首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
文章检索
  按 检索   检索词:      
出版年份:   被引次数:   他引次数: 提示:输入*表示无穷大
  收费全文   666篇
  免费   7篇
  国内免费   30篇
教育   359篇
科学研究   143篇
体育   31篇
综合类   47篇
文化理论   2篇
信息传播   121篇
  2024年   1篇
  2023年   3篇
  2022年   10篇
  2021年   36篇
  2020年   22篇
  2019年   12篇
  2018年   23篇
  2017年   19篇
  2016年   12篇
  2015年   35篇
  2014年   36篇
  2013年   56篇
  2012年   41篇
  2011年   62篇
  2010年   50篇
  2009年   56篇
  2008年   46篇
  2007年   54篇
  2006年   33篇
  2005年   27篇
  2004年   18篇
  2003年   9篇
  2002年   11篇
  2001年   13篇
  2000年   2篇
  1999年   3篇
  1998年   2篇
  1995年   3篇
  1994年   1篇
  1992年   1篇
  1991年   2篇
  1989年   1篇
  1970年   1篇
  1969年   1篇
  1957年   1篇
排序方式: 共有703条查询结果,搜索用时 0 毫秒
701.
702.
703.
This paper suggests that artificial intelligence in education (AIEd) can be fruitfully analysed as ‘policies frozen in silicon’. This means that they exist as both materialised and proposed problematisations (problem representations with corresponding solutions). As a theoretical and analytical response, this paper puts forward a heuristic lens that can provide insights into how AI technologies (or advocated AI technologies) function as proposed solutions to certain problematisations based on various imaginaries about how education and learning are best performed or supported. The combined reading of imaginaries and problematisations can thereby aid in our understanding of why and how visions of learning and education are framed in relation to AIEd developments. The overall ambition is to advance theoretical and analytical approaches towards an educational system which is (anticipated as) increasingly permeated by AI systems—systems that also support and implement, more or less, invisible models, standards and assessments of learning, as well as more grand visions of (technology-augmented) education in society.

Practitioner notes

What is already known about this topic

  • Artificial intelligence in education (AIEd) is repeatedly presented as a solution for a range of educational ‘problems’.
  • This means that such ‘solutions’ must also frame certain aspects as ‘problems’.
  • Such problems and ‘solutions’ (problematisations) also exist within certain imaginaries of the present times and of the future, where these problematisations are presented as particularly significant and acute, and promoting specific anticipations of learning and ideals of education.

What this paper adds

  • An exposition of problematisations in educational settings.
  • An exposition of educational imaginaries.
  • A heuristic lens for understanding the ‘present’ and ‘future’ in a particular imaginary as entangled in, and dependent on, a certain ‘past’.

Implications for practice and/or policy

  • The approach presented in this paper provides a heuristic lens for examining how AI technologies (or advocated AI technologies) function as proposed solutions to problematisations based on imaginaries about how education and learning are best performed or supported.
  • This aids our understanding of how and why certain visions of learning and education are framed in relation to AIEd developments (real or imagined).
  • It also advances theoretical and analytical approaches towards an educational system, which is (anticipated as) increasingly permeated by AI systems—systems that also support and implement, more or less, invisible models, standards and assessments of learning, as well as more grand visions of (technology-augmented) education in society.
  相似文献   
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号