共查询到19条相似文献，搜索用时 218 毫秒
1.
在系统分析教育技术常用的两种研究范式的基础上,结合哲学史的梳理,从方法论、研究方式和具体研究方法三个层面对现象学进行了分析,指出现象学是教育技术研究的第三种范式。在方法论层面,现象学范式的创新性突破在于穿透了“一般”和“个别”的割裂;在研究方式层面,现象学范式遵循质性研究的模式,擅长对微观体验的揭示;在具体研究方法层面,现象学范式综合运用访谈、体验报告等手段,使研究结论具有建构性。在此基础上,根据对教育技术研究特征的分析,明确了现象学之于教育技术研究的方法论价值在于贯通融合,即有利于教育技术研究的定位融合、视域融合和研究取向融合。 相似文献
2.
本文依据社会学对研究范式的界定,从研究范式产生的背景、研究目的、本体论、认识论、方法论以及研究者价值观等方面分析比较教育研究的实证主义研究范式、解释主义研究范式、批判理论研究范式、后现代主义研究范式、混合研究范式和思辨研究范式。 相似文献
3.
4.
军队思想政治教育范式的逻辑结构包括内在结构和外在关联两个方面。内在结构——哲学范式、社会学范式和操作范式,构成了一个有序整体,共同作用于军队思想政治教育研究与实践;外在关联——军队思想政治教育本体论、认识论和方法论,是建构军队思想政治教育范式的本体承诺、认知基础和方法导向。 相似文献
5.
学生精力转移理论是一个应用教育理论，属于基础理论范畴。它从认识论和方法论高度来诠释基础教育的根本规律。它具有鲜明的时代性、实践性、可操作性和实效性。它是笔者在自身班主任工作经验基础上，汲取全国各地先进教育改革经验，并从生理、心理、教育和管理四个层面进行整合后形成的能转化情感教育（宏观）的中观教育理论。它打破了传统教育理论仅从心理层面研究教育的局面，解决了以往教育理论操作性差，实效性不强的问题。该理论来源于教育一线，所有教师在工作中或多或少都带有它的影子，教师易于接受、理解和把握，它能较有效地解决世界性难题一一后进生教育问题。它为教育管理提供了新思路和新方法。 相似文献
6.
教育情感社会学是运用社会学的研究视角与研究方法来发现学校教育中的情感现象与问题,阐释学校教育中的情感与宏观、中观和微观社会之间的内在互动机制,找寻学校教育中的情感及情感教育问题解决的社会策略.其研究内容可以从宏观、中观和微观层面进行探讨.教育情感社会学拓展了教育社会学和情感社会学的研究空间,凸显学校教育中的情感及情感教育教学问题的社会性根源. 相似文献
7.
范式研究是对职业技术教育研究的元研究,它是对职业技术教育研究的深度反思和“自觉”,对于职业技术教育研究的发展具有重要的方法论意义.当前对职业技术教育范式的研究存在“话语碎片化、缺乏同一语境、缺乏哲学反思与批判”等问题.基于对“范式”、“研究范式”、“职业技术教育研究范式”的理解,从本体论、认识论、方法论上对职业技术教育研究进行重新审视,从而使职业技术教育研究范式走上合理路径. 相似文献
8.
2021年我国启动了“国家智能社会治理实验基地”的建设工作,开展面向人工智能教育领域的社会实验是其重点部署内容之一,以期超前研判智能教育的发展规律与风险挑战。围绕如何正确认识与科学推进人工智能教育社会实验的现实问题,文章立足于技术社会学视角,分析了传统实验、教育准实验、教育社会实验的异同,阐释了人工智能教育社会实验的核心内涵,论述了人工智能教育社会实验的本体论、认识论、方法论与价值论等理论基础,通过剖析人工智能与教育的融合路径与理论,认为人工智能教育社会实验研究的实践进路包括：微观层面应重点研究人机复合体认知、人机协同等场景中技术对个体适应性的影响;中观层面应重点研究智能学习环境、人机协同教学模式、智能学习测评等场景对学校教育体系的影响;宏观层面应重点研究资源配置、数字治理、教育公平等场景对社会制度与政策的影响,从而推动智能时代教育的高质量发展。 相似文献
9.
高职教育协调发展与特色办学 总被引：5，自引：0，他引：5
高职教育协调发展与特色办学问题可以从宏观、中观、微观三大层面探讨.宏观层面,从发展现状、政策导向和特色发展的角度,分析高职教育发展的背景;中观层面,从教育目标、职业能力、职教功能、专业设置的角度,研究高职教育的发展走势;微观层面,从技术特色确立、特色办学模式选择、教师岗位设置的角度,探讨高职特色的创建. 相似文献
10.
教育研究方法论范式与方法的反思 总被引：13，自引：0，他引：13
我们在谈及教育研究时，意指对教育现象、教育活动与教育问题进行科学的研究。科学的首要标准就是使用的方法是否科学。本文从本体论与认识论的角度探讨了教育研究方法论的范式。从而厘清方法论、方法、量化研究与质化研究之间的关系。在此基础上，通过对收集的教育学博士学位论文中“方法(论)”章节的分析，我们得出这样的结论：科学的方法论与方法的自觉意识在教育学博士学位论文的研究中还没有形成制度性的氛围。 相似文献
11.
Elliot P. Douglas Mirka Koro-Ljungberg Maura Borrego 《European Journal of Engineering Education》2010,35(3):247-257
The purpose of this paper is to explore some challenges and promises when the epistemological diversity embedded in qualitative research traditions is introduced to research communities with one dominant research paradigm, such as engineering education. Literature is used from other fields and empirical data are used from engineering education, including the practices of the European Journal of Engineering Education and the Journal of Engineering Education, with the expectation that the ideas that are presented are relevant to a broad range of education disciplines. A number of challenges are identified as the epistemological diversity of qualitative research is introduced to the primarily positivist field of engineering education. Ultimately, embracing epistemological diversity holds the promise of researchers being able to ask: ‘What questions and answers become possible from these newly created positions and what can be learned from these alternative approaches?’. 相似文献
12.
哲学是一切科学的母体,教育学的研究范式也深受时代哲学思想的影响.传统哲学是一种存在论和认识论的哲学,也是近代自然科学的哲学化的结果.传统哲学型塑了传统 "科学范式"的教育研究.随着生存论哲学的转向,教育研究范式也开始从"科学范式"向"人文范式"变革,开始关注教育中的"人"和"事件". 相似文献
13.
杨艳梅 《番禺职业技术学院学报》2010,9(2):33-36
比较教育的研究范式是在批判传统研究范式的同时产生新的研究范式,包括历史主义的研究范式、实证主义的研究范式、质性研究范式和多元研究范式。探讨这些研究范式的不断批判和超越,目的是改变比较教育研究者单一的线性思维方式,提倡批判的、综合的研究范式思维,使比较教育的研究更加全面、深化,促进比较教育学科的发展。 相似文献
14.
Reflection and reflective practice are key concepts in the educational literature as well as in research on physical education (PE) and physical education teacher education (PETE). The purpose of this article is to review the current empirical knowledge base for reflection and reflective practice in PE and PETE from 1995 to 2011. The review includes empirical research published in peer reviewed journals on the topics on reflection and reflective practice in the contexts of PE and PETE. There were 33 articles included in the review. Most of the research is conducted in the PETE context, where it was found that pre-service teachers do develop their reflective capabilities. However, the results also indicate students make little progress on critical reflections. In the PE context, it was found that teachers express a need for reflective communities. Theoretical and methodological challenges with the reviewed literature are discussed and suggestions for further research proposed. 相似文献
15.
Lina Markauskaite Peter Reimann 《British journal of educational technology : journal of the Council for Educational Technology》2014,45(3):385-391
This special issue brings together a set of contributions that represent and explore the state of the art regarding the development and application of digital technology‐enhanced research approaches in educational research—e‐research for education. Over the recent years, digital technologies have enhanced various aspects of scholarly practices, such as data collection and analysis, research collaboration, and publishing. New technology‐enhanced research approaches have been emerging in a number of educational research domains, such as learning analytics, educational data mining, digital ethnography and educational informatics. Although the potential of digital approaches has been generally acknowledged, many overarching conceptual and methodological questions remain unexplored and under‐theorised. This special issue provides a landmark collection that synthesises some important empirical and methodological advances in this research field, including methodologically innovative case studies and critical analyses of overarching epistemological, methodological and practical issues that inevitably will shape future developments of this research field. 相似文献
16.
Michael D. Sheehan R. Burke Johnson 《Educational technology research and development : ETR & D》2012,60(1):131-153
The purpose of this research was to probe the philosophical beliefs of instructional designers using sound philosophical constructs
and quantitative data collection and analysis. We investigated the philosophical and methodological beliefs of instructional
designers, including 152 instructional design faculty members and 118 non-faculty professionals. We used the Philosophy of
Social Science Inventory, a 52-item questionnaire, to measure 20 beliefs within four categories. We probed four ontological
beliefs (ontological realism, ontological relativism, physicalism, and idealism); five epistemological beliefs (epistemological
relativism, fallibilism, epistemological objectivity, rationalism, and empiricism); three axiological beliefs (ethical realism,
ethical relativism, and valueneutrality in research); and eight methodological beliefs (nomothetic, idiographic and critical
methods, scientific naturalism, humanism, and quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods). Our research questions included
(a) What are the predominant philosophical and methodological beliefs of instructional designers? (b) Do instructional design
faculty and non-faculty instructional designers, identifying with different research methodologies, hold different sets of
philosophical beliefs? and (c) What relationships exist between philosophical beliefs and age, gender, ethnicity, level of
education, and/or years of service? Overall, the philosophical profile of instructional designers can reasonably be described
as pragmatic. Belief characterizations of methodological subgroups (e.g., those identifying with qualitative, quantitative,
or mixed methods research) generally supported our hypotheses. Although demographic variables (except gender) were not singularly
important, our analyses suggest that a combination of ethnicity, gender, research preference, and level of education can be
used to predict philosophical and methodological beliefs. 相似文献
17.
作为一门关于理解与解释的学科,解释学的"理解"范式对认识比较教育的学科特性有所启发。从解释学视角看,比较教育研究就是对"客教育"的理解与解释。解释学对比较教育的研究主体、研究方法、研究过程、研究结果等都有一些启示。 相似文献
18.
Vivienne Bozalek Michalinos Zembylas 《International journal of qualitative studies in education》2017,30(2):111-127
Internationally, an interest is emerging in a growing body of work on what has become known as ‘diffractive methodologies’ drawing attention to ontological aspects of research. Diffractive methodologies have largely been developed in response to a dissatisfaction with practices of ‘reflexivity’, which are seen to be grounded in a representational paradigm and the epistemological aspects of research. While work on ‘reflexivity’ and ‘critical reflection’ has over the years become predominant in educational and social science research methodology literature, our reading indicates that there is still important conceptual work to be done putting these two practices – reflection and diffraction – in conversation with each other and exploring their continuities and breaks as well as examining the consequences for research methodologies in education. This article raises important questions about how the concepts of diffraction and reflection are defined and understood and discusses the methodological implications for educational research. 相似文献
19.
思想政治教育主客体研究述评 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
通过分析思想政治教育主客体理论范式演进,揭示其教育学和哲学认识论渊源。认为教育哲学关于教育者与受教育者关系的反思与哲学二元认识论向交往实践论范式的转换是生成思想政治教育主客体论的认识论来源。 相似文献