首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
相似文献
 共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 343 毫秒
1.
[目的/意义]以学术电子书出版商和高校图书馆为研究对象,梳理学术电子书出版商对高校图书馆资源建设和服务的影响,提出高校图书馆的应对之策。[方法/过程]通过网络调查,了解学术电子书出版商在图书馆市场的发展现状、电子书平台功能和销售模式,分析其对高校图书馆的影响,提出高校图书馆的应对策略。[结果/结论]研究发现学术电子书出版商一方面可以丰富馆藏资源的数量、提高馆藏资源质量、提高图书馆的服务水平和增加图书馆的资源利用率,另一方面也增加了图书馆资源整合的难度和资源采购支出。提出以下建议:调整馆藏政策,适时加大电子书馆藏比重;建立采购联盟,按需选择采购策略;加强与出版商合作,提高服务质量;积极开展用户培训,加强电子书的阅读推广活动。  相似文献   

2.
新媒体时代,"内容创业,知识变现"是各大平台最关注的话题,新媒体运营使电子书有了用武之地。纸质书的销售受到了电子书的影响,纸质书是否会被电子书所取代是现在出版社关注的重要问题。纸质书与电子书各自存在优势和缺点,两者不该被对立,应寻求相互融合、共同发展之路。本文利用SWOT分析法解析纸质书的优势、劣势,面临的机会和威胁,探索未来纸质书发展的策略。  相似文献   

3.
Aptara公司第三年度出版社电子书调查报告出炉,调查发现,电子书销售和产量猛增,尤其是大众图书出版社,但电子书阅读器、格式和标准等方面仍有诸多问题有待解决。该调查在4月份进行,共有1350家出版社参与。调查显示,尽管有众多出版社开始开发电子书设备和平台,但亚马逊仍占统治地位,大多数普通电子书都是通过该渠道销售。  相似文献   

4.
动态集锦     
《出版参考》2010,(1):47-48
约翰威立父子出版社与Scribd签订协议,通过“社会出版社”的网上书店销售电子书,包括(《傻瓜手册》(For Dummies)系列和Frommers旅行指南。  相似文献   

5.
Aptara公司第三年度出版社电子书调查报告出炉,调查发现,电子书销售和产量猛增,尤其是大众图书出版社,但电子书阅读器、格式和标准等方面仍有诸多问题有待解决。该调查在4月份进行,共有1350家出版社参与。调查显示,尽管有众多出版社开始开发电子书设备和平台,但亚马逊仍占统治地位,大多数普通电子书都是通过该渠道销售。  相似文献   

6.
动态集锦     
《出版参考》2011,(30):43-44
欧洲迎接电子书时代到来欧洲出版社对"数字化风暴"的抗拒减少,当地的经销网络已经建立,出版社在等待亚马逊、苹果、谷歌等国际公司的到来。据奥莱利传媒公司(O’Reilly Media)在10月11日前发布的一份全球电子书市场调查报告,尽管美国和英国之外的地区电子书销售份额依然很小——仅占总销售的1%,但这仍说明电子书销售已经铺开了。  相似文献   

7.
目前我国大多数出版社的电子书业务的进展并不顺利。电子书阅读器的昙花一现、智能手机和平板电脑等移动阅读终端的横空出世以及APP与电子书的完美契合使得进军APP类电子出版物已成为出版社开发电子书业务的新趋势。出版社不断尝试各类运作模式,规模较大、资金充足的出版社组建附属的新媒体部门来进行APP的开发,也有出版社以委托外包或者联合开发的形式,进行APP的开发或推广。然而,出版社的APP之路还存在着投入大于产出、盈利路漫漫、内容资源的授权与整合难等问题。  相似文献   

8.
过去五年中,电子书给出版业带来了巨大的冲击。虽说数字出版面临着自身独有的挑战,但电子书同时也为出版商创造了纸质书不可能提供的机遇。数字化的生产和分销带来的是比纸质书更为快捷、廉价、多功能的电子书,这使得电子书成为数字时代的最佳实验工具。图书的订阅、捆绑销售、特殊销售以及多媒体应用等则是电子书为出版业开辟新收益的不同途径。  相似文献   

9.
与传统资源及电子期刊的馆藏建设相比,学术电子书的馆藏建设发展缓慢,其主要原因是出版商对学术电子书的销售限制和使用限制与图书馆采购诉求之间存在矛盾。解决这一矛盾并达到双方的利益平衡,需要图书馆与出版商共同努力,寻求有效的合作模式,既可以保障图书馆采选、使用与保存电子书的权利又可以保障出版商的商业利益。参考文献23。  相似文献   

10.
熊妹 《现代出版》2010,(6):46-48
限制电子书大众消费市场发展的因素,从读者的角度来说,电子阅读器昂贵的价格、无线宽带的高资费、有限的电子书资源以及传统阅读习惯的惯性都影响了读者对电子书的购买意愿;从传统出版商的角度来说,电子书盈利模式的不明晰、版权保护法规的不完善及低价电子书对传统出版业的冲击使出版社不敢轻易试水电子书产业甚至有所排斥。  相似文献   

11.
A panel which included a librarian, publisher and e-book providers presented issues confronting the growth of e-books in the academic library marketplace. The e-book market projections are a small part of the higher education book market. Frontlist titles are demanded by libraries with suppliers eager to supply such titles. However, publishers are feeling their way through various rights and contract issues as well as business models as they determine which frontlist titles to provide in electronic form. The instability of business partners has contributed to publisher delays in releasing titles as e-books. No one, (librarians, suppliers, publishers) is throwing in the towel on e-books but the position this format takes in the publishing industry and therefore in library collections in the near future is unsettled.  相似文献   

12.
E-books have yet to assume a significant place in academic library collections. This article focuses on extracting common themes from the literature that might help the reader better understand why e-books have not yet become the cornerstone of the academic library. Patrons do not use e-books because they find the experience of using e-books incongruous with their experience of using other electronic resources, and many of the unexpected limitations they encounter when using e-books are not inherent to the format. Most often, they are purposefully imposed limitations tied to digital rights management techniques. Librarians do not purchase e-books because the titles they want to acquire are often not available electronically, because they are priced or packaged in a way that makes them less appealing than their print counterparts, or because acquiring e-books does not easily integrate into their normal acquisitions workflow.  相似文献   

13.
ABSTRACT

At the beginning of this decade, research on e-books clearly indicated that e-books were neither well received nor desired by students in higher education. However, in the past few years, academic institutions have begun reporting very good use rates for e-books. In this article, the change taking place in e-book use is explored. Faculty and student preference for reading print books, and not e-books, is the background for exploring the effects of forced adoption and user adaptation on e-book use in a small academic institution. In addition, the effect that relative advantage, current adoption rates, cultural norms, publishers' business models, and print book/e-book competition are having on current and future e-book use are discussed.  相似文献   

14.
This paper provides a broad international overview of e-books in academic libraries. The inconsistent terminology relating to e-books is noted in the first section and a brief history of e-books and some current definitions are given. The stakeholders within the e-book industry are described, with details of some of the services offered. For users and staff in library and information services, e-books can provide a variety of advantages as well as challenges, and these are outlined for those in academic libraries. Findings from various studies on e-books are presented and some of the issues involved in managing e-books in academic libraries are described. Finally an overview is presented of the e-Books Working Group in the United Kingdom. The paper is illustrated with a number of screenshots related to e-books in academic libraries in various parts of the world.  相似文献   

15.
This article reports on a study of the awareness, perceptions and use of e-books by academic staff in Further Education (FE) colleges throughout Northern Ireland (NI). It is the first comprehensive study of e-book use by FE faculty in NI and fills a significant gap in the research literature on e-books in education, which has tended to focus on Higher Education and the university setting. Data was collected through an online survey which was distributed to FE faculty across NI. The findings show that although FE academic staff are receptive to e-books and welcome them as a resource, poor reading experience and lack of awareness of relevant titles have had an impact. In particular, the research found that 40% of academic staff, in post less than five years, had not used e-books. Greater availability of titles, promotion, and better integration within teaching and learning emerge as key requisites for effective service delivery and enhancement of e-books within FE, as does the need for better targeted instruction and training aimed at academic staff. Understanding patrons' views, awareness, needs, habits and expectations in relation to e-books is crucial to help direct collection content while budgets remain tight and physical space limited.  相似文献   

16.
电子图书因其自身特性,使得它在读者使用过程中表现出一些优点和缺点。本文通过调查分析的方式,试图调查高校读者在电子图书的使用时间、空间和使用目的上的现状,并比较读者对纸质图书和电子图书的使用评价,以及这些评价如何影响了他们对其的使用,为图书馆的工作提供参考。  相似文献   

17.
《图书馆管理杂志》2013,53(1-2):429-451
SUMMARY

A virtual shelf for nursing that closely mirrors what previously was found on a physical reference shelf is now a reasonable goal. Advantages of doing this for nursing students and faculty in an academic setting are enumerated. Overviews of relevant vendor and publisher interfaces and models are included. The authors present a selected list of appropriate electronic reference sources that demonstrate how e-books and Internet sites can be combined to build a virtual reference shelf in this subject area.  相似文献   

18.
Academic libraries are choosing to purchase electronic books (e-books) rather than print more frequently for multiple reasons. Unfortunately, e-books are not being used as much as they should be. With increasing academic e-book collections, many studies have examined student and faculty use of and attitudes towards this innovation. This paper will analyze the results in this area of research and align them with the Diffusion of Innovations Theory that includes the Rogers Diffusion of Innovations Curve, innovation categories, and the factors affecting the diffusion process of an innovation. This analysis will give libraries a better understanding of who is using academic e-books, why academic e-books are being used, and how to influence the behaviour of the academic libraries' patrons to increase their use of academic e-books. An analysis of these three areas will help libraries to develop effective marketing and education strategies aimed at increasing e-book usage.  相似文献   

19.
The objectives of this paper are: (i) to illustrate the use of e-books by health studies students at a college of higher education; (ii) to provide a demonstration of how e-books may be facilitated by library and information services staff working across the health and academic sectors; (iii) to comment upon the experiences of health studies students, in using e-books. A focus group of 10 student midwives was used to gain insight into how e-books may be used in an academic context for health professionals. The findings of the student midwives' focus group are reported and discussed. In this instance, the student midwives were encouraged to use e-books as part of a structured information skills programme. The paper concentrates on how the e-books were used within this context and addresses the potential benefits and disadvantages from a student perspective. The results provide evidence of a largely positive experience of using e-books as an electronic information resource. The focus group reveals many benefits and advantages in the facilitation and use of e-books, as well as addressing areas for development. It is concluded that e-books have a place in health library and information resources, but further development of e-books and e-book collections is required and subsequent investigation into their most effective use.  相似文献   

20.
Although e-books date back to the 1970s, the peak of academic adoption was in the early to mid-2000s. At the beginning of the 2012/2013 academic year, the Franklin & Marshall (F&M) College Library had roughly 500,000 print volumes cataloged and only 12 e-books. By the end of that year, the catalog contained approximately 120,000 e-books. In February 2014, the F&M College Library conducted a campus-wide survey about e-books. By comparing these results with F&M’s usage statistics, the Library found practical suggestions on how to improve current acceptance and usage of e-books.  相似文献   

设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号