共查询到18条相似文献，搜索用时 31 毫秒
1.
2.
3.
20世纪90年代以来,欧盟将终身学习计划作为一项教育发展重要战略,经过一系列建设,业已形成了相对完整的计划体系,并为世界其他国家所认可。研究发现欧盟以2007年为界限将终身学习计划分为两个阶段,终身学习计划均与政策支持、专门的学习计划与关注学生就业率直接相关。欧盟这一系列终身学习计划为我国终身学习的推行提供了一定的参考。 相似文献
4.
欧盟推进终身学习的重大举措和经验 总被引：2，自引：0，他引：2
从制定概括性的学习建议到实施具体的教育计划,欧盟对终身学习的推进正逐步走向完善。文章立足于20世纪90年代以来,欧盟发表的具有重大意义的白皮书和备忘录,以及在实践中推行的作用显著的教育计划,简要总结了欧盟推进终身学习的经验。 相似文献
5.
终身学习理念在国际组织中具有独特的地位,联合国教科文组织、世界经合组织、世界银行和欧盟都不同程度地成为终身学习理念发展的推动力量。随着20世纪70年代终身学习理念出现开始,国际组织对终身学习理念的理解也在不断加深和提升,终身学习的观念在国际组织中不断发生变化。由于国际组织对成员国具有一定的政策影响力,国际组织通过相关政策制定和推行等方式来实现终身学习理念以及政策目标。 相似文献
6.
上世纪70年代初,原法国总理埃德加·富尔（EdgarFaure）及其同事,最早提出了“终身学习”的概念,认为每一个人必须终身不断地学习。多年来,欧盟的终身学习计划一直努力践行着这一理念,从上世纪90年代初起,欧盟陆续地推出了一系列以各自独立的方式加以实施和运行的教育计划。2007年,欧盟实施终身学习计划,该教育计划框架有四项支柱计划,分剐是夸关组斯计划、伊拉斯莫斯计划、达·芬奇计划、格龙维计划,以及两项辅助计划：横向计划、让·莫内计划。欧盟的终身学习计划展现了终身学习思想在欧洲付诸实践的比较先进的模式,其模式的思路与做法有许多值得借鉴,一是目标设置,导向目标和政策目标结构层层递进,目标内容贴近现实;二是人群覆盖,欧盟的终身学习计划人群覆盖的纵向考虑,尊重了人的发展与学习之终身性特征,而横向覆盖面又顾及了人们社会角色扮演与任务担当及其发展需求的多样性和差异性特征;三是内容设计,欧盟终身学习计划各分项计划在其内容要目“求同”的设计,使终身学习计划的整个内容结构更为规范,各教育板块间可以进行交流与合作,而具体教育内容“求异”的设计,有助于各教育板块保留自身特点,可以反映和满足不同学习者的不同学习需求。 相似文献
7.
构建学习化社会终身教育体系的思考 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
杨劲松 《北京教育(高教版)》2003,(5):37-39
一、着力普及与强化“学习化社会”和“终身教育” 伴随第三次科技革命诞生了“智能化、社会化、市场化”的现代先进生产力,与此相适应,出现了“学习化社会”及与之相适应的“终身学习”等新的教育理念。早在20世纪60年代,联合国教科文组织和经济合作 相似文献
8.
终身学习和组织学习型社会成了20世纪90年代以来的时髦口号。作为艺术教育的教师,是人类文明的传承者,更要确立终身学习的观念,要学会合作,学会学习,才能为培养出德艺双馨的艺术人才。 相似文献
9.
终身学习视角下我国社区教育研究综述 总被引：4，自引：1，他引：3
自20世纪90年代以来,我国围绕社区教育开展了广泛的研究。从终身学习的视角看社区教育研究的现状并不令人满意。目前,虽然有部分研究成果涉及终身学习的理念,但是仍缺乏专门、系统、深入的研究,其理论与实践的结合也不够紧密。随着知识经济时代、学习型社会的到来,社区教育应在理论和实践上关注人的终身学习,社区教育研究与实践应加强终身学习理念的指导。 相似文献
10.
终身学习政策的推展主要由国际组织主导。运用制度学习分析欧盟在成员国推行终身学习政策的过程可以发现,为维护其官僚合法性,欧盟并未全盘移植其他国际组织的终身学习理念,而是结合欧盟实际进行内容选择与政策迁移,并借助“开放合作方式”机制与欧洲教育区的设想,帮助成员国接纳并实施终身学习政策。但同时,在政策扩散中呈现出路径依赖,这可能会导致偏离政策初衷,出现理念标签化或口号化的结果。国际组织推行的理念在民族国家落地阶段,不仅应因地制宜,而且更要采取包容性政策框架才能更有助于成员国推行终身学习政策,发挥应有效果。 相似文献
11.
从国际实践比较来看,不存在一个"终身学习"的公认概念或权威理解,各国在实施终身学习战略时都表现出鲜明的特色.如欧盟强调终身学习的目的是培养公民的欧洲精神,促进欧盟一体化,将终身学习作为经济社会发展的综合战略;日本强调终身学习是为满足人们休闲的需要和精神的提高,其推行仰赖于垂直式的机构管理和"由中心带动"的做法;美国的终身学习更强调经济和功利的一面,其运行机制是市场机制. 相似文献
12.
Elena Tuparevska Rosa Santibáñez Josu Solabarrieta 《International Journal of Lifelong Education》2020,39(2):179-190
ABSTRACT The aim of the article is to analyse the concept of social exclusion in EU lifelong learning policies: how the concept has evolved from the 1990s in terms of meaning, definitions and closely connected concepts, what are the implications of this evolution, and whether there is coherence between the conceptual evolution and lifelong learning policy. Using a qualitative methodology, this article focuses on policy documents that form the European Union’s legal and political framework of reference in the lifelong learning area in the last two and a half decades. A total of 59 documents issued between 1992 and 2017 have been analysed using content analysis. The analysis of the documents has been complemented by 6 semi-structured interviews with EU lifelong learning experts. The results show that the concept is narrowly defined in terms of specific groups at risk of being socially excluded and in terms of employability, thus individualising the problem of exclusion and distracting attention from structural factors. 相似文献
13.
The evolution of the European Union’s lifelong learning policies: an institutional learning perspective 总被引：1，自引：1，他引：0
The EU’s lifelong learning policy has emerged as an overarching educational reform policy intended to address a wide range of issues, including education, employment and competitiveness. The question has been raised as to whether the resulting policy is merely a catch‐all concept that can be applied to any needs or whether it is underpinned by a comprehensive concept and strategy. This article advances the notion of institutional learning as the selective adoption by organisations of characteristics or policies from other organisations, as opposed to the wholesale homogenisation suggested by institutional isomorphism. Based on our periodisation of international lifelong learning policy, this article argues that a complete historical analysis of the discourse on lifelong learning, coupled with an analysis of the European Commission’s institutional learning from others will give a more appropriate picture of what contributed to the current conceptualisation of lifelong learning. 相似文献
14.
终身学习已经成为欧盟教育培训政策的主要标语。本文按时间顺序回顾了终身学习是如何作为欧盟教育培训领域的重要战略而出现的,并考察了终身学习对欧盟的影响,最后分析了它对我国构建学习型社会的借鉴意义。 相似文献
15.
16.
终身学习已经成为欧盟教育培训政策的主要标语。本文按时间顺序回顾了终身学习是如何作为欧盟教育培训领域的重要战略而出现的,并考察了终身学习对欧盟的影响,最后分析了它对我国构建学习型社会的借鉴意义。 相似文献
17.
Carmel Borg 《Globalisation, Societies & Education》2005,3(2):203-225
This paper provides a critical analysis of the EU’s Memorandum on lifelong learning in light of the evolution of the concepts of lifelong education and lifelong learning from the late sixties onward. It also analyses this document in light of the forces of globalisation that impinge on educational policy‐making in Europe as well as the all‐pervasive neo‐liberal ideology. The paper moves from theory to practice to provide critical considerations concerning certain ‘on the ground’ projects being presented as ‘best practice’ in EU documents. It brings out the neo‐liberal tenets that underlie much of the thinking and rationale for these projects, and indicates, in the process, how much of the old UNESCO discourse of lifelong education has been distorted to accommodate capitalism’s contemporary needs. An alternative conception of lifelong learning is called for. 相似文献
18.
Palle Rasmussen 《International Journal of Lifelong Education》2014,33(3):326-342
This article describes and discusses the development of lifelong learning policy in two EU member states, Denmark and Portugal. The purpose is to show how different societal and historical contexts shape the development and implementation of lifelong learning policies, even though these policies have significant common elements. As a basis for the discussion an inventory of policy elements is presented. Denmark and Portugal have been chosen as examples of smaller EU member states with different historical, social and cultural characteristics. Developments and policies in the two countries, including the links with EU education policy, are described. The discussion includes comparison drawing on the inventory of policy elements. A main conclusion is that the different historical trajectories of the two countries remain very important for present-day education and for the advancement of lifelong learning policy. Early development of public primary education and popular adult education has provided a strong foundation for lifelong learning policy in Denmark while in Portugal not only institutional provision but also popular demand for lifelong learning has had to be built up relatively recently. EU education policy has had much more impact on lifelong learning policy in Portugal than in Denmark, because Portugal has had to depend much more on economic support from the EU social fund. 相似文献