首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
文章检索
  按 检索   检索词:      
出版年份:   被引次数:   他引次数: 提示:输入*表示无穷大
  收费全文   122篇
  免费   2篇
  国内免费   1篇
教育   118篇
科学研究   4篇
各国文化   1篇
体育   1篇
文化理论   1篇
  2022年   2篇
  2021年   1篇
  2019年   3篇
  2018年   1篇
  2017年   1篇
  2016年   12篇
  2015年   5篇
  2014年   3篇
  2013年   22篇
  2012年   2篇
  2011年   4篇
  2010年   4篇
  2008年   2篇
  2006年   2篇
  2005年   2篇
  2004年   2篇
  2003年   2篇
  2002年   1篇
  2000年   1篇
  1999年   3篇
  1998年   1篇
  1997年   3篇
  1996年   2篇
  1995年   3篇
  1994年   4篇
  1993年   1篇
  1992年   1篇
  1991年   1篇
  1990年   3篇
  1989年   2篇
  1988年   2篇
  1987年   3篇
  1986年   2篇
  1985年   2篇
  1983年   1篇
  1982年   2篇
  1981年   1篇
  1980年   1篇
  1979年   1篇
  1978年   2篇
  1977年   2篇
  1976年   3篇
  1975年   1篇
  1973年   2篇
  1972年   1篇
  1968年   1篇
  1966年   1篇
  1944年   1篇
排序方式: 共有125条查询结果,搜索用时 15 毫秒
21.

Over the past 25 years, information and communication technologies have had a convoluted but ultimately advantageous impact on science teaching and learning. To highlight the past, present, and future of technology in science education, this paper explores the trajectories in five areas: science texts and lectures; science discussions and collaboration; data collection and representation; science visualization; and science simulation and modeling. These trajectories reflect two overall trends in technological advance. First, designers have tailored general tools to specific disciplines, offering users features specific to the topic or task. For example, developers target visualization tools to molecules, crystals, earth structures, or chemical reactions. Second, new technologies generally support user customization, enabling individuals to personalize their modeling tool, Internet portal, or discussion board. In science education, designers have tailored instructional resources based on advances in understanding of the learner. More recently, designers have created ways for teachers and students to customize learning tools to specific courses, geological formations, interests, or learning preferences.  相似文献   
22.
Despite repeated warnings against its usage, researchers and textbook authors continue to employ the phrase “level of confidence” as a synonym for the phrase “level of significance.” Three possible sources of this incorrect usage are noted: (a) imitation; (b) the related but different concepts of fiducial inference and confidence interval estimation; and (c) the myriad of terms associated with confidence. It is recommended that the magnitude of level of confidence be restricted to that of the complement of the level of significance and also that the term level of confidence should be used only in connection with interval estimation.  相似文献   
23.
24.
Targeted Support for Using Technology-Enhanced Science Inquiry Modules   总被引:1,自引:1,他引:0  
Designing effective professional development experiences for technology-enhanced inquiry instruction is the goal of the Technology Enhanced Learning in Science (TELS) NSF funded Center for Learning and Teaching. In order to provide this type of support to a large number of teachers, we devised a targeted professional development approach. Participating teachers implemented short inquiry modules that featured interactive scientific visualizations. We collaborated with 16 schools in eight districts and five states. This paper reports the design, implementation, and refinement of the targeted approach. Findings from interview data show that teachers faced challenges that are often associated with enacting technology innovations in K-12 classrooms. The targeted professional development approach addressed the challenges and allowed teachers to successfully implement the modules in their classrooms. The interview data clarify teachers’ perspectives on how using technology impacted their teaching practices and their ideas about student learning. This work contributes to a growing body of literature that identifies and addresses barriers to integrating technology into K-12 classrooms.  相似文献   
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
How generalizable are the scores from performance-based assessments? How can we best increase the gener-alizability of results? What level of generalizability is needed for different testing purposes?  相似文献   
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号