase, the elementary science methods courses, perspectives, and practices of six science teacher educators were examined to determine similarities and differences in the course goals and objectives, overall emphases, and their efforts to prepare their students to implement the Science Teaching Standards. The second phase of the study investigated the elementary science methods courses of a national sample of science teacher educators as reflected in their course syllabi. It was found that universal inclusion of content related to the Science Teaching Standards does not exist, nor are there clear linkages between course goals, activities, and assignments. 相似文献
12.
The aim of this exploratory study was to learn about the misconceptions that may arise for elementary and high school science teachers in their reflections on science and engineering practice. Using readings and videos of real science and engineering work, teachers’ reflections were used to uncover the underpinnings of their understandings. This knowledge ultimately provides information about supporting professional development (PD) for science teachers’ knowledge of engineering. Six science teachers (two elementary and four high school teachers) participated in the study as part of an online PD experience. Cunningham and Carlsen’s (Journal of Science Teacher Education 25:197–210, 2014) relative emphases of science and engineering practices were used to frame the design of PD activities and the analyses of teachers’ views. Analyses suggest misconceptions within the eight practices of science and engineering from the US Next Generation Science Standards in four areas. These are that: (1) the nature of the practices in both science and engineering research is determined by the long-term implications of the research regardless of the nature of the immediate work, (2) engineering and science are hierarchical, (3) creativity is inappropriate, and (4) research outcomes cannot be processes. We discuss the nature of these understandings among participants and the implications for engineering education PD for science teachers. 相似文献
13.
3D printing technology is a powerful educational tool that can promote integrative STEM education by connecting engineering, technology, and applications of science concepts. Yet, research on the integration of 3D printing technology in formal educational contexts is extremely limited. This study engaged preservice elementary teachers (N?=?42) in a 3D Printing Science Project that modeled a science experiment in the elementary classroom on why things float or sink using 3D printed boats. The goal was to explore how collaborative 3D printing inquiry-based learning experiences affected preservice teachers’ science teaching self-efficacy beliefs, anxiety toward teaching science, interest in science, perceived competence in K-3 technology and engineering science standards, and science content knowledge. The 3D printing project intervention significantly decreased participants’ science teaching anxiety and improved their science teaching efficacy, science interest, and perceived competence in K-3 technological and engineering design science standards. Moreover, an analysis of students’ project reflections and boat designs provided an insight into their collaborative 3D modeling design experiences. The study makes a contribution to the scarce body of knowledge on how teacher preparation programs can utilize 3D printing technology as a means of preparing prospective teachers to implement the recently adopted engineering and technology standards in K-12 science education. 相似文献
14.
《科学教育框架》提出了新阶段美国科学教育的发展愿景,反映出美国人才培养方案的新动向,在对科学的理解上,实现从"探究"到"实践"的跨越,在科学教育方面,体现从"科学与技术"到"科学、技术与工程"的整合,在学科教育内容方面,体现从科学"概念"到学科核心思想的提升。推进我国中小学科学教育,应提高中小学科学课程地位、重视中小学科学教育在人才培养系统中的启蒙性和基础性作用;注重中小学科学课程的统整性、综合性与实践性,适应社会发展需求;充分重视科学教育研究及其成果运用。 相似文献
15.
Christina Siry Gail Horowitz Femi S. Otulaja Nicole Gillespie Ashraf Shady Line A. Augustin 《Cultural Studies of Science Education》2008,3(2):451-470
We discuss the eight papers in this issue of Cultural Studies of Science Education focusing on the debate over conceptual change in science education and explore the issues that have emerged for us as we
consider how conceptual change research relates to our practice as science educators. In presenting our interpretations of
this research, we consider the role of participants in the research process and contextual factors in conducting research
on science conceptions, and draw implications for the teaching of science.
Christina Siry is a PhD student in the Urban Education program of the City University of New York, and an instructor at Manhattanville College. Her research interests focus on pre-service and in-service preparation for the teaching of science and she is currently researching the use of coteaching and cogenerative dialogue in elementary teacher preparation for the teaching of science. In particular, she is exploring the role that shared, supported teaching experiences can have in the construction of new teacher identity and solidarity. She has worked as an elementary science specialist teaching children in grades K-5, and in museum settings developing science programs for teachers and children. In addition to the position at Manhattanville College, Chris is a lecturer in the University of Pennsylvania’s Science Teacher Institute where she teaches science pedagogy to middle school teachers. Gail Horowitz is an instructor of chemistry at Yeshiva University, and a doctoral candidate in science education at Teachers College. For many years, she has been involved in research and curricular design within the organic chemistry laboratory setting, focusing specifically on the design of discovery or puzzle based experiments. Her doctoral research focuses on the intrinsic motivation of pre-med students. She is interested in trying to characterize and describe the academic goal orientations of pre-med students, and is interested in exploring how the curricular elements embedded in project based laboratory curricula may or may not serve to enhance their intrinsic motivation. Femi S. Otulaja is currently a PhD student and an adjunct professor of science teacher education at Queens College of the City University of New York. As a science teacher educator, his research interests focus on the use of cogenerative dialoguing and its residuals, such as coteaching, distributed leadership, culturally responsive pedagogy, as research and pedagogical tools for engaging, training and apprenticing urban middle and high schools pre- and in-service science teachers as legitimate peripheral participants. He also encourages the use of these modalities as assessment, evaluation and professional development tools for teaching and learning science and for realigning cultural misalignments in urban classrooms. His theoretical framework consists of a bricolage of participatory action research, constructivism, critical ethnography, cultural sociology, sociology of emotions, indigenous epistemology, culturally responsive pedagogy, critical pedagogy and conversation analyses. In addition, he advocates the use of technologies as assistive tools in teaching science. Nicole Gillespie is a Senior Program Officer at the Knowles Science Teaching Foundation (KSTF). She is a former naval officer and high school physics teacher. Nicole received her PhD in science education from the University of California, Berkeley in 2004 where she was supported by a Spencer Dissertation Fellowship. She worked with the Physics Education Group at the University of Washington and conducted research on students’ intuitive ideas about force and model-based reasoning and argumentation among undergraduate physics students at Berkeley. In addition to her work at KSTF, Nicole is an instructor in the University of Pennsylvania’s Science Teacher Institute. Ashraf Shady is a PhD candidate in the Urban Education program at the City University of New York Graduate Center; his strand of concentration is science, math, and technology. In his research he is currently using theoretical frameworks from cultural sociology and the sociology of emotion to examine how learning and teaching of science are enacted when students and their teachers are able to co-participate in culturally adaptive ways and use their social and symbolic capital successfully. His research interests focus on the use of cogenerative dialogues as a methodology to navigate cultural fields in urban education. Central to his philosophy as a science educator is the notion that teaching is a form of cultural enactment. As such, teaching, and learning are regarded as cultural production, reproduction, and transformation. This triple dialectic affirms that elements of culture are associated with the sociocultural backgrounds of participating stakeholders. Line A. Augustin received her doctorate degree in Chemistry (with a chapter of her dissertation on a case study of enactment of chemical knowledge of a high school student) and did a post-doc on Science Education at the Graduate Center, CUNY. She is currently teaching science content and methods courses in the Elementary and Early Childhood Education Department of Queens College, CUNY. She is interesting in investigating how racial, cultural, class and gender issues affect the ways that teaching and learning occurs in elementary classrooms, in understanding these issues and developing mechanism by which they can be utilized to promote better teaching and learning environment and greater dispositions towards science. She is also interested in what influences science teachers to change and/or to improve their teaching practices. 相似文献
| Christina SiryEmail: |
Christina Siry is a PhD student in the Urban Education program of the City University of New York, and an instructor at Manhattanville College. Her research interests focus on pre-service and in-service preparation for the teaching of science and she is currently researching the use of coteaching and cogenerative dialogue in elementary teacher preparation for the teaching of science. In particular, she is exploring the role that shared, supported teaching experiences can have in the construction of new teacher identity and solidarity. She has worked as an elementary science specialist teaching children in grades K-5, and in museum settings developing science programs for teachers and children. In addition to the position at Manhattanville College, Chris is a lecturer in the University of Pennsylvania’s Science Teacher Institute where she teaches science pedagogy to middle school teachers. Gail Horowitz is an instructor of chemistry at Yeshiva University, and a doctoral candidate in science education at Teachers College. For many years, she has been involved in research and curricular design within the organic chemistry laboratory setting, focusing specifically on the design of discovery or puzzle based experiments. Her doctoral research focuses on the intrinsic motivation of pre-med students. She is interested in trying to characterize and describe the academic goal orientations of pre-med students, and is interested in exploring how the curricular elements embedded in project based laboratory curricula may or may not serve to enhance their intrinsic motivation. Femi S. Otulaja is currently a PhD student and an adjunct professor of science teacher education at Queens College of the City University of New York. As a science teacher educator, his research interests focus on the use of cogenerative dialoguing and its residuals, such as coteaching, distributed leadership, culturally responsive pedagogy, as research and pedagogical tools for engaging, training and apprenticing urban middle and high schools pre- and in-service science teachers as legitimate peripheral participants. He also encourages the use of these modalities as assessment, evaluation and professional development tools for teaching and learning science and for realigning cultural misalignments in urban classrooms. His theoretical framework consists of a bricolage of participatory action research, constructivism, critical ethnography, cultural sociology, sociology of emotions, indigenous epistemology, culturally responsive pedagogy, critical pedagogy and conversation analyses. In addition, he advocates the use of technologies as assistive tools in teaching science. Nicole Gillespie is a Senior Program Officer at the Knowles Science Teaching Foundation (KSTF). She is a former naval officer and high school physics teacher. Nicole received her PhD in science education from the University of California, Berkeley in 2004 where she was supported by a Spencer Dissertation Fellowship. She worked with the Physics Education Group at the University of Washington and conducted research on students’ intuitive ideas about force and model-based reasoning and argumentation among undergraduate physics students at Berkeley. In addition to her work at KSTF, Nicole is an instructor in the University of Pennsylvania’s Science Teacher Institute. Ashraf Shady is a PhD candidate in the Urban Education program at the City University of New York Graduate Center; his strand of concentration is science, math, and technology. In his research he is currently using theoretical frameworks from cultural sociology and the sociology of emotion to examine how learning and teaching of science are enacted when students and their teachers are able to co-participate in culturally adaptive ways and use their social and symbolic capital successfully. His research interests focus on the use of cogenerative dialogues as a methodology to navigate cultural fields in urban education. Central to his philosophy as a science educator is the notion that teaching is a form of cultural enactment. As such, teaching, and learning are regarded as cultural production, reproduction, and transformation. This triple dialectic affirms that elements of culture are associated with the sociocultural backgrounds of participating stakeholders. Line A. Augustin received her doctorate degree in Chemistry (with a chapter of her dissertation on a case study of enactment of chemical knowledge of a high school student) and did a post-doc on Science Education at the Graduate Center, CUNY. She is currently teaching science content and methods courses in the Elementary and Early Childhood Education Department of Queens College, CUNY. She is interesting in investigating how racial, cultural, class and gender issues affect the ways that teaching and learning occurs in elementary classrooms, in understanding these issues and developing mechanism by which they can be utilized to promote better teaching and learning environment and greater dispositions towards science. She is also interested in what influences science teachers to change and/or to improve their teaching practices. 相似文献
16.
美国新近发布的课程文件报告《K-12科学教育的框架:实践,跨学科概念与核心概念》为美国未来的科学教育勾勒了总体蓝图,是美国制定新科学教育标准的基础和依据。新框架汲取了近年来科学教育、脑科学、学习科学等多方面研究成果,提炼出六条指导原则贯穿其中,并构建三维框架结构来概括所有学生在高中毕业前应完成的知识和实践内容。新框架提出的新思路值得我们关注和借鉴。 相似文献
17.
Science education researchers are concerned with preparing pre-service elementary teachers (PSETs) to teach in ways that support students to learn science in a meaningful way. Preparing elementary teachers to teach science is complicated given that they tend to be generalists and may not have the same experience with science as secondary teachers. During an elementary science methods course, we explored PSETs?? perspectives on the teaching and learning of science via a case study that included four PSETs. Using Frykholm??s (Journal of Curriculum and Supervision 19:125?C149, 2004) framework of ??educative?? and ??debilitating?? discomfort, we examined PSETs?? approaches to their own science learning and their approaches to science teaching. A theme apparent in PSETs?? perspectives was struggle. We described ways in which struggle was either educative or debilitating for PSETs, both in terms of their own learning and the ways in which they approached teaching. Some PSETs who struggled in their own learning developed learning experiences to engage their students in reform-based science teaching, while some PSETs developed learning experiences that prevented their students from experiencing any sort of struggle in their learning process. The ways in which these students dealt with their own learning struggles mirrored the ways in which they dealt with their struggles to become teachers of reform-based science instruction. Helping PSETs to deal with their feelings of discomfort with science content or ideas about the nature of science learning and teaching promoted by reform documents may be a key issue in developing their willingness to become facilitators of meaningful science learning. 相似文献
18.
Dr Christine M. Cunningham 《Research in Science Education》1998,28(2):243-257
Science education reform initiatives advocate incorporating more accurate portrayals of science in the high school classroom
that attend to science in its larger social context. However, conveying such understandings will require teachers to possess
new knowledge about how science is practised. This paper reports research that investigated the effect of teachers' sociological
understanding of science (SUS) on their design and implementation of curriculum innovations. It concludes that teachers' SUS
level strongly influences their ability to innovate; knowledge about science is necessary, but not sufficient, for sociologically
informed curricula. 相似文献
19.
20.
Vossen T. E. Henze I. Rippe R. C. A. Van Driel J. H. De Vries M. J. 《Research in Science Education》2019,51(2):891-911
Research and design activities are important focus points in international policies for secondary Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) education. It is up to school teachers to implement and supervise these activities in the STEM classroom. However, not much is known about the attitudes teachers hold towards supervising research projects or design projects. In this study, a questionnaire to measure teacher attitudes towards supervising research activities and design activities in secondary school was completed by 130 Dutch teachers who taught the relatively new Dutch STEM subjects O&O (research and design) and NLT (nature, life, and technology). These integrated STEM subjects are project and context based and are taught in a limited number of schools. Important differences between these integrated STEM subjects are their student and teacher populations: NLT is taught in grades 10–12 by teachers with a qualification in a science subject, while O&O is taught in grades 7–12 and can be given by any teacher in secondary school. The results showed that on average, both O&O and NLT teachers had high self-efficacy scores on supervising research and design projects even when they had received no special education in doing so. Furthermore, the teachers in general viewed supervising research projects as a more relevant activity than supervising design. Since research and design activities are becoming more important in (inter)national curriculum standards, STEM teacher education and subsequent professional development should not only familiarize teachers with supervising research projects, but with design projects as well.
相似文献