共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 140 毫秒
1.
《南昌教育学院学报》2016,(3):122-125
教师将网络和初中生英语写作教学中的教师反馈与同伴反馈相结合,对在线教师反馈和同伴反馈的认可度,合理性进行了对比研究。结果显示:学生对教师在线反馈较为认可,同伴在线反馈的合理性较低,教师反馈的正确率与学生写作水平呈正相关,教师反馈和同伴反馈在内容和类型上有较大差异。因此在线教师反馈应在初中英语写作课中大力提倡,同伴反馈应设计合理,操作严谨,作为教师反馈方式的一种补充,从而提高初中学生的英文写作水平。 相似文献
2.
邹李炜 《高等教育研究(成都)》2014,(3)
本文对比研究了网络环境下大一英语写作教学中使用教师反馈、同伴反馈和教师+同伴反馈方式的有效性及学生对不同反馈方式的态度。研究发现:三种反馈方式对学生英语写作水平的提高都有所帮助,但有效程度从高到低分别是教师+同伴反馈、教师反馈和同伴反馈;同伴反馈是教师反馈的有益补充,在写作教学中,能将这两种反馈方式结合起来,效果最为理想。 相似文献
3.
刘洁 《江西教育学院学报》2014,(4):104-106
基于多元反馈模式的英语写作教学模式注重在写作过程中采用教师反馈与同伴反馈,口头反馈与书面反馈相结合的模式,培养学生的自主学习能力、自我评价能力和提高学生的英语写作水平。通过多元反馈模式的实证研究,采用定量和定性的方法,比较研究多元反馈模式与传统模式的效果,从而构建一套基于多元反馈模式的英语写作模式。 相似文献
4.
李亚琴 《湖北广播电视大学学报》2009,29(6):151-152
写作教学向来是英语教学中的重点和难点,传统的作文评改模式制约了写作教学的发展。本文从过程教学法、协作学习理论及反馈理论出发,探讨了同伴反馈在大学英语写作教学中的应用,指出培训后的同伴反馈能增强学生的自我意识,对学生写作质量的提高有很大帮助。 相似文献
5.
评改反馈是英语写作教学的重要环节之一,但只有有效的反馈才能有效的提高学生的写作能力。对高职英语写作教学中使用教师反馈、同伴反馈和教师+同伴反馈3种反馈方式进行了实证研究。结果表明:教师反馈和同伴反馈仅在个别方面与学生写作能力提高有关联,教师+同伴反馈结合了两者的优势,能全方位提高学生的英语写作能力。 相似文献
6.
邹李炜 《唐山师范学院学报》2015,(1):155-157
在网络环境下比较30名大一本科新生的英语写作教学中使用教师反馈、同伴反馈和教师+同伴反馈的有效性及学生对不同反馈方式的态度。实验发现:三种反馈方式都对学生写作水平的提高有所帮助,但有效程度从高到低分别是教师+同伴反馈、教师反馈和同伴反馈。同伴反馈是教师反馈的有益补充。在写作教学中,能将两种反馈方式结合起来最为理想。 相似文献
7.
张成莉 《忻州师范学院学报》2016,(4):105-108
同伴反馈是英语作文修改的重要手段之一,随着过程教学法的提出而备受关注。同伴反馈在实施的过程中也呈现出一定的局限性与不足,如何在英语写作中有效实施同伴反馈则成为问题的关键。文章从评改培训,互评阶段,教师反馈和反思总结这四个阶段构建了英语写作同伴反馈的有效模式,这一模式综合考虑了反馈发出者、反馈接收者和反馈方式三方面因素,可以提高英语写作同伴反馈的有效性。 相似文献
8.
写作评改即反馈是写作中的重要环节。传统的教师反馈和同伴反馈各有优缺点。本文通过实证研究,提出以同伴反馈为主、教师反馈为辅的互补型反馈模式,旨在充分发挥两种评改模式的各自优势,提高反馈效率,促进学生英语写作水平的提高。 相似文献
9.
作为英语教学中的重点和难点．写作教学的发展受到传统作文评改模式的制约。本文分析了英语教师在写作教学中反馈的现状,提出教师应转变写作教学观念．采取多样化的写作反馈策略．构建一个教师和同伴互评相结合的英语写作教学反馈模式。以期对提高英语写作教学质量有所启示．培养学生写作的自我评估和修改能力。 相似文献
10.
11.
This paper reviews studies of peer feedback from the novel perspective of the providers of that feedback. The possible learning benefits of providing peer feedback in online learning have not been extensively studied. The goal of this study was therefore to explore the process of providing online peer feedback as a learning activity for the provider. We concluded that (1) providing online peer feedback has several potential learning benefits for the provider; (2) when providing online peer feedback, students use different cognitive processes; (3) the cognitive processes and the potential learning benefits can be realised when students use specific elements in the feedback they provide. 相似文献
12.
13.
解倩 《淮北职业技术学院学报》2014,(4):98-99
自20世纪70年代起,同伴互评就作为过程写作法的重要环节受到国内外学者广泛关注。其相关研究包括同伴互评本质、外语写作教学中的实际应用效果、与教师评价的对比等内容。其最新研究成果意义深远,为在英语写作教学中深入开展同伴互评提供了理论指导。因此,梳理相关文献就显得尤为迫切和重要。 相似文献
14.
The need for supporting student writing has received much attention in writing research. One specific type of support is feedback—including peer feedback—on the writing process. Despite the wealth of literature on both feedback and academic writing, there is little empirical evidence on what type of feedback best promotes writing in online environments. This article reports on research that tries to determine what type of feedback best improves the quality of collaborative writing and what the effects of feedback are on student learning in an environment based on asynchronous written communication. The results reveal that concerning the type of feedback, epistemic feedback or epistemic and suggestive feedback best improve the quality of collaborative writing performance. The nature of the feedback-giver (whether teacher feedback or teacher and peer) makes a difference to the final text only when the feedback is epistemic, or epistemic and suggestive. 相似文献
15.
Shulin Yu Yiran Zhang Yao Zheng Kaihao Yuan 《Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education》2019,44(1):50-65
While research on peer feedback in second language (L2) writing at university/college level has proliferated, scholars have conducted less research on peer feedback in L2 academic and scholarly writing. Drawing upon multiple sources of data including semi-structured interviews, stimulated recalls, online interviews via WeChat, first and revised drafts of master’s theses, peer written feedback, audio-recordings of oral peer feedback conferences and the finalised master’s theses, this case study examines how three master’s students affectively, behaviourally and cognitively engaged with peer feedback on drafts of their thesis in a Master of Education programme at a Macau university. The findings show that the relationship between sub-constructs within each dimension and the relationships between the three dimensions of student engagement were interconnected in a dynamic and complex way. While there were individual differences among the three students’ engagement, their affective engagement could promote or negatively influence their behavioural and cognitive engagement. This study builds our understanding of the multifaceted nature of master’s students’ engagement with peer feedback. It provides pedagogical implications about how peer feedback can enhance the quality of master’s students’ academic writing and sheds light on how to guide students to establish scholarly learning communities in higher education. 相似文献
16.
Maya Usher 《Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education》2018,43(5):745-759
As the number of participants in online distance learning courses increases, peer assessment is becoming a popular strategy for evaluating open assignments and for breaking the social isolation surrounding distance education. Yet, the quality and characteristics of peer assessment in massive online courses has received little attention. Hence, this study was set to examine peer feedback quality and grading accuracy in a project-based course. The study applied a sequential exploratory mixed methods design. It included 339 participants who studied the same engineering course, but in three different modes: on-campus (n = 77), small private online course (n = 110), and massive open online course (MOOC) (n = 152). Content analysis of feedback comments identified four categories: reinforcement, statement, verification and elaboration, arranged in an ascending scale of cognitive ability. The findings indicated that the MOOC participants provided more feedback comments and volunteered to assess more projects than their counterparts did. However, the on-campus students provided higher quality feedback and their peer grading was better correlated with the grades assigned by the teaching assistants. 相似文献
17.
以QQ群创建虚拟学习共同体及其教学应用 总被引：2，自引：0，他引：2
QQ是现在学生常用的聊天、交流工具,QQ群是具有一定共同特质的人组成的一个群体。学习共同体是学习者交流信息、分享资源和探究学习的天地,因此,可以以QQ群为平台建立基于网络的虚拟学习共同体。在QQ群中进行基于网络的主题式探究学习活动、小组协作学习、基于项目的学习,提高学习者的交流、合作、探究能力,并在活动中促进学习者的有效学习。以QQ群为平台的虚拟学习共同体还实现了与基于学校环境的真实共同体的课堂教学有机地无缝连接。 相似文献
18.
J. W. Gaynor 《Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education》2020,45(5):758-775
AbstractPeer review in the classroom can enhance numerous employability skills such as critical appraisal, writing skills, reflection practices and collaborative experiences. This study takes place over two years and discusses the implementation of a repeating blind peer review cycle across a single semester for final year chemistry students enrolled on a compulsory employability module. The feedback cycle promotes personal reflection through the use of mini-reflective questionnaires. The process was assessed by academic tutors at the resubmission stage and/or the peer feedback stage where the quality of peer feedback was directly assessed. The research investigates the quality of peer feedback, the importance of assessment and student perceptions of what is most useful. Methods include directed content analysis of feedback produced, student opinions and a focus group. Students were capable of offering useable feedback across a range of assessment criteria but tend to focus on the important criteria best aligned to the particular assignment. A range of motivational factors and tactics were noticed but students tended to find reviewing the most beneficial. 相似文献
19.
Research on feedback shows the dialogic perspective as one that potentially promotes learning improvement. This article presents the Dialogic Feedback Index (DFI), a measure that contributes to establishing to what extent feedback design is potentially dialogic. Performing the study in an online context enabled us to evaluate the potential of the index to measure the institutional situation in relation to dialogic feedback. The applied case allowed us to identify four teaching and learning contexts whose designs range from low to high dialogic context. We were also able to establish three components which had a great impact in differentiating one context from another. Specifically, it was found that designing teaching and learning contexts with high levels of dialogic potential of feedback involves: (1) providing feedback before the task is completed, (2) incorporating peer feedback into the process and (3) allowing resubmission once the feedback has been received. The DFI is intended as an applied tool for teaching staff and institutions. With it they can determine the level of dialogic potential of feedback and plan how to improve it. 相似文献
20.
The incorporation of self- and peer-assessment and feedback has significant potential as a pedagogical strategy to promote deep learning in project based coursework. This study examined the impact of a deeper approach to learning on pre-service teachers’ critical thinking and metacognitive skills. It also examined the impact on student learning outcomes within a project based module with a significant design element. Forty-seven students participated in the pilot of an online peer feedback system. Results suggest that the quality of students’ reflections through peer feedback and overall satisfaction with the module remained high despite students’ citing a preference for instructor feedback. The data also indicate that the incorporation of self- and peer-assessment and feedback resulted in higher quality learning outcomes and enhanced critical thinking skills. 相似文献