共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 31 毫秒
1.
Rebecca Toov 《Journal Of Archival Organization》2017,14(1-2):35-54
Content management systems provide bountiful opportunities for innovation within the standard frameworks of archival management. This article presents an opportunity for an in-depth survey and quantitative analysis of 103 member institutions' implementation processes and uses of ArchivesSpace. 相似文献
2.
As the archival profession has adapted to new challenges and adopted modern practices like More Product, Less Process, the University of Minnesota has embraced these changes. Even so, implementing new practices can take time and effort. With the adoption of ArchivesSpace in 2016, the University found itself being fast-tracked to even more efficient methods for establishing physical and intellectual control over collections. This article will examine the case studies of two large collections that were in the midst of being processed when ArchivesSpace was implemented at the University of Minnesota. How did the switch to ArchivesSpace impact the processing of these collections, and how will these experiences impact the future of archival processing at the University? 相似文献
3.
4.
Lisa Calahan 《Journal Of Archival Organization》2016,13(3-4):114-126
As the University of Minnesota's Archives and Special Collections began the daunting task of migrating into ArchivesSpace over 5,000 finding aids from fifteen different units, a clearly defined workflow provided clarity and success. This article outlines how staff developed an implementation timeline and workflow, harnessed support from partners in IT, provided training, and what the benchmarks to success were. By sharing this well-documented and thought-out implementation workflow, it can provide guidance as others try to navigate the many moving parts of implementing new collection management technology. 相似文献
5.
6.
7.
四个范式:欧洲档案学的观念和战略的变化——1840年以来西方档案观念与战略的变化 总被引：1，自引：1，他引：0
本报告首先梳理了西方档案理论与档案史,探讨了那些激发档案专业思想、战略及方法的概念,其次又着重阐述了档案鉴定这个由档案工作者从人类文献记录中挑选出很小比例作为档案长久保存的过程。19世纪至今的档案工作者对其工作、职能、活动及社会作用的认识经历了(或者说显示了)四个大的思想框架(或范式),探讨和了解这个背景可以让我们更好地认识和应对我们现在所处的这个数字时代的挑战。 相似文献
8.
9.
数字档案资源建设已成为档案界关注的热点问题,目前国内外已有较多研究成果。对有关此热点问题的代表性研究进行综述,梳理其研究主题,总结其研究特点,找出其存在的问题并加以思考,以期对我国数字档案资源建设后续研究有所裨益。 相似文献
10.
Jarrett M. Drake 《档案与原稿》2013,41(2):270-279
ABSTRACTAustralian and US-based archivists have recently begun to confront their complicity in a documentary landscape that excludes and erases the voices and views of minority, oppressed and poor communities. Archival professional organisations in both countries attempt to confront this issue by focusing on the homogeneity of the profession, specifically through using the discourse of diversity. Thus, this keynote address, delivered at the 2017 conference of the Australian Society of Archivists in Melbourne, explores the following question: how, if at all, does diversity form part of the solution for dismantling the white supremacy of archives? It begins this inquiry by recounting the author’s participation and experience with diversity projects of the Society of American Archivists, before speculating how archivists might transition away from the language of diversity and towards the language of liberation through the concept of an archive of the oppressed. The central argument of the address is that dismantling white supremacy in archives requires archivists abandon the neoliberal discourse of diversity and adopt an archive of the oppressed, or a cooperative approach in which oppressed peoples are positioned as subjects in our own liberation. 相似文献
11.
Theo Thomassen 《Archival Science》1987,1(4):373-385
This first introduction, written for educational purposes, is meant to be a concise basic text in which the core concepts of archival science are coherently defined and explained, in a non-polemical way and departing from a de-institutionalised point of view. It is not intended to support or reject any single theory, but to provide an overview. It should be read as a synthesis of a variety of shared ideas and views, not as a manifesto of a new approach to archival science. If there is anything new to it, it might be located in the coherent and integrated presentation. In this primer of archival science annotation has been avoided.This revised version was published online in October 2005 with corrections to the Cover Date. 相似文献
12.
档案学革命发生与否的范式论分析 总被引：1，自引：1，他引：0
档案学革命是否已经发生?档案学界分歧的焦点是档案学正处于常规科学时期,还是科学革命时期?运用范式论分析并质疑了"现阶段档案学已经完成了科学革命"的观点,指出当前档案学正处于常规科学向科学革命转变的时期。 相似文献
13.
14.
Community archives have compelled shifts in dominant archival management practices to reflect community agency and values. To analyse these shifts, we ask: In what ways do community archives and their staff challenge traditional archival modes of practice? Do community archives work within or against dominant frameworks for institutional sustainability? Do community archives challenge or replicate dominant custody practices? Based on semi-structured interviews with 17 founders, staff and volunteers at 12 Southern California community archives, this research examines the diverse models of practice utilised by community archives practitioners that diverge from and challenge standard practices in the field. By addressing these questions, our research uncovers a variety of models of practice employed by communities in Southern California to autonomously create and sustain their archives. 相似文献
15.
A first introduction to archival science 总被引：1，自引：1，他引：0
Theo Thomassen 《Archival Science》2001,1(4):373-385
This first introduction, written for educational purposes, is meant to be a concise basic text in which the core concepts
of archival science are coherently defined and explained, in a non-polemical way and departing from a de-institutionalised
point of view. It is not intended to support or reject any single theory, but to provide an overview. It should be read as
a synthesis of a variety of shared ideas and views, not as a manifesto of a new approach to archival science. If there is
anything new to it, it might be located in the coherent and integrated presentation. In this primer of archival science annotation
has been avoided.
The first of several versions of this First Introduction was written in August 1995. It was meant to meet the need of the
Netherlands Archiefschool for a basic text on archival science which could support its different programs for archival education
and training. After ample discussion with the archival science teachers of the Archiefschool, it was introduced in the 1995/1996
courses. From then on, it has been used in almost all courses and classes on archival science on the undergraduate, graduate
and postgraduate levels and in several training and retraining programs of the Archiefschool. The design of the first version
has been maintained in all subsequent versions, including this last one. Still, the text has frequently been adapted as a
result of discussions with students and colleagues, in and outside the school. This first English version can almost be deemed
as a collective product. Of the numerous colleagues who were engaged in this discussion and contributed to the text, special
mention has to be made of Peter Horsman, Hans Scheurkogel, Hans Hofman, Eric Ketelaar, Herman Coppens and Kent Hayworth, who
commented the English version. For the final text and all imperfections that may still cling to it I am, of course, responsible.
An earlier version in Dutch has been published as: Theo thomassen, “Een korte introductie in de archivistiek”, in: P.J. Horsman,
F.C.J. Ketelaar en T.H.P.M. Thomassen (red.),Naar een nieuw paradigma in de archivistiek ('s-Gravenhage, 1999), pp. 11–20. 相似文献
16.
什么是逻辑起点?中国档案学有没有逻辑起点?中国档案学的逻辑起点是什么?逻辑起点的确立对于中国档案学发展有何意义?本文致力于就这些在学界包括档案界内部,产生过广泛讨论的问题进行一些尝试性探讨.初步梳理基于逻辑起点选择的差异而产生的档案学内部“学派化”趋向,并在前人理论的基础上提出作者自己的观点. 相似文献
17.
A review of the archival literature, including records and information management, indicates that archivists’ have shown over
the last two decades an interest in program evaluation. The sparceness of the literature on the subject suggests a gap in
an articulate body of knowledge, based on solid theoretical and methodological foundations, for evaluation of archival programs
and activities. However, if they have not particularly investigated the subject from a theoretical perspective, archivists
have developed in their different organizations and working environment practical knowledge of and experience with program
evaluation. In large corporations as well as in public bureaucracies, they have been part of or subjected to specific or generic
program evaluation initiatives conducted by internal and external evaluators. But archivists might need now to go some steps
further and to look from a critical perspective at what is needed in order to get full benefit from program evaluation. 相似文献
18.
Terry Cook 《Archives and Museum Informatics》1997,11(1):15-37
This essay is a preliminary assessment of David Bearman as the leading archival thinker of the late twentieth century. Bearman has revolutionized thinking in archival circles around the world by offering a defence of traditional archival notions of provenance, evidence, recordness, and contextuality that equals the noblest statements of a Hilary Jenkinson, and by positing a relevant, dynamic, engaged future for archivists to transform the Information Age into a Record-Keeping Age. The essay is both a personal reflection and critical analysis. There are three main themes: an assessment of Bearman's ideas and their overall importance to general archival theory; a more specific exposition of the nature and importance of the University of Pittsburgh Project and of where Bearman sees that its results are leading archivists and their profession and institutions in future; and a critique of some of the implications, if not the conscious intentions, of his ideas and methods that seem to exclude the cultural, historical, and heritage dimensions and uses of archives, public or private. The overall aim of the essay is to push the archival discourse to the next stage by challenging and constructively critiquing as well as extolling the work of this archival pioneer. 相似文献
19.
Richard Lehane 《档案与原稿》2013,41(3):171-180
Meaning is lost when records are moved from the sites in which they were made and kept to archives. This paper weighs the significance of that loss by identifying different kinds of context that may be found in sites of creation. Should archivists emulate archaeologists and document sites before they disturb them? What difficulties arise? This paper finds that, even though physical contexts cannot be perfectly captured or wholly preserved, there is still value in documenting sites where there is a strong connection between environment, records and creator. Furthermore, that documentation can then be used as a powerful tool to enhance access. 相似文献
20.
中国档案学研究内容广博,外国档案学研究内容精深;中国档案学研究主体以高校档案专业教师为主,外国档案学研究主体以档案实际工作者为主;中国档案学研究方法以定性描述为主,外国档案学研究方法以实证研究为主。中外档案学研究的明显差异性不是偶然出现的,它与中外档案事业管理体制、教育体系和各国研究历史传统、档案职业专业化水平等诸多因素都有关系,在本文中,作者对产生这三个方面差异的原因进行了分析。 相似文献