Foreword     

Jonathan D. Fife 《ASHE Higher Education Report》1988,17(4):xv-xvi

  相似文献   

Foreword     

Jonathan D. Fife 《ASHE Higher Education Report》1988,17(3):xix-xx

  相似文献   

Foreword     

Jonathan D. Fife 《ASHE Higher Education Report》1981,10(3):iii-iii

  相似文献   

Foreword     

Jonathan D. Fife 《ASHE Higher Education Report》1979,8(4):v-v

  相似文献   

Women in American science   总被引：3，自引：0，他引：3  

Harriet Zuckerman  Jonathan R. Cole 《Minerva》1975,13(1):82-102

  相似文献   

Foreword     

Jonathan D. Fife 《ASHE Higher Education Report》1977,6(7):v-v

  相似文献   

‘A Heaven of Hell, a Hell of Heaven’: His Dark Materials, Inverted Theology, and the End of Philip Pullman’s Authority     

Jonathan Padley  Kenneth Padley 《Children‘s Literature in Education》2006,37(4):325-334

This article argues that Philip Pullman’s His Dark Materials may be read as a series which attempts to assault the Christian doctrine of God. We believe that this demonstrably accords with Pullman’s personal views, and that, through his story, he seeks to foster such views in his readership. However, the accuracy of his attack falls short of its intended mark when it is examined alongside classical Christian theology. The Authority which Pullman’s narrative destroys is actually more akin to the Christian view of the devil than he is the divine, and the victories of Will and Lyra—as a new Adam and Eve—have strong resemblances to the victories which Christianity claims for Christ and Mary. Pullman’s narrative, therefore, becomes an inversion of his deicidal intention rather than an inverting and revolutionary destruction of theology.

Jonathan PadleyEmail:

  相似文献   

Factors affecting the speed of free writing     

Jonathan Ferrier  Joanna Horne  Chris Singleton 《Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs》2013,13(1):66-78

Factors affecting the free writing speed of 11‐year‐old students were investigated using the Group and Individual Assessment of Handwriting Speed. Intelligence, gender, legibility and whether the student has special educational needs or speaks English as an additional language were all found to impact on writing speed to a significant extent. In one of the two schools studied, the students wrote significantly faster than the students in the other school. This ‘teacher effect’ was found to be independent of the other significant factors examined in the study and was attributed largely to instructional differences between schools and teachers. The average writing speed was 36% lower than published norms for this test, implying that 70.2% of the students would be eligible for extra time in examinations and raising doubts regarding the validity of these norms. It was concluded that vulnerability to teacher effects and other factors makes free writing an unreliable method of measuring writing speed, especially when group administered, and calls into question its use to justify the provision of examination access arrangements or accommodations.  相似文献   

Metacognitive monitoring in university classes: anticipating a graded vs. a pass-fail test affects monitoring accuracy     

Jonathan Barenberg  Stephan Dutke 《Metacognition and Learning》2013,8(2):121-143

Three field studies tested the hypothesis that anticipating a graded test as opposed to a pass-fail test enhances metacognitive monitoring. Participants were teacher candidates who completed a mid-term and a final test in psychology courses. Each participant chose whether the result of the final test should be evaluated with one of five grades or with a pass-fail decision. In both tests, participants answered true–false inference items about the contents of the course and indicated their confidence in the correctness of each answer. When a graded test was expected, confidence and the absolute accuracy of the confidence judgments increased and bias decreased to a greater extent than when a pass-fail decision was expected. However, expecting a grade increased participants’ confidence not only in correct answers but also in incorrect answers (Study 1). Feedback and instructions emphasizing the importance of accurate discrimination between correct and incorrect answers did not weaken this effect (Study 2). The generalizability of the findings was investigated by reanalyzing the test results of participants in eight other psychology courses (Study 3). The results are discussed in terms of the motivational consequences of grading.  相似文献   

Journal publications of Ph.D. graduates from American criminology and criminal justice programs     

Ellen G. Cohn  David P. Farrington  Jonathan R. Sorensen 《Journal of Criminal Justice Education》2013,24(1):35-49

This article assesses the quality of 12 American doctoral programs by counting the number of publications of their Ph.D. graduates in a large number of criminology and criminal justice journals, and in 20 more “academic” journals. While half of the Ph.D. graduates had no publications, the 4 percent who were the most productive (the “stars”) accounted for one third of all journal articles. Publication rates up to graduation predicted publication rates after graduation. The University of Maryland, Michigan State University, the University of California at Irvine, Florida State University, and Sam Houston State University had the most productive Ph.D. graduates in academic journals. There was a significant correlation between the productivity of a program's Ph.D. graduates and the productivity of its faculty members. The academic publication rate was influenced most by prevalence (the percentage of Ph.D.s with at least one publication), rather than by the percentage of “stars” or the frequency of publications.  相似文献