共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 31 毫秒
1.
Penetration of Nigerian predatory biomedical open access journals 2007–2012: a bibliometric study 
下载免费PDF全文
下载免费PDF全文 This paper presents the bibliometric characteristics of 32 biomedical open access journals published by Academic Journals and International Research Journals – the two Nigerian publishers in Jeffery Beall's list of 23 predatory open access publishers in 2012. Data about the journals and the authors of their articles were collected from the websites of the publishers, Google Scholar and Web of Science. As at December 2012, the journals had together produced a total of 5,601 papers written by 5,599 authors, and received 12,596 citations. Authors from Asia accounted for 56.79% of the publications; those from Africa wrote 28.35% while Europe contributed 7.78%. Authors from Africa accounted for 18.25% of the citations these journals received, and this is about one‐third the number of citations by authors in Asia (54.62%). At country level, India ranks first in the top 10 citer countries, while Nigeria, the host country of the journals, ranked eighth. More in‐depth studies are required to develop further information about the journals such as how much scientific information the journals contain, as well as the science literacy of the authors and the editorial. 相似文献
2.
Quan‐Hoang Vuong 《Learned Publishing》2019,32(4):314-324
This article discusses the emergence of academic publishing in a fast‐growing transition economy, Vietnam, where the race has heated up to publish in international journals, preferably with a high impact factor, and to accelerate the indexing of domestic journals. Within the fields of SSH alone, the publication output grew by 17% a year in the 2008–2018 period, encouraged by government policies and financial incentives for researchers. This review demonstrates an environment where there is sufficient financial growth to support increased R&D but limited skills and knowledge of how to increase quality publication output, either within national or international journals. The article highlights the drivers of increasing scientific publication output, as well as the traps and pitfalls that follow this competition. It suggests that there are opportunities for publishers and other organizations to improve ethical and practical publishing issues and to develop co‐publishing agreements that will increase the visibility of the country in international academia. The article indicates the harsh reality of pursuing higher publishing standards in academia, a world that has long been dominated by authors and publishers from industrialized countries. 相似文献
3.
应学术交流而生为学术交流而变——谈科技期刊的价值体现 总被引：2，自引：1，他引：1
针对传统科技期刊出版者对网络化、数字化冲击的担忧,从科技期刊的产生、科技期刊的价值表现等角度进行研究。认为:印刷技术和纸张的发明是科技期刊产生的技术基础,学术交流的需要是科技期刊产生的根本原因,纸质版科技期刊不能等同于科技期刊,科技期刊的核心价值体现于科技期刊在学术交流中的创造性。基于科技期刊在学术交流中所体现出的独特价值,科技期刊不仅不会在技术进步中消亡,反而会借助先进的技术手段发挥更加重要的作用。在网络化、数字化的环境中,科技期刊应该也能够适应学术交流的需要,从传播方式、传播载体、办刊理念、评价方式和出版模式等方面作出改变,以一种新的形式展现在人们的面前。 相似文献
4.
5.
There are 5,020 scientific, technical and medical (STM) periodicals, including 548 English‐language (E‐L) journals, in China. To quickly increase the international influence of Chinese journals, government management launched significant initiatives for publishers, such as the ‘Project for Enhancing International Impact of China STM Journals (PIIJ, 2013–2018)’. This paper investigates the underlying objectives and assumptions made about the value and impact of Chinese E‐L journals and the effect of PIIJ support and international publisher collaboration. The authors conclude that, while the E‐L journals are demonstrating some quantifiable improvements in internationalization, there are no equal pressures or recognition for qualitative quality measures, and this may undermine the ability of Chinese E‐L journals to build sustainable strategic plans. 相似文献
6.
Mulubrhan Balehegn 《International Information and Library Review》2017,49(2):97-100
Recently, there has been an alarming increase in the number of “academic” papers published in vanity journals and publishers. Such journals, dubbed predatory because their main objective is making money out of authors, compromise or completely abandon the peer review system. An increase in publishing with such journals, which is common in developing counties, will affect the quality of science, excellence, development, and individual researchers' and institutions' professional reputation. In this article, the author discusses strategies for individual researchers and institutions for identifying and discouraging publishing in predatory journals. Moreover, suggestions on how to deal with faculty who have published and already bestowed positions on the grounds of papers published in predatory journals are also given. Strategies and suggestions discussed in this article can provide insights to librarians and publication officers on how to curb the problem of predatory publications. 相似文献
7.
掠夺性科技期刊与科技期刊中掠夺性现象的特征研究 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
近年来,由于开放存取(OA)出版模式的兴起,掠夺性科技期刊的出现也引起国内外学者的关注。国内科技期刊中也存在着类似的管理和学术信誉差、商业利益至上的现象,并对正常的科研成果和出版资源形成了干扰和掠夺。本文将这些存在于国内外科技期刊中的掠夺现象一并回顾和总结,认为一方面国内科技期刊从业者,应重视和适应新兴OA期刊的发展趋势,另一方面相关科研管理部门也应逐步建立措施,完善掠夺性期刊预警制度。 相似文献
8.
The article processing charge (APC) is currently the primary method of funding professionally published open access (OA) peer‐reviewed journals. The pricing principles of 77 OA publishers publishing over 1,000 journals using APCs were studied and classified. The most commonly used pricing method is a single fixed fee, which can either be the same for all of a publisher's journals or individually determined for each journal. Fees are usually only levied for publication of accepted papers, but there are some journals that also charge submission fees. Instead of fixed prices, many publishers charge by the page or have multi‐tiered fees depending on the length of articles. The country of origin of the author can also influence the pricing, in order to facilitate publishing for authors from developing countries. 相似文献
9.
10.
Having found a business opportunity in exploiting the open access publishing model, predatory journals and publishers have been spamming authors with emails, inviting them to submit articles for publication. Authors may be misled by the names of prestigious authors and editors that predatory journals and publishers use to advertise their publishing services, either by claims that those scientists serve on the editorial boards or by sending invitations in their names. Given the fact that detailed knowledge of a journal is required to make an informed decision of whether the inviting journal is predatory or not, junior scientists are not likely to possess the knowledge or skill to make such decisions. In addition, analysis of the details of new suspicious journals and publishers can be a lengthy process or even a waste of time. Therefore, in this paper, we provide an analysis of a likely scenario that many authors are facing nowadays when they take on the difficult task of studying the details of suspicious journals as possible venues for the publication of their research findings. The analysis takes the form of an analysis of the Kenkyu Publishing Group, which is listed on Jeffrey Beall’s list of “predatory” open access publishers. 相似文献
11.
国外学术期刊OA出版论文处理费(APC)调查 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
调查了国际知名出版商Elsevier、Springer、Taylor & Francis、Wiley-Blackwell、NPG和国际知名OA期刊社BMC、PLoS、Hindawi、MDPI等OA期刊的论文处理费(APC)的收费标准.2015年度主要商业性出版社完全OA期刊的APC主要分布在1 000 ～5 000美元之间,混合型OA期刊的APC相对高些,分布较窄,基本在3 000美元左右.以瑞士MDPI公司为案例,分析该公司OA期刊的创办、期刊载文量、期刊经营、APC收取策略等.还简要讨论APC和OA出版机制,以期为我国的科研管理部门和期刊管理部门提供参考. 相似文献
12.
学术期刊虚假网站侵害了作者和出版者的合法权益,损害了学术期刊的声誉。为应对学术期刊虚假网站的侵权行为,我们在分析虚假网站特征的基础上,提出防范假冒网站侵害的措施。所研制的学术期刊网址查询系统,通过定期维护更新,增强识别虚假网站的便捷性,使作者可以实时查找到学术期刊的真实网站,期望有助于减少因虚假学术期刊网站泛滥给作者、出版者造成的困扰,为维护学术期刊网站的网络运行环境提供一种技术防范措施。 相似文献
13.
目前,国内期刊社关于论文作者稿酬的支付没有统一的标准,有的期刊社不支付稿酬,有的期刊社稿酬支付仍然沿用1999年发布的《出版文字作品报酬规定》,还有些期刊社采取优稿优酬制度,导致作者意见较多。为了更加公平合理地给期刊论文作者支付稿酬,建议国内期刊社可采用基本稿酬+被引频次支付部分稿酬的办法,并就其依据、实施方法、统计被引频次时间范围、不同期刊引用区别对待及其应用的可行性进行分析总结。 相似文献
14.
学术期刊编者如何把好期刊的学术质量关 总被引：18，自引：6，他引：12
论述学术期刊编者参与期刊学术把关的必要性和可能性.编者依靠辩证思维方法、专业学科知识以及编辑加工技能,高度重视并切实做好文稿的初审工作,准确选定审稿人,正确送审,实现高质量审稿,严格把住终审关,做一个合格的终审者,做好稿件退修,确保修回稿件质量,培养一支稳定的、高水平的撰稿队伍,从而实现对期刊的学术把关.要提高期刊质量,编者必须参与学术把关. 相似文献
15.
在开放存取(OA)的期刊出版时代,学术期刊的出版、发行和运营会遇到哪些问题,近些年国外学术期刊的积极探索和实践已初步给出了一些提示。首先,学术期刊面临经费问题,尽管期刊可以有多种经费来源,但审稿和制作费用、邮寄费用、在线提交和审稿系统的费用等均需覆盖,采取何种OA模式以及何种运营策略,对打造高品质的学术期刊至关重要。其次,传统期刊的门槛和影响力也将受到一定冲击从而发生改变,把握OA出版模式对现有期刊、学术传播和科研等方面可能的冲击和影响,以及给新生期刊带来的机遇和空间,对打造有影响力的学术期刊非常关键。 相似文献
16.
实行优先数字出版对于作者、读者、期刊出版方及国家科研发展都具有重要意义.我国实行优先数字出版的期刊越来越多,但与此同时出现了诸多乱象.对优先数字出版的认识不足、期刊出版方的管理制度不严、数据库的监管不严及行业标准的缺失是造成乱象的根源.期刊出版方在规范优先数字出版方面需要明确4 个要素: 概念、DOI 认证、版本的设置和优先出版文献的规范引用.此外,期刊出版方、数据库方和管理方应充分发挥自身力量推动优先数字出版有序、健康发展. 相似文献
17.
The individual members of 35 UK learned societies were surveyed on their attitudes to open access (OA); 1,368 responses were received. Most respondents said they knew what OA was, and supported the idea of OA journals. However, although 60% said that they read OA journals and 25% that they published in them, in both cases around one‐third of the journals named were not OA. While many were in favour of increased access through OA journals, concerns were expressed about the cost to authors, possible reduction in quality, and negative impact on existing journals, publishers, and societies. By contrast, less than half knew what self‐archiving was; 36% thought it was a good idea and 50% were unsure. Just under half said they used repositories of self‐archived articles, but 13% of references were not in fact to self‐archiving repositories. 29% said they self‐archived their own articles, but 10% of references were not to publicly accessible sites of any kind. The access and convenience of self‐archiving repositories were seen as positive, but there were concerns about quality control, workload for authors and institutions, chaotic proliferation of versions, and potential damage to existing journals, publishers, and societies. 相似文献
18.
19.
受最近Science网站的一则报道“科学家揭开期刊订阅的秘密”的启发,介绍目前传统纸质版、数字化和移动平台的期刊订阅模式,阐述捆绑式订阅价格差异较大的秘密是为了盈利,也是为了保护引用率少的期刊免遭淘汰.认为:模糊的我国专业期刊订阅盈利模式成为阻碍期刊发展的瓶颈,但其经营模式也出现了新的趋向;因此,寻找一种成熟、合理、适合自己期刊发展的经营模式,对于专业期刊既是挑战,也是机遇. 相似文献
20.
The open access (OA) model for journals is compared to the open source principle for computer software. Since the early 1990s nearly 1,000 OA scientific journals have emerged – mostly as voluntary community efforts, although recently some professionally operating publishers have used author charges or institutional membership. This study of OA journals without author charges shows that their impact is still relatively small, but awareness of it is increasing. The average number of research articles per year is lower than for major scientific journals but the publication times are shorter. 相似文献