School bullying in different cultures: Eastern and Western perspectives     

Noel Purdy 《Pastoral Care in Education》2016,34(4):248-249

  相似文献   

Divergent production in gifted adolescents using timed vs. untimed stimuli with creative prompting     

Gregg A. Johns  Linda W. Morse  David T. Morse 《Roeper Review》2013,35(3):165-166

Although creativity and expertise are related, they are nonetheless very different things. Expertise does not usually require creativity, but creativity generally does require a certain level of expertise. There are similarities in the relationships of both expertise and creativity to domains, however. Research has shown that just as expertise in one domain does not predict expertise in other, unrelated domains, creativity in one domain does not predict creativity in other, unrelated domains. People may be expert, and people may be creative, in many domains, or they may be expert, or creative, in few domains or none at all, and one cannot simply transfer expertise, or creativity, from one domain to another, unrelated domain. The domain specificity of creativity matters crucially for creativity training, creativity assessment, creativity research, and creativity theory. The domain specificity of creativity also means that interdisciplinary thinking, interdisciplinary collaboration, and interdisciplinary creativity are even more important than one would assume if creativity were domain general.  相似文献   

Editorial     

Jill Blackmore  Noel Gough  Bill Green 《The Australian Educational Researcher》1994,21(2):i-iv

  相似文献   

The Effect of Psychodrama Growth Groups on Self‐Concept and Dogmatism Scores in Student Teachers     

John Carroll  Noel Howieson 《Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education》1984,12(2):26-33

  相似文献   

Editorial: New discourses for new times, or old stories reinvented?     

Jill Blackmore  Noel Gough  Bill Green 《The Australian Educational Researcher》1997,24(2):i-vi

  相似文献   

Critical perspectives on curriculum work in Australia and New Zealand     

Noel Gough 《课程研究杂志》2013,45(3)

  相似文献   

Thinking/acting locally/globally: Western science and environmental education in a global knowledge economy     

Noel Gough 《International Journal of Science Education》2013,35(11):1217-1237

This paper critically appraises a number of approaches to 'thinking globally' in environmental education, with particular reference to popular assumptions about the universal applicability of Western science. Although the transnational character of many environmental issues demands that we 'think globally', I argue that the contribution of Western science to understanding and resolving environmental problems might be enhanced by seeing it as one among many local knowledge traditions. The production of a 'global knowledge economy' in/for environmental education can then be understood as creating transnational 'spaces' in which local knowledge traditions can be performed together, rather than as creating a 'common market' in which representations of local knowledge must be translated into (or exchanged for) the terms of a universal discourse.  相似文献   

Composers in the Movies by John C. Tibbetts     

Gregg Redner 《Journal of American culture (Malden, Mass. : 2003)》2007,30(2):241-241

  相似文献   

Norman Rockwell and American Attitudes Toward Technology     

Gregg De Young 《Journal of American culture (Malden, Mass. : 2003)》1990,13(1):95-103

  相似文献   

God,Sport Philosophy,Kinesiology: A MacIntyrean Examination     

Gregg Twietmeyer 《Quest (Human Kinetics)》2015,67(2):203-226

Sport philosophy is in crisis. This subdiscipline of kinesiology garners little to no respect and few tenure track lines in kinesiology departments. Why is this the case? Why isn’t philosophy held in greater esteem? Is it possible that philosopher Alasdair MacIntyre’s (2009) diagnosis found in “God, Philosophy, Universities” could actually be fruitfully applied to kinesiology? MacIntyre argued that philosophy’s fall from grace parallels the decline of theology in universities. This is the case for two simple reasons. First, philosophy was traditionally charged with giving an account of how the different disciplines fit together on the presumption that an orderly account of the universe could be given. However, the imperative for, as well the intelligibility of, such an account is hard to defend absent God. Second, without God, it becomes very difficult to argue that the philosophic enterprise is fundamentally human. Instead, philosophy becomes an esoteric enterprise meant for specialists. If this is right, then the sanitization of God from the modern university can also explain the plight of sport philosophy. To put it simply, theology must be taken seriously if philosophy is to be taken seriously. God must be admissible in the classroom. This does not mean that students should be catechized, but rather it is to insist that scholars must acknowledge (rather than hide from or dismiss) the legitimacy of theological questions.  相似文献