首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
相似文献
 共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 78 毫秒
1.
文章采用文献调研、网络调研与内容分析相结合的方法,梳理了数字学术的概念、内涵演变及国内外研究现状,构建出包含管理层、内容层、用户层三个层面的高校图书馆数字学术服务能力要素构成模型,并设计了一套包含规划准备期—内容建设期—能力提升期三阶段的服务能力培育框架,建议高校图书馆从树立数字学术服务理念、加强宣传和引导、瞄准用户需求寻求价值共创、建立专门数字学术服务部门、设置数字学术服务岗位、加强专业人才培养等方面进行数字学术能力的培养和提升。  相似文献   

2.
英国高校图书馆界开展了数字学术服务的研究与实践探索。文章在分析英国高校图书馆界数字学术服务研究的基础上,调查英国高校图书馆数字学术服务实践,分析英国7所高校图书馆数字学术服务的学科范围、数字学术服务团队及服务内容、数字学术服务中的合作、数字学术服务机构的组成、数字学术服务的方式。并结合我国图书馆界数字学术服务研究与实践进展,对我国高校图书馆提出建议:建立数字学术服务咨询与指导委员会、数字学术服务管理委员会,加强自身服务能力建设,为用户提供数字学术服务并与用户建立合作伙伴关系,合作开展数字学术服务及相关经验的交流学习。表3。图1。参考文献30。  相似文献   

3.
数字学术服务作为数字学术理念衍生的服务新形式及其为高校图书馆服务的数字化创新与变革提供了一条关键路径。文章在总结归纳数字学术服务及能力内涵的基础上,采用德尔菲法、层次分析法构建数字学术服务能力评价指标体系,并引入能力成熟度模型理论,设定各项指标的能力成熟度级别判定标准,结合评分方法,构建了高校图书馆数字学术服务能力成熟度模型,并评估了三所高校图书馆的数字学术服务能力。文章构建的模型为高校图书馆数字学术服务提供科学的能力评价工具及发展标准框架,以期推进数字学术服务能力水平的提升,支撑服务数字化转型。  相似文献   

4.
学术出版活动是促进科学知识传播、共享科研成果及推动科学研究的主要形式,而发表科技论文是学术出版活动的主要内容。近年来,随着科学技术的发展,全球学术出版活动蓬勃发展,与学术出版活动密切相关的第三方服务也逐渐兴起。学术出版第三方服务为科研人员开展科学研究提供了便利,被国内外学术界广泛接受,但由于其服务范围模糊、界限不分明,往往存在个别学术不端现象。本文基于最新发布的《学术出版第三方服务的边界蓝皮书(2020)》,阐述了其中规定的正当服务及不正当服务,并从管理部门、第三方服务机构、期刊编辑部及科研人员角度提出了学术不端行为防范对策。学术出版活动各个环节要积极参与治理学术不端问题,推动科研诚信及创新性国家建设。  相似文献   

5.
[目的/意义]从阐释数字学术的基本问题到进一步对比数字学术服务的内容特点,以期为图书馆及出版机构的研究者与从业者理解、探索、推进数字学术服务提供理论和实践两个维度的现实参考。[方法/过程]首先采用系统综述方法梳理数字学术概念内涵的现有研究概貌,展示数字学术对不同学科领域产生的影响和改变,并呈现连接图书馆、出版机构与数字学术活动的主要方式。然后,采用比较研究方法对15所图书馆2017年和2022年数字学术服务的名称与形式、内容及分类、框架要素、组织形式等进行对比分析。此外,采用比较研究方法对图书馆和出版机构数字学术服务的内容与形式进行对比分析。[结果/结论]人们对数字学术的认识已经相对清晰,数字学术内容丰富、影响多样,其核心在于数字技术赋能;图书馆和出版机构的数字学术服务角色源于传承和争取。从2017年到2022年,图书馆数字学术服务的名称与形式、内容及分类的整体情况有变化但不明显,个体图书馆的变化较大;图书馆与出版机构的数字学术服务在内容上互为补充、在形式上各有特色;数字学术及数字学术服务将在数字技术的驱动下持续发展。  相似文献   

6.
数字学术环境中的机构知识库探析   总被引:19,自引:0,他引:19  
机构知识库是数字学术环境中的一种资源存储形式和服务方式,是对本机构成员的智力资产进行集中收集、组织、保存并提供服务的一个集成系统。本文对数字学术环境中的机构知识库进行了概述,介绍了其含义、特点、作用与建设形式,分析了其结构和功能,并探讨了它与数字学术环境中与之相关的其它信息保障构成要素如学科知识库、数字图书馆、开放获取等方面的关系。  相似文献   

7.
搜索引擎的学术搜索服务及其影响分析   总被引:5,自引:0,他引:5  
文章介绍了几种主要网络搜索引擎开展的学术搜索服务业务,论述了其运行机理、服务模式,分析了学术搜索对图书馆、专业期刊数据库商等学术信息整合、服务单位及信息服务人员的影响.  相似文献   

8.
图书馆学术资源推荐服务是新信息化环境下图书馆的一种新的服务模式。基于关联数据的图书馆学术资源推荐可通过关联规则向用户推荐其满意的、相关度高的学术资源,关联数据架起了图书馆学术资源推荐与用户之间的桥梁。基于此,文章构建了基于关联数据的图书馆学术资源推荐系统框架,并展望了需进一步研究的问题。  相似文献   

9.
图书馆作为学术性文献信息服务机构,有的还担负博、硕士研究生培养任务,加强其自身学术建设,提高其自身学术水平,十分必要,不可或缺。如何建立科学、长效的学术运行和管理机制,是一个值得图书馆界特别关注的大问题。本文就如何进行这方面的建设,从六个方面进行了前瞻性的探索和研究。  相似文献   

10.
[目的/意义]基于对学术图书馆空间发展、资源建设和用户服务发展历程的梳理,剖析其在数字学术环境下的发展现状,为学术图书馆的空间再造、资源与服务整合提供思路,为提升服务效能、提高核心竞争力和可持续发展能力提供参考。[方法/过程]首先,对数字学术及数字学术环境进行定义,阐释数字学术与学术图书馆的互动关系。接着,分析学术图书馆从IC、LC、KC到创客空间的演变过程及其特点,考察国内外数字学术空间的发展现状及其原因。然后,从图书馆资源数据化、关联数据化及开放共享两个角度呈现数字学术环境下图书馆的资源建设现状与特点。最后,选取信息素养服务、研究数据服务和出版服务作为数字学术环境下图书馆用户服务的新内容进行分析。[结果/结论]学术图书馆空间创意化、资源与服务多元化是图书馆整合功能、高效运转以实现自我发展和满足用户需求的体现,也是图书馆为应对数字技术、数字化环境带来的机遇与挑战所做出的积极回应。  相似文献   

11.
Google Scholar is a free service that provides a simple way to broadly search for scholarly works and to connect patrons with the resources libraries provide. The researchers in this study analyzed Google Scholar usage data from 2006 for three library tools at San Francisco State University: SFX link resolver, Web Access Management proxy server, and ILLiad interlibrary loan server. Overall, the data suggested that Google Scholar had become a very useful resource in the library and was a significant addition to the library's collection of research databases. SFX data revealed requests from Google Scholar grew ten-fold from 2006 to 2011, and that Google Scholar became the top-ranked SFX source for requests in 2011. Library patrons favored Google Scholar over San Francisco State University's federated search tool, MetaLib, and it has become an important source for interlibrary loan requests. Analysis of San Francisco State University usage data will assist other libraries in their decisions about the implementation of Google Scholar.  相似文献   

12.
Dissertations can be the single most important scholarly outputs of junior researchers. Whilst sets of journal articles are often evaluated with the help of citation counts from the Web of Science or Scopus, these do not index dissertations and so their impact is hard to assess. In response, this article introduces a new multistage method to extract Google Scholar citation counts for large collections of dissertations from repositories indexed by Google. The method was used to extract Google Scholar citation counts for 77,884 American doctoral dissertations from 2013 to 2017 via ProQuest, with a precision of over 95%. Some ProQuest dissertations that were dual indexed with other repositories could not be retrieved with ProQuest-specific searches but could be found with Google Scholar searches of the other repositories. The Google Scholar citation counts were then compared with Mendeley reader counts, a known source of scholarly-like impact data. A fifth of the dissertations had at least one citation recorded in Google Scholar and slightly fewer had at least one Mendeley reader. Based on numerical comparisons, the Mendeley reader counts seem to be more useful for impact assessment purposes for dissertations that are less than two years old, whilst Google Scholar citations are more useful for older dissertations, especially in social sciences, arts and humanities. Google Scholar citation counts may reflect a more scholarly type of impact than that of Mendeley reader counts because dissertations attract a substantial minority of their citations from other dissertations. In summary, the new method now makes it possible for research funders, institutions and others to systematically evaluate the impact of dissertations, although additional Google Scholar queries for other online repositories are needed to ensure comprehensive coverage.  相似文献   

13.
This study measured the degree of Google Scholar adoption within academia by analyzing the frequency of Google Scholar appearances on 948 campus and library Web sites, and by ascertaining the establishment of link resolution between Google Scholar and library resources. Results indicate a positive correlation between the implementation of Google Scholar link resolution and the degree of Google Scholar adoption.  相似文献   

14.
ABSTRACT

In order to understand better and explain the practices of Google Scholar, this essay takes a rhetorical and holistic look at the search technology, language, and sociopolitical implications of the Google Scholar interface as well as the connection between Google Scholar and the actions of the Google Corporation. The relationship between Google Scholar and the academic library is also explored. In addition, the essay offers ways to encourage students to undertake this kind of critique in the information literacy classroom.  相似文献   

15.
Adding the external variables of satisfaction and loyalty to Fred Davis' technology acceptance model (TAM), this study examined the extent to which graduate students perceived Google Scholar to be a resource that is useful and easy to use. A survey of 1141 graduate students at the University of Minnesota asked questions exploring their perceptions of Google Scholar as part of their research process. Seventy-five percent of survey participants had used Google Scholar at least once before, and a statistical analysis of the responses found that perceived usefulness, loyalty, and, to a lesser extent, perceived ease of use, were positively and significantly related to the graduate students' intended use of the information resource. This research showed that TAM is an applicable model for predicting graduate student use of Google Scholar, which can help academic librarians seeking to understand graduate student acceptance of new information sources. Additionally, this study provides information about how librarians might best promote Google Scholar and other library resources to graduate students.  相似文献   

16.
Google Scholar’s coverage of the engineering literature is analyzed by comparing its contents with those of Compendex, the premier engineering database. Records retrieved from Compendex were searched in Google Scholar, and a decade by decade comparison was done from the 1950s through 2007. The results show that the percentage of records appearing in Google Scholar increased over time, approaching a 90 percent matching rate for materials published after 1990.  相似文献   

17.
Google Scholar 在科技论文学术查新中的作用   总被引:4,自引:0,他引:4       下载免费PDF全文
胡玲 《编辑学报》2008,20(4):359-360
Google Scholar是建立在Google搜索引擎上直接面向科研需要的学术资源的网络搜索工具,为广大学术查新工作者提供了极其方便的条件.阐述Google Scholar在科技论文学术查新中的作用,并分析其不足之处,提出了弥补方法.  相似文献   

18.
The new web-based academic communication platforms do not only enable researchers to better advertise their academic outputs, making them more visible than ever before, but they also provide a wide supply of metrics to help authors better understand the impact their work is making. This study has three objectives: a) to analyse the uptake of some of the most popular platforms (Google Scholar Citations, ResearcherID, ResearchGate, Mendeley and Twitter) by a specific scientific community (bibliometrics, scientometrics, informetrics, webometrics, and altmetrics); b) to compare the metrics available from each platform; and c) to determine the meaning of all these new metrics. To do this, the data available in these platforms about a sample of 811 authors (researchers in bibliometrics for whom a public profile Google Scholar Citations was found) were extracted. A total of 31 metrics were analysed. The results show that a high number of the analysed researchers only had a profile in Google Scholar Citations (159), or only in Google Scholar Citations and ResearchGate (142). Lastly, we find two kinds of metrics of online impact. First, metrics related to connectivity (followers), and second, all metrics associated to academic impact. This second group can further be divided into usage metrics (reads, views), and citation metrics. The results suggest that Google Scholar Citations is the source that provides more comprehensive citation-related data, whereas Twitter stands out in connectivity-related metrics.  相似文献   

19.
ABSTRACT

Google Scholar has multiple uses as a reference tool of last resort, including citation completion, an alternative when catalogs are down, and interdisciplinary metasearching and database suggestion. During the reference desk transaction, users can be taught effective Google Scholar search techniques such as advanced search functionality and the nuances of results' groupings. In addition, reference desk interactions with Google Scholar give insight for instructional workshops.  相似文献   

20.
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号