共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 578 毫秒
1.
Alison F. Eardley Clara Mineiro Joselia Neves Peter Ride 《Curator: The Museum Journal》2016,59(3):263-286
The authors discuss the principles of “access for all” in museums, both physical and intellectual access. They explore this question of multisensory processing in neurologically typical individuals, and case studies of two Portuguese museums that experimented with implementation of an “access for all” approach to the presentation of their permanent collections. The study was designed with three phases: addressing architectural barriers to access, preparation of accessible information about space and objects, and testing of alternative formats to convey this information to learn how to meet diverse needs in different ways. Set in the context of research on multisensory learning, this article discusses why an access for all principle is a majority issue as well as a moral and legal concept. It discusses two case studies where an “access for all” museological approach has been applied to access to the collections, with differing success. The discussion focuses on how an “access for all” approach could enhance learning, long‐term memorability and the ‘cultural value’ of a museum experience for all visitors. 相似文献
2.
3.
4.
5.
ABSTRACT In the ten years since the International Conference on the Principles and Future Development of AACR, long-standing debates have continued as to whether or not to have a “main entry,” and whether or not to exercise the rule of three to limit the number of headings or access points in certain cases. Recent proposals from the Joint Steering Committee for Development of RDA have recommended a change in “main entry” terminology to “primary access point,” and the elimination of the rule of three. This article explores how and why these shifts have occurred. 相似文献
6.
7.
《The Journal of Academic Librarianship》2023,49(4):102750
Journal articles are often made available prior to assignment to an issue, using labels like “early view,” “advanced online publication,” “ahead of print,” “online first,” or “in press.” While making articles available before an issue can speed up the scholarly communications cycle, a negative effect can be observed when full text is delivered through aggregator databases like EBSCO, ProQuest, or Gale products. This study assessed issue assignment delays across 18 journals which have full text aggregated in EBSCO's CINAHL Ultimate. Results show that articles published first in an early-view state are only available in the aggregator after they have been assigned to an issue. Any database-specific full-text delays (“embargos”) are then calculated from issue date rather than online publication date, leading subscribers who access the journals via aggregators to experience extended delays ranging from months to years in length. 相似文献
8.
"国际编目原则声明"研究 总被引：2，自引：0，他引：2
IFLA编目组为指导构建一部用于书目著录和检索的国际编目条例,提出了新的“国际编目原则声明”草案,俗称“法兰克福原则”,以取代“巴黎原则”。法兰克福原则基于“书目记录功能需求”,将目录功能扩展到发现、识别、选择、获取和导航,原则适用范围扩大到各类文献的书目与规范记录,同时增加检索点的规定,在检索点选择与形式上也有所变化。“法兰克福原则”将通过逐次修订,成为未来制订国际编目条例的基础。 相似文献
9.
10.
Christine Tobias 《Journal of Library & Information Services in Distance Learning》2017,11(1-2):175-182
ABSTRACTThe Michigan State University (MSU) Libraries' Website has a case of TMI: too much information organized by librarians for librarians. Finding relevant information about various library services, including the 24/7 Distance Learning Support Line, and access points to scholarly resources is often cumbersome, and given the limited time and staffing available in Web Services, it was impractical to embark on a comprehensive Website redesign. Instead, the implementation of two systems, LibAnswers and the A–Z Database List in LibGuides v2 CMS, served as a means for addressing the TMI issue and improving the usability of the MSU Libraries' Website. This case study will map the MSU Libraries' experience of implementing the LibAnswers and the A–Z Database List from early vision to launching the end product, as a means for resolving the “too much information” issue and improving the usability of the library's Website. 相似文献
11.
12.
Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva Judit Dobránszki Panagiotis Tsigaris Aceil Al-Khatib 《The Journal of Academic Librarianship》2019,45(6):102071
The issue of “predatory” publishing continues to affect many scholars around the world who publish. When one reads the fairly vast literature surrounding “predatory” publishing, there is an erroneous tendency to continue pivoting around Jeffrey Beall's blacklists of “predatory” open access (OA) journals and publishers. However, to be “predatory” involves much more than defining a handful of select behaviours, and it is becoming increasingly important to start defining, or curtailing, the lexicon to avoid referring to any journal or publisher that might display one of the following qualities (exploitative, deceptive, excessive, unscrupulous, abusive, advantageous, manipulative, profit-seeking, or others) as synonymously meaning “predatory”. This paper focuses mainly on the oft-interchangeable terms “predatory” and “exploitation”, and explores the morality of predatory and exploitative actions by applying a deontological ethics approach which implies that certain actions are wrong even if they achieve good consequences, with the understanding that because a predatory entity aims to exploit others, these actions would be considered morally wrong from a deontologist's perspective. In articulating our argument, we attempt to expand the conversation around this important topic, with the hope that it might bring additional clarity to the issue of what might constitute a “predatory” journal or publisher. 相似文献
13.
《Government Information Quarterly》2005,22(3):489-504
Any public intervention in the access to advanced telecommunications services should be based on one or more of the causes that justify State intervention in industry activities. More importantly, the opportunity and magnitude of the intervention should be directly related to the intensity with which such causes appear and, among these, to the one considered predominant.There are four “market failure” groups: inherent to the good (public goods, merit goods, externalities), referred to the market situation (failure of competition, incomplete markets, information failures), regarding the incidence in the economical development, and last, based on equity.We have analyzed the presence of these “justifying” causes in telecommunications on a general level, and particularly with regard to new infrastructures and services, and concluded that the greater part of these circumstances could justify public intervention. The assessment made of them provides a strict basis on which to construct every opinion this debate can generate. 相似文献
14.
15.
16.
17.
David Buckingham 《The Communication Review》2013,16(1-2):51-60
This article explores some of the dilemmas and difficulties encountered by academic researchers (and specifically those who work on media audiences) in presenting their work in the public domain. It considers some examples of media coverage of debates about media audiences, raising questions about academic authority, research evidence and public knowledge. It points to the limitations of a view of such debates as “moral panics” and proposes a different approach based on social constructionist analyses of “social problems.” It concludes by considering some of the ambivalence and uncertainty that surrounds the increasingly common requirement for academics to become engaged with the public at large. 相似文献
18.
Kimberly Anderson 《Archival Science》2013,13(4):349-371
This paper provides an analysis of the archival concepts of “record” and “evidence” as socio-cultural constructs arising out of a particular view of time. Archival records are usually characterized as having certain relationships to evidence in its temporal aspects—specifically, the requirement for a temporal disconnect between creation and use. This disconnect also necessitates a break between knowledge and the knower in which the record must be externalized and set aside from its creator in order to have “recordness”. This paper explores how Western concepts of time impact concepts of records and archival evidences and proposes an alternative framing. Since records have such power in our lives and societies, practitioners must begin to work with an expanded concept of record and sensitivity to differing time frames and worldviews. The paper proposes a new definition of “record” as an intentional, stable, semantic structure, which is used to identify three broad categories of record types, based on event-orientation or object-orientation, that are flexible enough to account for differing cultural and spiritual understandings of time. 相似文献
19.