共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 140 毫秒
1.
应用计算机文献检索,进而在编辑过程中准确把握稿件的真实性,了解相关论文领域的最新研究状况、论文编排以及参考文献的真实性四个方面分析,阐述了计算机文献检索对进一步提高科技期刊质量,有很重要的意义. 相似文献
2.
刘红霞 《辽宁广播电视大学学报》2008,(1):105-107
主要使用内容分析法,从科技期刊的标准化、规范化角度,对体育学术期刊稿件内容的特点、撰稿和编辑加工的标准化规范化情况进行分析探讨。认为体育学术期刊的稿件具有科学性、创新性、专业性和实用性等特点,其来稿和刊登稿件存在的问题主要是稿件编写格式,图、表、计量单位和参考文献的著录。应严格以国际标准和国家标准为依据,加强体育学术期刊编辑规范建设。 相似文献
3.
参考文献是文章的重要组成部分,根据参考文献提供的有效信息,可以辅助审稿,快速筛选稿件,是一编辑快速初审稿件的有效辅助手段. 相似文献
4.
科技期刊的初审工作 总被引：5，自引：0，他引：5
金永勤 《宁波大学学报(教育科学版)》2003,25(6):133-134
科技期刊的初审是审稿工作中的重要一环，编辑初审工作包括审查稿件的规范化；利用计算机检索、判断科技文献的创新性及科学性；通读全文，调整文章的结构层次，使其逻辑严密；对语言文字进行初加工。 相似文献
5.
基于目前科技期刊常用的方正书版文档格式,开发了一个数据析出系统,从文档中自动提取稿件的基本信息,解决了科技期刊编辑信息系统中稿件基本信息的自动采集问题. 相似文献
6.
姚冰 《四川教育学院学报》2009,25(10):55-57
学术论文参考文献著录问题主要表现在：1.无参考文献或参考文献著录为应付型;2.参考文献著录不规范;3.正文中引文标注不严谨。编辑可根据参考文献著录状况对稿件质量进行一定的甄别,并采取不同的处理策略：进行相应的规则教育、退稿以及提请相关机构完善著录标准和规则。 相似文献
7.
《中国科教创新导刊》2013,(21):219-219
稿件要求1.稿件应具有科学性、先进性和实用性,论点明确、论据可靠、数据准确、逻辑严谨、文字通顺。2.计量单位以国家法定计量单位为准;统计学符号按国家标准《统计学名词及符号》的规定书写。3.所有文章标题字数在20字以内。4.参考文献应引自正式出版物,在稿件的正文中依其出现的先后顺序用阿拉伯数字加方括号在段末上角标出。5.参考文献按引用的先后顺序列于文末。 相似文献
8.
徐海娟 《黄冈师范学院学报》2015,(3)
目的：：提高科技期刊参考文献的准确率及规范率。方法：通过建立科技期刊参考文献的编校流程,将参考文献分为4大类14小项,对参考文献作全面而规范的编校。结果：采用流程编校法提高了参考文献编校的效率,避免遗漏某一方面,既保证了参考文献的规范化,又有利于保持刊物的风格及形式统一。结论：通过制定参考文献的校对流程,可以提高参考文献的规范化,使参考文献达到“齐、清、定”的发稿要求。 相似文献
9.
文后参考文献是科技论文的一个重要组成部分 ,但通常不被人们所重视 ,存在的问题较多 .现从 9个方面就科技论文参考文献的功能进行了阐述 ,从而明确了参考文献在科技论文和科技期刊中的地位和作用 ,明确了准确著录文后参考文献的重要意义 ,以期引起作者和编者的重视 . 相似文献
10.
探索军事科技期刊的社会化，发挥军事科技期刊的社会化功能是办刊人员追求的一个目标，遵循社会科技期刊发行规律，构建军事科技期刊的新的运行机制和方式，是军事科技期刊重要的发展战略。实现军事科技期刊的社会化，必须寻求有效的方法和途径。 相似文献
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
Kathleen H. Offenholley 《The American journal of distance education》2013,27(4):236-248
ABSTRACTThe current study seeks to analyze university students’ perceptions of online peer assessment (PA) with regard to its effectiveness as a learning tool and as a contributing factor to motivation and interaction. Participants also responded to questions about self-perceived writing strength, attitudes toward peer review, and experiences with peer review. The survey was administered via link online for students who report having completed peer review in online courses. Results from participants revealed that students generally believe peer review to be effective, helpful to learning, increasing communication skills, and as contributing to a stronger written end product. Students also agreed that peer review increases interaction, participation, and a sense of community. Attitudes toward peer review indicate that female students are more intimidated by giving peer reviews than their male classmates, but they felt less intimidated online as compared to face-to-face. More experienced students and students farther along in their college careers are less likely to give peer reviews that are affected by the ones they receive. The results indicate that peer review is an important teaching and learning tool that merits more research with particular attention to gender and other demographic data. 相似文献
16.
Raoul Mulder Chi Baik Ryan Naylor Jon Pearce 《Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education》2014,39(6):657-677
Involving students in peer review has many pedagogical benefits, but few studies have explicitly investigated relationships between the content of peer reviews, student perceptions and assessment outcomes. We conducted a case study of peer review within a third-year undergraduate subject at a research-intensive Australian university, in which we examined: (1) students’ perceptions of the peer review process before and after peer review, (2) content of the peer reviews and what kinds of feedback were adopted and (3) the effect of participation in peer review on performance (grades) in the assessment task. Students overwhelmingly perceived peer review to be beneficial, and the opportunity to participate in peer review resulted in a significant improvement in the quality of work submitted for assessment. Students who benefited most from peer review were those of below-median performance, and the magnitude of benefit was related to the degree to which students engaged with the peer review process. Our study confirms that participation in peer review can lead to important improvements in performance and learning outcomes. 相似文献
17.
博士学位论文应经同行评议,这是我国学位条例的规定,也是各高校的通行做法。同行评议方式一般分为两种：由院系组织的明审和由校研究生管理部门组织的盲审。盲审因其规避了人情、关系等因素干扰获得优势,但也存在着因评议人对学科熟悉度的差异等原因而产生误判、错判的问题。本文通过对某高校近两年博士学位论文的同行评议数据进行比较、分析,认为最好的解决路径应是完善制度设计,从而更好地体现两者的价值。 相似文献
18.
同行评议是研究型大学教师聘任中的一个重要程序,其结论对于教师是否能够得到聘任、职称能否得到晋升具有决定性意义。在我国研究型大学教师同行评议的过程中,内部评议与外部评议、资格审查与同行评议、量化评价与同行评议是尤其需要注意的三对矛盾关系。 相似文献
19.
20.
Raphael Gillett 《Higher Education Quarterly》1989,43(1):20-38
The validity of indices of departmental research performance based on three different types of peer review is critically examined. The three types of peer review under investigation are: journal peer review, grant-giver peer review, and impressionistic peer review. It is shown that, of the indices considered, only those based on journal peer review constitute true performance indicators that are capable of yielding a reasonably valid measure of departmental performance. A basic requirement of a performance indicator is that it should relate output to input. None of the indices based on grant-giver peer review or impressionistic peer review satisfies this criterion. They are therefore unable to provide the information that the UGC seeks to obtain in its 1989–90 evaluation, namely, an indication of the cost-effectiveness of departmental research programmes. On both a priori and empirical grounds, indices based on grant-giver peer review and impressionistic peer review are shown to yield unsatisfactory measures of departmental research performance. Fifteen serious defects are identified in indices based on grant-giver peer review, and nine major flaws are highlighted in indices based on impressionistic peer review. Implications for the conduct of the UGC's 1989–90 evaluation are discussed. 相似文献