共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 140 毫秒
1.
王瑛 《江苏理工大学学报(社会科学版)》2002,4(4):122-125
构建人才高地的前提是熟悉人才状况和人才环境状况，而人才状况和人才环境状况始终是动态变化的。必须进行经常性的数据统计和信息收集整理。利用现代信息手段，建立人才与人才环境状况报告系统，为政府及相关部门提供准确，及时的人才信息，以利于国家人才队伍的建设和经济社会发展，人才与人才环境状况报告系统由数据采集子系统，评价指标体系子系统，数据统计及分析子系统，决策支持子系统，管理及维护子系统等组成，并确定报告周期。 相似文献
2.
陈锬 《福建教育学院学报》2000,(3)
管理人才主持的渗透着人才开发的参与管理，可称为“人才管理”。 其基础依靠尊重人才的群体风气，领导担负支持人才的组织使命，过程贯串显现 人才的创业活动，特征蕴含创业系统的人才机制。它坚持优化生态平衡、强化主 体创业的管理理念，取精用弘，蓄势应时，将在专业化成为大趋势的新世纪，再造 事业辉煌。 相似文献
3.
教育决策的民主与效益问题分析 总被引：2，自引：0，他引：2
在动态的管理活动过程中，决策是贯穿始终的行为，这是西蒙等人的决策理论早已认定的事实。教育管理是管理活动中的一部分，教育决策当然是教育管理活动中最重要的活动。决策的正确与否直接影响着教育管理活动的成功与失败。促成教育决策成功的因素很多，其中进行民主决策，实现教育决策的民主化是提高教育决策效益的必要条件。 相似文献
4.
关于地方高校实施人才强校战略的几点思考 总被引：3，自引：0，他引：3
高峰 《沈阳教育学院学报》2004,6(4):1-4
进入新世纪新阶段，党中央做出了实施人才强国战略的重大决策，高等学校作为培养人才的重要基地，在实施人才强国战略中担负着特殊重要的责任和使命。同样人才问题，也是高校改革与发展的核心问题和头等大事。面对新形势，许多高校及时地提出了人才强校战略。笔者认为地方高校如何应对挑战，也应实施人才强校战略。 相似文献
5.
高校科学决策的障碍研究 总被引：2，自引：0，他引：2
决策是管理过程的首要环节和执行各项管理职能的基础 ,是管理成败的关键。高校科学决策解决了新时期高等教育发展过程中的诸多难题 ,但高校决策的科学化仍然面临着许多诸如决策非专业、非生态、非系统、非民主以及非原则等方面的障碍。分析和研究并解决这些障碍 ,是高校决策科学化的关键所在。 相似文献
6.
分析高校现有人才管理系统的弱点，在此基础上，建立以决策为目标的新的人才管理系统，提出人才预测和人才规划数学模型，并设计系统的功能结构。 相似文献
7.
徐佳 《金华职业技术学院学报》2005,5(3):92-94,102
教师教学决策是指教师根据客观条件和学生需要，在教学前，教学中，教学后，经过科学而系统的分析，选择适当的教学方案，从而不断完善自身教学思想和行为的过程。教学决策包括程序化决策和非程序化决策。以个人决策为主，辅以必要的集体决策。属于微观决策，但会影响到教育的宏观决策。教师在教学决策中应注意时目标、资源、策略和时间的控制。 相似文献
8.
加强高技能人才职业教育的对策分析 总被引：3，自引：0，他引：3
随着知识经济的到来,企业对人才的竞争越来越激烈,这其中既包括管理人才、技术人才,还包括了技能人才,尤其是高技能人才。由于我国“重学历、轻技能”的传统培养人才观念,导致我国的技能人才总量严重不足,其中高技能人才更在全国范围内出现了“高薪难求”的局面,高技能人才的培养需要一个系统的职业教育过程,在这个过程中,政府、企业和个人都应该承担相应的责任,并采取相应的对策。 相似文献
9.
康明已 《淮北职业技术学院学报》2006,5(6):5-8
为了实现行政决策的科学化，本文在分析行政决策一般规律性原则的基础上，针对行政管理的特殊性，提出了在行政决策过程中应坚持规范化．制度化原则，科学化、民主化和公开化的原则，强化监控原则，并设计了科学化的行政决策制度，包括行政决策信息公开制度、行政决策听证制度、行政决策咨询制度、集体决策制度、行政决策监督反馈制度、行政决策责任追究制度。 相似文献
10.
本运用管理学和心理学的有关分析方法，就决策过程的心理因素进行分析，认为在教育决策中，对决策过程影响较大的心理因素有三个方面：决策主体，决策客体和决策环境中的惯性与规范等心理因素，并就这三个方面进行了初步分析。 相似文献
11.
This paper addresses the nature of governors in the governance of further education colleges in an English context. It explores the complex relationship between governors (people/agency), government (policy/structure) and governance (practice), in a college environment. While recent research has focused on the governance of schooling and higher education there has been little attention paid to the role of governors in the lifelong learning sector. The objective of the paper is to contribute to the debate about the purpose of college governance at a time when the Learning and Skills Council commissioning era ends and new government bodies responsible for further education and training, including local authorities, arrive. The paper analyses the nature of FE governance through the perspectives and experiences of governors, as colleges respond to calls from government for greater improvement and accountability in the sector. What constitutes creative governance is complex and controversial in the wider framework of regulation and public policy reform. As with other tricky concepts such as leadership, professionalism and learning, college governance is best defined in the contexts, cultures and situations in which it is located. College governance does not operate in a vacuum. It involves governors, chairs, principals, professionals, senior managers, clerks, community, business and wider agencies, including external audit and inspection regimes. Governance also acts as a prism through which national education and training reforms are mediated, at local level. While governing bodies are traditionally associated with the business of FE—steering, setting the tone and style, dealing with finance, funding, audit and procedural matters—they are increasingly being challenged to be more creative and responsive to the wider society. Drawing on a recent case study of six colleges, involving governors and key policy stakeholders, this paper explores FE governance in a fast changing policy environment. 相似文献
12.
“三重一大”制度是高校推进惩治和预防腐败体系建设的重要内容,实现了从个体决策、主观决策、行政型决策到集体决策、科学决策、治理型决策的变迁。当前,该制度面临着非民主障碍、非执行障碍和非系统障碍。针对此,要进一步建立健全集体决策规程,执行绩效评估机制、决策监督机制和决策责任机制。 相似文献
13.
ABSTRACTPolicy elites use rhetoric in speeches and press releases to provide framing that is intended to influence public opinion. These rhetorical events can be treated as instances in which speech usefully promotes particular discourses. Indeed, elected officials are able to influence how individuals think about problems and solutions through speeches and press releases. Two important rhetorical events in which political elites advance frames for social issues are annual state of the state addresses (SoSA) given by U.S. governors and gubernatorial press releases that inform media reporting about state policy. This study employed policy discourse and rhetorical analyses to examine SoSAs and press releases as rhetorical events within the context of educational policy. Our findings show that governors framed the roles of state government, governors, and educational stakeholders within a discourse that perpetuates a neoliberal version of education. In this framing, governors situated education’s purpose as being workforce and economic development, ignoring its role in addressing social issues and preparing informed, engaged participants for democratic society. Given that individuals make decisions about how to address social issues and understand public institutions based on framing provided by political elites, these findings raise implications for state educational policies and the public purposes of education. 相似文献
14.
李绮 《淮阴师范学院学报(哲学社会科学版)》2000,(6)
清末新政前后 ,地方督抚权力不断增长 ,逐渐成为一支独立的能够左右清廷政局的政治力量。晚清督抚不仅积极倡导新政 ,参与新政决策 ,还对科举制度的废除、君主立宪制的推行等产生了至关重要的影响。形成“督抚新政”的原因 ,主要是由于中央权威和政治信誉的下降 ,而地方督抚较之中央具有更多易于变通的因素 ,加上因民族危机、统治危机而产生的忧患意识激发了督抚自身思想的转化 ,使其对清末新政的领导起到了无可替代的作用 相似文献
15.
转型时期学校管理的复杂性需要领导有更为广阔的决策思维品质，而领导决策思维的品质又体现在决策思维的过程中，研究决策思维的原则能反映决策思维过程的特性，体现决策思维的规律。学校管理决策要达到科学、民主、规范、优化的程度，领导必须遵循决策思维的十大原则，如实事求是、有的放矢、信息流畅、三个有利、三个面向、科学民主、系统有序等。 相似文献
16.
梁红霞 《北京教育学院学报》2004,18(4):54-57
成人高校的未来发展和其承担的责任义务表明其经营管理应该侧重内部控制,内部控制是对成人高校各级组织机构进行的约束和指导,目的是提高成人高校的决策的正确性、资源使用的有效性、各个分院系处室工作的高效性以及信息的真实性。实行内部控制必须依靠成人高校领导者及其教职员工的通力配合。 相似文献
17.
张荣现 《河南师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2000,27(1):60-62
国有企业经过多年改革,虽然取得了很大成效,但尚未成为产权明晰的真正的现代企业,究其原因在于国有企业产权的二级委托代理模式,即政府(国家所有)——政府官员(代表政府行使所有者职能)——企业经理(受政府官员委托进行经营管理)。这一委托代理链条的出现,造成了企业产权模糊、政企不分、效率低下等一系列问题。在国有企业的购并重组过程中,上述代表不同利益的各相关主体动机各异,有效率动机、经理动机、政绩动机、政策性动机等。种种外化于企业自身经营效益的购并动机也引发了许多不良问题。 相似文献
18.
Arnold F. Shober 《Peabody Journal of Education》2013,88(5):559-575
Since the 1970s, American governors have become increasingly active in education politics. Where they once told state education chiefs to “make me the best education governor ever,” they now demand control of state boards of education, push for state control of school funding, and urge statewide standards for teacher evaluation. This article surveys the growth of gubernatorial interest in education in Wisconsin, Ohio, and Florida. It argues that sustained financial pressure on state budgets and widespread calls for educational equity have undercut both school districts and legislatures as effective arbiters of education policy. These twin pressures have forced governors, who have a statewide political constituency and are responsible for the state budget, to accept greater control over education policy. 相似文献
19.
Mayors,Governors, and Presidents: The New Education Executives and the End of Educational Exceptionalism 总被引：1，自引：1，他引：0
Jeffrey R. Henig 《Peabody Journal of Education》2013,88(3):283-299
Various accounts have noted a growing visibility and influence of presidents, governors, and mayors in the shaping of educational policy. Typically, explanations for this are discrete and situational: specific to particular levels of government, particular jurisdictions, particular visionary leaders, and transitory external events. This article reviews the historical manifestations of growing executive involvement in education throughout the federal system and introduces four rivals to the situational perspective. The emergence of the so-called new educational executives, it concludes, grows out of structural shifts in the institutional landscape and may be best understood as the more visible front edge of a broader reabsorption of education politics into the arena of general-purpose governance. 相似文献
20.
Helen Young 《British Journal of Sociology of Education》2017,38(6):812-826
School governing bodies in England have considerable powers and duties, and their formal role positions them as decision-makers. This article draws on qualitative research in the governing bodies of four maintained schools. Using deliberative democracy as a sensitising concept, the article considers some processes by which decisions are made (or not made) in governing bodies. Without claiming that governors never make decisions, it explores constraints and limitations on their ability to do so. Governors exhibit a paradoxical combination of busy-ness and passivity. On the one hand, governing bodies are constituted and structured around activity and technically decisions were made. On the other, decisions could rarely be attributed to active choices by governors. Rather, their more passive agreement with actions and positions was presented as almost unavoidable ‘common sense’, either due to the national policy context or the headteacher’s presentation of the available options. 相似文献