共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 418 毫秒
1.
ABSTRACT The Google Book Search Library Project has partnered with an array of impressive libraries, including Harvard University, the University of California System, University of Michigan, and the New York Public Library. The reasons for collaborating with Google to further book digitization are different for each library. Moreover, the exact way in which these libraries will use their own digital copies has yet to be decided for many of the libraries involved. While the Google Book Search Library Project remains controversial, the Google library partners are seizing an unprecedented opportunity to amplify the scale of their pre-existing digitization initiatives. 相似文献
2.
国内对Google图书搜索项目的研究进展 总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1
从文献入手,对我国学者近年来有关Google图书搜索项目的研究进行梳理和总结,首先简要分析了此项目的中文定名,然后归纳出国内学者关注的重点是版权问题、Goosle图书搜索产生的影响和图书馆的应对等几方面,并进行评述.最后建议今后可以研究图书搜索比较分析以及图书馆参与图书搜索项目后如何进一步发展. 相似文献
3.
Shawn Martin 《图书馆管理杂志》2013,53(1-2):141-150
ABSTRACT This article looks at two different projects, the Google Book Search project and the Text Creation Partnership, both linked to the University of Michigan Library. Though on the surface they are very different, the Text Creation Partnership, a model of cooperation between scholars, librarians, and publishers, may have some useful lessons for how to make Google Book Search more useful for academic research, particularly in full-text searching. 相似文献
4.
Robert J. Lackie MLIS 《The Reference Librarian》2013,54(1):35-53
Google's initiative to scan and add book content into its search engine has resulted in much praise and protest. Changing its digitization project's name from Google Print to Google Book Search and adding information to its site did not keep Google out of copyright court. However, publicity surrounding this project has spawned renewed interest in book digitization projects, with collaborative efforts quickly growing. This article will look at Book Search's history, highlight how it has been altered along with its name, and point out other interesting book digitization projects that Book Search has spawned or recently brought into the limelight, such as those associated with the Internet Archive. 相似文献
5.
Gloriana St. Clair 《图书馆管理杂志》2013,53(1-2):151-163
ABSTRACT This paper updates three ongoing book scanning projects (Google Book Search, the Million Book Project, and the Open Content Alliance), discusses the changing paradigm for authority in scholarly work, and reflects on the barrier of copyright and how it might be overcome. 相似文献
6.
This article summarizes published documents on metadata provided by Google for books scanned as part of the Google Book Search (GBS) project and provides suggestions for improvement. The faulty, misleading, and confusing metadata in current Google records can pose potentially serious problems for users of GBS. Google admits that it took data, which proved to be inaccurate, from many sources and is attempting to correct errors. Some argue that metadata is not needed with keyword searching; but optical character recognition (OCR) errors, synonym control, and materials in foreign languages make reliable metadata a requirement for academic researchers. The authors recommend that users should be able to submit error reports to Google to correct faulty metadata. 相似文献
7.
版权法没有合理使用的明确标准,有关合理使用的问题是依照个案事实裁判。现有版权立法也没有规制数字图书馆版权侵权问题,面对信息技术和网络技术对版权合理使用的挑战,传统版权法认定合理使用的四要件显然不利于公众利益和技术创新,数字图书馆的出现为扩大合理使用适用范围提供了良好的机会。 相似文献
8.
谷歌数字图书馆计划发展历程与版权问题分析 总被引：1，自引：1，他引：0
文章首先对谷歌数字图书馆计划进行简单介绍,并对图书馆计划实施至今所发生的事件进行简单历史回顾,然后分析谷歌数字图书馆计划的经济目的与文化目的,最后重点对该计划实施过程中的合理使用、"opt-out"与和解协议存在的版权法律问题进行分析,认为谷歌不能以合理使用来抗辩其行为. 相似文献
9.
Michael Neubert 《Slavic & East European Information Resources》2013,14(1):53-62
ABSTRACT. Google is pursuing “mass digitization” of Russian books as part of its efforts that now involve more than a dozen partners, although so far there is no separate Russian‐language search interface. How easy is it to find materials in books.google.com that are in Russian? What do users need to know to maximize their results? 相似文献
10.
Jeffrey Beall 《期刊图书馆员》2013,64(1):40-53
This article critically examines four Google search products (Google Advanced Search, Google News Advanced Search, Google Books Advanced Search, and Google Advanced Scholar Search) and shows how each uses metadata to enhance or improve search results. In addition, the article shows how metadata can increase search precision and recall in information discovery systems. From a library perspective, this article analyzes some of the metadata-enabled features of Google's advanced search pages and compares these features to those found in a typical online library catalog. From a serials perspective, Google News Advanced Search demonstrates how Google indexes news websites, sites that are essentially continuing resources. As Google incorporates more and more metadata functionality into its advanced search pages, they increasingly begin to function more like online library catalogs and less like search pages found in a traditional Internet search engine. The simple search box has many limitations, and like libraries, Google is increasingly creating and offering metadata-enabled search features that improve search precision and recall in its products. 相似文献
11.
胡远玲 《大学图书情报学刊》2004,22(3):47-49
搜索引擎之王Google开放了它的查询接口,可以让全世界各地的程序员有限免费地以WehService的方式,对Google下查找指令,并且将结果用于自己的程序或网页中,给程序员带来了极大的方便。章介绍了Google API在Delphi中的使用,并给出了详细的Delphi程序。 相似文献
12.
Kay Cahill 《图书馆管理杂志》2013,53(1-2):67-75
ABSTRACT This article explores some of the key impacts that Google and new technologies such as Web 2.0 have had on the way people see information and information professionals and presents the argument that much of what is typically seen as negative about Google is, in fact, positive. 相似文献
13.
《图书馆管理杂志》2013,53(3-4):191-206
SUMMARY Buoyed by its brand name, Google News has grown from its beta stage into a popular news site with a significant share of the Internet market for “Current Events and Global News.” The success of Google News raises questions about the nature of news and even the desirability of Google's presenting news. Where does Google News fit into the myriad news resources available on the Internet and in libraries? How does Google News work? Is Google News an effective source for news research? How will Google News stand up to its competition, in particular a new wave of community news sites? 相似文献
14.
Google和百度两种搜索引擎比较研究 总被引：2，自引：0，他引：2
王香莲 《现代图书情报技术》2004,20(8):52-55
从索引数据库、信息检索功能和检索结果等方面对两种著名的搜索引擎Google 和百度进行了详细比较，为用户更好地利用搜索引擎提供参考。并提出两者有待进一步完善的技术建议。 相似文献
15.
Charlie Potter 《图书馆管理杂志》2013,53(1-2):5-28
ABSTRACT In order to understand better and explain the practices of Google Scholar, this essay takes a rhetorical and holistic look at the search technology, language, and sociopolitical implications of the Google Scholar interface as well as the connection between Google Scholar and the actions of the Google Corporation. The relationship between Google Scholar and the academic library is also explored. In addition, the essay offers ways to encourage students to undertake this kind of critique in the information literacy classroom. 相似文献
16.
Robert J. Lackie 《图书馆管理杂志》2013,53(1-2):183-194
ABSTRACT This article considers the Google Librarian Central and the Google for Educators sites and related projects, such as The Literacy Project, from the search and advertising giant, and how libraries, schools, and others view their value and impact. 相似文献
17.
Google搜索引擎及其技术简介 总被引：19，自引：2，他引：17
搜索引擎已经成为人们网络：生活必不可少的工具，因此，国内外的各种搜索引擎纷纷出现。而Google搜索引擎以其雄厚的技术为支撑，凭借其强大的检索功能和高质量的检索服务，逐渐吸引和留住了世界各地的大量网民，成为了世界上最著名的搜索引擎之一。本文在介绍Google基本概况、检索特色及特色功能的基础上，介绍了其核心技术及工作机理，最后对其发展趋势作了分析。 相似文献
18.
19.
Barbara Quint 《图书馆管理杂志》2013,53(1-2):77-79
ABSTRACT Provides new insights into the growth and development of Google Scholar, based on an interview with its designer, Anurag Acharya. 相似文献
20.
Adrienne Canino 《Public Services Quarterly》2019,15(3):248-255
This essay examines the beta tool from Google, Google Dataset Search. The Google Dataset Search, announced in September 2018, is a search engine specific to finding research data published on the internet. The structure and methods of the search engine are examined, as well as the methods Google recommends to web developers to make it an effective tool across the World Wide Web. The column concludes with a discussion of the pros and cons of this tool in the research information landscape. 相似文献