共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 781 毫秒
1.
文章运用文献计量学方法,对《编辑学报》等13种编辑出版类期刊的高被引论文进行了数据分析和阐述。研究发现:编辑出版类期刊高被引论文主要集中在《编辑学报》《中国科技期刊研究》《编辑之友》《出版发行研究》《中国出版》5种期刊,刊发高被引论文较多的年份均在2000年后,高被引论文作者多为科技期刊编辑。发表在期刊第1—6期的高被引论文较多,且呈递减趋势,而发表在期刊第7—12期的高被引论文较少。编辑出版类期刊高被引论文最关注科技期刊、期刊编辑、数字出版三大研究主题,不同编辑出版类期刊高被引论文研究主题存在较大差异。 相似文献
2.
我国图书情报学高被引论文热点分析 总被引：3，自引：0，他引：3
应用《中国引文数据库》网络版作为统计源,采用引文分析法对我国图书情报学高被引论文（被引≥50频次）的发表年份分布、期刊分布、基金论文情况、多产作者、主题分布等进行统计和分析,讨论近年来该学科领域的热点研究主题。 相似文献
3.
胡军 《图书馆理论与实践》2012,(2):21-24
根据CNKI的《中国期刊全文数据库》和《中国引文数据库》统计了5所民族地区高校图书馆1981—2010发表的论文,进行了论文的年代分析、图书情报学核心期刊分析、基金论文分析、合作情况分析、核心作者分析、发文量、被引篇数、频次、下载量及H值分析、高频被引论文分析,从而揭示了民族地区高校图书馆学术研究的现状。 相似文献
4.
中国图书情报学研究领域的学者影响力报告——基于2003～2007年CNKI的统计分析 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
通过《中国知识资源总库》中的《中国期刊全文数据库》和《中国引文数据库》对2003～2007年图书情报学领域学者所发表的论文及其成果被引两方面的统计数据进行分析,以衡量学者在图书情报学研究领域的创新度和学术影响力。 相似文献
5.
我国情报学主要期刊引文定量分析 总被引：42，自引：1，他引：42
运用文献计量方法 ,通过对《情报学报》等我国情报学四种主要期刊2 0 0 1年所发表论文的引用文献 (包括引文的数量、语种、类型、学科、年代和被引期刊分布 )的定量调查分析 ,得出我国情报学研究文献引文的一般规律。 相似文献
6.
高校情报学研究状况的计量评价--武汉大学、南京大学、北京大学情报学论文的统计分析 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
论文利用文献计量学方法，对三所重点高校在情报学核心期刊上发表的论文进行文献数量分布、研究主题分布、发文被引和自引等方面的计量分析，以评价三所高校在情报学领域的研究热点、学科劳动组织和学科生产率。 相似文献
7.
图书馆学情报学高影响力论文特征及所反映的学科差异分析 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
选取CNKI数据库中图书馆学和情报学被引频次最高的论文各100篇,作为本学科的高影响力论文,分析其外部特征和内容特征。提出了高被引论文新颖度、被引响应时间等概念并加以测度。研究发现:高影响力论文在发表后5—10年间的引用频次相对较高,两个学科的差异不大;具有指导性、方法论价值的论文更有高被引的可能;探索问题广泛、细致、深入的综述性论文有高被引的可能。两学科的差异在于:图书馆学研究内容相对集中,情报学研究跨学科的性质更为明显;图书馆学实践性特征较明显,情报学多体现出纯科学的特征;情报学文献的被引老化时间要长于图书馆学;两学科就共同关注的问题所采取的研究思路和研究角度不完全相同。图6。表2。参考文献19。 相似文献
8.
杨彩霞 《图书馆理论与实践》2007,(5):66-69,75
《图书馆理论与实践》是公认的我国图书情报学的核心期刊,不仅发表了大量的图书情报学论文,而且引用文献更是覆盖了中外图书情报学及其相关领域的重要文献。从引文的数量、语种、类型、年代分布、来源期刊和自引等方面对其进行统计分析,不仅可客观评价《图书馆理论与实践》的学科地位,还可以全面地把握我国图书情报学发展的动态过程、特点和规律。 相似文献
9.
高被引论文是指被引用频次相对较高,被引用的周期相对较长的学术论文.高被引论文的被引频次能够客观地反映论文的影响力以及在学术交流中的作用和地位,因此,近年来高被引论文成为国际上普遍采用的科研水平评价标准.①随着应用范围的不断扩大,图书情报学科也广泛采用高被引论文来评价本学科的学术研究成果.本文采用此评价方法对2005 ～ 2014年发表在学术期刊上的图书情报学论文成果进行统计,力图通过客观的定量数据分析和研究,揭示高被引论文的特征,探讨我国图书情报学研究现状和发展趋势,为提高成果质量和学科发展提供参考. 相似文献
10.
11.
《现代图书情报技术》核心著者测评 总被引：15，自引：0，他引：15
朱亚丽 《现代图书情报技术》2004,20(12):83-84
依据发文篇数和被引频次确定出29名核心著者，借用相关系数 r，分析了核心著者发文量和被引量之间的相关性。 相似文献
12.
13.
依据发文量和被引量两个计量指标,利用综合指教法确定《中国图书馆学报》的核心著者。 相似文献
14.
基于论文发表的普赖斯定律,以5本高被引核心期刊《科学学研究》《科研管理》《科学学与科学技术管理》《中国科技论坛》《研究与发展管理》刊载的1141篇文献为样本,实证检验论文被引频次的影响因素。结果表明：（1）论文被引频次整体程度不高,论文被引频次对刊载时间有较强依赖性的同时,二者之间也存在非线性关系;（2）作者是否合作、论文是否定量研究、论文下载次数、期刊影响因子与论文被引频次之间显著正相关,而期刊年发文量与论文被引频次之间显著负相关,且第一作者所在机构、性别以及论文受到基金资助的数量、期刊主办方等与论文被引频次之间不存在显著相关性。本研究的主要发现是论文特征决定论文被引频次,并得出相关启示,提出研究不足及未来方向。 相似文献
15.
16.
This article presents a citation analysis of articles published in 2011 from 11 kinesiology journals. The results of the citation analysis of 11 kinesiology journals are compared to a citation analysis of articles published in 2011 by faculty in the School of Kinesiology, University of Michigan. Comparing the four areas of kinesiology, Movement Science, Athletic Training, Sports Management, and Physical Education, the results show that articles published in Movement Science and Athletic Training cited a higher percentage of journal articles than articles published in Sports Management and Physical Education. While some of the materials cited went as far back as 1874, the mean age ranged from 1996 to 2004. Human Kinetics was the most cited publisher and the American Journal of Sports Medicine was the most cited journal. The University of Michigan Library owns 75% of the materials cited in the publications cited by School of Kinesiology faculty. Faculty in the School of Kinesiology cited many textbooks, a format not actively collected by the library before this analysis. 相似文献
17.
《The Journal of Academic Librarianship》2020,46(5):102223
The aim of this paper is to identify the most prevailing trends of research and publishing in the field of Library and Information Science (LIS) based on the publications of the past five years. The study follows a complex methodology. First, the scope of the journals to be analysed were defined, using the results of the Scimago Journal Rank (SJR) from the period between 2013 and 2017, and then their most cited articles were selected based on Web of Science (WoS) data. During the selection process we performed a comparative analysis of the journals as well, involving several criteria, to be able to finally choose 632 articles, published between 2014 and 2018 to be included in our research sample. We then examined (1) the authors occurring most frequently, (2) the most often cited articles, (3) the institutions with the highest publication activity, (4) the most common topics based on titles, keywords, and abstracts, and (5) the connections between all of the above. The results of the analyses provide an international overview and assessment of the leading research topics and the most prominent representatives of LIS, all of which are directly connected to the notion and the activities of academic libraries. 相似文献
18.
19.
《The Journal of Academic Librarianship》2022,48(6):102618
PurposeThis paper aims to examine whether Altmetric data can be used as an indicator for identifying predatory journals.Design/methodology/approachThis is an applied study which uses citation and Altmetrics methods. The study selected 21 predatory journals from the Beall's list and Kscien's list, as well as 18 non-predatory open access journals from the DOAJ's list, in the field of Library and Information Science. The Altmetric score for articles published in these journals was obtained from the Altmetric Explorer, a service provided by Altmetric.com. Web of Science was used to search for citation data of articles published in these journals.FindingsThe predatory journals almost have no presence in social media, with poor Altmetric score. In contrast, non-predatory open access journals have a high presence rate and Altmetric score. There is a significant positive correlation between the number of articles cited and the number of articles having Altmetric score among non-predatory open-access journals, but not among predatory journals. Poor Altmetric score may be viewed as a potential characteristic of predatory journals, but other indicators would also need to be considered to determine whether a journal is predatory.Originality/valueDistinct from the traditional research methods, this study combined citation analysis and Altmetrics analysis. By comparing the characteristics of predatory journals and non-predatory open access journals, the findings contribute to the identification of predatory journals. 相似文献
20.
B.T. Sampath Kumar K.S. Manoj Kumar 《International Information and Library Review》2012,44(4):202-211
This study investigates the decay and half-life of online citations cited in four open access journals published between 2000 and 2009. A total of 1158 online citations cited in 1086 research articles published in two science and social science journals spanning a period of 10 years (2000–2009) were extracted. Study found that 24.58% (267 out of 1086) of articles had online citations and these articles contained a substantially very less number of online citations (2.98%) compared to previous study results. 30.56% (26% in Science and 52.73% in Social Science) of online citations were not accessible and remaining 69.44% of online citations were still accessible. The ‘HTTP 404 error message-page not found’ was the overwhelming message encountered and represented 67.79% of all HTTP message. Domains associated with .ac and .net had higher successful access rates while .org and .com/.co had lowest successful access rates. The half-life of online citations was computed to be approximately 11.5 years and 9.07 years in Science and Social science journal articles respectively. 相似文献